Best of the Week
Most Popular
1. Ray Dalio: This Debt Cycle Will End Soon - John_Mauldin
2.Stock Market Dow Plunge Following Fake US - China Trade War Truce - Nadeem_Walayat
3.UK House Prices 2019 No Deal BrExit 30% Crash Warning! - Nadeem_Walayat
4.What the Oil Short-sellers and OPEC Don’t Know about Peak Shale - Andrew_Butter
5.Stock Market Crashed While the Yield Curve Inverted - Troy_Bombardia
6.More Late-cycle Signs for the Stock Market and What’s Next - Troy_Bombardia
7.US Economy Will Deteriorate Over Next Half Year. What this Means for Stocks - Troy_Bombardia
8.TICK TOCK, Counting Down to the Next Recession - James_Quinn
9.How Theresa May Put Britain on the Path Towards BrExit Civil War - Nadeem_Walayat
10.This Is the End of Trump’s Economic Sugar High - Patrick_Watson
Last 7 days
Is a Deleveraging Event about to Unfold in the Stock Market? - 11th Dec 18
Making Money through Property Investment - 11th Dec 18
Brexit: What Will it Mean for Exchange Rates? - 11th Dec 18
United States Facing Climate Change Severe Water Stress - 10th Dec 18
Waiting for Gold Price to Erupt - 10th Dec 18
Stock Market Key Support Being Re-Tested - 10th Dec 18
May BrExit Deal Tory MP Votes Forecast, Betting Market Analysis - 10th Dec 18
Listen to What Gold is Telling You - 10th Dec 18
The Stock Market’s Long Term Outlook is Changing - 10th Dec 18
Palladium Shortages Expose Broken Futures Markets for Precious Metals - 9th Dec 18
Is an Inverted Yield Curve Bullish for Gold? - 9th Dec 18
Rising US Home Prices and Falling Sales - 8th Dec 18
Choosing Who the Autonomous Car Should Kill - 8th Dec 18
Stocks Selloff Boosting Gold - 8th Dec 18
Will Weak US Dollar Save Gold? - 7th Dec 18
This Is the End of Trump’s Economic Sugar High - 7th Dec 18
US Economy Will Deteriorate Over Next Half Year. What this Means for Stocks - 7th Dec 18
The Secret Weapon for Getting America 5G Ready - 7th Dec 18
These Oil Stocks Are a Ticking Time Bomb - 7th Dec 18
How Theresa May Put Britain on the Path Towards BrExit Civil War - 7th Dec 18
How easy is it to find a job in the UK iGaming industry? - 6th Dec 18
Curry's vs Jessops - Buying an Olympus TG-5 Tough Camera - 5th Dec 18
Yield Curve Harbinger of Stock Market Doom - 5th Dec 18
Stock Market Crashed While the Yield Curve Inverted - 5th Dec 18
Global Economic Outlook after Trump-Xi Trade War Timeout - 5th Dec 18
Stock Market Dow Plunge Following Fake US - China Trade War Truce - 5th Dec 18
Subverting BREXIT - British People vs Parliament Risks Revolution - 5th Dec 18
Profit from the Global Cannabis Boom by Investing in the Beverage Industry - 4th Dec 18
MP's Vote UK Government Behaving like a Dictatorship, in Contempt of Parliament - 4th Dec 18
Isn't It Amazing How The Fed Controls The Stock Market? - 4th Dec 18
Best Christmas LED String and Projector Lights for 2018 - Review - 4th Dec 18
The "Special 38" Markets You Should Trade ebook - 4th Dec 18
Subverting BrExit - AG Confirms May Backstop Deal Means UK Can NEVER LEAVE the EU! - 3rd Dec 18
The Bottled Water Bamboozle - 3rd Dec 18
Crude Oil After November’s Declines - 3rd Dec 18
Global Economic Perceptions Are Shifting - Asia China Markets Risks - 3rd Dec 18
Weekly Charts and Update on Equity Markets, FX Trades and Commodities - 3rd Dec 18
TICK TOCK, Counting Down to the Next Recession - 3rd Dec 18
Stock Market Key (Short-term) Support Holds - 3rd Dec 18
Stocks Bull Market Tops Are a Process - 3rd Dec 18
More Late-cycle Signs for the Stock Market and What’s Next - 3rd Dec 18
A Post-Powell View of USD, S&P 500 and Gold - 2nd Dec 18
Elliott Wave: SPX Decision Time Is Coming Soon - 2nd Dec 18

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How You Could Make £2,850 Per Month

The Unemployment Conspiracy; It's the Policy, Stupid

Economics / Unemployment Jun 12, 2011 - 02:27 AM GMT

By: Mike_Whitney

Economics Best Financial Markets Analysis ArticleWhen the recovery began 2 years ago, the rate of unemployment was 9.5 percent. Today it's 9.1 percent. Think about that for a minute. Doesn't that prove that the market isn't really self-correcting after all? I mean, if the market was self-correcting then unemployment would have gone down by now, right? But, it hasn't. Why?


There's a long answer for that, and a short answer. The short answer is that unemployment can stay high forever if the wrong policies are in place. If you don't believe that, then vote Republican in 2012 and watch what happens when they start hacking away at public spending. Unemployment will soar to 15 or 20 percent in the blink of an eye.

So, it's the policy that matters not the market. And when the wrong policies are implemented, then demand weakens, people get laid off, and the economy goes into a funk.  The good news is that we know how to fix the problem and get the economy revved up again. But the bad news is the politicians are not interested in doing what it takes to put people back to work.  In fact, unemployment isn't even on their radar. Maybe that's because some of their bigshot constituents aren't bothered high unemployment; in fact, they kind of like it. It crushes big labor and puts pressure on wages.  Maybe that's why they haven't been griping.       

Look, the economy is just a reflection of the ideas of the people in power, right? That's why economics can't be separated from politics, because it is politics. And, it's totally agenda driven. There's no economic theory that's not agenda driven.

There's no reason why a recession has to drag on year after year. Everyone knows what needs to be done; it's just a matter of doing it. But, of course, that's not possible because "what needs to be done"  conflicts with the objectives of the people who run the system. So the slump goes on and on and people get madder and madder until, finally, something snaps and the crowds pour out onto the streets and and start burning stuff down. That's how it works, isn't it? Have you checked out Athens, lately? How about Madrid, Lisbon, Dublin, or Reykjavik? People are pissed. And they're not pissed about the recession. They're pissed because they're getting reamed and they know it. They're pissed about the policy.

So, is that where America is headed; massive public demonstrations and street violence?

Could be. It's hard to tell.  If the politicians stick with the same policies that created the recession and high unemployment, then we're headed for trouble. But if they make a course correction and fix the situation, then things will improve. It's up to them.  

Think back to when Barack Obama first took office. The administration quickly slapped together an $800 billion stimulus package and rushed it through congress. What does that tell you?

It tells you that policymakers aren't really dopes, after all.  It tells you that when the lights are blinking red they know what they need to do and they do it fast.  The Obama stimulus stopped the bleeding (The economy was shedding 750,000 jobs per month when Bush left office) and gradually turned the economy around. It took a long time, but the patient finally started showing signs of life.  

At the time, no one talked about the budget deficits because they knew that avoiding another Great Depression was more important. And, no one suggested that we forgo fiscal stimulus and try to stop the downward spiral by purchasing trillions of dollars of government bonds (QE) in an experiment that may or may not work. No one said anything like that, because they already KNEW that the traditional tried-and-true Keynesian methods of reversing the plunge would work. And they did.

So what does that prove?

It proves that the people in power actually know what to do, but they pretend otherwise so they can pursue their own agenda. All this deficit hawkery and QE2 is just agenda-driven gibberish. It has nothing to do with fixing the economy or putting people back to work.     

So what should we be doing to reduce unemployment and get the economy back on track?

Well, we should do what we did in the '50s, 60's and 70s when the economy was growing and the middle class was at its apex. We should implement the policies that focus on job creation and wage growth. Here's an excerpt from "The Crisis of Capitalism: Keynes Versus Marx" by Robert Skidelsky which sums it up perfectly:

  "Keynesianism dominated the political economy of developed economies from the 1950s through to the mid 1970s. As Thomas Palley argues, ‘economic policy was designed to achieve full employment, and the economy was characterized by a system in which wages grew with productivity. This configuration created a virtuous circle of growth. Rising wages meant robust aggregate demand, which contributed to full employment. Full employment in turn provided an incentive to invest, which raised productivity, therefore supporting higher wages'." ("The Crisis of Capitalism: Keynes Versus Marx", Robert Skidelsky) Link--http://www.skidelskyr.com/site/article/the-crisis-of-capitalism-keynes-versus-marx/
 
British economist John Maynard Keynes knew that capitalist economies perform best at full employment because the additional spending leads to widespread prosperity and stronger growth. But, as Skidelksy points out, the government has a role to play in sustaining employment to ensure the economy operates at maximum capacity. Here's more from the same article:

"Public Investment & Full Employment
 
Keynes’s answer ... is for the state to ensure enough investment and/or consumption in the economy to maintain continuous full employment.....The key to any restoration of a Keynesian political economy is thus the rehabilitation of the state as an instrument of the public interest...."

So the government should be directly involved in maintaining full employment. That means that fiscal stimulus has to be provided at various points in the business cycle to keep things running smoothly.  But, as Professor Alan Nasser points out in a recent article in Counterpunch, there are two kinds of fiscal stimulus; one that works, and one that doesn't. It's an important distinction that needs to be clarified. Here's an excerpt from Nasser's article:  

 "...Closing the employment gap requires a specifically targeted stimulus, intended to stimulate not merely aggregate demand, but "effective demand". This was the kind of stimulus Keynes had in mind as his remedy for chronic unemployment. Aggregate demand stimulation is not authentically Keynesian. Keynes was explicit that the goal of macroeconomic stabilization policy is "a closer approximation of full employment as nearly as is practicable." (The General Theory, p. 378-379) He was unambiguous as to the principal effective means of accomplishing this goal: direct government job creation through public works projects....

If boosting effective demand is the explicit goal of fiscal policy, then work projects and the jobs they require must be provided directly by government. A resurrected Works Progress Administration is what will do the trick." ("Putting People to Work; The Kind of Stimulus We Need", Alan Nasser, Counterpunch)

 Full employment is not a pipedream. In fact, it's an easily achievable goal if we're willing to use state resources. The real question is whether activists can apply enough pressure to force the changes that are needed,  so that everyone who wants a job can find one.  

By Mike Whitney

Email: fergiewhitney@msn.com

Mike is a well respected freelance writer living in Washington state, interested in politics and economics from a libertarian perspective.

© 2011 Copyright Mike Whitney - All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis.
Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors.

Mike Whitney Archive

© 2005-2018 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Comments

gary anderson
12 Jun 11, 13:15
government jobs?

Do you even know what a libertarian IS?


Bill
13 Jun 11, 01:56
Spend, Spend, Spend.

Spend, spend, spend and spend some more. Yeah, that'll work.


Judge
12 Jul 11, 05:23
Bwahahahahahahaa!

Mike says "The economy was shedding 750,000 jobs per month when Bush left office"

And now we are shedding 450,000 per WEEK!

Good thing the “One” is here to save us all.

How’s that Hope and Change working for you Mike?


brianthiesen
12 Jul 11, 12:05
Instant Loss of Credibility

Firstly mike, anyone who uses %100 manipulated and BS stats to make argument in one direction or another has no credibility. Secondly the instant anyone says the word republican or democrat they are even worse.

As if to say in any way this 1 party (the republicrats) are in any way different from each other.

There is a reason recessions have to drag on year after year... they are profitable for a small few at the expense of the many.

Your hero OBAMA (the man soon to found not even an american in any way) rushed that through to pay off bankers who lined his and all 535 campign coffers for decades. THis had absolutely nothing to do with smarts or not being dopy.

By smarts i mean not what is smart for the whole but what is smart for them and them and their cronies alone.

The government playing a role in this economy or any economy is the EXACT AND ONLY REASON why we as a planet are in this mess (other than us voting them in and believing they care about us or anyone but themselves)

What is your definition of stimulus? Massive banker bonuses and CDS releif to the tune of trillions?

For years now you have been on about how the govt "needs to spend more" and as this is not working because they have only 1 goal (to make them more money which means the public losing more) you will clamour on about how it "isnt enough"

Does it need to be %300 of gdp until the 24th century to get "back on track?"

Should we just vote for the "opposite party" every four years and hope it all works our and if the country doesn vote for the party you did will you chastise them? Or admit that Obama has one goal and that is to make himself king of usa without any recourse (THIS IS CALLED TYRANNY OR DICTATORSHIP OR A DESPOT)

The only reason any politician would want full employment is so he can spend at will due to the tax revenues and take credit for the "good things he did"

Then if it all goes bad... blame it on the last administration or the global economy or the left wingers (or right wingers or centre right left wingers

"Lucky for leaders that people do not think" - ADOLF HITLER

Think on that if you can.... be sure to vote dem again... I'm sure it will all change if you do....... YES WE CAN


christian
12 Jul 11, 15:41
corps run the show

Mike the problemo is this and you will admit that both houses of congress are beholden to big corporations...big industry....well in this era of globalization...

Corporations have been the teflon don's of this CRISIS...they are sitting on piles of cash....corporate bond's are safe money esp. for the big multi nationals......now guess what even with 9.2% (now unemployment) WE ARE IN A SWEET SPOT FOR CAPTIAL CORPORATIONS..

cheap cometeting labor force...no growth in wages....and trimming fat (jobs) at the first sign of declining growth/earnings. SO THIS IS THE NEW NORMAL and it doesn't get talked about. 9.2 % unemployment w/ minimal wage leverage for workers is the SWEEET SPOT FOR CORPORATIONS and they are sitting on CASH.....they love it...they don't want CHANGE lol. they are winning. and they hold sway over politicians who may do good to act when crisis approaches but thats it beyond playing politics to win next election. the fed's qe's are progressively getting funneled into GOLD and COMMODITY's it would seem....although i'm sure the fed will add some hurdles to help funnel money in stocks should qe 3 be inacted (NOT TILL AT LEAST another month or two) prolly fall if at all.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in

6 Critical Money Making Rules