Most Popular
1. It’s a New Macro, the Gold Market Knows It, But Dead Men Walking Do Not (yet)- Gary_Tanashian
2.Stock Market Presidential Election Cycle Seasonal Trend Analysis - Nadeem_Walayat
3. Bitcoin S&P Pattern - Nadeem_Walayat
4.Nvidia Blow Off Top - Flying High like the Phoenix too Close to the Sun - Nadeem_Walayat
4.U.S. financial market’s “Weimar phase” impact to your fiat and digital assets - Raymond_Matison
5. How to Profit from the Global Warming ClImate Change Mega Death Trend - Part1 - Nadeem_Walayat
7.Bitcoin Gravy Train Trend Forecast 2024 - - Nadeem_Walayat
8.The Bond Trade and Interest Rates - Nadeem_Walayat
9.It’s Easy to Scream Stocks Bubble! - Stephen_McBride
10.Fed’s Next Intertest Rate Move might not align with popular consensus - Richard_Mills
Last 7 days
Friday Stock Market CRASH Following Israel Attack on Iranian Nuclear Facilities - 19th Apr 24
All Measures to Combat Global Warming Are Smoke and Mirrors! - 18th Apr 24
Cisco Then vs. Nvidia Now - 18th Apr 24
Is the Biden Administration Trying To Destroy the Dollar? - 18th Apr 24
S&P Stock Market Trend Forecast to Dec 2024 - 16th Apr 24
No Deposit Bonuses: Boost Your Finances - 16th Apr 24
Global Warming ClImate Change Mega Death Trend - 8th Apr 24
Gold Is Rallying Again, But Silver Could Get REALLY Interesting - 8th Apr 24
Media Elite Belittle Inflation Struggles of Ordinary Americans - 8th Apr 24
Profit from the Roaring AI 2020's Tech Stocks Economic Boom - 8th Apr 24
Stock Market Election Year Five Nights at Freddy's - 7th Apr 24
It’s a New Macro, the Gold Market Knows It, But Dead Men Walking Do Not (yet)- 7th Apr 24
AI Revolution and NVDA: Why Tough Going May Be Ahead - 7th Apr 24
Hidden cost of US homeownership just saw its biggest spike in 5 years - 7th Apr 24
What Happens To Gold Price If The Fed Doesn’t Cut Rates? - 7th Apr 24
The Fed is becoming increasingly divided on interest rates - 7th Apr 24
The Evils of Paper Money Have no End - 7th Apr 24
Stock Market Presidential Election Cycle Seasonal Trend Analysis - 3rd Apr 24
Stock Market Presidential Election Cycle Seasonal Trend - 2nd Apr 24
Dow Stock Market Annual Percent Change Analysis 2024 - 2nd Apr 24
Bitcoin S&P Pattern - 31st Mar 24
S&P Stock Market Correlating Seasonal Swings - 31st Mar 24
S&P SEASONAL ANALYSIS - 31st Mar 24
Here's a Dirty Little Secret: Federal Reserve Monetary Policy Is Still Loose - 31st Mar 24
Tandem Chairman Paul Pester on Fintech, AI, and the Future of Banking in the UK - 31st Mar 24
Stock Market Volatility (VIX) - 25th Mar 24
Stock Market Investor Sentiment - 25th Mar 24
The Federal Reserve Didn't Do Anything But It Had Plenty to Say - 25th Mar 24

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How to Protect your Wealth by Investing in AI Tech Stocks

Requiem for the Republican Party

Politics / US Politics May 06, 2009 - 05:43 PM GMT

By: Mike_Whitney

Politics

Best Financial Markets Analysis ArticleThe experts think the Republican party can get up off the canvas and stage a comeback, but don't bet on it. The poor GOP isn't really even a party anymore; it's more like a vaudeville troupe scuttling from one backwater to the next performing the same worn slapstick. They've simply become irrelevant, a "non-party" that no one pays much attention to apart from the occasional zinger on the Daily Show or Letterman. In truth, the GOP is so deeply-traumatized from their shocking fall from power, they'd probably benefit from a spell on the couch. Perhaps if they spent a few weeks in therapy, they'd see what a mess they've made of everything.


No one is suggesting that the Democrats are perfect either. Far from it. The Dems seemed to relish the 8 years they spent as Bush's doormat while the Bill of Rights was split into matchwood and the country was dragged from one war to the next. Bush served two full terms and the feckless Democrats never stood up to him or stopped him even once from doing exactly what he wanted. Wiretapping. Iraq. Torture. Never.

The Democratic party is loaded with bloviating windbags like Barney Frank and Nancy Pelosi who "talk the talk" but never deliver the goods. Frank has proved repeatedly that he's just lobby-fodder for the banking fraternity, faithfully doing their bidding and dressing it up in altruistic mumbo-jumbo. Pelosi's just as bad. When she's not applying tooth-whitener, she's busy making sure that anything remotely resembling progressive legislation never reaches the floor of the House. (Yer doin' a heckuva job, Nancy)

The party is full of blowhards, phonies and gobshites that are in the pocket of big business. Everyone knows it.

The only thing the Dems have going for them is that they're not Republicans. That's it. They're not the party that took over all three branches of government and proceeded to douse all of Washington in gasoline and burn it to the ground. That's how the Republican's celebrate their victories; self immolation! In America's 230 year history, no party has ever crashed-and-burned so fast or with such fanatical zeal.

The Republicans proved that they are unfit to govern. They're better suited to carping from the sidelines where they can do less damage. Let's hope it stays that way. No one wants another 8 years like the last.

Fortunately, Republican leaders have been given a permanent roost at FOX News so they can emerge from their holes from time to time to throw stones at Obama or swap sob-stories with their fellow conservatives. It's harmless fun and no one really cares anyway. Hopefully it will ease the pain of watching the nation spin out of their orbit while their political aspirations disappear down the toilet. The truth is, the country has moved on since the election and the Republicans will need a major facelift if they want to be competitive again. From the looks of it so far, that's hardly a sure-thing.

Now that the dust has settled from the election--and the full-extent of the losses are known--the finger-pointing has begun. Everyone wants to know who drove the Republican party into the ground?

There's plenty of blame to go around and, of course, the first name that's on everyone's list is George Bush. But Bush wasn't as important as people think. He was a bit-player who was chosen for the job because his patrons thought they could stitch-together another Reagan and because he could be counted on to follow orders without question. But Bush wasn't steering the ship o state; not really. The administration was essentially a franchise split up between the three main actors; Cheney, Rumsfeld and Rove. Of those three, the one who probably did the most damage was Rove through his chronic backroom maneuvering, his hamhanded public relations operations and his political arm-twisting. Rove's bullyboy antics produced a number of short-term triumphs, but they cost the party dearly in terms of credibility. Just look at the Terry Schiavo fiasco; an emotionally-charged issue of personal morality which the administration turned into a feeding-frenzy. The poor husband was turned into the devil-incarnate for simply carrying out the explicit wishes of his stricken wife. Michael Schiavo was ripped to shreds by a feral media that had become the propaganda-arm of the White House. The whole episode had Rove's stink all over it.

Eventually Rove's wheeling and dealing caught up to him and he was forced to step down amid a barrage of allegations. His scorched earth, "take no prisoners" approach galvanized the base, but alienated decent conservatives who were not comfortable with his win-at-all-cost shenanigans. The same was true of Republican politicians. Some of them didn't like marching in lockstep with the administration's directives. Others didn't like Rove himself, a petty, unprincipled opportunist whose sole talent was destroying his political enemies. Ultimately, the party of Lincoln became the party of Rove slipping its ideological moorings and abandoning all claim to moderation. Rove left the party in a shambles and, now, just look what's left--- a scattering of Bible-flailing crackpots, a few pudgy white guys with baseball caps pulled down over their ears, and a stable-full of toothy anchors over at Murdoch's sandbox. Other than that, the GOP is nothing but wreckage and bad memories.

Obama didn't beat the Republicans. The Republicans beat themselves and they know it. It was a self-inflicted wound. (Politicide?) The party has simply run out of steam. How much mileage can one get on a platform which contains just two planks: War and tax cuts? That's not a vision of the future; it's the early signs of dementia.

The Republican party has never been "the party of ideas"; that's a complete myth. The Republican leadership hates ideas, because ideas mean social programs which divert money from the coffers business tycoons and crooked banksters. Ideas cost money; it's as simple as that. Republican ideas are different; they usually involve poking around people's bedrooms telling them what they can and can't do or railing against science like evolution or stem cells. In fact, "Republican ideas" is an oxymoron like "military intelligence". The words are basically incongruous; they don't fit together.

The United States veers slightly to the right politically, so winning elections shouldn't be that hard for any party that truly represents conservative values. But the Republican party doesn't represent conservative values, that's another myth. In fact, the party isn't even pro life. If they were, then Bush would have pushed for anti abortion legislation when he controlled both houses of congress. But he didn't. Why? Because the Republicans know that if they put an end to the abortion flap for good, half of their base will have no reason to drag themselves to the polls every two years. That's the truth. Keeping abortion as a permanent issue--without making any effort to end it--is all part of a cynical calculation to keep the religious loonies engaged. Republicans will never end it; it's their meal ticket.

Despite the beating they took in the elections, the Republican party is still in the hands of zealots, militarists and screwballs. Oddly enough, this disparate coalition seems to enjoy wandering aimlessly through the political wilderness. For the most part, they cling to the belief that liberalism has destroyed the country and that the way back to traditional values is by electing far-right candidates like party-favorite Sarah Palin. But a Palin candidacy would be a disaster; she's polarizing "red meat" pitbull who doesn't achieve the broader goal of attracting "center-right" independents into the fold. (particularly the all-important Hispanic vote) She's brings nothing to the ticket. Besides, elevating Palin only confirms the public's worst fears, that the party has become a dinosaur run by addle-brained fundamentalists who are incapable of change.

Less than two years ago, party bigwigs were putting the finishing touches on their plans for a one party system and a new American century. My, how things change! The whole fantasy has come crashing to earth. The Republican party is finished. Stick a fork in it.

By Mike Whitney

Email: fergiewhitney@msn.com

Mike is a well respected freelance writer living in Washington state, interested in politics and economics from a libertarian perspective.

Mike Whitney Archive

© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Comments

John Whitney
07 May 09, 21:58
Whitney's Bush Derangement

"...well respected freelance writer..."

Er...respected by who? Mike Whitney's (no relation) piece is just another anti-Bush rant. I'm tired of this never ending Bush-derangement syndrome. We've had eight years of all this anti-Bush crap. Enough. Move on.

Bush lost because of the economy - simple. But the problem is - Obama hasn't got a clue. By the time The One has finished trashing the economy with his ill-conceived socialist stimulus packages aimed at income redistibution towards his burgeoning client state, the nation's debt will be out of sight and the Bush years will be remembered with fondness. It will be that bad.


gfmucci
09 May 09, 16:09
Incapable of change????

"..that the party has become a dinosaur run by addle-brained fundamentalists who are incapable of change."

I agree that both parties have screwed up. I am not an advocate of either party. However, not everyone who wants to effectively defend this nation, protect our borders, and promote liberty and prosperity is a "fundamendalist incapable of change." I'm rather sick and tired of virtually any crap-headed "change" being rammed down our throats being declared "good and necessary" and those who don't accept that crap being called a "fundamentalist." I'm not willing to become a Muslim. I'm not willing to accept that personal initiative be supplanted by an "entitlement" mentality. I'm not willing to see our national security diminished. I'm not willing to see morality declared irrelevant. I'm not willing to see our nations' laws ignored. Am I resisting change? Well, I - guess - so. That is because not all change is good. And I'm hardly a "fundamentalist."


Jorge
10 May 09, 14:16
Oh really?

Pssst - Mark

Look at FOX ratings vice CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, and the newspapers which are going down in flames. Maybe that's why you need the fairness doctrine. No one is buying.

While you whined about no-bid contracts to Halliburton, Democrats just did that by giving GM & the UAW a preloaded contract for how many cars that no one will buy except the gooberment? No one is buying.

Your brand isn't selling, so it appears you have to subjugate the market and FORCE the masses into your wrong headed views.

I'm sure I'm tilting at windmills, though. All 10 million of them that together will produce about 10 watts of power at full speed! Happy days are here again! Long live the dear leader Obama, his ACORNS and greenshoots! Hahaha


princetrumpet
14 Sep 11, 08:14
Stick a fork in this article

Thanks for the laugh, Mr. Whitney. This is article is even funnier today than it was when I first read it and saved it a couple of years ago. Go grab a beer with Anthony Weiner and then count some votes in his old district.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in