Best of the Week
Most Popular
1. Stock Markets and the History Chart of the End of the World (With Presidential Cycles) - 28th Aug 20
2.Google, Apple, Amazon, Facebook... AI Tech Stocks Buying Levels and Valuations Q3 2020 - 31st Aug 20
3.The Inflation Mega-trend is Going Hyper! - 11th Sep 20
4.Is this the End of Capitalism? - 13th Sep 20
5.What's Driving Gold, Silver and What's Next? - 3rd Sep 20
6.QE4EVER! - 9th Sep 20
7.Gold Price Trend Forecast Analysis - Part1 - 7th Sep 20
8.The Fed May “Cause” The Next Stock Market Crash - 3rd Sep 20
9.Bitcoin Price Crash - You Will be Suprised What Happens Next - 7th Sep 20
10.NVIDIA Stock Price Soars on RTX 3000 Cornering the GPU Market for next 2 years! - 3rd Sep 20
Last 7 days
Gold, Silver and Copper - The 3 Metallic Amigos and Their Messages - 5th Dec 20
TESCO Christmas Decorations Festive Shop 2020 - How to Beat the Coronavirus Economic Depression - 5th Dec 20
Premium Bonds Good, Bad or Ugly Investment? Here's What Return (Prize Wins) to Expect - 5th Dec 20
How to accomplish a technical analysis with the Forex - 5th Dec 20
What is life insurance and what are the benefits of having it? - 5th Dec 20
Pre-COVID US Economy Wasn’t All That Great Either - 4th Dec 20
Bitcoin Breath Taking Surge - Crypto Trading Event - 4th Dec 20
Platinum Begins A New Rally – Gold & Silver Will Follow - 4th Dec 20
Don't Let the Silver (and Gold) Bull Shake You Off! - 4th Dec 20
Stronger Risk Appetite Sends Gold below $1,800 - 4th Dec 20
A new “miracle compound” is set to take over the biotech market - 4th Dec 20
Eiro-group Review –The power of trading education - 4th Dec 20
Early Investors set to win big as FDA fast-tracks this ancient medicine - 3rd Dec 20
New PC System Switch On, Where's Windows 10 Licence Key? Overclockers UK OEM Review (5) - 3rd Dec 20
Poundland Budget Christmas Decorations Shopping 2020 to Beat the Corona Economic Depression - 3rd Dec 20
What is the right type of insurance for you, and how do you find it? - 3rd Dec 20
What Are the 3 Stocks That Will Benefit from Covid-19? - 3rd Dec 20
Gold & the USDX: Correlations - 2nd Dec 20
How An Ancient Medicine Is Taking On The $16 Trillion Pharmaceutical Industry - 2nd Dec 20
Amazon Black Friday vs Prime Day vs Cyber Monday, Which are Real or Fake Sales - 1st Dec 20
The No.1 Biotech Stock for 2021 - 1st Dec 20
Stocks Bears Last Chance Before Market Rally To SPX 4200 In 2021 - 1st Dec 20
Globalists Poised for a “Great Reset” – Any Role for Gold? - 1st Dec 20
How to Get FREE REAL Christmas Tree 2020! Easy DIY Money Saving - 1st Dec 20
The Truth About “6G” - 30th Nov 20
Ancient Aztec Secret Could Lead To A $6.9 Billion Biotech Breakthrough - 30th Nov 20
AMD Ryzen Zen 3 NO UK MSRP Stock - 5600x, 5800x, 5900x 5950x Selling at DOUBLE FAKE MSRP Prices - 29th Nov 20
Stock Market Short-term Decision Time - 29th Nov 20
Look at These 2 Big Warning Signs for the U.S. Economy - 29th Nov 20
Dow Stock Market Short-term and Long-term Trend Analysis - 28th Nov 20
How To Spot The End Of An Excess Market Trend Phase – Part II - 28th Nov 20
BLOCKCHAIN INVESTMENT PRIMER - 28th Nov 20
The Gold Stocks Correction is Maturing - 28th Nov 20
Biden and Yellen Pushed Gold Price Down to $1,800 - 28th Nov 20
Sheffield Christmas Lights 2020 - Peace Gardens vs 2019 and 2018 - 28th Nov 20

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

FIRST ACCESS to Nadeem Walayat’s Analysis and Trend Forecasts

The Unemployment Conspiracy; It's the Policy, Stupid

Economics / Unemployment Jun 12, 2011 - 02:27 AM GMT

By: Mike_Whitney

Economics Best Financial Markets Analysis ArticleWhen the recovery began 2 years ago, the rate of unemployment was 9.5 percent. Today it's 9.1 percent. Think about that for a minute. Doesn't that prove that the market isn't really self-correcting after all? I mean, if the market was self-correcting then unemployment would have gone down by now, right? But, it hasn't. Why?


There's a long answer for that, and a short answer. The short answer is that unemployment can stay high forever if the wrong policies are in place. If you don't believe that, then vote Republican in 2012 and watch what happens when they start hacking away at public spending. Unemployment will soar to 15 or 20 percent in the blink of an eye.

So, it's the policy that matters not the market. And when the wrong policies are implemented, then demand weakens, people get laid off, and the economy goes into a funk.  The good news is that we know how to fix the problem and get the economy revved up again. But the bad news is the politicians are not interested in doing what it takes to put people back to work.  In fact, unemployment isn't even on their radar. Maybe that's because some of their bigshot constituents aren't bothered high unemployment; in fact, they kind of like it. It crushes big labor and puts pressure on wages.  Maybe that's why they haven't been griping.       

Look, the economy is just a reflection of the ideas of the people in power, right? That's why economics can't be separated from politics, because it is politics. And, it's totally agenda driven. There's no economic theory that's not agenda driven.

There's no reason why a recession has to drag on year after year. Everyone knows what needs to be done; it's just a matter of doing it. But, of course, that's not possible because "what needs to be done"  conflicts with the objectives of the people who run the system. So the slump goes on and on and people get madder and madder until, finally, something snaps and the crowds pour out onto the streets and and start burning stuff down. That's how it works, isn't it? Have you checked out Athens, lately? How about Madrid, Lisbon, Dublin, or Reykjavik? People are pissed. And they're not pissed about the recession. They're pissed because they're getting reamed and they know it. They're pissed about the policy.

So, is that where America is headed; massive public demonstrations and street violence?

Could be. It's hard to tell.  If the politicians stick with the same policies that created the recession and high unemployment, then we're headed for trouble. But if they make a course correction and fix the situation, then things will improve. It's up to them.  

Think back to when Barack Obama first took office. The administration quickly slapped together an $800 billion stimulus package and rushed it through congress. What does that tell you?

It tells you that policymakers aren't really dopes, after all.  It tells you that when the lights are blinking red they know what they need to do and they do it fast.  The Obama stimulus stopped the bleeding (The economy was shedding 750,000 jobs per month when Bush left office) and gradually turned the economy around. It took a long time, but the patient finally started showing signs of life.  

At the time, no one talked about the budget deficits because they knew that avoiding another Great Depression was more important. And, no one suggested that we forgo fiscal stimulus and try to stop the downward spiral by purchasing trillions of dollars of government bonds (QE) in an experiment that may or may not work. No one said anything like that, because they already KNEW that the traditional tried-and-true Keynesian methods of reversing the plunge would work. And they did.

So what does that prove?

It proves that the people in power actually know what to do, but they pretend otherwise so they can pursue their own agenda. All this deficit hawkery and QE2 is just agenda-driven gibberish. It has nothing to do with fixing the economy or putting people back to work.     

So what should we be doing to reduce unemployment and get the economy back on track?

Well, we should do what we did in the '50s, 60's and 70s when the economy was growing and the middle class was at its apex. We should implement the policies that focus on job creation and wage growth. Here's an excerpt from "The Crisis of Capitalism: Keynes Versus Marx" by Robert Skidelsky which sums it up perfectly:

  "Keynesianism dominated the political economy of developed economies from the 1950s through to the mid 1970s. As Thomas Palley argues, ‘economic policy was designed to achieve full employment, and the economy was characterized by a system in which wages grew with productivity. This configuration created a virtuous circle of growth. Rising wages meant robust aggregate demand, which contributed to full employment. Full employment in turn provided an incentive to invest, which raised productivity, therefore supporting higher wages'." ("The Crisis of Capitalism: Keynes Versus Marx", Robert Skidelsky) Link--http://www.skidelskyr.com/site/article/the-crisis-of-capitalism-keynes-versus-marx/
 
British economist John Maynard Keynes knew that capitalist economies perform best at full employment because the additional spending leads to widespread prosperity and stronger growth. But, as Skidelksy points out, the government has a role to play in sustaining employment to ensure the economy operates at maximum capacity. Here's more from the same article:

"Public Investment & Full Employment
 
Keynes’s answer ... is for the state to ensure enough investment and/or consumption in the economy to maintain continuous full employment.....The key to any restoration of a Keynesian political economy is thus the rehabilitation of the state as an instrument of the public interest...."

So the government should be directly involved in maintaining full employment. That means that fiscal stimulus has to be provided at various points in the business cycle to keep things running smoothly.  But, as Professor Alan Nasser points out in a recent article in Counterpunch, there are two kinds of fiscal stimulus; one that works, and one that doesn't. It's an important distinction that needs to be clarified. Here's an excerpt from Nasser's article:  

 "...Closing the employment gap requires a specifically targeted stimulus, intended to stimulate not merely aggregate demand, but "effective demand". This was the kind of stimulus Keynes had in mind as his remedy for chronic unemployment. Aggregate demand stimulation is not authentically Keynesian. Keynes was explicit that the goal of macroeconomic stabilization policy is "a closer approximation of full employment as nearly as is practicable." (The General Theory, p. 378-379) He was unambiguous as to the principal effective means of accomplishing this goal: direct government job creation through public works projects....

If boosting effective demand is the explicit goal of fiscal policy, then work projects and the jobs they require must be provided directly by government. A resurrected Works Progress Administration is what will do the trick." ("Putting People to Work; The Kind of Stimulus We Need", Alan Nasser, Counterpunch)

 Full employment is not a pipedream. In fact, it's an easily achievable goal if we're willing to use state resources. The real question is whether activists can apply enough pressure to force the changes that are needed,  so that everyone who wants a job can find one.  

By Mike Whitney

Email: fergiewhitney@msn.com

Mike is a well respected freelance writer living in Washington state, interested in politics and economics from a libertarian perspective.

© 2011 Copyright Mike Whitney - All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis.
Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors.

Mike Whitney Archive

© 2005-2019 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Comments

gary anderson
12 Jun 11, 13:15
government jobs?

Do you even know what a libertarian IS?


Bill
13 Jun 11, 01:56
Spend, Spend, Spend.

Spend, spend, spend and spend some more. Yeah, that'll work.


Judge
12 Jul 11, 05:23
Bwahahahahahahaa!

Mike says "The economy was shedding 750,000 jobs per month when Bush left office"

And now we are shedding 450,000 per WEEK!

Good thing the “One” is here to save us all.

How’s that Hope and Change working for you Mike?


brianthiesen
12 Jul 11, 12:05
Instant Loss of Credibility

Firstly mike, anyone who uses %100 manipulated and BS stats to make argument in one direction or another has no credibility. Secondly the instant anyone says the word republican or democrat they are even worse.

As if to say in any way this 1 party (the republicrats) are in any way different from each other.

There is a reason recessions have to drag on year after year... they are profitable for a small few at the expense of the many.

Your hero OBAMA (the man soon to found not even an american in any way) rushed that through to pay off bankers who lined his and all 535 campign coffers for decades. THis had absolutely nothing to do with smarts or not being dopy.

By smarts i mean not what is smart for the whole but what is smart for them and them and their cronies alone.

The government playing a role in this economy or any economy is the EXACT AND ONLY REASON why we as a planet are in this mess (other than us voting them in and believing they care about us or anyone but themselves)

What is your definition of stimulus? Massive banker bonuses and CDS releif to the tune of trillions?

For years now you have been on about how the govt "needs to spend more" and as this is not working because they have only 1 goal (to make them more money which means the public losing more) you will clamour on about how it "isnt enough"

Does it need to be %300 of gdp until the 24th century to get "back on track?"

Should we just vote for the "opposite party" every four years and hope it all works our and if the country doesn vote for the party you did will you chastise them? Or admit that Obama has one goal and that is to make himself king of usa without any recourse (THIS IS CALLED TYRANNY OR DICTATORSHIP OR A DESPOT)

The only reason any politician would want full employment is so he can spend at will due to the tax revenues and take credit for the "good things he did"

Then if it all goes bad... blame it on the last administration or the global economy or the left wingers (or right wingers or centre right left wingers

"Lucky for leaders that people do not think" - ADOLF HITLER

Think on that if you can.... be sure to vote dem again... I'm sure it will all change if you do....... YES WE CAN


christian
12 Jul 11, 15:41
corps run the show

Mike the problemo is this and you will admit that both houses of congress are beholden to big corporations...big industry....well in this era of globalization...

Corporations have been the teflon don's of this CRISIS...they are sitting on piles of cash....corporate bond's are safe money esp. for the big multi nationals......now guess what even with 9.2% (now unemployment) WE ARE IN A SWEET SPOT FOR CAPTIAL CORPORATIONS..

cheap cometeting labor force...no growth in wages....and trimming fat (jobs) at the first sign of declining growth/earnings. SO THIS IS THE NEW NORMAL and it doesn't get talked about. 9.2 % unemployment w/ minimal wage leverage for workers is the SWEEET SPOT FOR CORPORATIONS and they are sitting on CASH.....they love it...they don't want CHANGE lol. they are winning. and they hold sway over politicians who may do good to act when crisis approaches but thats it beyond playing politics to win next election. the fed's qe's are progressively getting funneled into GOLD and COMMODITY's it would seem....although i'm sure the fed will add some hurdles to help funnel money in stocks should qe 3 be inacted (NOT TILL AT LEAST another month or two) prolly fall if at all.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in

6 Critical Money Making Rules