Best of the Week
Most Popular
1. Ray Dalio: This Debt Cycle Will End Soon - John_Mauldin
2.Stock Market Dow Plunge Following Fake US - China Trade War Truce - Nadeem_Walayat
3.UK House Prices 2019 No Deal BrExit 30% Crash Warning! - Nadeem_Walayat
4.What the Oil Short-sellers and OPEC Don’t Know about Peak Shale - Andrew_Butter
5.Stock Market Crashed While the Yield Curve Inverted - Troy_Bombardia
6.More Late-cycle Signs for the Stock Market and What’s Next - Troy_Bombardia
7.US Economy Will Deteriorate Over Next Half Year. What this Means for Stocks - Troy_Bombardia
8.TICK TOCK, Counting Down to the Next Recession - James_Quinn
9.How Theresa May Put Britain on the Path Towards BrExit Civil War - Nadeem_Walayat
10.This Is the End of Trump’s Economic Sugar High - Patrick_Watson
Last 7 days
Where is the Dow Stock Market Santa Rally? - 17th Dec 18
With Weaker Climate Consensus, Expect Elevated Climate Change - 16th Dec 18
SMIGGLE Advent Calendar 2018 UK Contents - What You Get Look Inside Review - 16th Dec 18
Is there a Lump of Coal in Santa's Stock Market Bag? - 16th Dec 18
This Market Will Drive Gold in 2019… - 16th Dec 18
Gerald Celente:Central Banks Can’t Stop a 2019 Debt Disaster - 16th Dec 18
Gold Stocks Triple Breakout - 15th Dec 18
The stock market fails to rally each day. What’s next for stocks - 14th Dec 18
How Low Could the S&P 500 Go? - 14th Dec 18
An Industrial to Stock Trade: Is Boeing a BUY Here? - 14th Dec 18
Will the Arrest of Huawei Executive Derail Trade War Truce? - 14th Dec 18
Trump vs the Fed: Who Wins? - 13th Dec 18
Expect Gold & Silver to Pullback Before the Next Move Higher - 13th Dec 18
Dollar Index Trends, USDJPY Setting Up - 13th Dec 18
While The Stocks Bulls Fiddle With The 'Fundamentals,' Rome Burns - 13th Dec 18
The Historic Role of Silver - 13th Dec 18
Natural Gas Price Setup for a Big Move Lower - 13th Dec 18
How to Get 20% Off Morrisons Weekly Supermarket Shopping - 13th Dec 18
Gold Price Analysis: Closer To A Significant Monetary Event - 13th Dec 18
Where is the Stock Market Santa Claus Rally? - 12th Dec 18
Politics and Economics in Times of Crisis - 12th Dec 18
Owning Precious Metals in an IRA - 12th Dec 18
Ways to Improve the Value of Your Home - 12th Dec 18
Theresa May No Confidence Vote, Next Tory Leader Betting Market Analysis and Forecasts - 12th Dec 18
Gold & Global Financial Crisis Redux - 12th Dec 18
Wow Your Neighbours With the Best Christmas Projector Lights for Holidays 2018! - 12th Dec 18
Stock Market Topping Formation as Risks Rise Around the World - 11th Dec 18
The Amazing Story of Gold to Gold Stocks Ratios - 11th Dec 18
Stock Market Medium term Bullish, But Long Term Risk:Reward is Bearish - 11th Dec 18
Is a Deleveraging Event about to Unfold in the Stock Market? - 11th Dec 18
Making Money through Property Investment - 11th Dec 18
Brexit: What Will it Mean for Exchange Rates? - 11th Dec 18
United States Facing Climate Change Severe Water Stress - 10th Dec 18
Waiting for Gold Price to Erupt - 10th Dec 18
Stock Market Key Support Being Re-Tested - 10th Dec 18
May BrExit Deal Tory MP Votes Forecast, Betting Market Analysis - 10th Dec 18
Listen to What Gold is Telling You - 10th Dec 18
The Stock Market’s Long Term Outlook is Changing - 10th Dec 18
Palladium Shortages Expose Broken Futures Markets for Precious Metals - 9th Dec 18
Is an Inverted Yield Curve Bullish for Gold? - 9th Dec 18

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How You Could Make £2,850 Per Month

Bitcoin is Bitcoin

Currencies / Bitcoin May 08, 2018 - 03:14 PM GMT

By: Submissions

Currencies

Mike Jarmuz writes: Someone once tried to sell me a used Rolex for $500 when the fair market value of this “Rolex” would be around $4,500.  The watch said Rolex, it definitely looked like a Rolex and for someone who never had worn a Rolex before….. I guess it also felt like a Rolex.  But… this watch was definitely NOT a Rolex and I thankfully did not make this purchase.  This is pretty much the analogy for anyone buying Bitcoin Cash today and thinking it’s Bitcoin.  It looks like Bitcoin, it may feel like Bitcoin and somehow there are people out there who refer to it as “the real Bitcoin.”  I mean after all, Bitcoin.com has multiple PSA references and warnings about it. Unfortunately, they aren’t warning you (to your benefit) at all.  They are one of the biggest proponents in the spreading of misinformation.  The whole damn website is lousy with inaccurate and downright factually incorrect information.  But why?  Why would Bitcoin.com along with a handful of other “bad actors” try and doup the public? 


Do they really believe that Bitcoin Cash or as we like to say “BCash” is actually Bitcoin?  Did the guy trying to sell me that watch actually believe it was in fact a real Rolex? Was he just being “nice” by pricing it at 10% of the actual cost of the watch?  Or did he know the watch was not genuine?  Both salesman in my analogy have one goal and that is to sell you a cheap knock off product.  BCash is like buying a fake Coach bag on Canal Street.  You’re free to buy it, you can use it, but you’d be lying to yourself if you thought for a minute this was “the real thing.”  By fleecing the public and bilking you, they are the ONLY ones who are profiting and they’re not doing you any favors.  This is all by design and there are some serious BCash players that coordinate these “pumps.” 

I mean, you have CNBC outright telling you to buy BCash.  You have Blockchain.info (the largest mobile wallet globally) who for some reason still has not implemented Segregated Witness in their wallets.  Why would this be?  Perhaps it has something to do with Roger Ver (owner of Bitcoin.com) being one of (if not their largest) investors.  It took Coinbase (supposedly the “leader” in this space) over a year to implement the basic OPTIONAL network upgrade (which only helps the network and their customers by lowering transaction costs) and their priorities instead were to add BCash first.  Of course they also did it with zero notice and in the sketchiest way by pegging the price at $3,500 on the open and the entire roll out seemed like an insider trading paradise.  Then again, we’re in a pseudo regulated market and of course nobody is being questioned or will ever go to prison because somehow these fraudulent practices are not yet illegal.       

I feel sorry for the newcomers entering this space, doing their homework and being sold this bill of goods.  The crypto space is lousy with scammers, schemes and just about every con job imaginable.  All designed to separate you from your Bitcoin.  Cloud mining, Bitconnect type ponzi scams, the idea of purchasing some “masternode” that is going to throw off huge dividends, crypto trading courses, machine to machine payment pipe dreams, smart contract platforms and partnership rumors, buying into “the next Bitcoin” and that’s just for starters.  Why oh why do people think they need to “do something” with their Bitcoin?  Maybe it’s the ADD society we’re living in and being a HODLer isn’t exciting enough.  It’s truly unfortunate that most newcomers visit the Bitcoin.com website and probably leave thinking that this was somehow “Satoshi’s true vision.”  Only time will tell what happens and how this all plays out.  Hopefully Bitcoin.com one day will be as irrelevant as Internet.com is today.  Or is it more like a Pepsi vs. Coke or McDonalds and Burger King?  Is there a place for BCash in the future and does it solve a problem?  They would like you to think so but actually with ON CHAIN Bitcoin transaction fees NEAR ZERO, there is no need for this useless BCash altcoin. 

Or better yet, let’s take Grisham’s Law and try to apply it here.  Grisham’s Law basically states that if there are two forms of money in circulation, which are accepted by law and similar, the more valuable one will gradually disappear from circulation.  In other words people spend the least valuable money first.  If you had an equal amount of Bitcoin and BCash, and had to spend one…. which one would you choose?  I, without hesitation, would dump that BCash almost instinctively. It’s not even up for debate, in my brain.  I don’t have any BCash by the way.  But, there ain’t no way, that I’m spending my precious Bitcoin, if faced with that choice.  So, if people in general are forced to choose, what do you think they will do?  Does this strengthen Bitcoin’s use case as a long term store of value…..  YES.  If you had to lock up all your money in one crypto (or something) for 20 years and went to sleep, how would you choose to store those funds?  What would you do?  For starters., if you’d rather lock it up in BCash, then you’re out of your mind.  Reality is, that if you are smart, you’d probably choose Bitcoin.  It’s the only answer.  There is however, a 100% guarantee of one outcome.  If you choose to lock that money up in dollars, your purchasing power will ONLY be devastated over time.  Government spending is the greatest bull market in history, it’s never gone down. 

Why are small blocks paramount for Bitcoin’s success?  Why can’t Bitcoin just hard fork and raise the block size limit?  On the surface it seems like this is a logical solution to a problem of full blocks and high fees.  By the way, 1-2 megabyte Bitcoin blocks are CURRENTLY NOT FULL and the 8 megabyte BCash blocks are damn near empty.  Bitcoin gives anyone with a $50 laptop the ability to download an entire copy of the blockchain and interact directly with the Bitcoin Network.  There is no trusted 3rd party involved.  There is no need to rely on someone else’s node.  Your blockchain.info wallet is what is actually technically referred to as  an SPV wallet.  You yourself are not actually directly broadcasting your transaction to the Bitcoin Network.  You are relying on the SPV (simplified payment verification) provider.  Therefore, your money is not actually under your control.  It’s like having a bank account.  You ask permission to send a Chase quickpay and they allow it to happen.  You ask permission to send a wire and they allow it to happen.  In fact, you’re actually asking permission to even withdraw “your money”….. And then they allow it.  Bitcoin is powerful because it’s permissionless.  This is a crucial and non-negotiable aspect that must be maintained. 

For those not familiar with Moore’s law and still have not read the Bitcoin Whitepaper in which it is referenced, it states that the number of transistors in an integrated circuit doubles approximately every two years.  Smaller blocks are what allows this ratio to not be at risk in regards to Bitcoin scaling.  A harfork to raise the block size is always a last resort option.  In fact Segwit does increase the Block size in a small and manageable way over time.  We’re already seeing some 2 megabyte Bitcoin blocks since it’s debut and the adoption is only at about 35%.  Adoption is important and Segwit is what is known as a “soft fork” because it’s completely optional and backwards compatible.  If you don’t want to use a Segwit address, you don’t have to but you’ll pay higher fees by not doing so. 

What does this all mean?  Why are big blocks bad?  For example, assume people actually used BCash and their 8 meg blocks were full.  In a very short time, the average computer would not be able to run a full node and you would be forced to rely on a third party provider.  No different than our banking system today.  This is actually what they want.  They want you to be beholden to them.  Watch this insane Craig Wright speech (fake Satoshi) where he says “if you can’t afford a $25,000 computer to run your own node then go piss off.”  I know it’s hard to give an hour of your life to this video but if you want the real picture of what a scam BCash is, then it’s a must watch.  Think for yourself.  This video and big blocker propagandhi should make the decision very easy.  Is this what you want?  This guy went on record claiming he was Satoshi and then it was publicly debunked.  He should have been written off as a laughing stock.  It’s a miracle he wasn’t burned after that, how quickly people forget. 

Or you have someone like Adam Back, who was actually cited in the Bitcoin Whitepaper giving this speech about scaling.  Who do you want to trust with your life savings?  It’s a complete juxtaposition from Craig Wright’s demeanor.  One is sane and a brilliant computer scientist who’s project Hashcash was directly cited in Satoshi’s White Paper and an actual cypherpunk from that era.  The other is like a traveling carney selling you snake oil and “exercising daemons” on stage.    

Segwit was a milestone for Bitcoin and it took over three years of development and testing.  It was so thoroughly tested that in the process Blockstream and the Bitcoin Core developers indirectly discovered an open SSL bug that existed in over 30% of all websites on the internet.  Doesn’t this sound like the type of innovation that you want from the people securing your money?  The smartest people in the world are working on Bitcoin, not on Bitcoin Cash. 

If you feel like you are missing out because the price is pumping, don’t be fooled.  You want BCash because it’s cheaper?  You get what you pay for. 

By Mike Jarmuz

http://thecryptoyears.com/

© 2018 Copyright Mike Jarmuz - All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors.


© 2005-2018 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in

6 Critical Money Making Rules