Best of the Week
Most Popular
1. Investing in a Bubble Mania Stock Market Trending Towards Financial Crisis 2.0 CRASH! - 9th Sep 21
2.Tech Stocks Bubble Valuations 2000 vs 2021 - 25th Sep 21
3.Stock Market FOMO Going into Crash Season - 8th Oct 21
4.Stock Market FOMO Hits September Brick Wall - Evergrande China's Lehman's Moment - 22nd Sep 21
5.Crypto Bubble BURSTS! BTC, ETH, XRP CRASH! NiceHash Seizes Funds on Account Halting ALL Withdrawals! - 19th May 21
6.How to Protect Your Self From a Stock Market CRASH / Bear Market? - 14th Oct 21
7.AI Stocks Portfolio Buying and Selling Levels Going Into Market Correction - 11th Oct 21
8.Why Silver Price Could Crash by 20%! - 5th Oct 21
9.Powell: Inflation Might Not Be Transitory, After All - 3rd Oct 21
10.Global Stock Markets Topped 60 Days Before the US Stocks Peaked - 23rd Sep 21
Last 7 days
Why Most Investors LOST Money by Investing in ARK FUNDS - 27th Jan 22
The “play-to-earn” trend taking the crypto world by storm - 27th Jan 22
Quantum AI Stocks Investing Priority - 26th Jan 22
Is Everyone Going To Be Right About This Stocks Bear Market?- 26th Jan 22
Stock Market Glass Half Empty or Half Full? - 26th Jan 22
Stock Market Quoted As Saying 'The Reports Of My Demise Are Greatly Exaggerated' - 26th Jan 22
The Synthetic Dividend Option To Generate Profits - 26th Jan 22
The Beginner's Guide to Credit Repair - 26th Jan 22
AI Tech Stocks State Going into the CRASH and Capitalising on the Metaverse - 25th Jan 22
Stock Market Relief Rally, Maybe? - 25th Jan 22
Why Gold’s Latest Rally Is Nothing to Get Excited About - 25th Jan 22
Gold Slides and Rebounds in 2022 - 25th Jan 22
Gold; a stellar picture - 25th Jan 22
CATHY WOOD ARK GARBAGE ARK Funds Heading for 90% STOCK CRASH! - 22nd Jan 22
Gold Is the Belle of the Ball. Will Its Dance Turn Bearish? - 22nd Jan 22
Best Neighborhoods to Buy Real Estate in San Diego - 22nd Jan 22
Stock Market January PANIC AI Tech Stocks Buying Opp - Trend Forecast 2022 - 21st Jan 21
How to Get Rich in the MetaVerse - 20th Jan 21
Should you Buy Payment Disruptor Stocks in 2022? - 20th Jan 21
2022 the Year of Smart devices, Electric Vehicles, and AI Startups - 20th Jan 21
Oil Markets More Animated by Geopolitics, Supply, and Demand - 20th Jan 21
Fake It Till You Make It: Will Silver’s Motto Work on Gold? - 19th Jan 22
Crude Oil Smashing Stocks - 19th Jan 22
US Stagflation: The Global Risk of 2022 - 19th Jan 22
Stock Market Trend Forecast Early 2022 - Tech Growth Value Stocks Rotation - 18th Jan 22
Stock Market Sentiment Speaks: Are We Setting Up For A 'Mini-Crash'? - 18th Jan 22
Mobile Sports Betting is on a rise: Here’s why - 18th Jan 22
Exponential AI Stocks Mega-trend - 17th Jan 22
THE NEXT BITCOIN - 17th Jan 22
Gold Price Predictions for 2022 - 17th Jan 22
How Do Debt Relief Services Work To Reduce The Amount You Owe? - 17th Jan 22
RIVIAN IPO Illustrates We are in the Mother of all Stock Market Bubbles - 16th Jan 22
All Market Eyes on Copper - 16th Jan 22
The US Dollar Had a Slip-Up, but Gold Turned a Blind Eye to It - 16th Jan 22
A Stock Market Top for the Ages - 16th Jan 22
FREETRADE - Stock Investing Platform, the Good, Bad and Ugly Review, Free Shares, Cancelled Orders - 15th Jan 22
WD 14tb My Book External Drive Unboxing, Testing and Benchmark Performance Amazon Buy Review - 15th Jan 22
Toyland Ferris Wheel Birthday Fun at Gulliver's Rother Valley UK Theme Park 2022 - 15th Jan 22
What You Should Know About a TailoredPay High Risk Merchant Account - 15th Jan 22

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How to Protect your Wealth by Investing in AI Tech Stocks

A Financial Road to Nowhere

Stock-Markets / Credit Crisis 2011 Jan 14, 2011 - 01:43 PM GMT

By: Barry_Elias


Last month, I discussed the huge risks undertaken by the financial community and the severe mistrust it has breed.

An unlimited ability to lend, even if you don’t have the money: sounds too good to be true.

Or is it?

Manmohan Singh and James Aitkin authored a recent International Monetary Fund (IMF) working paper, which describes the mechanics that realized this objective.

When a financial institution lends funds, it typically secures collateral to compensate for potential liabilities or losses. Think of it as a catastrophic insurance policy.

Yet, the United Kingdom permits unlimited use of the same collateral for additional lending. This is the equivalent of enabling an infinite amount of credit and debt. In financial parlance this is termed: rehypothecation. The same applies to specific products in the United States, such as futures, derivatives, and repurchase agreements.

Rehypothecation created $4 trillion in lending with only $1 trillion in collateral (a churn or collateral velocity of 4). With the click of a mouse, the financial community gave themselves $3 trillion to lend.

By November 2007, outstanding loans by non-bank entities such as hedge funds were believed to be $6 trillion. This amount has been revised to $10 trillion. Coincidentally, this $4 trillion difference was equal to the amount outstanding at hedge funds.

The New York Times reports that the face (notional) value of all derivatives increased six fold from $100 trillion in 1998 to $600 trillion in 2008. Most of this trading was controlled by several financial institutions including Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley, and Deutsche Bank.

This trading is unusual in that the price spread between buyer and seller is known only to the clearing institution. This means the buyer knows the price it paid, but it does not know the price the seller received. The same applies to the seller. Moreover, much of this trading did not possess the adequate collateral (capital) to offset losses.

This off-exchange derivative transaction was primarily the result of two pieces of legislation signed by President Clinton: Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999, which permitted banks to perform investment services (partial repeal of Glass-Steagall Act of 1933), and The Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000. These acts were sanctioned by the 1999 Presidential Working Group on Financial Markets. The participants included Federal Reserve Board Chairman Alan Greenspan, Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Arthur Levitt, and Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers (and against the better judgment Commodities Futures and Trade Commission Chairwoman Brooke Bornsley).

Andrew G Haldane, Executive Director of Financial Stability at the Bank of England, suggests economies of scale and return on investment diminish when deposits at a financial institution reach tens of billions of dollars. During the past several decades a few banks have accumulated hundreds of billions of dollars in assets. At this level, profit margins were eroding, and banks developed creative methods to increase revenue and profit.

Most of the growth in assets and excess risk taking was the result of the deregulation of the derivatives market, not interstate banking. In 1982, the Garn-St. Germain Act allowed any bank holding company to acquire failed banks and thrifts, and in 1997 the Riegle-Neal Act of 1994 took effect, which permitted interstate branching for domestic bank holding companies and foreign banks.

Assets at top three U.S. banks actually declined from 10 percent in 1982 to 7 percent in 1992. By 1997, when interstate banking was permitted, this figure reached 15 percent, and in 1999 it stood at 20 percent. In 1999, Glass-Steagal was partially repealed, allowing banks to enter the securities industry more readily, and in 2000, derivatives were further deregulated. These two pieces of legislation helped propel that figure to 40 2008.

Hence, we saw the exponential risk taking implied in off-exchange trading and rehypothecation (reusing the same collateral). These mechanisms also formed the template for opaque, misleading asset securitization (i.e., subprime loans purchased and implicitly guaranteed by Government Sponsored Entities such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac).

The result was cataclysmic.

According to Haldane, the financial crisis has far reaching implications.

While U.S. government losses may total hundreds of billions (possibly more in my view), global GDP has underperformed significantly and will continue to do so. The first year following the crisis, global GDP (income) was 6.5 percent lower than the projected path, representing a $4 trillion loss. Over time the projected loss to global income may $60 trillion — $200 trillion (annual world GDP is $60 trillion).

Essentially, the financial community engineered a tremendous transfer of wealth from society to themselves: not a positive return on investment for the U.S., nor the world.

Read more: A Financial Road to Nowhere

By Barry Elias


Barry Elias provides economic analysis to Dick Morris, a former political adviser to President Clinton.

He was cited and acknowledged in two recent best-sellers co-authored by Mr. Morris: “Catastrophe” and “2010: Take Back America - a Battle Plan.” Mr. Elias graduated Phi Beta Kappa from Binghamton University with a degree in economics.

He has consulted with various high-profile financial institutions in New York City.

© 2011 Copyright Barry Elias - All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors.

© 2005-2019 - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.

Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in