Best of the Week
Most Popular
1. Gold vs Cash in a Financial Crisis - Richard_Mills
2.Current Stock Market Rally Similarities To 1999 - Chris_Vermeulen
3.America See You On The Dark Side Of The Moon - Part2 - James_Quinn
4.Stock Market Trend Forecast Outlook for 2020 - Nadeem_Walayat
5.Who Said Stock Market Traders and Investor are Emotional Right Now? - Chris_Vermeulen
6.Gold Upswing and Lessons from Gold Tops - P_Radomski_CFA
7.Economic Tribulation is Coming, and Here is Why - Michael_Pento
8.What to Expect in Our Next Recession/Depression? - Raymond_Matison
9.The Fed Celebrates While Americans Drown in Financial Despair - John_Mauldin
10.Hi-yo Silver Away! - Richard_Mills
Last 7 days
Redefining Political Economy, Globalization & Business Models Consequent on Corona Virus Pandemics - 9th Apr 20
Plus500 Rreview - 9th Apr 20
Gold Price Closely Tracks Debt-to-GDP Ratio - 9th Apr 20
Gold, Silver and Rigged Market Socialism - 9th Apr 20
Going to School in Lockdown Britain, Dobcroft Sheffield - 9th Apr 20
Amazon Face Masks to Protect Against Covid-19 Viral Particles N95, FPP2, PM2.5, for Kids and Adults - 9th Apr 20
Is Natural Gas Price Ready For An April Rally? - 8th Apr 20
Market Predictions And The Business Implications - 8th Apr 20
When Will UK Coronavirus Crisis Imrpove - Infections and Deaths Trend Trajectory Analysis - 8th Apr 20
BBC Newsnight Focuses on Tory Leadership Whilst Boris Johnson Fights for his Life! - 8th Apr 20
The Big Short Guides us to What is Next for the Stock Market - 8th Apr 20
USD Index Sheds Light on the Upcoming Gold Move - 8th Apr 20
The Post CoronaVirus New Normal - 8th Apr 20
US Coronavirus Trend Trajectory Forecast Current State - 7th Apr 20
Boris Johnson Fighting for his Life In Intensive Care - UK Coronavirus Crisis - 7th Apr 20
Precious Metals Are About To Reset Like In 2008 – Gold Bugs, Buckle Up! - 7th Apr 20
Crude Oil's 2020 Crash: See What Helped (Some) Traders Pivot Just in Time - 7th Apr 20
Was the Fed Just Nationalized? - 7th Apr 20
Gold & Silver Mines Closed as Physical Silver Becomes “Most Undervalued Asset” - 7th Apr 20
US Coronavirus Blacktop Politics - 7th Apr 20
Coronavirus is America's "Pearl Harbour" Moment, There Will be a Reckoning With China - 6th Apr 20
Coronavirus Crisis Exposes Consequences of Fed Policy: Americans Have No Savings - 6th Apr 20
The Stock Market Is Not a Magic Money Machine - 6th Apr 20
Gold Stocks Crash, V-Bounce! - 6th Apr 20
How Can Writing Business Essay Help You In Business Analytics Skills - 6th Apr 20
PAYPAL WARNING - Your Stimulus Funds Are at Risk of Being Frozen for 6 Months! - 5th Apr 20
Stocks Hanging By the Fingernails? - 5th Apr 20
US Federal Budget Deficits: To $30 Trillion and Beyond - 5th Apr 20
The Lucrative Profitability Of A Move To Negative Interest Rates - Pandemic Edition - 5th Apr 20
Visa Denials: How to avoid it and what to do if your Visa is denied? - 5th Apr 20 - Uday Tank
WARNING PAYPAL Making a Grab for US $1200 Stimulus Payments - 4th Apr 20
US COVID-19 Death Toll Higher Than China’s Now. Will Gold Rally? - 4th Apr 20
Concerned That Asia Could Blow A Hole In Future Economic Recovery - 4th Apr 20
Bracing for Europe’s Coronavirus Contractionand Debt Crisis - 4th Apr 20
Stocks: When Grass Looks Greener on the Other Side of the ... Pond - 3rd Apr 20
How the C-Factor Could Decimate 2020 Global Gold and Silver Production - 3rd Apr 20
US Between Scylla and Charybdis Covid-19 - 3rd Apr 20
Covid19 What's Your Risk of Death Analysis by Age, Gender, Comorbidities and BMI - 3rd Apr 20
US Coronavirus Infections & Deaths Trend Trajectory - How Bad Will it Get? - 2nd Apr 20
Silver Looks Bearish Short to Medium Term - 2nd Apr 20
Mickey Fulp: 'Never Let a Good Crisis Go to Waste' - 2nd Apr 20
Stock Market Selloff Structure Explained – Fibonacci On Deck - 2nd Apr 20
COVID-19 FINANCIAL LOCKDOWN: Can PAYPAL Be Trusted to Handle US $1200 Stimulus Payments? - 2nd Apr 20
Day in the Life of Coronavirus LOCKDOWN - Sheffield, UK - 2nd Apr 20
UK Coronavirus Infections and Deaths Trend Trajectory - Deviation Against Forecast - 1st Apr 20
Huge Unemployment Is Coming. Will It Push Gold Prices Up? - 1st Apr 20
Gold Powerful 2008 Lessons That Apply Today - 1st Apr 20
US Coronavirus Infections and Deaths Projections Trend Forecast - Video - 1st Apr 20
From Global Virus Acceleration to Global Debt Explosion - 1st Apr 20
UK Supermarkets Coronavirus Panic Buying Before Lock Down - Tesco Empty Shelves - 1st Apr 20
Gold From a Failed Breakout to a Failed Breakdown - 1st Apr 20
P FOR PANDEMIC - 1st Apr 20
The Past Stock Market Week Was More Important Than You May Understand - 31st Mar 20
Coronavirus - No, You Do Not Hear the Fat Lady Warming Up - 31st Mar 20
Life, Religions, Business, Globalization & Information Technology In The Post-Corona Pandemics Age - 31st Mar 20
Three Charts Every Stock Market Trader and Investor Must See - 31st Mar 20
Coronavirus Stocks Bear Market Trend Forecast - Video - 31st Mar 20
Coronavirus Dow Stocks Bear Market Into End April 2020 Trend Forecast - 31st Mar 20
Is it better to have a loan or credit card debt when applying for a mortgage? - 31st Mar 20

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter


Unemployment Economic Theory and the U.S. Dollar

Economics / Economic Theory Oct 05, 2009 - 01:13 AM GMT

By: Howard_Katz


Best Financial Markets Analysis ArticleGold made a quick dip to the $990 area on Friday and then whipped around to close above $1,000.  We cannot completely rule out one final pull back to $960.  However, the U.S. dollar is in free fall.  So any dip in gold will be very brief.

Just above, at the $1025-$1030 levels are two important resistance lines.  $1025 is the top line of the ascending triangle which has been forming in gold for the past year-and-a-half., and $1030 is the neckline of a head and shoulders bottom.  If these patterns can break out to the up side on higher volume, then it will signal a powerful up move in gold, probably to last through the autumn and winter.

The collapse of the U.S. dollar since 2001 looks more and more like the collapse of the British pound in 1947-48.  At this point, other nations ceased to use the pound as the world reserve currency.  The British Empire collapsed.  And the pre-eminent position which Britain had held in Europe and the world from the time of the 17th century came to an end.  The causes were Keynesianism and Fabian socialism.  Those two causes are operating here in the U.S., and while it is too early to say there is no hope, things look very bad.

Today I want to use the idea of unemployment to explain many of the hopelessly confused ideas of modern economics.  We stand near the beginning of a new century, and it is my hope that the ideas of the 21st will not repeat the terrible tragedies of the 20th.  The men of the 18th century (Adam Smith, Jeremy Bentham, Noah Webster) solved the problem of economics with the result that the 19th and early 20th centuries were periods of unimagined success and achievement.  Never had mankind reached such heights.  But the same period which saw these great achievements in the practical realm witnessed a disaster in the intellectual realm.  Crackpots and frauds dominated the field of economics from the 1920s to the present day, and unemployment was their most widely discussed concept.

The newness of the concept is shown by the fact that English and American, although considered to be the same language (or dialects of each other), have different words for the concept: “unemployment” in American, “redundancy” in English.  Here in the U.S., the word dates from the 1870s.  Before that time there was not enough unemployment going on to invent a word for it.  Why is that?  And how had the people of the early and mid 19th century solved this problem which we today cannot solve?

Of course, when I ask a question about history, I am violating an unwritten rule of modern economics.  It is firmly taught in pretty much every economics class in the country (and, I suspect, the world) that one must, UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES, look at the facts for the answer to any question.  Why this should be I do not know.  Adam Smith, the founder of the subject, was very knowledgeable about facts.  All other sciences make an emphatic point of researching the facts and testing their theories against the facts.

Why, I would like to ask, should there be any unemployment?  An unemployed good is one which is not used.  Go to your local market.  You see thousands of goods for sale.  And yet the amazing thing is that virtually all of them are used.  At the end of the day, week or month, the merchant has very few unemployed goods that he has to throw away.  All of the shoppers take their purchases home, and very little remains unemployed.  The reason for this is simple.  To leave a good unemployed is waste, and whoever wastes an economic good loses the wealth which it represents.  What we observe is that the very last ounce of rationality of which the human species is capable is exerted to minimize this waste.  Hence the unemployment is very small.  Why should things be different when we are talking about the unemployment of human labor?

Probably the most important cause of unemployment is the over valuation of human labor.  We have seen that the word came into use in the U.S. in the 1870s.  What was going on in the U.S. economy at that time?

When the Civil War started in 1861, the Union issued paper money (called greenbacks) to pay for troops and war supplies.  From 1861 to 1865, the U.S. price level doubled.  In 1866, there was a feeling that too much money had been issued, and a part of it was withdrawn.  Prices fell, and many of the war profiteers suffered losses.  (This was called – from the point of view of the war profiteers – the First Post War Depression.)

In the early 1870s, an intense political battle was fought over the issue of whether the country should return to hard money.  President Grant vetoed a bill to post the resumption of hard money, and the 1874 elections showed that hard money sentiment was dominant in the country.  In early 1875, Congress voted resumption of hard money, effective 1879.  Furthermore, silver was demonetized so that the new American hard money system was based on gold alone.

The result of these two steps (the elimination of the greenbacks and the further elimination of silver money) caused a long, severe contraction of the money supply.  Prices declined in the U.S. for 30 years, and an average $1.00 item in 1866 was down to 30¢ by 1896.

I might add parenthetically that this was a period of repeated and severe “depressions.”  At the same time, it was the greatest period of economic growth in the history of any country in the world.  The period began with the Pony Express.  It ended with the telegraph, the telephone, motion pictures and the automobile.  This was the period when Wall Street came into its own as a force in American life.  The electric light and a host of other electronic inventions improved the quality of the life of the average American.  The airplane, radio and ultimately television were just around the corner.  If you meet a person who claims to be an economist, then please ask him for me, if there were so many depressions in this period, then how come it saw the greatest economic growth ever?

But to go back to our study of unemployment, one of the things which happens in a period of falling prices is that wages do not fall as rapidly as prices.  Workers are misled by their nominal wage when they should be looking at their real wage.  For example, if both prices and wages are 100 and if prices fall to 90, then wages are likely to fall to something like 93.  The working man can buy more with his $93 than he used to buy with his $100, but this fact does not sink in with most working men.  They think that their wages are lower because they use the simple minded thinking that $93 is less than $100.  But in fact they can buy more goods with the $93 than they used to buy with the $100.

The employers are more rational than their employees.  They know that they are paying wages which are too high, and they cannot afford it.  Since their workers are being stubborn and will not work for 90, they are compelled to let some of the workers go.  Hence there is unemployment.  This is the most important cause of unemployment.  Government reduces the money supply.  Prices go down.  Wages also go down but not as much.  So real wages (computed in terms of what the worker’s salary will buy) can buy more goods.  Wages are too high, and employers lay some of their workers off.

Here is our first lesson about unemployment.  Unemployment is caused by the fact that real wages rise above their fair market value, and employers cannot pay the high wage.  This rise in real wages is caused by the fact that government shrinks the money supply.  This causes a fall in prices.  But worker irrationality stubbornly resists a corresponding fall in nominal wages.

What happened in the 1870s (and subsequent “depressions”) was that the workers finally realized that their wage demands were too high.  They lowered their demands (grudgingly), and the high unemployment disappeared.

What caused the “depression” of the 1930s was that the U.S. money supply fell by about 30% from 1930-1932.  There was a corresponding 30% fall in prices.  We do not have good wage data, but wages must have resisted the fall in prices.  With wages too high, the nation’s employers laid workers off.

However, in the 1930s the government went berserk intervening in the economy.  One of the first New Deal programs was to plow under crops and kill pigs.  If the nation had been in a depression, then how would it have helped to destroy food?  (Ask Obama, his solution to the current economy is to destroy cars.)  They then indulged all sorts of labor irrationality (such as giving one class of workers the  legal right to get higher wages by beating up other workers, thus forcing these workers into unemployment).  Thus the unemployment of the 1930s was not really reduced until the rise in prices of the 1940s led to a drop in real wages.  This eliminated the over valuation of wages and permanently solved the unemployment problem of that era.

Of course, today (meaning the period from 1940 to the present) we have the opposite problem.  Instead of destroying money, the government continually creates money.  In this case, the opposite occurs.  (Nominal) wages do not rise as fast as prices, and real wages decline.  (Real wages in the U.S. peaked in 1972 and have been declining ever since.  We are the first generation of Americans to be poorer than our fathers.  Thank you Richard Nixon.)  This labor problem was understood by the Loco-Focos of the 1830s.  (A loco-foco was a friction match, a new invention of the time. when Tammany Hall tried to take over a meeting dominated by this new group by dousing the lights, they whipped out their loco-focos, lit lanterns and carried on as before.  It was a way of saying that they were friendly to new technology and knew how to put it to practical use.  From that day, they called themselves the Loco-Focos.  They were the first practical political group to organize around the idea that the bankers should not have a right to create money.

The Loco-Focos summed up the above problem as follows:

“When the currency expands, the loaf contracts.
When the currency contracts, the loaf disappears.”

In short, if the government increases the currency, the worker’s loaf of bread contracts (which happened through most of the latter 20th century).  And if the government decreases the currency, then real wages rise.  This makes employers unable to pay some of their workers, and for these workers the loaf of bread disappears.  If we want a society where virtually everyone is employed making a fair wage (for the value they create), then the government should simply keep the (per capita) money supply stable.  This is what was accomplished by the American gold standard (with minor exceptions when the money supply was disturbed as above).

Unemployment became an important political issue when the U.S. went off the gold standard.  The paper aristocracy wanted to depreciate the currency resulting in the first Loco-Foco principle (a decline in real wages).  They, of course, did not want to admit that they were anti-labor because that would have cost them the votes of the working class.  They falsely argued that they were pro-labor because they were against unemployment.  Once this was put over, they began to deliberately create unemployment so that they could lower it by further depreciating the currency. 

Getting union workers to beat up other workers and deny them jobs was one of their tactics.  Another was the tactic of enacting forbidden-to-work laws (fraudulently labeled “minimum wage laws”) in which workers with low labor value were forbidden from making employment contracts.  Later they actually paid people to remain unemployed. and imposed special punishments on employers (such as health insurance for older workers).   In the U.S., during the late 19th century, workers averaged a 60% increase in real wages per 30 year period.  The country became a massive job creating machine.  Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1954 reports unemployment for 1906 as 0.8% and for 1907 as 1.8%  America at this time was a giant job-creating machine, and millions of immigrants from diverse parts of the world were drawn here to get those jobs.

Since 1972, the first part of the Loco-Foco warning has been particularly true.  The cur-rency has expanded, and the loaf has contracted.  Real wages have fallen for the first time in U.S. history, and the average working man is getting poorer.  We will soon have another dramatic illustration of this truth due to the Bush-Bernanke expansion of money in the autumn of 2008.

The above illustrates a few of the lies upon which our society today is based.  The Democratic Party in the U.S. (and left-wing parties around the world) won the votes of the working man by reducing his wages and threatening him with unemployment.  Almost everything you have been taught is a lie. 

As for myself, I am trying to spread a little economic truth and to this end I publish an economic letter, The One-handed Economist ($300 per year).  It helps you to combat these lies and protect your earnings from the paper aristocracy.  Visit my web site,  I also blog on political and social issues.  This week’s blog ( continues my discussion of Newsweek’s proposal to kill your granny (no charge).

© 2009 Copyright Howard S. Katz - All Rights Reserved Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors.  

© 2005-2019 - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


David Dzidzikashvili
19 Oct 09, 16:39
Economic Crisis Blues

Even though some experts point fingers to positive economic data, there are still many factors of concern that are pushing against a quick recovery. Eventually it will get back to reasonable levels, but we won’t see the economy getting back to shape until 2012 or maybe even 2014 (complete recovery).

Nobody truly knows exactly when things will return back to normal. What experts say it is as good as their imagination allows them to be and the assumption theories they base their forecasts on. I don’t think those experts have a clear vision of future or where is the economy heading…

Dollar will get much weaker on the long run... You can't borrow trillions and expect negative economic results. Just does not work that way.

Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in

6 Critical Money Making Rules