I would like to explain the difference between investing in the actual metal versus precious metal ETFs. One should completely realize when buying a precious metal ETF, it is simply a representation of the price in gold or silver. Investing in precious metals entails buying the real metal directly or through a program that offers the right to receive physical metal in deliverable form upon liquidation with no conditions.

What is overlooked by most professionals?

One of the items that I read in the prospectus of the gold and silver ETFs that concerns me relates to the reported expenses of the fund. I am a professional expert in the storage and security of gold and silver. I run a fully segregated and insured storage program that is independent of the financial system. I also run a very unique physical gold and silver bullion fund that takes delivery of all physical metal, as well as, stores and insures the metal outside the financial system in fully segregated and armored vaults. I am very knowledgeable with the cost of insuring and securing physical metal.

The expense ratios for many of the ETFs and other funds are very telling.
Many products want to have the lowest fee to attract today's cost conscious investor. However, there is an old saying, "You get what you pay for". I will take the SPDR Gold Shares "GLD" for example. They claim the custodian charges .10 % or 10 basis point to properly safeguard the gold. A qualified custodian must properly store the physical metal through the use of very specific security controls such as cameras, sensors, armed guards, etc. However just as important is the insurance which would protect the facility and owner of the metal in the event of a breakdown in the security controls of the vault.

What is fascinating is the unbelievably low cost the SPDR Gold Shares pays for this security and insurance. Lets forget about the cost of simply providing a secure facility to store the gold.

At these level of assets, there is only one company in the world that insures physical precious metals in armored vaults. I have been told there is no way this insurance company would charge a meager 10 basis points annually for an "all risk" policy. That is equivalent to insuring a car worth $10,000 and its driver for ten dollars a year. No insurance company could ever make enough money to cover the risk of loss on that policy except maybe AIG. Even some of the largest custodians for valuable assets pay a minimum of 15 to 25 basis points just for an "all risk" insurance policy.

Personally, I question any program that stores their metal at a financial institution. In many cases, the financial institution is internally insuring much of the gold it stores. The problem with that is, if the institution runs into financial trouble the owner of the metal has no protection against the loss or damage to the items being stored. And isn't the idea of owning gold and silver a hedge against a failure in the financial system?

That is why our programs store everything outside the financial system in independently insured vaults.

Bob Coleman
www.goldsilvervault.com

© 2009 Copyright Bob Coleman - All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors.

Comments

Chuma Mgolodelwa
05 Jul 09, 12:36

Where these fears are coming from

Bob- As much as I hear what you are saying, and not just you alone, many have voiced their concerns and fears around metal etf, but but but I have to say I am not convinced. My problem is most of those who have problems with metal etf are those who have an interest in the metal trade market and stand to and already are on the lossing side. In other words in my mind most of the concern are coming more out of fear of lossing market share due to etf companies growth. Conflict of interest. I doubt if concerns are truely based on flaws on the etf markets, but may actually be a means to preserve their market share.

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in

The Market Oracle is a FREE Financial Markets Forecasting & Analysis web-site.
(c) 2005-2024 MarketOracle.co.uk (Market Oracle Ltd) - Market Oracle Ltd asserts copyright on all articles authored by our editorial team and all comments posted. Any and all information provided within the web-site, is for general information purposes only and Market Oracle Ltd do not warrant the accuracy, timeliness or suitability of any information provided on this site. nor is or shall be deemed to constitute, financial or any other advice or recommendation by us. and are also not meant to be investment advice or solicitation or recommendation to establish market positions. We do not give investment advice and our comments are an expression of opinion only and should not be construed in any manner whatsoever as recommendations to enter into a market position either stock, option, futures contract, bonds, commodity or any other financial instrument at any time. We recommend that independent professional advice is obtained before you make any investment or trading decisions. By using this site you agree to this sites Terms of Use. From time to time we promote or endorse certain products / services that we believe are worthy of your time and attention. In return for that endorsement and only in the cases where you purchase directly though us may we be compensated by the producers of those products.