Best of the Week
Most Popular
1. TESLA! Cathy Wood ARK Funds Bubble BURSTS! - 12th May 21
2.Stock Market Entering Early Summer Correction Trend Forecast - 10th May 21
3.GOLD GDX, HUI Stocks - Will Paradise Turn into a Dystopia? - 11th May 21
4.Crypto Bubble Bursts! Nicehash Suspends Coinbase Withdrawals, Bitcoin, Ethereum Bear Market Begins - 16th May 21
5.Crypto Bubble BURSTS! BTC, ETH, XRP CRASH! NiceHash Seizes Funds on Account Halting ALL Withdrawals! - 19th May 21
6.Cathy Wood Ark Invest Funds Bubble BURSTS! ARKK, ARKG, Tesla Entering Severe Bear Market - 13th May 21
7.Stock Market - Should You Be In Cash Right Now? - 17th May 21
8.Gold to Benefit from Mounting US Debt Pile - 14th May 21
9.Coronavius Covid-19 in Italy in August 2019! - 13th May 21
10.How to Invest in HIGH RISK Tech Stocks for 2021 and Beyond - Part 2 of 2 - 18th May 21
Last 7 days
AI Stocks Strength vs Weakness - Why Selling Google or Facebook is a Big Mistake! - 14th Jun 21
The Bitcoin Crime Wave Hits - 14th Jun 21
Gold Time for Consolidation and Lower Volatility - 14th Jun 21
More Banks & Investors Are NOT Believing Fed Propaganda - 14th Jun 21
Market Inflation Bets – Squaring or Not - 14th Jun 21
Is Gold Really an Inflation Hedge? - 14th Jun 21
The FED Holds the Market. How Long Will It Last? - 14th Jun 21
Coinbase vs Binance for Bitcoin, Ethereum Crypto Trading & Investing During Bear Market 2021 - 11th Jun 21
Gold Price $4000 – Insurance, A Hedge, An Investment - 11th Jun 21
What Drives Gold Prices? (Don't Say "the Fed!") - 11th Jun 21
Why You Need to Buy and Hold Gold Now - 11th Jun 21
Big Pharma Is Back! Biotech Skyrockets On Biogen’s New Alzheimer Drug Approval - 11th Jun 21
Top 5 AI Tech Stocks Trend Analysis, Buying Levels, Ratings and Valuations - 10th Jun 21
Gold’s Inflation Utility - 10th Jun 21
The Fuel Of The Future That’s 9 Times More Efficient Than Lithium - 10th Jun 21
Challenges facing the law industry in 2021 - 10th Jun 21
SELL USDT Tether Before Ponzi Scheme Implodes Triggering 90% Bitcoin CRASH in Cryptos Lehman Bros - 9th Jun 21
Stock Market Sentiment Speaks: Prepare For Volatility - 9th Jun 21
Gold Mining Stocks: Which Door Will Investors Choose? - 9th Jun 21
Fed ‘Taper’ Talk Is Back: Will a Tantrum Follow? - 9th Jun 21
Scientists Discover New Renewable Fuel 3 Times More Powerful Than Gasoline - 9th Jun 21
How do I Choose an Online Trading Broker? - 9th Jun 21
Fed’s Tools are Broken - 8th Jun 21
Stock Market Approaching an Intermediate peak! - 8th Jun 21
Could This Household Chemical Become The Superfuel Of The Future? - 8th Jun 21
The Return of Inflation. Can Gold Withstand the Dark Side? - 7th Jun 21
Why "Trouble is Brewing" for the U.S. Housing Market - 7th Jun 21
Stock Market Volatility Crash Course (VIX vs VVIX) – Learn How to Profit From Volatility - 7th Jun 21
Computer Vision Is Like Investing in the Internet in the ‘90s - 7th Jun 21
MAPLINS - Sheffield Down Memory Lane, Before the Shop Closed its Doors for the Last Time - 7th Jun 21
Wire Brush vs Block Paving Driveway Weeds - How Much Work, Nest Way to Kill Weeds? - 7th Jun 21
When Markets Get Scared and Reverse - 7th Jun 21
Is A New Superfuel About To Take Over Energy Markets? - 7th Jun 21
Why Tether USDT, Stable Scam Coins Could COLLAPSE the Crypto Markets - Black Swan 2021 - 6th Jun 21
Stock Market: 4 Tips for Investing in Gold - 6th Jun 21
Apple (AAPL) Summer Correction Stock Trend Analysis - 5th Jun 21
Stock Market Sentiment Speaks: I 'Believe' We Rally Into A June Swoon - 5th Jun 21
Stock Market Russell 2000 After Reaching A Trend Channel High Flags Out - 5th Jun 21
Money Is Cheap, Own Gold - 5th Jun 21
Bitcoin and Ravencoin Cryptos CRASH Bear Market Buying Levels Price Targets - 4th Jun 21

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How to Protect your Wealth by Investing in AI Tech Stocks

Dow Stock Market Bottom or Dead Cat Bounce?

Stock-Markets / Stocks Bear Market Mar 09, 2009 - 03:15 AM GMT

By: Andrew_Butter

Stock-Markets Best Financial Markets Analysis ArticleAccording to my calculation the DJIA is currently selling for about 40% of its long-term equilibrium value. That doesn't mean that prices won't go down, but I don't think they will go down very much more; for a few reasons, not least that following the 1929 Crash prices bottomed (my calculation) at 39% of long-term equilibrium value.


Early January I predicted 25% down on end 2008, so Friday was significant for me because the markets hovered around that number. If that was the bottom I was right, although I would have been wrong about the timing, I didn't expect this until 2010.

Perhaps I got it completely wrong?

Outside of the chartists there are, as always, two camps. There are some traders who are saying that the market will turn soon, one I respect is Steve Leuthold of the Grizzly Short Fund who made 75% gain shorting over the past year. He came on Bloomberg last week and said that now is not the time to short, i.e. "don't buy my fund". That's a lot more believable as a prediction than one that ends up "do buy my fund". But he's not going long either; or at least that's what he said...(maybe he lied)?

The other camp is looking at P/E ratios, which bottomed at below 7 on three previous occasions in the past 100 years. They point out that P/E now is about 15 which is only slightly shy of its long term average and on top of that, earnings are going down.

If that argument is right the Dow could bottom at 3,000 and the S&P 500 could bottom at 300 or so, less than half where they are today.

It's a compelling argument, but I don't believe it.

Gut feeling...my "Blink Instinct" says, "go with Steve". But none of us has been here before, even Steve, even though it looks like he's been around the block more than a couple of times. So gut feeling might be deceptive, we all rationalize what we want to believe.

My logic, which I trust less than my gut, is as follows:

1: This may sound completely asinine, but P/E as a predictor of price it is dimensionally incorrect. What we are talking about here is a price at which the market turns. "P" divided by "E" is not the same dimension as "P". It's like saying "(one apple + two oranges = three oranges)".

The correct dimension for PRICE (apart from what's on the price-tag today) is either:

(a) Some measure of future earnings, (or dividend, or net free cash flow, take your pick - and that could be a prediction, the company projections, or the last ten years, take your pick on that too), divided by an interest rate, preferably a long one. That's got dimensions "E" divided by interest rates, "I".

(b) And/or some variation of Book (net assets less liabilities), preferably worked out using depreciated replacement cost not mark-to-market (which defeats the whole point). Working that out is tricky, particularly for intangibles like brand value, (and what gets written up as Book, isn't necessarily that number - it's a construct based on tax codes).

Where you are trying to reach is an estimate for where the market would be IF the market was working properly, that's the base line. The assumption is that in periods of uncertainty and fear, (or debt fuelled recklessness), the market does not properly reflect value. Knowing where that point is, at least gives a landmark, like when you go surfing, you pick a spot on the shore to tell you how far you drifted.

2: The basic logic for the P/E argument, as far as I can see, is that the "Black Swan" this time will look just like the ones last time, all three of them in the past 100 Years.

That just does not make any sense to me; it's one thing to base a prediction on a thousand points of data, but THREE points? I thought what that book says is that even with a thousand points there is a 0.1% chance (or something) that you get to go 20 Standard Deviations from the mean (actually a P/E of 7 is "only" 1.4 standard deviations from the 100 year mean). I don't dispute that markets deviate from the mean, what worries me is basing a conclusion on three points of data.

3. Chad Brand pointed out correctly that the times that P/E ratios were low, earnings were through the roof (http://seekingalpha.com/article/124672). Nowadays things are bouncing around so much you don't even really know what earnings are, and the point is not what they are today, it's what they will be.

You still need to reconcile the P&L to the balance sheet, and that's based on what these days?...Mark-to-market! That's great, talk about basing a projection on dependant variables! In my opinion you would be better basing a price on brand value than the junk that comes out accounting profession with an SEC stamp on it these days (and don't forget, it was lousy valuations that got us here in the first place).

4: Run a regression of "E" against "P" for 100 years, and you get garbage, account for interest rates and it gets worse. There is a reason for that (see above).

So, right now, according my "Opinion of Value" based strictly on International Valuation Standards is that the Dow (and the S&P and whatever - they track), is exactly 159% of the PRICE (price is 38% of value).

That's a buy, perhaps not today, and right now my model (which said SELL/SHORT on 17th September 2008 (it got that right)), says STICK...but I say, someday soon.

My model also says that after it goes up, it will come down one more time (not to where it is now), before life begins again (earliest 2011).

Then I could be completely wrong, all I can say is that if the Dow goes down below 6,000 I'm going to give up and go fishing (too old and fat to surf now).

But one thing is sure, some time in the future, and hopefully by then all of the Dumb Asses that brought us this mess are either broke, or in jail, or both; life will resume, and in the end of the day, the markets never lie.

By Andrew Butter

Andrew Butter is managing partner of ABMC, an investment advisory firm, based in Dubai ( hbutter@eim.ae ), that he setup in 1999, and is has been involved advising on large scale real estate investments, mainly in Dubai.

© 2009 Copyright Andrew Butter- All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors.

Andrew Butter Archive

© 2005-2019 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in