Most Popular
1. It’s a New Macro, the Gold Market Knows It, But Dead Men Walking Do Not (yet)- Gary_Tanashian
2.Stock Market Presidential Election Cycle Seasonal Trend Analysis - Nadeem_Walayat
3. Bitcoin S&P Pattern - Nadeem_Walayat
4.Nvidia Blow Off Top - Flying High like the Phoenix too Close to the Sun - Nadeem_Walayat
4.U.S. financial market’s “Weimar phase” impact to your fiat and digital assets - Raymond_Matison
5. How to Profit from the Global Warming ClImate Change Mega Death Trend - Part1 - Nadeem_Walayat
7.Bitcoin Gravy Train Trend Forecast 2024 - - Nadeem_Walayat
8.The Bond Trade and Interest Rates - Nadeem_Walayat
9.It’s Easy to Scream Stocks Bubble! - Stephen_McBride
10.Fed’s Next Intertest Rate Move might not align with popular consensus - Richard_Mills
Last 7 days
Global Warming ClImate Change Mega Death Trend - 8th Apr 24
Gold Is Rallying Again, But Silver Could Get REALLY Interesting - 8th Apr 24
Media Elite Belittle Inflation Struggles of Ordinary Americans - 8th Apr 24
Profit from the Roaring AI 2020's Tech Stocks Economic Boom - 8th Apr 24
Stock Market Election Year Five Nights at Freddy's - 7th Apr 24
It’s a New Macro, the Gold Market Knows It, But Dead Men Walking Do Not (yet)- 7th Apr 24
AI Revolution and NVDA: Why Tough Going May Be Ahead - 7th Apr 24
Hidden cost of US homeownership just saw its biggest spike in 5 years - 7th Apr 24
What Happens To Gold Price If The Fed Doesn’t Cut Rates? - 7th Apr 24
The Fed is becoming increasingly divided on interest rates - 7th Apr 24
The Evils of Paper Money Have no End - 7th Apr 24
Stock Market Presidential Election Cycle Seasonal Trend Analysis - 3rd Apr 24
Stock Market Presidential Election Cycle Seasonal Trend - 2nd Apr 24
Dow Stock Market Annual Percent Change Analysis 2024 - 2nd Apr 24
Bitcoin S&P Pattern - 31st Mar 24
S&P Stock Market Correlating Seasonal Swings - 31st Mar 24
S&P SEASONAL ANALYSIS - 31st Mar 24
Here's a Dirty Little Secret: Federal Reserve Monetary Policy Is Still Loose - 31st Mar 24
Tandem Chairman Paul Pester on Fintech, AI, and the Future of Banking in the UK - 31st Mar 24
Stock Market Volatility (VIX) - 25th Mar 24
Stock Market Investor Sentiment - 25th Mar 24
The Federal Reserve Didn't Do Anything But It Had Plenty to Say - 25th Mar 24

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How to Protect your Wealth by Investing in AI Tech Stocks

How JPMorgan and the London Whale Can Sink Your Stocks Portfolio

Companies / Banksters Aug 15, 2013 - 11:28 AM GMT

By: Money_Morning

Companies

Greg Madison writes: In the spring of 2012, JPMorgan Chase & Co.'s (NYSE: JPM) not-so-rogue trader, Bruno Iksil, better known as the London Whale, made a series of derivatives trades on credit default swaps that only appeared to be unauthorized.

In reality, those trades were just one side of JPMorgan betting against the other in a doom struck hedging strategy.


We're talking about trades so big they made waves across a $10 trillion market.

The London Whale lost at least $5.8 billion - perhaps as much as $6.2 billion - on those bets, and it's possible that the losses will head north from there.

As hard as it may be to believe, for his part The London Whale doesn't seem to have done anything illegal. Indeed, Bruno Iksil hasn't been charged with any wrongdoing.

In fact, the Whale is singing like a canary, cooperating fully with U.S. investigators.

JPMorgan's London Whale Snitch

What appears to be happening is that two of Iksil's colleagues, Javier Martin-Artajo and Julien Grout, are being charged on grounds that they conspired to hide the scope of Iksil's losses.

Martin-Artajo was in charge of a team that made highly speculative trades on credit default swaps, and Grout was responsible for recording the daily values of the positions. In a surprising turn, The Whale has supplied investigators with tantalizing email communications which appear to show that he urged restraint and advocated for proper valuation of the instruments he was handling.

So was Bruno Iksil, the London Whale himself, just the wheelman in these proceedings?
Martin-Artajo and Grout are charged with wire fraud and making false filings with the SEC.

Here again we have the mythical "serious charges" that the SEC and Justice Department like to talk about. But Martin-Artajo, Grout, and perhaps Iksil himself all have the misfortune of being expendable.

As we've seen with all the Justice Department's "investigations," it's not the top-ranking Jamie Dimons who end up falling on their swords, but those in the middling ranks.

In fact, the allegations hint at some tremendous pressure being exerted on the little fish, as Martin-Artajo, Grout, and Iksil were urged to "show smaller and smaller" losses. JPMorgan dramatically understated these losses to begin with, and then they rocketed from a few hundred million dollars up to around $6 billion.

Such is the word from on high, and such are the forces that eventually break markets.

More Dangerous Than They Seem

Very often, news of these huge trades netting huge losses seems to us to be abstract. There exists a (mistaken) sense that this happens so very far above our heads that it has no real effect on individual investors.

After news breaks of another big scandal on Wall Street, regulators vow action... bankers deny responsibility... risk to the system...

Then we shrug it off and get back to our lives, albeit with that much less faith in the system.

But the impact of these scandals in reality hit far closer to home...

Whenever Wall Street undergoes these world-scorching periods of Götterdämmerung, wherein impossibly huge sums are lost and hand-wringing goes into overdrive, there is serious fallout for "small" investors; you know, anyone playing with less than a $97 billion bankroll.

One immediate effect would be for anyone who happens to be holding any of the 3.77 billion shares that JPMorgan has outstanding. News of the London Whale's shenanigans sent shares of JPM tumbling, shedding nearly 10% of the share price in hours.

If you haven't hedged your portfolio against that kind of risk, if it's not risk-balanced properly, you're in a bit of trouble there.

That 10% is not an insignificant loss. In fact, it's this very loss that is driving a class-action lawsuit against JPMorgan and such principals as CEO Jamie Dimon, Ina Drew (chief of the trading unit where Iksil made his mega-trades), and Doug Braunstein.

But there's another, more insidious effect that these games have on individual investors. Ina Drew must have been fully aware that her people were taking up positions that were, in essence, counter to investors at the same firm. Javier Martin-Artajo knew the full extent of the Whale's losses.

The markets work best with maximum transparency and when good information prevails. But JPMorgan's actions run counter to this, in effect undermining the integrity of the entire market. In that sense, anyone who had anything in the market was adversely affected by these activities.

JPMorgan was operating on a different level than the rest of us, but that doesn't mean they're not just scam artists at heart. Click here, and make sure no one's got their eye on you for a mark.

Source :http://moneymorning.com/2013/08/14/how-jpmorgan-and-the-london-whale-can-sink-your-portfolio/

Money Morning/The Money Map Report

©2013 Monument Street Publishing. All Rights Reserved. Protected by copyright laws of the United States and international treaties. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution (electronic or otherwise, including on the world wide web), of content from this website, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of Monument Street Publishing. 105 West Monument Street, Baltimore MD 21201, Email: customerservice@moneymorning.com

Disclaimer: Nothing published by Money Morning should be considered personalized investment advice. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized investent advice. We expressly forbid our writers from having a financial interest in any security recommended to our readers. All of our employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication, or after the mailing of printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended by Money Morning should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Money Morning Archive

© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in