Best of the Week
Most Popular
1.Gold Price Trend Forecast, Where are the Gold Traders? - Bob_Loukas
2.Stocks Bear Market of 2017 Begins? Shorting the Dow At its Peak! - Nadeem_Walayat
3.Betting on President Trump Leaving Office Early, Presidency End Date - Betfair Market - Nadeem_Walayat
4.Why Stock Market Analysts Will be Wrong About 2017 - Clif_Droke
5.Is This The Best Way For Investors To Play The Electric Car Boom - OilPrice_Com
6.Silver Price 2017 Trend Forecast Update - Video - Nadeem_Walayat
7.Gold Price Set For Very Bullish 2017, Trend Forecast - Austin_Galt
8.10 Things I learned From Meetings With Trump’s Transition Team - - John_Mauldin
9.How Investors Can Profit From Trumps Military Ambitions - OilPrice_Com
10.Channel 4 War on 'Fake News', Forgets Own Alt Reality Propaganda Broadcasting - Nadeem_Walayat
Last 7 days
Stock Market SPX New All-time Highs Continue - 25th Feb 17
POWERFUL GOLD & SILVER COILED SPRINGS: Important Charts You Have To See - 25th Feb 17
Underperformance in Gold Stocks Argues for Interim Peak - 25th Feb 17
Watch What Happens When Silver Price Hits $26...  - 25th Feb 17
Gold Futures Buying Yet to Start - 25th Feb 17
When the Stock Market Flying Pig Tops - 24th Feb 17
Gold, Second Fed Hike and Interest Rates - 24th Feb 17
Bitcoin Price Hits Record High! - 24th Feb 17
Another Stock Market Bubble? Bring it On! - 24th Feb 17
What Investors Need To Know About U.S. Money Market Funds? - 24th Feb 17
When Was America’s Peak Wealth? - 24th Feb 17
The Oscars – Worth Their Weight in Gold? - 24th Feb 17
The Best Reasons to Buy Gold in the Age of Trump - 22nd Feb 17
Silver, The Return of Stagflation - 22nd Feb 17
Why EU BrExit Single Market Access Hard line is European Union Committing Suicide - 22nd Feb 17
Gold: Short End US Rates Matter More Than Long End Real Yields - 22nd Feb 17
CONTINENTAL RESOURCES: Example Of What Is Horribly Wrong With The U.S. Shale Oil Industry - 22nd Feb 17
Here’s Proof Rising Rates Are Good for Gold - 21st Feb 17
Gold and Silver Weekly Update - 21st Feb 17
US Dollar and Gold Battle of the Cycles - 21st Feb 17
NSA and CIA is the Enemy of the People - 21st Feb 17
Big Moves in the World Stock Markets - Big Bases - 21st Feb 17
Stock Market Uptrend Continues - 21st Feb 17
Brent Crude Oil Price Technical Update: Low Volatility Leads to High Volatility - 20th Feb 17
Trump’s Tax System Could Spark The Wave Of Self-Employment - 20th Feb 17
Here’s How to Stay Ahead of Machines and AI - 20th Feb 17
Warning Signs Of Instability In Russia - 20th Feb 17
Warning: This Energy Investment Could Wreak Havoc On Your Portfolio - 20th Feb 17
The Mother of All Financial Bubbles will be Unimaginably Destructive when it Bursts - 19th Feb 17
Gold’s Fundamentals Strengthen - 18th Feb 17
The Flynn Fiascom, the Trump Revolution Ends in a Whimper - 18th Feb 17
Not Nearly Enough Economic Growth To Keep Growing - 18th Feb 17
SPX Stocks Bull Market Continues to make New Highs - 18th Feb 17
China Disaster to Trigger Gold Run, Trump to Appoint 5 of 7 Fed Governors - 18th Feb 17

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

State of Global Markets 2017 - Report

Bitcoin Price Dancing around $1,000

Currencies / Bitcoin Feb 14, 2017 - 06:44 PM GMT

By: Mike_McAra

Currencies

In short: no speculative positions.

Needham & Co., an investment firm, has issued a new report on the potential success of three prospective Bitcoin ETF. In the report, we read:

Given elevated interest in the bitcoin ETFs that are going through the regulatory approval process we're revisting the subject with a deeper dive to take a look at the factors that may affect approval, differences between the three filings, market indicators of approval odds, and the effect of approval/disapproval on price. Overall, we maintain our estimates that the likelihood of approval is less than 25% but that, if it were approved, such an ETF would be extremely successful. That said, there are some market indicators that seem to suggest higher odds than our own estimates. Ultimately, while we don't see any specific reason to disapprove the Winklevoss Bitcoin ETF, we think the SEC is likely to disapprove out of an abundance of caution around bitcoin itself (as opposed to something specific to the filing).


The general idea here is that there is nothing wrong, technically, with the Winklevoss filing but rather the SEC is not familiar with Bitcoin itself and may be disinclined to give a go-ahead. If this assessment is correct, this might mean that we would have to wait a lot longer for a Bitcoin ETF.

While we agree with the opinion that a Bitcoin ETF would be largely successful as it would address the demand from Bitcoin investors. Currently, it is relatively hard to trade Bitcoin if one is not comfortable with the notion of a Bitcoin exchange. A Bitcoin ETF would potentially change that and it is our view that a lot of investors currently willing to participate in the market but not able to do so would enter and possibly give Bitcoin a boost.

On the other hand, we find the assessment of odds at 25% to potentially underestimate the chances of a Bitcoin ETF being approved. At present, we would put the odds of the ETF getting approval at 50%. It seems to us that the fact that the Winklevoss twins have made significant changes to the filing along the way works in their favor. On the other hand, the process is already very long and this might be an indication that the SEC doesn’t necessarily know how to approach Bitcoin. This would be detrimental to the prospects of the ETF being approved.

For now, let’s focus on the charts.

On BitStamp, we saw a decisive drop in volume following the Thursday drop. Recall our comments from that day:

The action was mostly to the upside but yesterday we saw a very curious development. Bitcoin failed to move down decisively in spite of very negative news (PBOC meeting with exchanges). This was a bullish development, possibly even more bullish than the previous appreciation. All of this was denied today since Bitcoin fell pretty strongly in the early hours (...) – the decline is not visible in the chart yet since the chart is based on daily closes. But does this denial mean that all is bearish for Bitcoin?

We went on to write that it was not a game changer in terms of positioning, in our opinion. So far, the situation has played out consistently with our remarks as Bitcoin came back above $1,000, which greatly weakened the bearish implications. This was, however, followed by action which brought Bitocin below $1,000 again (this is written around 12:00 p.m.). Is this the end of a knee-jerk reaction following the recent decline?


On the long-term BTC-e chart, we see that a double top pattern might be emerging. Our previous comments:

The most important change now is that the bullish development we described earlier (lack of reaction to bearish news) was denied and followed by very strong declines on significant volume. This, on the face of it, is a very bearish development. However, if we dig a bit deeper the implications are not extremely bearish just now.

First of all, Bitcoin went down below $1,000 but not below $900 and it has already rebounded and is now close to $1,000. The situation is still pretty volatile and we are yet to see a close below $1,000. If we don’t see one today, the bearish indications will be weakened. At the same time, the most important line we’ve mentioned several times in the past is the 38.2% Fibonacci retracement level based on the August 2016 – January 2017 move up. The line is currently at around $882 which is still pretty far from the current price levels. At present, it seems that the situation has changed to more bearish than before but not bearish enough, in our opinion, to put on speculative short positions. Given the volatility we’ve seen today, we can’t really rule out a move below this line or a move back above $1,000 for that matter. We would be inclined to view the bearish case as somewhat stronger, however, we would like to see more confirmations. (...)

For the time being, $882 remains a very powerful level, in our opinion. The current situation resembles a double top and we might be in for more significant depreciation in Bitcoin. This, however, is still relatively unclear as the currency is still above the mentioned level. This means that while there are some bearish indications, we haven’t seen a decisive confirmation just yet, in our opinion.

Summing up, in our opinion not having speculative positions might be favorable at the moment.

Trading position (short-term, our opinion): no positions.

Regards,

Mike McAra
Bitcoin Trading Strategist

Bitcoin Trading Alerts at SunshineProfits.com

Disclaimer

All essays, research and information found above represent analyses and opinions of Mike McAra and Sunshine Profits' associates only. As such, it may prove wrong and be a subject to change without notice. Opinions and analyses were based on data available to authors of respective essays at the time of writing. Although the information provided above is based on careful research and sources that are believed to be accurate, Mike McAra and his associates do not guarantee the accuracy or thoroughness of the data or information reported. The opinions published above are neither an offer nor a recommendation to purchase or sell any securities. Mr. McAra is not a Registered Securities Advisor. By reading Mike McAra’s reports you fully agree that he will not be held responsible or liable for any decisions you make regarding any information provided in these reports. Investing, trading and speculation in any financial markets may involve high risk of loss. Mike McAra, Sunshine Profits' employees and affiliates as well as members of their families may have a short or long position in any securities, including those mentioned in any of the reports or essays, and may make additional purchases and/or sales of those securities without notice.

Mike McAra Archive

© 2005-2016 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in

Catching a Falling Financial Knife