Best of the Week
Most Popular
1. Market Decline Will Lead To Pension Collapse, USD Devaluation, And NWO - Raymond_Matison
2.Uber’s Nightmare Has Just Started - Stephen_McBride
3.Stock Market Crash Black Swan Event Set Up Sept 12th? - Brad_Gudgeon
4.GDow Stock Market Trend Forecast Update - Nadeem_Walayat
5.Gold Significant Correction Has Started - Clive_Maund
6.British Pound GBP vs Brexit Chaos Timeline - Nadeem_Walayat
7.Cameco Crash, Uranium Sector Won’t Catch a break - Richard_Mills
8.Recession 2020 Forecast : The New Risks & New Profits Of A Grand Experiment - Dan_Amerman
9.Gold When Global Insanity Prevails - Michael Ballanger
10.UK General Election Forecast 2019 - Betting Market Odds - Nadeem_Walayat
Last 7 days
Welcome to the Zombie-land Of Stock Market Investing - 11th Nov 19
Illiquidity & Gold And Silver In The End Game - 11th Nov 19
Key Things You Need to Know When Starting a Business - 11th Nov 19
Stock Market Cycles Peaking - 11th Nov 19
Avoid Emotional Investing in Cryptocurrency - 11th Nov 19
Australian Lithium Mines NOT Viable at Current Prices - 10th Nov 19
The 10 Highest Paying Jobs In Oil & Gas - 10th Nov 19
World's Major Gold Miners Target Copper Porphyries - 10th Nov 19
AMAZON NOVEMBER 2019 BARGAIN PRICES - WD My Book 8TB External Drive for £126 - 10th Nov 19
Gold & Silver to Head Dramatically Higher, Mirroring Palladium - 9th Nov 19
How Do YOU Know the Direction of a Market's Larger Trend? - 9th Nov 19
BEST Amazon SMART Scale To Aid Weight Loss for Christmas 2019 - 9th Nov 19
Why Every Investor Should Invest in Water - 8th Nov 19
Wait… Was That a Bullish Silver Reversal? - 8th Nov 19
Gold, Silver and Copper The 3 Metallic Amigos and the Macro Message - 8th Nov 19
Is China locking up Indonesian Nickel? - 8th Nov 19
Where is the Top for Natural Gas? - 7th Nov 19
Why Fractional Shares Don’t Make Sense - 7th Nov 19
The Fed Is Chasing Its Own Tail; It Doesn’t Care What You Think - 7th Nov 19
China’s path from World’s Factory to World Market - 7th Nov 19
Where Is That Confounded Recession? - 7th Nov 19
FREE eBook - The Investment Strategy that could change your future - 7th Nov 19
Is There a Stock Market Breakout Ahead? - 6th Nov 19
These Indicators Aren’t Putting to an Economic Resurgence - 6th Nov 19
Understanding the Different Types of Travel Insurance - 6th Nov 19
The Biggest Gold Story Of 2020 - 6th Nov 19
Best Money Saving FREE Bonfire Night Fire Works Show Sheffield 2019 - 5th Nov 19
Is the Run on the US Dollar Due to Panic or Greed? - 5th Nov 19
Reasons Why Madrid Attracts Young Professionals - 5th Nov 19
Larger Bullish Move in USD/JPY May Just Be Getting Started - 5th Nov 19
Constructive Action in Gold & Silver Stocks - 5th Nov 19
The Boring Industry That Hands +500% Gains - 5th Nov 19
Stock Market Chartology vs Fundamentals - 4th Nov 19
The Fed’s Policy Is Like Swatting Flies with Nuclear Weapons - 4th Nov 19
Stock Market Warning: US Credit Delinquencies To Skyrocket In Q4 - 4th Nov 19
Stock Market Intermediate Topping Process Continues - 4th Nov 19
Stock Market $SPY Expanded Flat, Déjà Vu All Over Again - 4th Nov 19
How To Buy Gold For $3 An Ounce - 4th Nov 19

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How To Buy Gold For $3 An Ounce

Goldman Sachs Lost $90 Million on Paulson’s CDO And Saved Themselves $1 Billion

Companies / Credit Crisis 2010 Apr 18, 2010 - 02:31 AM GMT

By: Andrew_Butter

Companies

Best Financial Markets Analysis ArticleGoldman Sachs is “vigorously” protesting their innocence against the SEC complaint; here is their second press release:


http://finance.yahoo.com/news/..

Of course they are correct; there is no case to answer and unless the politicians can get to the Judge, it will likely be thrown-out at the first hearing.

A CDO is a wager between two consenting adults. In this case the “long-end-of the stick” was betting $1 billion that US house prices would go on going  up forever, the “short-end-of-the stick” (held by John Paulson) was betting $15 million that wouldn’t happen. Everyone knew what they were doing and all disclosures of fact were perfectly in accordance with all SEC and other regulations.

All Goldman did was act as the “heavenly match-maker”.

No one “pressurized” ACA Management to do something stupid, and in any case they were “professionals”, so even if they did, they should have made the right call, and no-one “pressurized” Moody’s to stamp AAA on its backside either.

Paulson won the bet; the odds interestingly were 66.6 against – the Antichrist number; that’s pure Wall Street; the value of anything is what you can get someone dumber than you to pay; so much for “God’s Work”.

But there is one little weak point in Goldman’s story which the SEC appears to have not noticed. Nothing to do with Monsieur Tourre; who simply remarked to a friend, what everyone knew in Goldman, which was that house-prices were tanking and so was the financial system.

It’s got to do with motive.

Goldman told a little white-lie when they said:

In 2006, Paulson & Co. indicated its interest in positioning itself for a decline in housing prices. The firm structured a synthetic CDO through which Paulson benefitted from a decline in the value of the underlying securities.

Well that’s true, up to a point, Paulson was “in the market”, and if he hadn’t bought CDS (shorting the housing market) from Goldman starting late 2005 or early 2006 he had been sleeping, and all the evidence is that he was not.

Other people had been buying CDS from Goldman including Michael Barry, who was the guy who worked everything out, Greg Lippmann learned the “trade” from him; its quite probable John Paulson either learned the trade, or picked up clues from Burry.

You can read all about that in “The Big Short”, and if the SEC wants to win this thing, they will read that account with care.

http://www.amazon.com/Big-Short-Inside-Doomsday-Machine/dp/0393072231

Burry had been buying Credit Default Swaps from Goldman since 2005; this is what he had to say about that:

Goldman Sachs e-mailed him a great long list of crappy mortgage bonds to choose from. “This was shocking to me, actually,” he says. “They were all priced according to the lowest rating from one of the big-three ratings agencies.” He could pick from the list without alerting them to the depth of his knowledge. It was as if you could buy flood insurance on the house in the valley for the same price as flood insurance on the house on the mountaintop.

So Goldman’s were a bunch of morons, OK, but that’s not criminal. But here is the thing.

Goldman had been in the business of creating RMBS for quite some time, and they had been throwing in a CDS with the “package” to help push the sales along. But, and this is where it gets clever, they hadn’t “hedged” those (in insurance terms they hadn’t re-insured, they were “self insured”).

Fair enough, that’s like if you buy a car and the dealer throws in fully comprehensive insurance with the deal, except he doesn’t bother to buy that insurance from a broker, he takes the risk himself; nothing illegal about that.

Then late 2006, the writing started to be on the wall, even Goldman could see it; this is what Burry had to say about that:

Three days later he heard from Goldman Sachs. His saleswoman, Veronica Grinstein, called him on her cell phone instead of from the office phone. (Wall Street firms now recorded all calls made from their trading desks.) “I’d like a special favour,” she asked. She, too, wanted to buy some of his credit-default swaps. “Management is concerned,” she said. They thought the traders had sold all this insurance without having any place they could go to buy it back. Could Mike Burry sell them $25 million of the stuff, at really generous prices, on the subprime-mortgage bonds of his choosing? Just to placate Goldman management, you understand.

They were trying to buy back the CDS that they had issued, in the “good times”, when socially inept “suckers” like Burry were offering to buy them at silly prices. And they wanted to buy them back and give Burry a very healthy margin.

Motive?

 By that time AIG had started waking up to “smell the roses”, so Goldman couldn’t offload any of the radioactive CDS they had written onto AIG (they say “hedge in Wall Street).

So they created a “synthetic CDO”, which is basically a collection of CDS on a pool of RMBS, like a big bet. But as they correctly stated in a press release in December 2009 in response to an article in the NYT on this particular CDO, there needs to be one party holding the long-end-of-the-stick and another holding the short-end, for that to work.

So Paulson was in town, he had been buying CDS from Goldman, they had his number on speed-dial; did he roll up one day and say “you got any action?”, or did they call him? It doesn’t matter.

But why didn’t Goldman take the short-end?

Probably because it was Goldman who had packaged up the toxic garbage that the CDS were insuring, and it’s one thing to sell bets against the stuff you created, it’s another thing to actually place bets yourself. There are limits, even on Wall Street.

And that wasn’t their priority anyway, what they wanted to do was get all those CDS that they had written, off their balance sheet, and onto someone else’s. Like an exposure of about $1 billion.

And I have absolutely no doubt that they had the smartest lawyers in the world checking every detail, to ensure that they complied with SEC regulations.

Which is why I suspect they may get away with it…unless of course someone can prove motive.

And here’s a thought, perhaps while they were at it they managed to persuade the good Mr. Paulson to sell them back some of the CDS that they were so desperate to buy-back, so they could be put in the pool.

Just to placate Goldman management, you understand.

By Andrew Butter

Twenty years doing market analysis and valuations for investors in the Middle East, USA, and Europe; currently writing a book about BubbleOmics. Andrew Butter is managing partner of ABMC, an investment advisory firm, based in Dubai ( hbutter@eim.ae ), that he setup in 1999, and is has been involved advising on large scale real estate investments, mainly in Dubai.

© 2010 Copyright Andrew Butter- All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors.

Andrew Butter Archive

© 2005-2019 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in

6 Critical Money Making Rules