Best of the Week
Most Popular
1.Gold and Silver Inevitable Sentiment Reversal -John_Townsend
2.Stock Market Accelerates to Dow 15,105 New High - Fundamental Reasons Why -Nadeem_Walayat
3.The New Untouchables of the 21st Century - Raul_I_Meijer
4.Bank of England Celebrates 50 Months of Stealth Inflation Theft From Savers and Tax payers - Nadeem_Walayat
5.The Real Reason Gold Price Fell -Lawrence Roulston
6.Gold Gold Bugs and Stock Market Index Trend Forecasts - David_Petch
7.Dow, Gold and Jobs Up - The Fed’s Next Step! - Robert_M_Williams
8.Has the Great Gold Crash Divorced Bullion from Futures Prices? - Peter Krauth
9.Nigel Lawson Waits for Thatcher to Die Before Admitting He's Wrong on Europe - Nadeem_Walayat
10.Crash, Depression, Currency Wars . . . Trade Wars and then Real Wars - Video - Gerald Celente
Last 72 Hrs
How to Spot Market Trading Opportunities - FREE EBOOK - 18th May 13
The Fading 2008 Stock Market Doomsday Scenarios - 18th May 13
Commodities Boom to be Driven by the Urbanisation of 1 Billion More People - 18th May 13
The UK Green Energy Policy Shambles - 17th May 13
US Dollar Ends Another 9 Year Down Cycle - 17th May 13
Stock Market Extreme Euphoria Tops - 17th May 13
Gold Wars: U.S. Undermining Iranian Currency By Blocking Gold Imports - 17th May 13
How the U.S. Government Makes $120 Billion From Student Loans Misery - 17th May 13
The Key Reason to Buy Gold Stocks Now - 17th May 13
A Reminder, the Fed Is NOT Printing Money - 17th May 13
Remember the $700 Billion Toxic Asset Bailout? - 17th May 13
Walt Disney - A Fairy Tale Growth Stock Story - 16th May 13
Could Cuba’s Past Be America's Future? - 16th May 13
Controlling the Beginning Stages of Hyperinflation by Manipulating the Gold and Silver Prices - 16th May 13
Silver and the Dow - 16th May 13
Gold Bullion Demand Remains Strong Whilst Price Remains Weak - 16th May 13
Why Jim Chanos is Wrong About China's "Ghost Cities" - 16th May 13
Is Apple's "Next Big Thing" Vaporware? - 16th May 13
Warning: Why My Flash Crash Alert Flag Is Flying High - 16th May 13
Mervyn King Mission Accomplished, Bankster's Saved, Debt Monetized Via QE Stealth Inflation Theft - 16th May 13
U.S. Dollar Collapse and Japan’s Sham Currency War - 16th May 13
Understanding Market Cycles to Improve Stock Market Trading - 16th May 13
Prohibition Caused the Greatness of Gatsby - 15th May 13
Gold and Bitcoin are the Currencies of the Future - 15th May 13
Is Wal-Mart The Perfect Dividend Growth Stock Again? - 15th May 13
Putin’s Power Play to Change the Uranium Mining Sector - 15th May 13
Follow Africa's Richest Man Into One of the Best Investment Opportunities in the World - 15th May 13
BRICs Are a Bust, South Korea is Only Real Economy Left in the World - 15th May 13
Gold Swift and Violent Plunge to $1100 Possible - 15th May 13
We Are All Going to Die! Looming 6th Major Extinction - 15th May 13
Extremist Ideology of Multiculturalism is Why Over 90% of Immigrants Tend NOT Assimilate - 15th May 13
Geopolitical Journey: Europe, the Glorious and the Banal - 15th May 13
Why Obama's Syria 'Red' Line Turns Pink - 15th May 13

Free Instant Analysis

Free Instant Technical Analysis


Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

Gold and Silver Bear Market ?

Throwing Our Energy at Impossible Dreams

Politics / Social Issues Dec 18, 2009 - 01:15 AM GMT

By: Submissions

Politics

Best Financial Markets Analysis ArticleP.F. Henshaw writes: In the haystack of contentious arguments at Copenhagen it seems only the occasional unofficial commentary pointed to the real solvable source of our monumental collision with the limits of the earth. Somehow in the process of growing ever bigger, mankind got "big", and continuing to grow still bigger is optional. Yes, it sort of "happened naturally", and is also natural for us to be a bit confused about the whole turn of events it precipitates, but it is still also definitely our own choice to be doing it too, and we're simply hiding from the problem it creates on the whole.


It may be easy to question the morality of how the Chinese chose to limit their population growth by limiting personal freedoms, but did face the challenge. You really can't argue with the fact that virtually everyone else is just ignoring that same profound moral dilemma, that affluence naturally multiplies people. Instead we have a world desperately trying to mitigate climate change with an unqualified commitment to of sustaining the accelerating growth affluence forever.

Our technique for doing that is also our choice, trying to decrease our impacts on the earth by multiplying wealth more efficiently. What that actually does is feed our appetites at multiplying rates for profit as our first and last priority. It somewhat reduces the growth rate of our multiplying impacts, instead of reducing them, to then shortly make living on earth entirely unprofitable. Though it's completely voluntary and purposeful, I'm sure everyone swept up in steering the planet in that direction intends something rather different than the consequence of making all our problems ever more insolvable.

People even mostly know and understand that at natural growth limits, as strains multiply, the cheapest way to reduce your strains and waste of energy is ALWAYS to just skip the option of adding to your investments in expansion. If the house needs a roof and another floor might make it unstable, build the roof! That trick is even seen in nature's greatest success stories. Every organism that survives its own explosive growth from a single cell uses that as its way of bringing its own growth to a smooth and sustainable climax, for example!

Anything that reaches its climax at a peak of vitality does so by ending its self-investment in growth at the time its design is complete and worth sustaining. Our economic rule has been closer to "every good thing must be discarded". The alternative is to just turn off the growth pumps when they start to cause trouble, and sort things out to find what's worth keeping. That's the whole formula for sustainability for so very many big and small things people do for themselves, and that we rely on in things that take care of themselves in nature too.

Still, where is the cognitive path? Humanity clearly believes in and is devoting its most concentrated efforts on making its growth machine more efficient, to grow its way out of the earth's ever more severe physical constraints...

Growing your way out of environmental constraints is a plan that does work splendidly sometimes, as for a little chick inside it's egg, yes, or an infant in the womb. Then bursting from severe environmental constraints reveals fields of grain and new worlds of choices waiting, for which the new organism only has a limited appetite. The plan to just crash your limits often enough also works OK in pursuing "the impossible dream" in the worlds of ideas, within the 'noosphere', where the only real limit is imagination and failures of imagination are of little real physical consequence.

The physical world is different though. We now have a whole planet of leaders who believe we only need to physically grow our economies ever faster to burst out of the limits of an entire planet! They truly act as if wishing we had the limitless resources and freedoms of the past would surely cause them to reappear. That's the worst kind of fundamentalist delusion, a most extreme sort of misguided sophistry.

Is it a mass hysteria? Is it a case of worldwide Alzheimer's disease, leading us to withdraw into our emotional detachment from the natural world and bumble around waving amazingly clever self-deceptions.., like growth to reduce impacts? I wonder, instead of creating ever more dramatic diversions in response to our ever more desperate situations, could we 'wake up' as from a dream? It would be a great deal less expensive, in fact. Could we just shift the use of our creative powers to discovering this new reality we find, that we've clearly seen approaching for decades of decades?

There's also a need to help people understand why efficiency , productivity, hard work and big families used to be so good for everything. They once both relieved burdens and provided freedoms for people directly benefiting from them, but also created wealth and opportunity for everyone else too. That was the magic of economic growth. The problem now is that the very same things have the reverse effect, and multiply complications and constraints for everyone.

I think that's what has everyone fooled, that as mankind proceeded to get bigger and bigger we silently crossed a threshold of becoming "big", say between 50 and 75 years ago. After that, quite unnoticed, our normal way of relieving burdens on ourselves, hard work, productivity and efficiency, started ever more dominantly multiplying burdens on each other and the earth... More growth now pushes everyone all ever harder against nature's limits instead of giving everyone more freedoms.

Continuing as we always did, now that the responses of the planet have so dramatically changed meanings, seems to be how we ended up trying to reduce our burdens on the earth by multiplying them! In a world as changed as ours is, living in the past or dreaming of returning to the past, as all the world's leaders promote, is really a kind of dementia and disorientation. Nature changed her orientation and we just didn't notice...! Just pausing to learn about this unfamiliar place and our unexpected arrival, might be a more productive diversion than arguing about how to get our vehicle going ever faster again. We're marooned, as it were, on a part of the planet we never saw before, and it's a bit of luck really too. We're apparently both nearly out of gas and saved from heading over a cliff only by few flat tires and grinding gears in the transmission.
 

Thanks to Emily S in Massachusetts

 (China Daily 12/10/2009 page10) 


© 2005-2013 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Comments

Phil Henshaw
26 Dec 09, 05:39
impossible dreams, so then what?

So... it's leaves open the question, what does one do to rethink a culture that completely designed its own life support systems around a principle of expansion that seems to have run out of space in every way possible. It's like having to dig up the old homework you never turned in, from day one, perhaps. Or is is more like deciding to find out what that constantly flashing "check engine" light really means... on a vehicle you inherited, for which none of the prior owners had ever read the manual beyond the "quick-start guide"?


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in

FREE Deflation Survival GuideFREE Updated 118 Page Independant Investor E-book