Best of the Week
Most Popular
1. The Trump Stock Market Trap May Be Triggered - Barry_M_Ferguson
2.Why are Central Banks Buying Gold and Dumping Dollars? - Richard_Mills
3.US China War - Thucydides Trap and gold - Richard_Mills
4.Gold Price Trend Forcast to End September 2019 - Nadeem_Walayat
5.Money Saving Kids Gardening Growing Giant Sunflowers Summer Fun - Anika_Walayat
6.US Dollar Breakdown Begins, Gold Price to Bolt Higher - Jim_Willie_CB
7.INTEL (INTC) Stock Investing to Profit From AI Machine Learning Boom - Nadeem_Walayat
8.Will Google AI Kill Us? Man vs Machine Intelligence - N_Walayat
9.US Prepares for Currency War with China - Richard_Mills
10.Gold Price Epochal Breakout Will Not Be Negated by a Correction - Clive Maund
Last 7 days
US Housing Market Real Terms BUY / SELL Indicator - 16th July 19
Could Trump Really Win the 2020 US Presidential Election? - 16th July 19
Gold Stocks Forming Bullish Consolidation - 16th July 19
Will Fed Easing Turn Out Like 1995 or 2007? - 16th July 19
Red Rock Entertainment Investments: Around the world in a day with Supreme Jets - 16th July 19
Silver Has Already Gone from Weak to Strong Hands - 15th July 19
Top Equity Mutual Funds That Offer Best Returns - 15th July 19
Gold’s Breakout And The US Dollar - 15th July 19
Financial Markets, Iran, U.S. Global Hegemony - 15th July 19
U.S Bond Yields Point to a 40% Rise in SPX - 15th July 19
Corporate Earnings may Surprise the Stock Market – Watch Out! - 15th July 19
Stock Market Interest Rate Cut Prevails - 15th July 19
Dow Stock Market Trend Forecast Current State July 2019 Video - 15th July 19
Why Summer is the Best Time to be in the Entertainment Industry - 15th July 19
Mid-August Is A Critical Turning Point For US Stocks - 14th July 19
Fed’s Recessionary Indicators and Gold - 14th July 19
The Problem with Keynesian Economics - 14th July 19
Stocks Market Investors Worried About the Fed? Don't Be -- Here's Why - 13th July 19
Could Gold Launch Into A Parabolic Upside Rally? - 13th July 19
Stock Market SPX and Dow in BREAKOUT but this is the worrying part - 13th July 19
Key Stage 2 SATS Tests Results Grades and Scores GDS, EXS, WTS Explained - 13th July 19
INTEL Stock Investing in Qubits and AI Neural Network Processors - Video - 12th July 19
Gold Price Selloff Risk High - 12th July 19
State of the US Economy as Laffer Gets Laughable - 12th July 19
Dow Stock Market Trend Forecast Current State - 12th July 19
Stock Market Major Index Top In 3 to 5 Weeks? - 11th July 19
Platinum Price vs Gold Price - 11th July 19
What This Centi-Billionaire Fashion Magnate Can Teach You About Investing - 11th July 19
Stock Market Fundamentals are Weakening: 3000 on SPX Means Nothing - 11th July 19
This Tobacco Stock Is a Big Winner from E-Cigarette Bans - 11th July 19
Investing in Life Extending Pharma Stocks - 11th July 19
How to Pay for It All: An Option the Presidential Candidates Missed - 11th July 19
Mining Stocks Flash Powerful Signal for Gold and Silver Markets - 11th July 19
5 Surefire Ways to Get More Viewers for Your Video Series - 11th July 19
Gold Price Gann Angle Update - 10th July 19
Crude Oil Prices and the 2019 Hurricane Season - 10th July 19
Can Gold Recover from Friday’s Strong Payrolls Hit? - 10th July 19
Netflix’s Worst Nightmare Has Come True - 10th July 19
LIMITLESS - Improving Cognitive Function and Fighting Brain Ageing Right Now! - 10th July 19
US Dollar Strength Will Drive Markets Higher - 10th July 19
Government-Pumped Student Loan Bubble Sets Up Next Financial Crisis - 10th July 19
Stock Market SPX 3000 Dream is Pushed Away: Pullback of 5-10% is Coming - 10th July 19
July 2019 GBPUSD Market Update and Outlook - 10th July 19

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

Top AI Stocks Investing to Profit from the Machine Intelligence Mega-trend

China Currency Bill: Politics vs. Economics, Is the U.S. ready for a global trade war?

Politics / US Politics Oct 10, 2011 - 02:17 AM GMT

By: EconMatters

Politics

Best Financial Markets Analysis ArticleThe latest move on China politics at Washington is the China currency bill, due at the U.S. Senate on Tuesday, Oct. 12.  The proposal would levy tariffs on China and four other Asian countries for artificially depressing the value of their currencies to boost their exports.

To us, it seems evident that those in Washington have not thought this through completely (or chose to ignore).  Here is how the math would work.


According to the government trade data, China imports from the U.S. about $57.7 billion for the first 7 months of 2011 ($100 billion annualized), and the number will only grow with increasing Chinese household income.  So just based on pure math, the Big Question #1 is this:

How many American jobs will be lost if the U.S. loses all or even part of the $100 billion annual export business with China when China retaliates with similar tariffs on U.S. goods?  

The same math works for the U.S. imports from China, which is at about $374 billion annualized using the July 2011 year-to-date figure.  So the Big Question #2 is:

How much damage would the U.S. tariff on Chinese imported goods do to the pocketbook of American business and consumers?   
It seems many are quite fixated on the trade deficit number the U.S. has with China.  However, as the table (showing the top 10 countries) and chart below illustrates, America runs trade deficits with many other trading partners, not just China.  And realistically, the total trade deficit of $160.4 billion for the first seven months of 2011, even if completely reversed to zero, is a tiny drop in the big bucket of the $14-trillion U.S. economy.

The point is that even if China revalues Yuan to Washington's satisfaction, it will not have the significant impact to the U.S. economy and jobs as some are led to believe.

Chart Source: U.S. Census Bureau


One strong support of this currency bill is that by keeping the Chinese Yuan artificially low, many American jobs have lost/outsourced to China; whereas in fact, tax is actually one of the biggest considerations that U.S. corporations have moved operations overseas, including China.  

Another reason China has become attractive to many western firms (including the U.S.) is the access to a large and highly educated work force on a lower pay scale.  Due to the long ingrained cultural belief that values higher education, China has too many college graduates that the domestic economy can't fully absorb yet.

Apple, for example, has a huge China operation with Foxcom producing its popular i products, but hit a wall at Brazil. Reuters reported that Apple's $12 billion iPad deal with Brazil came to a screeching halt partly due to "Brazil's own deep structural problems such as a lack of skilled labor," high taxes and bad infrastructure.

In addition to decades of anti-business policies, including unfavorable tax treatments and bureaucratic regulations, to disincentivize establishing business at home, the U.S. also has similar structural problems to those of Brazil in labor and infrastructure.

A few forecasts we have seen so far already indicate that the U.S. is not producing enough college educated work force to even fuel its normal growth.  On the infrastructure side, according to the estimate by the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE),  America is in need of $2.2 trillion investment to high-grade the aging and outdated infrastructure up to where they should be.

Now, since the central focus of this latest currency bill is China's "currency manipulation", we can take a look at other countries that have also dabbled in this sport.

For instance, Japan has repeatedly intervened in the currency market over the years.  So, does the massive unprecedented G7 Yen intervention  in March count?  How about when Swiss National Bank (SNB) vowed to "defend" the minimum EUR/CHF exchange rate at 1.20 with some very sizable interventions in the open currency market?

The two aforementioned examples may all have perfectly legitimate reasons, but they highlighted the fact that no country wants a strong currency which hurts its export business.  Many central banks have intervened in the currency market (some well publicized, some more "discrete") when its currency put the country at a disadvantage.  And these past interventions will not be the last either.

On that note, China most likely could make a fairly good argument that the U.S. Fed's programs of QE's, Twist, the rising federal deficits, and debt are all just part of the effort by the U.S. government to debase the Dollar in order to have the trade advantage over rival currencies as well.

Also from a logical point of view, should the bill not be amended to include all of the U.S. trading partners who have engaged in currency intervention activity?  If so, then the Big Question #3 would be:

Is the U.S. ready for a global trade war?   

So it is quite hypocritical for the politicians at Washington to single China out when there are many other countries (including the U.S.) doing exactly the same thing.

What it comes down to is that many U.S. politicians are facing reelection in 13 months, and China currency bill is one easy mark to show voters that they are doing something to address the unemployment issue.  However, one such bill would come with a hidden high price tag and serious repercussion to the U.S. economy that taxpayers can not afford to foot.

Even if Washington has the answers and contingency plans in place for the 3 Big Questions asked herein (which is highly improbable, and also begs the question of risk/reward and value-add), the currency bill is nothing more than politics to save their own jobs in the next election, instead of one with any kind of economic considerations.

Frankly, in light of the U.S. debt and deficit shamble, lawmakers would be much better off focusing on cleaning the fiscal house (and not to repeat the embarrassing debt ceiling debate to get yet another sovereign credit downgrade), instead of spending precious time and energy taking on China and/or any of the trading partners over currency valuation.

By EconMatters

http://www.econmatters.com/

The theory of quantum mechanics and Einstein’s theory of relativity (E=mc2) have taught us that matter (yin) and energy (yang) are inter-related and interdependent. This interconnectness of all things is the essense of the concept “yin-yang”, and Einstein’s fundamental equation: matter equals energy. The same theories may be applied to equities and commodity markets.

All things within the markets and macro-economy undergo constant change and transformation, and everything is interconnected. That’s why here at Economic Forecasts & Opinions, we focus on identifying the fundamental theories of cause and effect in the markets to help you achieve a great continuum of portfolio yin-yang equilibrium.

That's why, with a team of analysts, we at EconMatters focus on identifying the fundamental theories of cause and effect in the financial markets that matters to your portfolio.

© 2011 Copyright EconMatters - All Rights Reserved Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors.


© 2005-2019 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Comments

Ernie Messerschmidt
10 Oct 11, 10:31
we already have a global trade war

We already have a global trade war. The real American economy and the interests of the American people have pretty much lost. China and the international corporations and big banks have pretty much won. But the fat lady hasn't sung yet. The shitty status quo that the author defends is in crisis, the American people are rising up. Ian Fletcher is 100% right in his book Free Trade Doesn't Work. "Free trade" is theoretically wrong ideology, suicidal for the American economy and people, and in place because it is in the ruling capitalist pigs' interest. Things can turn around. War is the nature of things, certainly in international economics. America, an ideology-drugged sleeping giant, needs to wake up and fight back. Watch out, China!


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in

6 Critical Money Making Rules