Best of the Week
Most Popular
1. Market Decline Will Lead To Pension Collapse, USD Devaluation, And NWO - Raymond_Matison
2.Uber’s Nightmare Has Just Started - Stephen_McBride
3.Stock Market Crash Black Swan Event Set Up Sept 12th? - Brad_Gudgeon
4.GDow Stock Market Trend Forecast Update - Nadeem_Walayat
5.Gold Significant Correction Has Started - Clive_Maund
6.British Pound GBP vs Brexit Chaos Timeline - Nadeem_Walayat
7.Cameco Crash, Uranium Sector Won’t Catch a break - Richard_Mills
8.Recession 2020 Forecast : The New Risks & New Profits Of A Grand Experiment - Dan_Amerman
9.Gold When Global Insanity Prevails - Michael Ballanger
10.UK General Election Forecast 2019 - Betting Market Odds - Nadeem_Walayat
Last 7 days
U-Turn or Perfect Storm? Globalization at Crossroads - 22nd Oct 19
Stock Market Indexes Struggle and TRAN suggests a possible top - 22nd Oct 19
Fake Numbers Fueling the Wage War on Wealth - 22nd Oct 19
A Look at Peak Debt - 22nd Oct 19
The Coming Great Global Debt Reset - 22nd Oct 19
GamStop Became Mandatory - 22nd Oct 19
Learn to Spot Reliable Trading Setups: ANY Market, Any Market Time Frame - 21st Oct 19
How To Secure A Debt Consolidation Loan Even If You Have A Bad Credit Rating - 21st Oct 19
Kids Teepee Tent Fun from Amazon by Lavievert Review - 15% Discount! - 21st Oct 19
Stock Market Stalls: Caution Ahead - 21st Oct 19
Stock Market Crash Setup? - 21st Oct 19
More Stock Market Congestion (Distribution) - 21st Oct 19
Revisiting “Black Monday Stock Market Crash October 19 1987 - 21st Oct 19
Land Rover Discovery Sports Out of Warranty Top Money Saving Tips - 21st Oct 19
Investing lessons from the 1987 Stock Market Crash From Who Beat it - 20th Oct 19
Trade Wars: Facts And Fallacies - 20th Oct 19
The Gold Stocks Correction and What Lays Ahead - 19th Oct 19
Gold during Global Monetary Ease - 19th Oct 19
US Treasury Bonds Pause Near Resistance Before The Next Rally - 18th Oct 19
The Biggest Housing Boom in US History Has Just Begun - 18th Oct 19
British Pound Brexit Chaos GBP Trend Forecast - 18th Oct 19
Stocks Don’t Care About Trump Impeachment - 17th Oct 19
Currencies Show A Shift to Safety And Maturity – What Does It Mean? - 17th Oct 19
Stock Market Future Projected Cycles - 17th Oct 19
Weekly SPX & Gold Price Cycle Report - 17th Oct 19
What Makes United Markets Capital Different From Other Online Brokers? - 17th Oct 19
Stock Market Dow Long-term Trend Analysis - 16th Oct 19
This Is Not a Money Printing Press - 16th Oct 19
Online Casino Operator LeoVegas is Optimistic about the Future - 16th Oct 19
Stock Market Dow Elliott Wave Analysis Forecast - Video - 16th Oct 19
$100 Silver Has Come And Gone - 16th Oct 19
Stock Market Roll Over Risk to New highs in S&P 500 - 16th Oct 19
10 Best Trading Schools and Courses for Students - 16th Oct 19
Dow Stock Market Short-term Trend Analysis - 15th Oct 19
The Many Aligning Signals in Gold - 15th Oct 19
Market Action Suggests Downside in Precious Metals - 15th Oct 19
US Major Stock Market Indexes Retest Critical Price Channel Resistance - 15th Oct 19
“Baghad Jerome” Powell Denies the Fed Is Using Financial Crisis Tools - 15th Oct 19
British Pound GBP Trend Analysis - 14th Oct 19
A Guide to Financing Your Next Car - 14th Oct 19
America's Ruling Class - Underestimating Them & Overestimating Us - 14th Oct 19
Stock Market Range Bound - 14th Oct 19
Gold, Silver Bonds - Inflation in the Offing? - 14th Oct 19
East-West Trade War: Never Take a Knife to a Gunfight - 14th Oct 19
Consider Precious Metals for Insurance First, Profit Second... - 14th Oct 19

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

Stock Market Trend Forecast Oct - Dec 2019 by Nadeem Walayat

The Unemployment Conspiracy; It's the Policy, Stupid

Economics / Unemployment Jun 12, 2011 - 02:27 AM GMT

By: Mike_Whitney

Economics Best Financial Markets Analysis ArticleWhen the recovery began 2 years ago, the rate of unemployment was 9.5 percent. Today it's 9.1 percent. Think about that for a minute. Doesn't that prove that the market isn't really self-correcting after all? I mean, if the market was self-correcting then unemployment would have gone down by now, right? But, it hasn't. Why?


There's a long answer for that, and a short answer. The short answer is that unemployment can stay high forever if the wrong policies are in place. If you don't believe that, then vote Republican in 2012 and watch what happens when they start hacking away at public spending. Unemployment will soar to 15 or 20 percent in the blink of an eye.

So, it's the policy that matters not the market. And when the wrong policies are implemented, then demand weakens, people get laid off, and the economy goes into a funk.  The good news is that we know how to fix the problem and get the economy revved up again. But the bad news is the politicians are not interested in doing what it takes to put people back to work.  In fact, unemployment isn't even on their radar. Maybe that's because some of their bigshot constituents aren't bothered high unemployment; in fact, they kind of like it. It crushes big labor and puts pressure on wages.  Maybe that's why they haven't been griping.       

Look, the economy is just a reflection of the ideas of the people in power, right? That's why economics can't be separated from politics, because it is politics. And, it's totally agenda driven. There's no economic theory that's not agenda driven.

There's no reason why a recession has to drag on year after year. Everyone knows what needs to be done; it's just a matter of doing it. But, of course, that's not possible because "what needs to be done"  conflicts with the objectives of the people who run the system. So the slump goes on and on and people get madder and madder until, finally, something snaps and the crowds pour out onto the streets and and start burning stuff down. That's how it works, isn't it? Have you checked out Athens, lately? How about Madrid, Lisbon, Dublin, or Reykjavik? People are pissed. And they're not pissed about the recession. They're pissed because they're getting reamed and they know it. They're pissed about the policy.

So, is that where America is headed; massive public demonstrations and street violence?

Could be. It's hard to tell.  If the politicians stick with the same policies that created the recession and high unemployment, then we're headed for trouble. But if they make a course correction and fix the situation, then things will improve. It's up to them.  

Think back to when Barack Obama first took office. The administration quickly slapped together an $800 billion stimulus package and rushed it through congress. What does that tell you?

It tells you that policymakers aren't really dopes, after all.  It tells you that when the lights are blinking red they know what they need to do and they do it fast.  The Obama stimulus stopped the bleeding (The economy was shedding 750,000 jobs per month when Bush left office) and gradually turned the economy around. It took a long time, but the patient finally started showing signs of life.  

At the time, no one talked about the budget deficits because they knew that avoiding another Great Depression was more important. And, no one suggested that we forgo fiscal stimulus and try to stop the downward spiral by purchasing trillions of dollars of government bonds (QE) in an experiment that may or may not work. No one said anything like that, because they already KNEW that the traditional tried-and-true Keynesian methods of reversing the plunge would work. And they did.

So what does that prove?

It proves that the people in power actually know what to do, but they pretend otherwise so they can pursue their own agenda. All this deficit hawkery and QE2 is just agenda-driven gibberish. It has nothing to do with fixing the economy or putting people back to work.     

So what should we be doing to reduce unemployment and get the economy back on track?

Well, we should do what we did in the '50s, 60's and 70s when the economy was growing and the middle class was at its apex. We should implement the policies that focus on job creation and wage growth. Here's an excerpt from "The Crisis of Capitalism: Keynes Versus Marx" by Robert Skidelsky which sums it up perfectly:

  "Keynesianism dominated the political economy of developed economies from the 1950s through to the mid 1970s. As Thomas Palley argues, ‘economic policy was designed to achieve full employment, and the economy was characterized by a system in which wages grew with productivity. This configuration created a virtuous circle of growth. Rising wages meant robust aggregate demand, which contributed to full employment. Full employment in turn provided an incentive to invest, which raised productivity, therefore supporting higher wages'." ("The Crisis of Capitalism: Keynes Versus Marx", Robert Skidelsky) Link--http://www.skidelskyr.com/site/article/the-crisis-of-capitalism-keynes-versus-marx/
 
British economist John Maynard Keynes knew that capitalist economies perform best at full employment because the additional spending leads to widespread prosperity and stronger growth. But, as Skidelksy points out, the government has a role to play in sustaining employment to ensure the economy operates at maximum capacity. Here's more from the same article:

"Public Investment & Full Employment
 
Keynes’s answer ... is for the state to ensure enough investment and/or consumption in the economy to maintain continuous full employment.....The key to any restoration of a Keynesian political economy is thus the rehabilitation of the state as an instrument of the public interest...."

So the government should be directly involved in maintaining full employment. That means that fiscal stimulus has to be provided at various points in the business cycle to keep things running smoothly.  But, as Professor Alan Nasser points out in a recent article in Counterpunch, there are two kinds of fiscal stimulus; one that works, and one that doesn't. It's an important distinction that needs to be clarified. Here's an excerpt from Nasser's article:  

 "...Closing the employment gap requires a specifically targeted stimulus, intended to stimulate not merely aggregate demand, but "effective demand". This was the kind of stimulus Keynes had in mind as his remedy for chronic unemployment. Aggregate demand stimulation is not authentically Keynesian. Keynes was explicit that the goal of macroeconomic stabilization policy is "a closer approximation of full employment as nearly as is practicable." (The General Theory, p. 378-379) He was unambiguous as to the principal effective means of accomplishing this goal: direct government job creation through public works projects....

If boosting effective demand is the explicit goal of fiscal policy, then work projects and the jobs they require must be provided directly by government. A resurrected Works Progress Administration is what will do the trick." ("Putting People to Work; The Kind of Stimulus We Need", Alan Nasser, Counterpunch)

 Full employment is not a pipedream. In fact, it's an easily achievable goal if we're willing to use state resources. The real question is whether activists can apply enough pressure to force the changes that are needed,  so that everyone who wants a job can find one.  

By Mike Whitney

Email: fergiewhitney@msn.com

Mike is a well respected freelance writer living in Washington state, interested in politics and economics from a libertarian perspective.

© 2011 Copyright Mike Whitney - All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis.
Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors.

Mike Whitney Archive

© 2005-2019 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Comments

gary anderson
12 Jun 11, 13:15
government jobs?

Do you even know what a libertarian IS?


Bill
13 Jun 11, 01:56
Spend, Spend, Spend.

Spend, spend, spend and spend some more. Yeah, that'll work.


Judge
12 Jul 11, 05:23
Bwahahahahahahaa!

Mike says "The economy was shedding 750,000 jobs per month when Bush left office"

And now we are shedding 450,000 per WEEK!

Good thing the “One” is here to save us all.

How’s that Hope and Change working for you Mike?


brianthiesen
12 Jul 11, 12:05
Instant Loss of Credibility

Firstly mike, anyone who uses %100 manipulated and BS stats to make argument in one direction or another has no credibility. Secondly the instant anyone says the word republican or democrat they are even worse.

As if to say in any way this 1 party (the republicrats) are in any way different from each other.

There is a reason recessions have to drag on year after year... they are profitable for a small few at the expense of the many.

Your hero OBAMA (the man soon to found not even an american in any way) rushed that through to pay off bankers who lined his and all 535 campign coffers for decades. THis had absolutely nothing to do with smarts or not being dopy.

By smarts i mean not what is smart for the whole but what is smart for them and them and their cronies alone.

The government playing a role in this economy or any economy is the EXACT AND ONLY REASON why we as a planet are in this mess (other than us voting them in and believing they care about us or anyone but themselves)

What is your definition of stimulus? Massive banker bonuses and CDS releif to the tune of trillions?

For years now you have been on about how the govt "needs to spend more" and as this is not working because they have only 1 goal (to make them more money which means the public losing more) you will clamour on about how it "isnt enough"

Does it need to be %300 of gdp until the 24th century to get "back on track?"

Should we just vote for the "opposite party" every four years and hope it all works our and if the country doesn vote for the party you did will you chastise them? Or admit that Obama has one goal and that is to make himself king of usa without any recourse (THIS IS CALLED TYRANNY OR DICTATORSHIP OR A DESPOT)

The only reason any politician would want full employment is so he can spend at will due to the tax revenues and take credit for the "good things he did"

Then if it all goes bad... blame it on the last administration or the global economy or the left wingers (or right wingers or centre right left wingers

"Lucky for leaders that people do not think" - ADOLF HITLER

Think on that if you can.... be sure to vote dem again... I'm sure it will all change if you do....... YES WE CAN


christian
12 Jul 11, 15:41
corps run the show

Mike the problemo is this and you will admit that both houses of congress are beholden to big corporations...big industry....well in this era of globalization...

Corporations have been the teflon don's of this CRISIS...they are sitting on piles of cash....corporate bond's are safe money esp. for the big multi nationals......now guess what even with 9.2% (now unemployment) WE ARE IN A SWEET SPOT FOR CAPTIAL CORPORATIONS..

cheap cometeting labor force...no growth in wages....and trimming fat (jobs) at the first sign of declining growth/earnings. SO THIS IS THE NEW NORMAL and it doesn't get talked about. 9.2 % unemployment w/ minimal wage leverage for workers is the SWEEET SPOT FOR CORPORATIONS and they are sitting on CASH.....they love it...they don't want CHANGE lol. they are winning. and they hold sway over politicians who may do good to act when crisis approaches but thats it beyond playing politics to win next election. the fed's qe's are progressively getting funneled into GOLD and COMMODITY's it would seem....although i'm sure the fed will add some hurdles to help funnel money in stocks should qe 3 be inacted (NOT TILL AT LEAST another month or two) prolly fall if at all.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in

6 Critical Money Making Rules