Most Popular
1. It’s a New Macro, the Gold Market Knows It, But Dead Men Walking Do Not (yet)- Gary_Tanashian
2.Stock Market Presidential Election Cycle Seasonal Trend Analysis - Nadeem_Walayat
3. Bitcoin S&P Pattern - Nadeem_Walayat
4.Nvidia Blow Off Top - Flying High like the Phoenix too Close to the Sun - Nadeem_Walayat
4.U.S. financial market’s “Weimar phase” impact to your fiat and digital assets - Raymond_Matison
5. How to Profit from the Global Warming ClImate Change Mega Death Trend - Part1 - Nadeem_Walayat
7.Bitcoin Gravy Train Trend Forecast 2024 - - Nadeem_Walayat
8.The Bond Trade and Interest Rates - Nadeem_Walayat
9.It’s Easy to Scream Stocks Bubble! - Stephen_McBride
10.Fed’s Next Intertest Rate Move might not align with popular consensus - Richard_Mills
Last 7 days
Friday Stock Market CRASH Following Israel Attack on Iranian Nuclear Facilities - 19th Apr 24
All Measures to Combat Global Warming Are Smoke and Mirrors! - 18th Apr 24
Cisco Then vs. Nvidia Now - 18th Apr 24
Is the Biden Administration Trying To Destroy the Dollar? - 18th Apr 24
S&P Stock Market Trend Forecast to Dec 2024 - 16th Apr 24
No Deposit Bonuses: Boost Your Finances - 16th Apr 24
Global Warming ClImate Change Mega Death Trend - 8th Apr 24
Gold Is Rallying Again, But Silver Could Get REALLY Interesting - 8th Apr 24
Media Elite Belittle Inflation Struggles of Ordinary Americans - 8th Apr 24
Profit from the Roaring AI 2020's Tech Stocks Economic Boom - 8th Apr 24
Stock Market Election Year Five Nights at Freddy's - 7th Apr 24
It’s a New Macro, the Gold Market Knows It, But Dead Men Walking Do Not (yet)- 7th Apr 24
AI Revolution and NVDA: Why Tough Going May Be Ahead - 7th Apr 24
Hidden cost of US homeownership just saw its biggest spike in 5 years - 7th Apr 24
What Happens To Gold Price If The Fed Doesn’t Cut Rates? - 7th Apr 24
The Fed is becoming increasingly divided on interest rates - 7th Apr 24
The Evils of Paper Money Have no End - 7th Apr 24
Stock Market Presidential Election Cycle Seasonal Trend Analysis - 3rd Apr 24
Stock Market Presidential Election Cycle Seasonal Trend - 2nd Apr 24
Dow Stock Market Annual Percent Change Analysis 2024 - 2nd Apr 24
Bitcoin S&P Pattern - 31st Mar 24
S&P Stock Market Correlating Seasonal Swings - 31st Mar 24
S&P SEASONAL ANALYSIS - 31st Mar 24
Here's a Dirty Little Secret: Federal Reserve Monetary Policy Is Still Loose - 31st Mar 24
Tandem Chairman Paul Pester on Fintech, AI, and the Future of Banking in the UK - 31st Mar 24
Stock Market Volatility (VIX) - 25th Mar 24
Stock Market Investor Sentiment - 25th Mar 24
The Federal Reserve Didn't Do Anything But It Had Plenty to Say - 25th Mar 24

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How to Protect your Wealth by Investing in AI Tech Stocks

Did Apple Stock Get Its Groove Back?

Companies / Apple Jun 04, 2014 - 05:11 PM GMT

By: Investment_U

Companies

Tom Sandford writes: It’s official: Google (Nasdaq: GOOG) has surpassed Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL) as the most valuable brand in 2014.

And that’s got Apple fanboys and execs squirming in similar fashion.

Perhaps Apple executives could smell the smoke of incendiary public perception long before they saw the flames. Even before the study came out, the rumor mill was awash with talk of Apple making purchases to blast the company coolness factor into overdrive.


So what product could possibly fill such need for a company and its stakeholders ? Well, Apple called for innovation, and Dr. Dre answered.

Beating the Heat

On May 29, Apple snapped up Beats Electronics LLC, the headphone and audio mastery empire Dre co-created with industry aficionado Jimmy Iovine, for a cool $3 billion.

It’s hard to argue the colorful, ostentatious earphones that sell for $300 a pop aren’t still one of the coolest ways to blow your dough, especially with a constant onslaught of celebrity endorsements (e.g. atop LeBron James’s noggin courtside at the 2008 Beijing Olympics or around Lady Gaga’s alabaster neck).

But was it a wise move, or will the purchase take a bigger bite out of Apple’s core with no guaranteed payoff? Iovine seems to think the former, in a quote released with the acquisition announcement.

“I’ve always known in my heart that Beats belonged with Apple,” said Jimmy Iovine. “The idea when we started the company was inspired by Apple’s unmatched ability to marry culture and technology. Apple’s deep commitment to music fans, artists, songwriters and the music industry is something special.”

But the company has been matched - by Google and other successful tech upstarts - which leaves current and future investors with a hanging question: Can Apple get its groove back?

Capitalizing on Cool

Aside from upping Apple’s Fonzie factor, there is actually a much more tangible reason for Apple’s investment. Though Beats is known primarily for headphones, it also maintains a music streaming service with as many as 250,000 subscribers and 20 million tracks, which was designed to contend with Pandora Media Inc. (Nasdaq: P), Spotify (which is rumored to be planning an $8 billion IPO), and Apple’s iTunes Radio (until recently, that is).

Although the announcement of a possible marriage of between Beats and iTunes subscribers has had a ripple effect on the Internet radio domain, is it really worrying the big boys?

For execs with one of the biggest Internet radio pioneers, Pandora, the answer is no - they don’t expect it to rock the boat on their fairly steady traffic of 8.91% of total radio listeners.

“We did see a slight drop in users from that and since have recovered and continued to grow,” he said, of iTunes Radio at a recent investment conference.

In fact, he doesn’t think Beats, iTunes Radio or Spotify are direct competitors, meaning an iTunes-Beats alliance wouldn’t be much of a worry.

“The connected radio, the lean-back experience, the free, ad-supported part of music listening, that’s Pandora’s domain,” he said. “And we still have a dominant market share and by far the best product.”

The True Cost of Cool

Apple investors should have nothing to fear - to assure a continuing source of cool, Beats’ founders were also part of the package deal, and will become the newest executives added to Apple’s roster. As far as costs to Apple, the venture’s not so risky for a company flush from so much cash on reserve.

Though $3 billion may sound like a significant amount, it may be peanuts to Apple - just 2% of the $150 billion Apple has amassed over the years, according to Forbes.

Pandora investors shouldn’t be surprised to see the stock drop or slow a few points as Apple’s alliance comes to fruition, but with Pandora’s soaring fourth quarter profits and revenue growth of 52%, it may just be a blip on the Internet radio radar.

With Beats, Apple has gained a new foothold in the struggle to stand on the razor’s edge of innovation, but some critics say it simply cuts into Apple’s reputation, according to Bob Lefsetz in Variety.

“We no longer live in an Apple world. Apple dominated music because of the seamless interface of the iPod and iTunes, with the iTunes Store the glue holding it all together,” he writes. “It no longer has a market monopoly. As that dominance erodes, you must come up with a new dominant product, one that hopefully ties all your others together.”

Perhaps Beats will be that acquisition for Apple, but that all depends on consumer response, Apple’s perceived innovation and what LeBron decides to wrap around his ears this season.

Source: http://www.investmentu.com/article/detail/37851/nasdaq-aapl-buys-beats

http://www.investmentu.com

Copyright © 1999 - 2014 by The Oxford Club, L.L.C All Rights Reserved. Protected by copyright laws of the United States and international treaties. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution (electronic or otherwise, including on the world wide web), of content from this website, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of Investment U, Attn: Member Services , 105 West Monument Street, Baltimore, MD 21201 Email: CustomerService@InvestmentU.com

Disclaimer: Investment U Disclaimer: Nothing published by Investment U should be considered personalized investment advice. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized investment advice. We expressly forbid our writers from having a financial interest in any security recommended to our readers. All of our employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended by Investment U should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Investment U Archive

© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in