Best of the Week
Most Popular
1. Dollargeddon - Gold Price to Soar Above $6,000 - P_Radomski_CFA
2.Is Gold Price On Verge Of A Bottom, See For Yourself - Chris_Vermeulen
3.Dow Stock Market Trend Forecast 2018 - Nadeem_Walayat
4.Gold Price to Plunge Below $1000 - Key Factors for Gold & Silver Investors - P_Radomski_CFA
5.Why The Uranium Price Must Go Up - Richard_Mills
6.Dow Stock Market Trend Forecast 2018 - Video - Nadeem_Walayat
7.Jim Rogers on Gold, Silver, Bitcoin and Blockchain’s “Spectacular Future” - GoldCore
8.More Signs That the Stock Market Will Rally Until 2019 - Troy_Bombardia
9.It's Time for A New Economic Strategy in Turkey - Steve_H_Hanke
10.Fiat Currency Inflation, And Collapse Insurance - Raymond_Matison
Last 7 days
Gold Exodus to Reverse - 22nd Sep 18
Bitcoin Trader SCAM WARNING - Peter Jones, Dragons Den Fake Facebook Ads - 22nd Sep 18
China Is Building the World’s Largest Innovation Economy - 21st Sep 18
How Can New Companies Succeed in the Overcrowded Online Gambling Market? - 21st Sep 18
Golden Sunsets in the Land of U.S. Dollar Hegemony - 20th Sep 18
5 Things to Keep in Mind When Buying a Luxury Car in Dubai - 20th Sep 18
Gold Price Seasonal Trend Analysis - Video - 20th Sep 18
The Stealth Reason Why the Stock Market Keeps On Rising - 20th Sep 18
Sheffield School Applications Crisis Eased by New Secondary Schools Places - 20th Sep 18
Precious Metals Sector: It’s 2013 All Over Again - 19th Sep 18
US Dollar Head & Shoulders Triggered. What's Next? - 19th Sep 18
Prepare for the Stock Market’s Volatility to Increase - 19th Sep 18
The Beginning of the End of the Dollar - 19th Sep 18
Land Rover Discovery Sport 'Approved Used' Bad Paint Job - Inchcape Chester - 19th Sep 18
Are Technology and FANG Stocks Bottoming? - 18th Sep 18
Predictive Trading Model Suggests Falling Stock Prices During US Elections - 18th Sep 18
Lehman Brothers Financial Collapse - Ten Years Later - 18th Sep 18
Financial Crisis Markets Reality Check Now in Progress - 18th Sep 18
Gold’s Ultimate Confirmation - 18th Sep 18
Omanization: a 20-year Process to Fight Volatile Oil Prices  - 18th Sep 18
Sheffield Best Secondary Schools Rankings and Trend Trajectory for Applications 2018 - 18th Sep 18
Gold / US Dollar Inverse Correlation - 17th Sep 18
The Apple Story - Trump Tariffs Penalize US Multinationals - 17th Sep 18
Wall Street Created Financial Crash Catastrophe Ten Years Later - 17th Sep 18
Trade Wars Are Going To Crash This Stock Market - 17th Sep 18
Why Is Apple Giving This Tiny Stock A $900 Million Opportunity? - 17th Sep 18
Financial Markets Macro/Micro View: Waves and Cycles - 17th Sep 18
Stock Market Bulls Prevail – for Now! - 17th Sep 18
GBPUSD Set to Explode Higher - 17th Sep 18
The China Threat - Global Crisis Hot Spots & Pressure Points - 17th Sep 18 - Jim_Willie_CB
Silver's Relationship with Gold Reaching Historical Extremes - 16th Sep 18
Emerging Markets to Follow and Those to Avoid - 16th Sep 18
Investing - Look at the Facts to Find the Truth - 16th Sep 18
Gold Stocks Forced Capitulation - 15th Sep 18
Hindenburg Omen & Consumer Confidence: More Signs of Stock Market Trouble in 2019 - 15th Sep 18
Trading The Global Future - Bad Consequences - 15th Sep 18
Central Banks Have Gone Rogue, Putting Us All at Risk - 15th Sep 18
Gold Price Seasonal Trend Analysis - 14th Sep 18
Growing Number of Small Businesses Opening – and Closing – In the UK - 14th Sep 18
Gold Price Trend Analysis - Video - 14th Sep 18
Esports Is Exploding—Here’s 3 Best Stocks to Profit From - 13th Sep 18
The Four Steel Men Behind Trump’s Trade War - 13th Sep 18
How Trump Tariffs Could Double America’s Trade Losses - 13th Sep 18
Next Financial Crisis Is Already Here! John Lewis 99% Profits CRASH - Retail Sector Collapse - 13th Sep 18
Trading Cryptocurrencies: To Win, You Must Know Where You're Wrong - 13th Sep 18
Gold, Silver, and USD Index - Three Important “Nothings” - 13th Sep 18
Precious Metals Sector On a Long-term SELL Signal - 13th Sep 18
Does Gambling Regulation Work - A Case Study - 13th Sep 18
The Ritual Burial of the US Constitution - 12th Sep 18
Stock Market Final Probe Higher ... Then the PANIC! - 12th Sep 18
Gold Nuggets And Silver Bullets - 12th Sep 18
Bitcoin Trading - SEC Strikes Again - 12th Sep 18

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

Trading Any Market

Crude Oil Prices Moving To Red Alert

Commodities / Crude Oil Jan 08, 2012 - 08:53 AM GMT

By: Andrew_McKillop

Commodities Best Financial Markets Analysis ArticlePeak oil is moving back fast as permitted dinner time talk - and office time action with futures and options. And the reasons are multiple, well known, but heavily discounted until now. Through late 2011, many times, the IEA's chief economist Fatih Birol has outlined how radically the IEA sees the oil price outlook, particularly the coming and fast intensifying trend of reserve depletion hitting onshore, mature, conventional oil production. Lost in the climate crisis talk however, the oil price message was often sidelined.


Birol's agency in November said this: "If fossil fuel (energy) infrastructure is not rapidly changed, the world will lose for ever the chance to avoid dangerous climate change", but the oil price punch line came later: even in semi recession, oil prices grew through 2011. Birol has many times sounded the IEA warning: oil prices increased through 2011, despite the European crisis, near-recession in the US, recession in Japan, and falling economic growth in China and India.

Oil price rises in 2010-2011 levered up the OECD's net annual oil import costs (after re-exports and refined product exports) by 30% to about $790 billion from around $625 billion in 2010. For year 2011, Brent grade oil import prices to the 3 largest world importer countries and regions - USA, Europe, China - averaged $111 a barrel.

Until late 2011, both the US EIA, IEA and most analysts were forecasting only low level price growth in 2012, but the bets are now off.

DEMAND DRIVEN PINCH ON SUPPLY SURPLUSES

Oil imports to the United States are expected to stagnate or decline over coming years because of new fuel efficiency standards for cars and trucks, and an increase in domestic oil and natural gas production, but oil import demand in Europe, and especially China and India will continue growing in a global supply-constrained environment. For this reason, joined by rising nearterm geopolitical threats to supply in the Middle East, both the EIA and IEA continue forecasting high oil prices - even very high oil prices.

Certainly for the last 2 years, since 2009, the IEA deliberately confuses the subject of limiting global average temperature rises to 2 degrees celsius by 2025 through cutting OECD fossil energy consumption enough to prevent CO2 levels rising above 450 ppm (0.045%) in the Earth's atmosphere - with the real issue of how to prevent oil prices hitting $150 a barrel by as soon as this year, 2012. We can expect it will rectify this in the near term, but the most extreme CO2-cutting goals would imply a cut in world oil demand by as much as 33%-50% by 2025, which could be taken as a proxy for the needed cut in demand to prevent oil prices spiraling upward due to weakening supply surpluses.

The IEA, more outspoken than the US EIA presents what it calls unfavourable scenarios able to bring $200 a barrel oil by as early as 2015-2017 - without any special geopolitical tensions or pressure. The IEA basically signals little respite for energy consumers in a context where oil supply constraint grows every year due to supply-demand constraints.

The OPEC link is clear: in November, the IEA repeated warnings of the "clear need" for more OPEC oil this year, and every year forward in its 5-year scenario to 2017. While the US EIA's end year forecasts for oil prices in 2012 range through a more than generous $49 to $192 a barrel, underlining the critical level of uncertainty that exists in oil price forecasting, both the IEA and EIA assume that year-average oil import prices will steadily rise. Goldman Sachs, since Sept 2011, forecasts a highly precise 2012 oil price target of $130 for Brent and $126.50 for WTI.

Current IEA price forecasts range from an unrealistically low $114 a barrel in 2015, to $212 in 2035, in current dollars. This implies 2015 prices well above $125, and 2035 prices in dollars of the day which could exceed $275 a barrel.

CAN WE KEEP PRICES DOWN ?

On the supply side, this switches the focus to global spending on energy infrastructures, and oil and gas E&P (exploration-production) in particular. For the IEA, a vast upsurge in oil E&P spending is presented as critical to heading off Climate Change Crisis, but the the real nearterm threat to the economy is oil prices spiraling up to $150 a barrel and staying there - even during low level or "contained" economic recession of the type operating in the US, Europe and Japan at this time.

Optimistic forecasts say global energy companies are expected to raise oil and gas E&P spending nearly 10% this year, according to Dahlman Rose & Co., which estimates that despite sluggish economic growth and concerns about European and US sovereign debt, spending will hit $595 billion in 2012.

This however includes all sectoral financing operations like M&As and debt restructuring, and the narrowly defined number for real physical spending in 2011 and 2012 will come in closer to $400 bn - which is only equal to oil and gas E&P spending in the most recent record year, of 2007.

IEA studies and reports, since July 2011, claim that for every $1 of energy sector investment in recent years, from high cost and hard-to-integrate renewables to oil, gas and coal, electric power and the now flagging low-profile nuclear industry, this must be raised to $4.30 by 2017. This is a 330 % increase, with an implied or hoped-for target in global oil and gas E&P spending of at least $1.6 trillion-a-year, but the chances of this massive boost in energy sector spending happening are nearly zero.

The downturn in oil and gas spending since 2007 was partly due to recession, but was also driven by a large rise in green energy "vanity tech" investment and spending, reaching its most recent peak of about $300 - $350 bn in year 2010, according to Bloomberg New Energy Finance. To be sure this is tapering down quite fast now, but the potential for oil and gas sector spending levering up to $1.6 trillion-a-year by or before 2017 is so low we don't even have to think about it.

The implication for oil prices is easy. World conventional, onshore, mature oilfield reserves and production capacity is falling, at dangerously high rates, probably around 3.3 - 4 Mbd lost each year: without deep and sharp, global scale economic recession we can only have Oil Shock defined as prices rising to previously unknown high levels. When we have sustained Oil Shock of that type we will likely also have global economic recession - or inflation: the closed loop is so simple that average political deciders can understand what is threatened, and we can expect action !

ADD THE GEOPOLITICAL PREMIUM

Probable action may simply focus increased "quantitative easing", printing fiat money to compensate rising oil prices - making oil prices grow even faster. However, the geopolitical risk premium, already as high as $10 on each barrel today, in the opinion of many analysts, is capable of mightily rising. Far more than any other basic commodity, with few and small scale exceptions oil remains "The Prize" of oil crisis book writers, like Daniel Yergin and others.

For the potential, and threatened oil shocks of the near term future, we can be certain that Arab Spring revolts, the Iran nuclear crisis, threats to Putin's power, and ever rising Chinese and Indian oil demand can or will play a major role in advancing the arrival of an economic event horizon. This can be set with a simple question that has complex answers: The economy has to absorb higher oil prices - but how will this happen ? Not having too many answers question shifts us back to heroic-type supply side responses and actions.

With the possible but unsure exception of Libya's regime change in 2011, military action to ensure oil supply security and push down prices has been a long story of failure, but this does not prevent the military option happening again. The major problem in the present context is time: net surplus oil production capacity has continually fallen for as long as 7 - 10 years, according to the IEA and other sources, and is now set to significantly accelerate. This makes it high risk to operate regime change military adventure in major oil exporter countries, if only due to loss of export capacity during the hostilities, certainly further raising world oil prices in that interval.

This then re-shifts the focus to non-oil energy production, and oil-saving initiatives and programs in the major oil consuming, oil intensive economies, which is likely the "hidden agenda" of the IEA's climate crisis and green energy quest or crusade in recent years. Here we find a direct relation with oil prices - green energy development without heavy and permanent government subsidies needs much higher oil prices to give these high cost alternatives economic elbow room. Green energy delivers high priced energy, so if we want green energy, we must accept higher price energy - which hurts the economy.

For many reasons however, including economic and geopolitical relations with oil exporters, political deciders in consumer countries will not openly engage and commit to raising oil prices, due to this being a green flag for oil exporters to seek higher prices. Likewise, oil saving programs operated either through raising oil prices, or only on a voluntary basis, have usually failed and caused economic damage in a global economy context where fear of limiting economic growth still remains stronger than the fear of high oil prices.

The bottom line at this time is that oil prices can easily rise to new "exotic" levels this year. This will cause initial stretching of the Brent/WTI premium, due to Middle East conflict and the Iran oil embargo hurting Europe a lot more than the US, followed by a later and large shrink of the premium, even to almost nothing. The potential "target price" for both grades may be as high as $150 per barrel, with the time needed to reach these price levels being able to be short, under worst case scenarios.

By Andrew McKillop

Contact: xtran9@gmail.com

Former chief policy analyst, Division A Policy, DG XVII Energy, European Commission. Andrew McKillop Biographic Highlights

Andrew McKillop has more than 30 years experience in the energy, economic and finance domains. Trained at London UK’s University College, he has had specially long experience of energy policy, project administration and the development and financing of alternate energy. This included his role of in-house Expert on Policy and Programming at the DG XVII-Energy of the European Commission, Director of Information of the OAPEC technology transfer subsidiary, AREC and researcher for UN agencies including the ILO.

© 2012 Copyright Andrew McKillop - All Rights Reserved Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors.


© 2005-2018 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in

6 Critical Money Making Rules