Most Popular
1. Banking Crisis is Stocks Bull Market Buying Opportunity - Nadeem_Walayat
2.The Crypto Signal for the Precious Metals Market - P_Radomski_CFA
3. One Possible Outcome to a New World Order - Raymond_Matison
4.Nvidia Blow Off Top - Flying High like the Phoenix too Close to the Sun - Nadeem_Walayat
5. Apple AAPL Stock Trend and Earnings Analysis - Nadeem_Walayat
6.AI, Stocks, and Gold Stocks – Connected After All - P_Radomski_CFA
7.Stock Market CHEAT SHEET - - Nadeem_Walayat
8.US Debt Ceiling Crisis Smoke and Mirrors Circus - Nadeem_Walayat
9.Silver Price May Explode - Avi_Gilburt
10.More US Banks Could Collapse -- A Lot More- EWI
Last 7 days
Stock Market Volatility (VIX) - 25th Mar 24
Stock Market Investor Sentiment - 25th Mar 24
The Federal Reserve Didn't Do Anything But It Had Plenty to Say - 25th Mar 24
Stock Market Breadth - 24th Mar 24
Stock Market Margin Debt Indicator - 24th Mar 24
It’s Easy to Scream Stocks Bubble! - 24th Mar 24
Stocks: What to Make of All This Insider Selling- 24th Mar 24
Money Supply Continues To Fall, Economy Worsens – Investors Don’t Care - 24th Mar 24
Get an Edge in the Crypto Market with Order Flow - 24th Mar 24
US Presidential Election Cycle and Recessions - 18th Mar 24
US Recession Already Happened in 2022! - 18th Mar 24
AI can now remember everything you say - 18th Mar 24
Bitcoin Crypto Mania 2024 - MicroStrategy MSTR Blow off Top! - 14th Mar 24
Bitcoin Gravy Train Trend Forecast 2024 - 11th Mar 24
Gold and the Long-Term Inflation Cycle - 11th Mar 24
Fed’s Next Intertest Rate Move might not align with popular consensus - 11th Mar 24
Two Reasons The Fed Manipulates Interest Rates - 11th Mar 24
US Dollar Trend 2024 - 9th Mar 2024
The Bond Trade and Interest Rates - 9th Mar 2024
Investors Don’t Believe the Gold Rally, Still Prefer General Stocks - 9th Mar 2024
Paper Gold Vs. Real Gold: It's Important to Know the Difference - 9th Mar 2024
Stocks: What This "Record Extreme" Indicator May Be Signaling - 9th Mar 2024
My 3 Favorite Trade Setups - Elliott Wave Course - 9th Mar 2024
Bitcoin Crypto Bubble Mania! - 4th Mar 2024
US Interest Rates - When WIll the Fed Pivot - 1st Mar 2024
S&P Stock Market Real Earnings Yield - 29th Feb 2024
US Unemployment is a Fake Statistic - 29th Feb 2024
U.S. financial market’s “Weimar phase” impact to your fiat and digital assets - 29th Feb 2024
What a Breakdown in Silver Mining Stocks! What an Opportunity! - 29th Feb 2024
Why AI will Soon become SA - Synthetic Intelligence - The Machine Learning Megatrend - 29th Feb 2024
Keep Calm and Carry on Buying Quantum AI Tech Stocks - 19th Feb 24

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How to Protect your Wealth by Investing in AI Tech Stocks

US Living Standards and Productivity

Economics / US Economy Jun 04, 2008 - 10:18 AM GMT

By: Gerard_Jackson

Economics Boring as this might seem to some of our rightwing pundits, we can get no where in economic debate without the application of theory. Many of the questions that are popping up these days are linked to the alleged connection between productivity, unemployment and inflation. There are no links here in the functional sense. In a free market unemployment will not rise even where productivity is falling.


Of course, in such a situation real incomes will also be falling. In other words, productivity is linked to real wages and not the volume of employment. So long as there is sufficient capital and land available there will always be jobs for those able and willing to work. The alleged link between productivity and inflation is paraded in the press as if it is an established economic fact while in reality it is an economic myth. The source of the myth is the erroneous belief that rising prices are inflationary or cause inflation.

Irrespective of what politicians and their economic advisors think, inflation is a monetary problem. There is no way you can get a continuous rise in general prices (assuming output is not falling) without a monetary expansion. What rising productivity tends to do, however, is offset the price effects of an expanding money supply by continuously lowering production costs. The result is then stable prices or a lower rate of 'price inflation'. The point is that in the absence of inflationary policy prices would be falling. Therefore any attempt to stabilize prices requires an inflationary policy.

Unfortunately the confusion gets even worse. I have frequently said that people never seem to learn from economic history. But this view should be qualified with the observation that we need a theory if we are to learn the correct lessons. This is rarely the case as is evidenced by what passes for economic debate in the media. Now it is still being argued by some that the Fed should have applied the monetary brakes in 2000 because the labour market was tightening and a tightening labour market — in their opinion always signals inflation. Others argued that America was on a new growth path and its rising productivity could easily accommodate rising wages without triggering inflation.

Who was right? Neither, is the answer. During the 1950s the German and British economies suffered very tight labour markets, but for very different reasons. Rapid growth in Germany's capital structure created severe labour shortage which had to be alleviated by introducing guest workers'. There was nothing inflationary there. Quite simply, capital accumulation outstripped the labour supply. In Britain, on the other hand, labour shortages were created by Keynesian policies that generated inflation and balance-of-payments problems followed by recurring credit crunches.

Clearly, a tight labour market in itself is never evidence of inflationary pressures, even where real wage rates are rising. So which is it for America, the Germany of the '50s or Britain? In my view it is Britain. Productivity is not the clue because it was also rising in Britain during the '50s. The clues are savings, money supply and the current account deficit. American savings fell, the money supply rapidly expanded and this in turn fuelled the growing current account deficit, and still is, by sucking in imports. The dollar depreciation is now reversing the flow of trade. However, the fall in the dollar was the result of the Fed's Keynesian policy of using interest rates to stimulate the economy*.

Like Britain of the '50s the American economy was driven by credit expansion instead of genuine savings as was the case with German economy. The real consequences of the Fed's reckless monetary policy were largely hidden because America's flexible labour markets allowed the economy considerable room for cost adjustments. This means that labour and capital tend to be more efficiently used than in countries like Germany and Japan. Combined with newly applied technologies this meant rising productivity.

Now by real consequences I don't just mean the misallocation of resources (what the Austrian School of economics calls malinvestments) but also the distinct possibility that Keynesian policies reshaped America's capital structure in a way that has kept living standards lower than they would otherwise have been.

By Gerard Jackson
BrookesNews.Com

Gerard Jackson is Brookes' economics editor.

Copyright © 2008 Gerard Jackson

Gerard Jackson Archive

© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in