Most Popular
1. Banking Crisis is Stocks Bull Market Buying Opportunity - Nadeem_Walayat
2.The Crypto Signal for the Precious Metals Market - P_Radomski_CFA
3. One Possible Outcome to a New World Order - Raymond_Matison
4.Nvidia Blow Off Top - Flying High like the Phoenix too Close to the Sun - Nadeem_Walayat
5. Apple AAPL Stock Trend and Earnings Analysis - Nadeem_Walayat
6.AI, Stocks, and Gold Stocks – Connected After All - P_Radomski_CFA
7.Stock Market CHEAT SHEET - - Nadeem_Walayat
8.US Debt Ceiling Crisis Smoke and Mirrors Circus - Nadeem_Walayat
9.Silver Price May Explode - Avi_Gilburt
10.More US Banks Could Collapse -- A Lot More- EWI
Last 7 days
Stock Market Volatility (VIX) - 25th Mar 24
Stock Market Investor Sentiment - 25th Mar 24
The Federal Reserve Didn't Do Anything But It Had Plenty to Say - 25th Mar 24
Stock Market Breadth - 24th Mar 24
Stock Market Margin Debt Indicator - 24th Mar 24
It’s Easy to Scream Stocks Bubble! - 24th Mar 24
Stocks: What to Make of All This Insider Selling- 24th Mar 24
Money Supply Continues To Fall, Economy Worsens – Investors Don’t Care - 24th Mar 24
Get an Edge in the Crypto Market with Order Flow - 24th Mar 24
US Presidential Election Cycle and Recessions - 18th Mar 24
US Recession Already Happened in 2022! - 18th Mar 24
AI can now remember everything you say - 18th Mar 24
Bitcoin Crypto Mania 2024 - MicroStrategy MSTR Blow off Top! - 14th Mar 24
Bitcoin Gravy Train Trend Forecast 2024 - 11th Mar 24
Gold and the Long-Term Inflation Cycle - 11th Mar 24
Fed’s Next Intertest Rate Move might not align with popular consensus - 11th Mar 24
Two Reasons The Fed Manipulates Interest Rates - 11th Mar 24
US Dollar Trend 2024 - 9th Mar 2024
The Bond Trade and Interest Rates - 9th Mar 2024
Investors Don’t Believe the Gold Rally, Still Prefer General Stocks - 9th Mar 2024
Paper Gold Vs. Real Gold: It's Important to Know the Difference - 9th Mar 2024
Stocks: What This "Record Extreme" Indicator May Be Signaling - 9th Mar 2024
My 3 Favorite Trade Setups - Elliott Wave Course - 9th Mar 2024
Bitcoin Crypto Bubble Mania! - 4th Mar 2024
US Interest Rates - When WIll the Fed Pivot - 1st Mar 2024
S&P Stock Market Real Earnings Yield - 29th Feb 2024
US Unemployment is a Fake Statistic - 29th Feb 2024
U.S. financial market’s “Weimar phase” impact to your fiat and digital assets - 29th Feb 2024
What a Breakdown in Silver Mining Stocks! What an Opportunity! - 29th Feb 2024
Why AI will Soon become SA - Synthetic Intelligence - The Machine Learning Megatrend - 29th Feb 2024
Keep Calm and Carry on Buying Quantum AI Tech Stocks - 19th Feb 24

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How to Protect your Wealth by Investing in AI Tech Stocks

The Dummies Guide To Valuing A CDO: Reference Barnett-Hart’s Thesis

Interest-Rates / Credit Crisis 2010 Mar 20, 2010 - 03:01 PM GMT

By: Andrew_Butter

Interest-Rates

Best Financial Markets Analysis ArticleThe “News” over the past eighteen months, is that the people who said that they knew how to do a rating on a CDO (Collateralized Debt Obligation), now say they don’t know how to do that.

And the people who said they knew how to value a CDO, or a RMBS (Residential Mortgaged Backed Security), now say they can’t do that either.


And The Reason Why? Well they realised that in fact they never knew how to do it in the first place, which is why they managed to lose “X” trillion for their employers or customers, which fortunately (for them) the American Taxpayer has agreed to pay back, on account of the fact that people who are completely clueless are essential for the proper functioning of the US economy.

That’s nice.

Although, on reflection, I’m quite glad I don’t pat US taxes.

I was reading A.K. Barnett-Hart’s now famous undergraduate thesis “The Story of the CDO Market Meltdown: An Empirical Analysis”. It’s impressive, it’s also a very well written and easy-to-read account of what happened; you can find a link to it here:

http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2010/03/15/michael-lewiss-the-big-short-read-the-harvard-thesis-instead/

One of her conclusions, based on doing multivariate regression analysis was that the best predictor of a CDO default; is the year it was written, like if it used mortgages written in 2006 and 2007.  I’m not sure if I understood her table right but it looked like she got a 35% R-Squared on that.

Pity she didn’t put in the extent of mispricing of the housing market as a variable (housing was the fundamental asset that collateralized most of those instruments).

For example – here is a plot of data that I eyeballed from one of her charts (Fig 11), plotted against the extent of market mispricing that I calculated in September 2008:

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article6250.html

What that says is essentially confirming what Barnett-Hart was saying, i.e. that when the junk going into the CDO was 2006 or 2007 vintage, well, they blew up; but what that adds is putting a number to it, and identifying the key driver.

The straight line R-Squared is 88% for twenty points of data (love to have the actual but there you go), I suspect though the best-fit is an “S” curve which has a 92% R-Squared.

That’s a pretty similar result to the analysis that I did a while ago:

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article12918.html

That was looking at an analysis that I did of a study done by a team from Columbia University led by Dr. Wei Jiang which as far as I have seen represents the most coherent study of the mortgage market in USA (not as famous as Ms. Barnett-Hart but then she writes really nice, and dare I say it, she is a LOT prettier).

So two pieces of evidence that basically the level of toxicity is a function of how badly the geniuses misread the market mispricing, basically if the LTV you use is about right, then OK, defaults are low, like about zero.

You are a genius – collect $6 billion in fees.

BUT if the value you use for the “L” in the LTV is wrong – like by about 40% too high (I’m talking about reference “Other than Market Value here, not “What you might have sold the asset to some dumb bastard to yesterday” (M-2-M)),  then the chances of a default are well pretty much linear in line with the mispricing.

Except there is an “S-Curve” – which is normal in nature.

I used to work on a toxic-asset-assembly line, my job was to work out “V” , and I’m proud to say that every  “V’ that I worked out was the “V” in ten years time (that I said it would be).

Pretty boring stuff, but if you have money and you want to make you “V” go up, it’s a good idea to know what “V” really is today (outside of the “V” you can get from selling something to someone dumber than you).

Insofar as either rating or valuing a CDO (or any other sort of toxic asset is concerned), what this analysis shows is that 90% of that is about the “V”.

Work out the “V” and well, let the remaining 10% just take care of itself.

By Andrew Butter

Twenty years doing market analysis and valuations for investors in the Middle East, USA, and Europe; currently writing a book about BubbleOmics. Andrew Butter is managing partner of ABMC, an investment advisory firm, based in Dubai ( hbutter@eim.ae ), that he setup in 1999, and is has been involved advising on large scale real estate investments, mainly in Dubai.

© 2010 Copyright Andrew Butter- All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors.

Andrew Butter Archive

© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in