Smoking Gun: Global Food Waste Debunks Overpopulation Theory And Humanitarian Aid
Politics / Food Crisis Jan 21, 2014 - 09:38 AM GMTBy: Sharon_Kayser
  
    
Would it be all about money again? To find out, let's follow Alice down the   rabbit hole...
 
  
    
   
Would it be all about money again? To find out, let's follow Alice down the   rabbit hole...
(countdown: time to choose Empathy over Fear)
The UN is quite a paradox onto itself as its reports continue to deliver excellent mathematical clues as why the system 'is clearly designed to fail'. Yes, you read well and instead of trying to patch its cracks getting larger and deeper it is about time to admit that Global Oligarchy is a 'cabal' whose century-long timeline has undeniable track records. Finally, the secret is more obvious than never. The flaws and evidence have become too huge to be concealed. Up to these days, not that many are aware that the UN (the ultimate aim of the cabal) was engineered by the very same club of elitist financiers that plotted the rise and downfall of the Soviets in order to replace Communism with its sugarcoated version, renamed Socialism. Isn't the 'Communist Manifesto' in favor of almighty elites ruling over the means of production (7th Plank), progressive taxation (2nd Plank) and centralization of credit (5th Plank) after all? As we shall see, Karl Marx must be laughing in his grave as you read this. This column isn't meant to take side but demonstrate that the system is utterly broken - beyond repair - and that we have to let it go in order to rebuild a new one from scratch. What kind of a system do we have left but Capitalism, would you ask? It is about time to quit thinking in these terms. The Right vs Left paradigm is a diversion preventing from seeing what is really going on while truth is hidden in plain sight. However, this being said, genuine Capitalism has never existed for long periods of time over the course of Human History and thus remains above all a theory for scholars and economists to fight over. Moreover, our current system has nothing to do with Capitalism at all, in a way a movement such as 'Occupy Wallstreet', against Capitalism, is mis/disinformed. This being said and let's face it: what we now globally have is a 'Fascistic Triumvira' composed of corporations, central banks and governments that have caged the Human Race in a prison that is so vast that bars and fences are invisible.
Although this investigation aims at delving into the deception that is 'food waste', it is useful to mention that 'water waste' too is a highly disturbing topic that will be thoroughly investigated in a future column. For the moment, just remember that the UN Food and Agriculture Organization report (FAO) indicates that we currently extract less than 10% of the 43,750 cubic kilometers of fresh water(see 1st link next paragraph) returned each year to the Earth's rivers, lakes and aquifers. One inevitable question pops into mind: is this just plain carelessness or eco-terrorism? How does it come that despite the so many technological advances, the so-called rich West hasn't been more efficient at redistributing our 'blue gold' which Life depends upon but can spend trillions on standing armies? Is taxation a scheme for collateral destruction? As a matter of fact, aquifers can be found almost everywhere. It is more about how deep one is willing to drill to reach them. The climate change argument stands no chance here. The most cynical perhaps is that the 'sodas industry' unscrupulously exploits aquifers to manufacture their drinks (poisoned with high corn syrup and hazardous dyes) and which are bottled in plastic containing some 24,000 chemicals wrecking our bodies havoc . So much for our world CEOs and lawmakers who are supposed to have graduated in the most prestigious colleges. Could education itself turn out being a massive hoax?
Now back to our 'food waste' issue. The same FAO, along with the Stockholm International Water Institute and the International Water Management Institute concluded that close to half of all foods produced worldwide – are wasted after production. Another source mentions that some 54 percent of the world's food wastage occurs during production, post-harvest handling and storage, while 46 percent occurs at the processing, distribution and consumption stages. And of course, these large quantities of wasted food go along with an equal amount of wasted water. What is truly interesting and appalling at once here is that while the waste happens at the consumer level in industrialized countries, developing countries are dominated by high losses at the post-harvest and processing stage. The absurdity here is that Western organizations probing food waste in poor countries accuse a lack of efficient technology and modern infrastructure. Exactly what do enjoy high-income countries. Additionally, another FAO report claims that 1/3 of the food (representing £470bn economic loss and 3.3bn tonnes of CO2 emissions globally every year) produced never reaches our plates and we'd need 50% more food to feed world populations by 2030. Do you see the aberration and hypocrisy at play here? We do not have an overpopulation problem but a failure of leadership... though we must start wondering: if it has gone that bad, do we actually need 'people to tell us what to do, organize and control our food chain? It is time to take a deep breath in and carefully analyze this because the answer is very crucial, the latter will eventually determine the fate of Mankind. We stand at crossroads and they are only two directions possible. One of which is headed toward self-extinction, and the other, reclaiming our Sovereignty.
Produce and die anyway! While many, who do not grasp the ill-effects linked to our food chain, might think that it would be easier to sue corporations all together to resolve the outrageous conundrum, it doesn't work that way as multinationals operate for profits. Food retailers have the habit to shift their losses on to the consumers, all of which in the form of inflation. Additionally, retailers also contribute to waste as a result of their contractual arrangements with suppliers. Failure to supply agreed quantities renders farmers or processors liable to have their contracts canceled. As a consequence, they plan to produce more than actually required to meet the contract, to have a margin of error. Surplus production is often simply disposed. Under such coercive business attitudes, it is easy to figure out why farmers and retailers too cause food spikes. They too have commitments to meet. Sure, there are other deceiving and irrational factors behind price hikes -such as unnecessary strict sell-by dates, buy-one-get-one free and the demand for cosmetically perfect food - but if supermarkets throw out food or donate it to food banks, at the end of the day, it really wouldn't make any difference: they must keep Wall Street Shareholders happy. Reporting honestly such staggering losses would cause a global stock market crash overnight. The fear factor helps evil prosper. Lawmakers as well as the consumers want to keep their jobs. So, until this unsustainable framework collapases under its own weight, lies and food inflation are here to stay, it is just too bad for consumers. Those who don't have a garden or access to a local farm will be the first to starve when 'reality' sets in. But don't you worry, meanwhile Queen Elizabeth and Obama have their own gardens since 2009.
The Century of The   Self and its pursuit of happiness 'spelling doom'. As a matter of fact, the   structure of our food chain rests on the factories and retailers which must keep   us into a consuming frenzy mode as if there were no tomorrows. Look at the   amount of food oriented TV commercials and ads in magazines. Our lives are   enchained to theirs but it only can end at the expense of the many since nobody   can live on 'borrowed times' for ever. One thing is certain though, eventually   Western central banks will pull the plug on our highway living on credit which   they induced in the first place. 
  
  The intended failure of humanitarian   aid. The topic of food waste alone is enough to grasp that aid is colonialism in   disguise. Of course, there is always someone or something to blame for when it   is not working according to plans, but lets take a look at the fundamental   dynamics of humanitarian aid. Most colonies were left on the brink of ruin and   in the hands of (Western friendly) dictators after their independence on   purpose. So the concept of 'Humanitarian Aid' could be invented. The hugest   downside of 'Humanitarian Aid' is that it depresses a country's economy by   slowing down factories. And who says less production, says less jobs. Then 'the   velocity of money' sets the downward spiral into motion. And because the   economy is kept (artificially) depressed, there is less tax revenues, and   governments are forced into odious   and illegitimate debts to operate, which only make the matters worst. It   goes without saying that such governments are very weak and thus subjected to be   overthrown unexpectedly. This generally leads to a currency breakdown (with risk   of civil wars or guerrillas fighting), which turns out being a huge bounty for   Western corporations since the economic conditions allow them to buy everything   for pennies on the dollar. So indeed, under such circumstances, how could   developing countries prevent food waste better? How can they improve their   infrastructure? And further, what does it tell about our Humanitarian   Organizations? How can the The American Red Cross CEO accept an over half a   million dollar salary, and that of the UNICEF receive more than $1 million   without feeling any remorse? Let's now digress a little bit: and what about the   best paid religious   NGOs leaders. Take a look at the top 25 compensation   packages while you are at it, it is only one click away. Obviously, Charity   Inc has its own elites' inner circle. What do we make of all those pictures of   starving children appearing on our TV screens on regular basis? The scandal of   humanitarian and foreign aid alike is so appalling that it should rightfully   make us wonder about the concept of 'enforced generosity' embodied by the   Welfare State. Volunteering and acting locally is the only way to make it   worthwhile. Of course, this alarming food waste, plays into the hands of   humanitarian organizations. The only core question here remains: why didn't they   see anything coming?
A Closer Look At The Global Madness
Using 2011 retail prices, the avoidable food waste in the United States (for the year 2009) has a total retail value of 197.7 billion USD. Consumer waste alone amounts to 124.1 billion USD, or nearly 63 percent of the total retail value of wasted food (Venkat 2011). Danielle Nierenberg co-project director of the Worldwatch Institute contends that 31 million tons end in landfills or incinerators each year. That's roughly equivalent to the weight of 74 Golden Gate bridges!
  With   47 million on food stamps, American is literally becoming a Food   Stamp Nation. CBS reported last September that The House has voted to cut nearly $4 billion a year from food stamps, a 5% reduction to   the nation's main feeding program used by more than 1 in 7 Americans: this will   force 47.7m People to live on less than one   meal a day. The cost of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program -SNAP- has   more than doubled since 2008, coming to nearly $78 billion last year.   (washingtonpost/2013/09/23). While this clearly shows that the SNAP doesn't   address the food waste and is thus a mere scheme to waste taxpayers' money, a   pertinent question surfaces: why aren't food stamp recipients allowed to get   their groceries directly from their local food banks instead? Don't worry, it   will simply never happen as long as profit-ponzi economics is being implemented.   Meanwhile Doctors   lobby against food stamp reductions. 
  
  Obesity becoming a plague in   the so-called rich nations. As a response, the British grocery giant Tesco vowed   on 21.10.2013 to reduce the nearly 60,000 tons of food wasted by its suppliers   and shoppers each year. As part of the measures, Tesco said it would end a range   of multiple-buy offers, which encourage consumers to over-buy. Simultaneously,   studies show that western countries consume every day a surplus of 1400 calories   per person for a total of 150   trillion calories a year. The article continues: 'Times have changed,   overabundance times are over and the costs of this irresponsible and inefficient   behavior are increasing. The world population has grown tenfold and hunger is   still persistent and growing –also in Europe-, the EU has constant and   unsustainable yearly deficit of 75 million tons of biomass with the rest of the   world, the costs of disposal for waste continue to increase and EU legislation   pushes in prevention'. We should all shake our heads in disbelief here. So not   only seeds are manipulated genetically (think Monsanto), crops are too sprayed   with various pesticides, food getting additional chemical treatments and   irradiated during processing, all of which destroys nutrients and causes   cravings, making us sick and putting on weight. You see, corporations cash in on   all ends of spectrum. Big Pharma Inc, is there to help. Have you ever heard, by   any chance, a commercial on TV praising healthy and balanced diets with organic   wholesome foods then citing all the side effects of conventional supermarket   items? If they do so when featuring prescription drugs, why not about food?   Under such circumstances, what to think of the pharmaceutical, diet and fitness   industries? Many people have no idea how dire our situation really is. 
  
  Same gloomy picture in the UK and EU. One-fifth of what households buy   ends up as waste, and around 60% of that could have been eaten, according to a   report from the government’s waste advisory group, Wrap.   (theguardian.com/environment/2013). In Britain every year 18 million tonnes of   food still perfectly edible are thrown away by households alone for an annual   retail value cost of 14 billion pounds: at the same time 4 million people in the   UK do not have access to a healthy diet (zerowasteeurope.eu/2010/12). Wasting food and hunger side by side is scandalous. In France only,   each citizen throws away every year 7kgs of food still in the original package   when in the same country, 8 million people are at risk of poverty. 
  
  In   March 2013, according to a study by the European Commission, 89 million tonnes or 179 Kg per capita of food are   wasted every year in the European Union. By 2020 this could increase by over   40%. Well, cynically we should rejoice at the prospect that if the IMF 10% Supertax Bail-in   Proposal on all Eurozone household savings, is passed, such an increase will   most likely not come true... but let's not fool ourselves: in this economic   environment, less buying will too result in more food price inflation. However,   inflation cannot go on forever. At some point, hyperinflation sets in and   completely destroys the purchasing power. 
  
  In Sub-Saharan Africa alone,   up to 150kgs of food produced is lost per person every year, according to FAO   research.(guardian.uk). In the region, there are at least 265 million people   hungry, heightening the travesty of the food waste problem. More than a quarter   of the food produced in Africa spoils before it is eaten. 
  
  As China has   enjoyed a boom over the past two decades, food waste has too become a major   concern. According to WorldWatch Institute, more than $32 billion of food is   thrown away in China annually, although 128 million Chinese live below the   poverty line and often lack sufficient food. (usa.chinadaily.com). But that's   China only. An estimated 42 percent of the fruit and vegetables and 20 percent   of the grain produced in the Asia Pacific region are lost or wasted. In short: 1.3 billion ton of food, enough to feed 3 billion   people - are lost annually. 
  
  More banking data. While the West gets   fatter and sicker, The World Bank   Food Price Index rose by 60 percent in the course of just a few months of   2008, and international prices of maize, rice, and wheat increased by 70   percent, 180 percent, and 120 percent, respectively, compared to the   mid-2007. Between 2000 and 2012, the World Bank global food price index increased   104.5 percent, at an average annual rate of 6.5 percent. But the spikes   affect everything. For example: The wholesale price index (WPI), India's main   inflation measure, climbed to 6.46 percent last month - its fastest rate since   February - pushed up by food prices such as a 322 percent jump in onion prices,   government data showed (Reuters: 10.14.13). Here the inflation index just   follows the supply and demand, though it is outrageously misleading as we throw   out food like never before. As you can see, inflation also causes scarcity since   everything becomes more expensive. It should be obvious to all by now that The   World Bank pretends to address a distress that it helps sustain in the first   place. The squeeze can only worsen and there is a brick wall forming on the   horizon. 
  
  Rightfully, the UN   warns of looming worldwide food crisis in 2013... and we can trust that with   such trends, the threat hasn't gone away. Rising food prices will threaten   disaster and unrest and much of it will be blamed on the global warming.   Although records show that earth temperatures have never been constant, such a   blatant pillage and waste of resources will never be admitted by our so-called   lawmakers. However, this UN statement is very enlightening and proves we cannot   trust the organization. The UN perfectly knows the prime cause of food waste but   then double-speaks as if it never read the investigations of its own FAO   department. 
  
  To add to the injury, the hypocritical UN claims that: 
  'We've not been producing as much as we are consuming'. Supplies are now   very tight across the world and reserves are at a very low level, leaving no   room for unexpected events next year," said Abdolreza Abbassian, a senior   economist with the FAO.... The UN figures come as one of the world's leading   environmentalists, Lester Brown, president of the Earth Policy Research Center   in Washington, says that the climate is no longer reliable and the demands for   food are growing so fast that a breakdown is inevitable... the global food   supply system could collapse at any point, leaving hundreds of millions more   people hungry, sparking widespread riots and bringing down governments. Lester   goes on: Food shortages undermined earlier civilizations. We are on the same   path. Each country is now fending for itself. The world is living one year to   the next,' he writes in a new book. According to Lester Brown, we are seeing the   start of a food supply breakdown with a dash by speculators to "grab" millions   of square miles of cheap farmland, the doubling of international food prices in   a decade, and the dramatic rundown of countries' food reserves. 
  
  THE   SMOKING GUN. While we shouldn't trust global warming theories too fast, Lester   Brown knows that the system is predatory and pretends to play the visionary.   This is the sobering and revolting outcome awaiting us around the corner. It   is what globalization has always meant to be about. Last April,   worldwatch.org established that the global population grew by 3.8 billion or   122.9 percent between 1961 and 2010, net per capita food production increased by 49   percent over this period. This is a smoking gun: the two-digit number   just mentioned matches our current global food waste! And this figure   doesn't take into account the yearly 15 trillion calories surplus in the West   stipulated above? Overpopulation theory is (another) mega deception which makes   people hope for wars. Have you ever heard :'we need a war, we can't feed the   whole planet anymore'? Such a train of thoughts comes from either ignorance,   intellectual laziness or a lack of access to information. 
  
  The Insanity   of Our Food Policy. The former World bank economist, Joseph Stiglitz, sheds more   light on farms   subsidies in America that have been implemented since the Great Depression   and which can be illustrated with the slogan 'taking from the poor to subsidize   the rich'. The slogan is now a worldwide fact. Although Stiglitz unfortunately   agrees that those subsidies were necessary when the depression was raging, he   misses the mark. What really caused the Great Depression that rippled through   Europe is the credit binge fueled by the Federal Reserve which also is   responsible for the 2008 crash, which in turn exposed the derivatives industry   as the ultimate pool of toxic assets that contaminated the Old Continent and   even countries like Iceland. The MSM will never tell us how the current US and   European financial crises dire are. It is however puzzling that Stiglitz who   came out as a whistleblower more than a decade ago to decries the WB actions in   developing countries (aimed at land grabbing on a large scale after saddling   countries with more debts they could possibly repay), will not say that this   very same scenario now playing everywhere in developing and developed countries   alike. News are being fragmented on purpose. It is up to us to assemble the   puzzle. But, forget about Stiglitz and Lester Browm, John Perkins author of 'Confessions of An Economic Hit   Man', a NYtimes best-seller a few years ago, tells it all on youtube. 
  
  Farm subsidies, what are they good for? They simply are designed to   eliminate competition over time. Everybody would support a family farmer but   that's quite another thing to subsidize the expansion of a mega-farm that puts   smaller farms out of business. It is now a fact that mega-farms, the top 10 percent of farmers, collected 74% of all subsidies, amounting to   nearly $166 billion over 16 years! The real winners in the subsidy explosion   since the mid-'90s have clearly been the animal feedlot operators and the   largest corporate mega-farms. Suppliers like Monsanto and big grain traders. The   bottom 80% of recipients averaged just $587 a year. Mega-farms pocket billions   of dollars while food waste is at record high... do the maths? Who benefits?   Organic sellout: USDA guts   organic rules to Protect (animal) Mega-Farms. The UK, this is much of the   same: 'mega   farms' help keep food prices down, say experts (11/2013). Prices low? At the   expense of society? By the way, did you know that among the number of landowners   claiming a slice of the £3.5bn   subsidy in the UK, EU subsidy recipients include the Queen and the Duke of   Westminster? Mega-Farms do not only bankrupt smaller competitors, they also are toxic at many levels, not to mention the rampant animal abuse. 
Recently Bloomberg.com wrote that The World's 2170 Billionaires Control $33 Trillion In Net Worth, Double The US GDP. What the article didn't speak of is the 'Armada of Millionaires and Multimillionaires' working either directly with or for them. They've got what they always wanted: the privtization of the world. And all this was done in the broad daylight while we were burying our heads into the sand, hypnotizing ourselves with 'the laws of attraction' or 'don't speak of evil, just ignore it and it will go away' type of thinking, running on the debt treadmill to make ends meet or buy the latest IT gadgets, watching dumbing down reality TV shows or Hollywood Super-Heroes type of entertainment, boozing, over-eating and... carelessly wasting food.
ADDENDUM: Philosophy Before Ecology To Address Food Waste - and call to abolish usury
(To be continued - next: Smoking Gun II - 'Water Waste Debunks Climate Change')
By Sharon Kayser
http://empathyascurrency.blogspot.co.uk
Sharon Kayser, screenwriter, works with the Award winning documentary film maker Danny Schechter. Her dramatization DEBT INC is available for sale. Her goal is to organise monthly workshops in Manhattan sponsored by your donations, and which will start in August this year. In her spare time she is an autodidact embracing futuristic concepts such as The Venus Project.
© 2014 Copyright Sharon Kayser - All Rights Reserved Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors.
© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.
	

  