Best of the Week
Most Popular
1. TESLA! Cathy Wood ARK Funds Bubble BURSTS! - 12th May 21
2.Stock Market Entering Early Summer Correction Trend Forecast - 10th May 21
3.GOLD GDX, HUI Stocks - Will Paradise Turn into a Dystopia? - 11th May 21
4.Crypto Bubble Bursts! Nicehash Suspends Coinbase Withdrawals, Bitcoin, Ethereum Bear Market Begins - 16th May 21
5.Crypto Bubble BURSTS! BTC, ETH, XRP CRASH! NiceHash Seizes Funds on Account Halting ALL Withdrawals! - 19th May 21
6.Cathy Wood Ark Invest Funds Bubble BURSTS! ARKK, ARKG, Tesla Entering Severe Bear Market - 13th May 21
7.Stock Market - Should You Be In Cash Right Now? - 17th May 21
8.Gold to Benefit from Mounting US Debt Pile - 14th May 21
9.Coronavius Covid-19 in Italy in August 2019! - 13th May 21
10.How to Invest in HIGH RISK Tech Stocks for 2021 and Beyond - Part 2 of 2 - 18th May 21
Last 7 days
USDT Ponzi Scheme FINAL WARNING To EXIT Before Tether Collapses Crypto Exchange Markets - 22nd Jun 21
Stock Market Correction Starting - 22nd Jun 21
This Green SuperFuel Could Change Everything For the $14 Trillion Shipping Industry - 22nd Jun 21
Virgin Media Fibre Broadband Installation - What to Expect, Quality of Wiring, Service etc. - 21st Jun 21
Feel the Inflationary Heartbeat - 21st Jun 21
The Green Superfuel That Could Disrupt Global Energy Markers - 21st Jun 21
How Binance SCAMs Crypto Traders with UP DOWN Coins, Futures, Options and Leverage - Don't Get Bogdanoffed! - 20th Jun 21
Smart Money Accumulating Physical Silver Ahead Of New Basel III Regulations And Price Explosion To $44 - 20th Jun 21
Rambling Fed Triggers Gold/Silver Correction: Are Investors Being Duped? - 20th Jun 21
Gold: The Fed Wreaked Havoc on the Precious Metals - 20th Jun 21
Investing in the Tulip Crypto Mania 2021 - 19th Jun 21
Here’s Why Historic US Housing Market Boom Can Continue - 19th Jun 21
Cryptos: What the "Bizarre" World of Non-Fungible Tokens May Be Signaling - 19th Jun 21
Hyperinflationary Expectations: Reflections on Cryptocurrency and the Markets - 19th Jun 21
Gold Prices Investors beat Central Banks and Jewelry, as having the most Impact - 18th Jun 21
Has the Dust Settled After Fed Day? Not Just Yet - 18th Jun 21
Gold Asks: Will the Economic Boom Continue? - 18th Jun 21
STABLE COINS PONZI Crypto SCAM WARNING! Iron Titan CRASH to ZERO! Exit USDT While You Can! - 18th Jun 21
FOMC Surprise Takeaways - 18th Jun 21
Youtube Upload Stuck at 0% QUICK FIXES Solutions Tutorial - 18th Jun 21
AI Stock Buying Levels, Ratings, Valuations Video - 18th Jun 21
AI Stock Buying Levels, Ratings, Valuations and Trend Analysis into Market Correction - 17th Jun 21
Stocks, Gold, Silver Markets Inflation Tipping Point - 17th Jun 21
Letting Yourself Relax with Activities That You Might Not Have Considered - 17th Jun 21
RAMPANT MONEY PRINTING INFLATION BIG PICTURE! - 16th Jun 21
The Federal Reserve and Inflation - 16th Jun 21
Inflation Soars 5%! Will Gold Skyrocket? - 16th Jun 21
Stock Market Sentiment Speaks: Inflation Is For Fools - 16th Jun 21
Four News Events That Could Drive Gold Bullion Demand - 16th Jun 21
5 ways that crypto is changing the face of online casinos - 16th Jun 21
Transitory Inflation Debate - 15th Jun 21
USDX: The Cleanest Shirt Among the Dirty Laundry - 15th Jun 21
Inflation and Stock Market SPX Record Highs. PPI, FOMC Meeting in Focus - 15th Jun 21
Stock Market SPX 4310 Right Around the Corner! - 15th Jun 21
AI Stocks Strength vs Weakness - Why Selling Google or Facebook is a Big Mistake! - 14th Jun 21
The Bitcoin Crime Wave Hits - 14th Jun 21
Gold Time for Consolidation and Lower Volatility - 14th Jun 21
More Banks & Investors Are NOT Believing Fed Propaganda - 14th Jun 21
Market Inflation Bets – Squaring or Not - 14th Jun 21
Is Gold Really an Inflation Hedge? - 14th Jun 21
The FED Holds the Market. How Long Will It Last? - 14th Jun 21
Coinbase vs Binance for Bitcoin, Ethereum Crypto Trading & Investing During Bear Market 2021 - 11th Jun 21
Gold Price $4000 – Insurance, A Hedge, An Investment - 11th Jun 21
What Drives Gold Prices? (Don't Say "the Fed!") - 11th Jun 21
Why You Need to Buy and Hold Gold Now - 11th Jun 21
Big Pharma Is Back! Biotech Skyrockets On Biogen’s New Alzheimer Drug Approval - 11th Jun 21
Top 5 AI Tech Stocks Trend Analysis, Buying Levels, Ratings and Valuations - 10th Jun 21
Gold’s Inflation Utility - 10th Jun 21
The Fuel Of The Future That’s 9 Times More Efficient Than Lithium - 10th Jun 21
Challenges facing the law industry in 2021 - 10th Jun 21
SELL USDT Tether Before Ponzi Scheme Implodes Triggering 90% Bitcoin CRASH in Cryptos Lehman Bros - 9th Jun 21
Stock Market Sentiment Speaks: Prepare For Volatility - 9th Jun 21
Gold Mining Stocks: Which Door Will Investors Choose? - 9th Jun 21
Fed ‘Taper’ Talk Is Back: Will a Tantrum Follow? - 9th Jun 21
Scientists Discover New Renewable Fuel 3 Times More Powerful Than Gasoline - 9th Jun 21
How do I Choose an Online Trading Broker? - 9th Jun 21
Fed’s Tools are Broken - 8th Jun 21
Stock Market Approaching an Intermediate peak! - 8th Jun 21
Could This Household Chemical Become The Superfuel Of The Future? - 8th Jun 21
The Return of Inflation. Can Gold Withstand the Dark Side? - 7th Jun 21
Why "Trouble is Brewing" for the U.S. Housing Market - 7th Jun 21
Stock Market Volatility Crash Course (VIX vs VVIX) – Learn How to Profit From Volatility - 7th Jun 21
Computer Vision Is Like Investing in the Internet in the ‘90s - 7th Jun 21
MAPLINS - Sheffield Down Memory Lane, Before the Shop Closed its Doors for the Last Time - 7th Jun 21
Wire Brush vs Block Paving Driveway Weeds - How Much Work, Nest Way to Kill Weeds? - 7th Jun 21
When Markets Get Scared and Reverse - 7th Jun 21
Is A New Superfuel About To Take Over Energy Markets? - 7th Jun 21

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How to Protect your Wealth by Investing in AI Tech Stocks

Eight Ways to Tell If You Should Hold or Fold Your Mutual Fund Investment

InvestorEducation / Learning to Invest Jun 08, 2010 - 05:39 AM GMT

By: Money_Morning

InvestorEducation

Best Financial Markets Analysis ArticleLarry D. Spears writes: With the whipsaw patterns U.S. stocks have experienced in recent weeks - both the Dow Jones Industrial Average and Standard & Poor's 500 Index are down 12% from their highs for the year - even the most ardent buy-and-hold investors are studying their portfolios, searching for holdings to cull.


But what if your buy-and-hold strategy has been implemented using mutual funds? As part of a solid "defensive-investing" review, should you consider bailing out of your current mutual-fund holdings at this point and start looking for better funds to ride into any future recovery?

You'll only know if you take the time to make the review. And you should take that time.
In this two-part story - this is Part II - we examine the eight questions to ask yourself as you attempt to determine whether your mutual fund still fits you - or whether it's time to move in another direction. Part I appeared yesterday (Monday).

Here are the remaining questions mutual-fund investors need to ask:

4. Has the performance disparity upset your portfolio balance? Over time, economic conditions and differences in the performance of various market sectors - and the funds in your portfolio that track them - can cause asset-allocation percentages to diverge from your desired levels. For example, a couple of big winners by your speculative fund manager might put 20% of your assets in that category, rather than the 10% you want - leaving a smaller proportion for other categories, such as income.

Dealing with this situation - and preventing it from getting worse (further out of balance) - demands that you adjust your holdings on a periodic basis, a process known as rebalancing. If you have just one fund in an "over-weighted" segment of your portfolio, you would sell some of your shares and reinvest the proceeds in existing or new funds in a different, currently "under-weighted" category. If you have more than one fund in a sector that has become over-weighted, sell the weakest performer in the group.

When should you do this rebalancing? There are several schools of thought. Some advisors suggest following a regular schedule - say, every 18 months to two years, if needed - while others suggest doing it after the market has experienced major rallies or after specific sectors have pushed the weightings in some categories to new highs.

Whichever approach you choose, be sure to factor tax consequences into the equation; having to pay too much to Uncle Sam - or having to pay that extra levy at the wrong time - could negate the benefits of rebalancing.

5. Are your fund's fees going up? Mutual funds are generally considered longer-term investments and, over time, even small increases in fund fees and expenses can eat away at your long-term returns.

Fee increases can result from numerous factors. Sometimes, it's simple greed by the fund managers. Other times, it can signal a drop in operating efficiency. Rising expense ratios can also be the result of excess redemptions, with a fund raising annual fees because it has to spread its expenses out over fewer shareholders. This was responsible for a huge wave of fund-fee hikes after investors bailed out of the stock market in late 2008 and early 2009.

Whatever the cause, fund fees have trended higher in recent years. According to Morningstar.com (Nasdaq: MORN), today's average annual fund expense fee is 1.34% of assets. That's down slightly from 1.38% in 2000, but well above the Morningstar estimate of 1.18% for 1990.

All funds charge fees - even those, such as index funds, that aren't actively managed. So you shouldn't automatically sell when a fund increases its expenses, especially if the fund company offers a reasonable justification. By the same token, you shouldn't pay more for less performance. If fees are going up and returns are going down, look for a lower-cost fund in the same sector.

The same applies to sales charges. Paying a high "load" without a good reason makes little sense given the number of no-load funds out there that perform well for less - and often with greater efficiency.

6. Are you happy with the fund's manager? When you place your money into a mutual fund, you're putting a certain amount of faith in the manager's expertise and knowledge - talents you hope will lead to an outstanding return on an investment that fits your investment goals. If the fund performs well, the manager generally gets your praise - and, if it doesn't, he or she gets the blame (deserved or not).

However, evaluating portfolio managers isn't quite that simple. Some do very well when the market is suffering, then lag when the market turns higher. Others outperform on bullish moves, but slide to the bottom of the rankings in downturns. A very few outperform in up and down markets alike.

In the end, what most investors prefer is a manager who can achieve a balance over time - maybe not the best in good times and certainly not the worst in bad. What very few want to see is a change in their fund's manager.

As already noted, some managers leave on their own job, riding your fund's success to new opportunities. Others get the boot, usually due to poor performance. Either way, a change in managers will likely lead to at least modest changes in the fund's style and in its results; after all, the new manager will want to "make his own mark" with the fund.

Just as two to three years of patience may be needed for a good fund gone bad to recover, you should resist the urge to immediately leave a fund just because of a change in managers. It typically takes at least six months for a new manager to restructure his predecessor's portfolio. So you probably needn't worry about a further dip in returns before that. At the same time, however, you can't expect to see an immediate improvement in results.

How long you give a new manager to prove himself after that depends on his past performance - which the fund will publicize when the appointment is made - and his early results in this new job. If both are good, hold your shares for a year or two; if either makes you nervous, switch sooner.

7. Are you familiar with the fund's board - and do you approve of the board members' actions? Most investors know about the individual or team that manages their fund's portfolio, and they're familiar with the management firm that runs their fund's "family" and sells its shares. What many investors don't realize is that both must answer to the fund's Board of Trustees, which is legally responsible for evaluating fund performance, hiring and firing managers and setting shareholder fees.

That fact got major attention in late March, when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled (in Jones v. Harris Associates) that fund managers can continue to set fees according to past standards, but must provide justification to the boards of trustees whenever fees charged to retail fund customers are higher than those assessed to institutional clients.

Recent studies had indicated fees for retail-fund shareholders are often double those of institutions, which has led critics of the fund-management system to charge that boards of trustees aren't doing their jobs. The critics cite close ties between trustees and fund operators, the fact that some boards oversee dozens - or, in some cases, even hundreds - of funds, and that boards rarely fire fund managers, even when the fund's performance is dreadful.

The ruling sparked much discussion at the national meeting of mutual fund executives in Washington in early May, with some observers predicting that trustees will:

•Be pressured into conducting much stricter oversight of fund operations.
•Be more closely reviewing managers' relationships with institutional clients.
•Eventually have to mandate lower fees.
"They're not going to want to get sued," Ben Phillips, a partner and the director of research for management-consulting firm Casey Quirk & Associates LLC, told FoxBusiness.com.

Others didn't see the ruling leading to major changes, noting that U.S. mutual fund fees are already among the lowest in the world.

"The ruling seems to presume directors have never looked at differential fees in the past, and that's not the case," Bruce Crockett, chairman of the board that oversees the Invesco Ltd. (NYSE: IVZ) family of funds, told FoxBusiness. "I don't see how this [the ruling] changes much."

Crockett doesn't see a big increase in the number of portfolio managers being fired by trustees for poor performance, calling the replacement of a manager "a nuclear option."
One way some companies ensure directors closely watch out for shareholder interests is to require board members to invest in the funds they govern, but a recent survey of America's largest fund companies found that most merely encourage directors to own shares rather than requiring it.

There's also a move afoot to get the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to change its rule regarding independent oversight of fund operations. The current rules require 40% of a fund board's seats to be held by independent directors, but a change would apparently have little impact since a survey last year found that independent directors already make up three-quarters of fund boards in nearly 90% of fund companies. Almost two-thirds of fund companies also have boards with independent chairpersons.

As an individual shareholder, you really have no easy way to determine how strongly your fund's board stands up for your rights. But if the fund shows a recent trend toward rising fees coupled with marginal performance, something's likely amiss with the fund's oversight and you may want to consider a switch.

8. Do your funds continue to meet your goals? When you're just getting started in the investment world, mutual funds serve a valuable purpose, providing you with a level of diversification and access to securities and asset classes you otherwise couldn't afford. But as you gain experience and acquire more wealth, you may prefer to invest directly and manage your own portfolio. If you're moving into that phase in your investment career, that alone may be reason enough to start moving out of funds.

Similarly, as you age, your life goals change, and that - more than performance - can prompt a "Sell" decision. Do you need cash for a child's college, a new house, or some other purpose? Do you need income for retirement rather than growth? Are you becoming more conservative and feel you can no longer handle the volatility of high-tech or other speculative funds? Does your current tax situation make selling more affordable at this time?

Any change in your investment or life goals is a good time to consider a mutual fund sale - and only you can provide the answers to the many possible questions involved in your decision.

This article provides a lot of useful guidelines, but you have to tailor them to your own situation - and adjust them as needed.

As John Bonnanzio, group editor of the newsletter "Fidelity Insight," often says: "I think the first rule ... when it comes to buying or selling any actively managed fund, [is that] all rules are meant to be broken."

Which leads to one final tip: If you know you don't have the patience to give new managers a chance, endure occasional poor returns and wait two or three years for good funds to recover, you may want to sell all of your actively managed funds. You may get better results - and sleep more soundly - by relying on index funds.

[Editors' Note: For a sidebar on this story that appears elsewhere in today's issue of Money Morning, please click here. For other stories in Money Morning's "Defensive Investing" series, please click here.]

Source: http://moneymorning.com/2010/06/08/defensive-investing-3/

Money Morning/The Money Map Report

©2010 Monument Street Publishing. All Rights Reserved. Protected by copyright laws of the United States and international treaties. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution (electronic or otherwise, including on the world wide web), of content from this website, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of Monument Street Publishing. 105 West Monument Street, Baltimore MD 21201, Email: customerservice@moneymorning.com

Disclaimer: Nothing published by Money Morning should be considered personalized investment advice. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized investent advice. We expressly forbid our writers from having a financial interest in any security recommended to our readers. All of our employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication, or 72 hours after the mailing of printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended by Money Morning should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Money Morning Archive

© 2005-2019 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in