Best of the Week
Most Popular
1. Investing in a Bubble Mania Stock Market Trending Towards Financial Crisis 2.0 CRASH! - 9th Sep 21
2.Tech Stocks Bubble Valuations 2000 vs 2021 - 25th Sep 21
3.Stock Market FOMO Going into Crash Season - 8th Oct 21
4.Stock Market FOMO Hits September Brick Wall - Evergrande China's Lehman's Moment - 22nd Sep 21
5.Crypto Bubble BURSTS! BTC, ETH, XRP CRASH! NiceHash Seizes Funds on Account Halting ALL Withdrawals! - 19th May 21
6.How to Protect Your Self From a Stock Market CRASH / Bear Market? - 14th Oct 21
7.AI Stocks Portfolio Buying and Selling Levels Going Into Market Correction - 11th Oct 21
8.Why Silver Price Could Crash by 20%! - 5th Oct 21
9.Powell: Inflation Might Not Be Transitory, After All - 3rd Oct 21
10.Global Stock Markets Topped 60 Days Before the US Stocks Peaked - 23rd Sep 21
Last 7 days
Stock Market Investing LESSON - Buying Value - 27th Nov 21
Corsair MP600 NVME M.2 SSD 66% Performance Loss After 6 Months of Use - Benchmark Tests - 27th Nov 21
Stock Maket Trading Lesson - How to REALLY Trade Markets - 26th Nov 21
SILVER Price Trend Analysis - 26th Nov 21
Federal Reserve Asks Americans to Eat Soy “Meat” for Thanksgiving - 26th Nov 21
Is the S&P 500 Topping or Just Consolidating? - 26th Nov 21
Is a Bigger Drop in Gold Price Just Around the Corner? - 26th Nov 21
Financial Stocks ETF Sector XLF Pullback Sets Up A New $43.60 Upside Target - 26th Nov 21
A Couple of Things to Think About Before Buying Shares - 25th Nov 21
UK Best Fixed Rate Tariff Deal is to NOT FIX Gas and Electric Energy Tariffs During Winter 2021-22 - 25th Nov 21
Stock Market Begins it's Year End Seasonal Santa Rally - 24th Nov 21
How Silver Can Conquer $50+ in 2022 - 24th Nov 21
Stock Market Betting on Hawkish Fed - 24th Nov 21
Stock Market Elliott Wave Trend Forecast - 24th Nov 21
Your once-a-year All-Access Financial Markets Analysis Pass - 24th Nov 21
Did Zillow’s $300 million flop prove me wrong? - 24th Nov 21
Now Malaysian Drivers Renew Their Kurnia Car Insurance Online With - 24th Nov 21
Gold / Silver Ratio - 23rd Nov 21
Stock Market Sentiment Speaks: Can We Get To 5500SPX In 2022? But 4440SPX Comes First - 23rd Nov 21
A Month-to-month breakdown of how Much Money Individuals are Spending on Stocks - 23rd Nov 21
S&P 500: Rallying Tech Stocks vs. Plummeting Oil Stocks - 23rd Nov 21
Like the Latest Bond Flick, the US Dollar Has No Time to Die - 23rd Nov 21
Cannabis ETF MJ Basing & Volatility Patterns - 22nd Nov 21
The Most Important Lesson Learned from this COVID Pandemic - 22nd Nov 21
Dow Stock Market Trend Analysis - 22nd Nov 21
UK Covid-19 Booster Jabs Moderna, Pfizer Are They Worth the Risk of Side effects, Illness? - 22nd Nov 21
US Dollar vs Yields vs Stock Market Trends - 20th Nov 21
Inflation Risk: Milton Friedman Would Buy Gold Right Now - 20th Nov 21
How to Determine if It’s Time for You to Outsource Your Packaging Requirements to a Contract Packer - 20th Nov 21
2 easy ways to play Facebook’s Metaverse Spending Spree - 20th Nov 21
Stock Market Margin Debt WARNING! - 19th Nov 21
Gold Mid-Tier Stocks Q3’21 Fundamentals - 19th Nov 21
Protect Your Wealth From PERMANENT Transitory Inflation - 19th Nov 21
Investors Expect High Inflation. Golden Inquisition Ahead? - 19th Nov 21
Will the Senate Confirm a Marxist to Oversee the U.S. Currency System? - 19th Nov 21
When Even Stock Market Bears Act Bullishly (What It May Mean) - 19th Nov 21
Chinese People do NOT Eat Dogs Newspeak - 18th Nov 21
CHINOBLE! Evergrande Reality Exposes China Fiction! - 18th Nov 21
Kondratieff Full-Season Stock Market Sector Rotation - 18th Nov 21
What Stock Market Trends Will Drive Through To 2022? - 18th Nov 21
How to Jump Start Your Motherboard Without a Power Button With Just a Screwdriver - 18th Nov 21
Bitcoin & Ethereum 2021 Trend - 18th Nov 21
FREE TRADE How to Get 2 FREE SHARES Fractional Investing Platform and ISA Specs - 18th Nov 21
Inflation Ain’t Transitory – But the Fed’s Credibility Is - 18th Nov 21
The real reason Facebook just went “all in” on the metaverse - 18th Nov 21
Biden Signs a Bill to Revive Infrastructure… and Gold! - 18th Nov 21
Silver vs US Dollar - 17th Nov 21
Silver Supply and Demand Balance - 17th Nov 21
Sentiment Speaks: This Stock Market Makes Absolutely No Sense - 17th Nov 21
Biden Spending to Build Back Stagflation - 17th Nov 21
Meshing Cryptocurrency Wealth Generation With Global Fiat Money Demise - 17th Nov 21
Dow Stock Market Trend Forecast Into Mid 2022 - 16th Nov 21
Stock Market Minor Cycle Correcting - 16th Nov 21
The INFLATION MEGA-TREND - Ripples of Deflation on an Ocean of Inflation! - 16th Nov 21

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How to Protect your Wealth by Investing in AI Tech Stocks

US Social Security Budget Deficit: False Alarm Or False Hope?

Politics / US Economy Apr 23, 2008 - 04:40 PM GMT

By: Ronald_R_Cooke

Politics A recent Wall Street Journal MarketWatch column by Dr. Irwin Kellner entitled “False Alarm” concludes Social Security is not likely to run out of money any time soon.

Kellner's conclusion contradicts the findings of the fund's Trustees in their 2008 report   “Status of the Social Security and Medicare Programs”.   As described in their summary: “ The financial condition of ..  Social Security …. remains problematic. Projected long run program costs are not sustainable under current financing arrangements. Social Security's current annual surpluses of tax income over expenditures will begin to decline in 2011 and then turn into rapidly growing deficits as the baby boom generation retires. ….  Growing annual deficits are projected to exhaust …. Social Security reserves in 2041.” Furthermore, his conclusion also disagrees with the findings of the Congressional Budget Office which estimates Social Security insolvency will occur in 2052. 

Kellner points out the Fund's Trustees assume an average annual growth rate of 2.3% per year in making their intermediate projections of American economic growth. He compares this rate of growth with the 3.4% per year America experienced from 1960 through 2005, and concludes the lower figure must be labeled as “conservative”. Furthermore, Kellner believes the Fund's low cost projection, which assumes an average annual GDP growth rate of 2.9%, is more realistic because (we presume) it is closer to his historical benchmark of 3.4%. With this growth rate assumption, Kellner believes Social Security will never run out of money. There will always be sufficient funds to keep the fund solvent.

I disagree.  Predicting Social Security solvency is not an easy task, and it is not simply a mathematical exercise. We must consider both the economic and the cultural environment within which these estimates are made. By way of illustration, let's look at two problems – one economic and one cultural.

First.  Conventional economists frequently fall into a credibility pothole because they project the future based on the past. With a little tweaking here and there, they believe the mathematical extrapolation of dead economic data can be used to predict future economic performance.

But this assumption is absurd. Life is not a catatonic repetition of events and circumstances. Cultures evolve. Lifestyles change. Immigration shifts the balance of political power and changes the economic landscape. Technology creates new products. Technological change destroys old markets. Once powerful institutions stumble and fade away. Life is a dynamic process. Credible economic analysis must be equally dynamic.  

For example, conventional economics does not handle resource depletion very well. Economic theory assumes increased demand will bring about higher prices; higher prices will stimulate additional production; and when production exceeds demand, competition will force prices down. That works just fine if we are forecasting the market for door knobs. It doesn't work very well if there are serious limits to the addition of new production.

Nowhere is this anomaly more evident than in the case of oil depletion. Absent a bad recession, demand will soon exceed supply. Prices have already started to increase. Oil companies are responding with new drilling and recovery projects. But supply will not grow enough to overcome the increase in demand (again absent a bad recession). First of all, the nations that own most of the world's oil resources are non to anxious to make big increases in production. They like high prices and modest increments in volume. Secondly, there are serious limitations on the availability of places to drill for oil.  So.  What is the result?

The fact that world oil demand will soon exceed production is going to have a dramatic impact on the American economy. Higher rates of inflation and unemployment will decrease the real rate of economic growth. It should not come as a surprise if the average annual increase in GDP, adjusted for inflation, is less than 1% from 2006 through 2030. If this happens, Social Security will be in trouble long before 2041.

Second. Conventional economics ignores people. It assumes human behavior will not change much in the future, or at least not enough to alter the results of an mathematical extrapolation based on dead data.

This assumption is also false. If the average annual Social Security payout is $12,000, then a couple can expect to have $24,000 a year to spend (less Medicare). If the median income for an American couple is $48,500, and they need 70% of that amount to maintain their current lifestyle, then they need an annual income of $34,000 upon retirement. To this amount, one must add annual increases to cover the cost of inflation. That means, on average, American couples must fund $10,000 a year, plus additional sums to cover the cost of inflation, from other sources. Since the basis of projected Social Security benefits is projected to decline, and Medicare premiums are projected to increase, the spread between your Social Security benefits and the cost of living will increase over the years.  Because the Federal Government underestimates the rate of inflation (see – CPI: Sophisticated Theory, Terrible Ethics on my blog at ), no sane person should anticipate annual increases in Social Security benefits will actually keep up with the rate of inflation.

Unfortunately, less than 50% of married couples (or domestic partners) will have additional income from pensions or annuities. More than 40% of all retirees will see their annual income decline by more than 30%. Really dumb agricultural policy is currently focused on increasing the price of food (thank you SENATORS Obama, Clinton and McCain), and gasoline ain't going to be cheap.

Baby Boomers (all born between 1946 and 1964) are not going to be happy when they retire and the reality of their desperate financial situation finally sinks in. These people are going to be really, really depressed when they have to sell their comfortable 2400 square foot middle class suburban home in order to scrape together enough money to rent a 420 square foot mobile home, endure unbearable cold in the winter because they can't afford the cost of fuel, and eat dog food for meat.  No.  Baby Boomers will do what they have always done.


And politicians, ever mindful of the next election, will increase Social Security payments to help them out. That means current estimates of Social Security fund solvency are inherently bogus because they fail to consider the possibility of some unknown, but definitely probable,  increase in benefits.

Conventional economic research frequently yields inadequate conclusions based on irrelevant or obsolete data that has been interpreted using algorithms of questionable relevance. In other words - we play with the numbers. It's a great academic exercise.  Cultural Economists, on the other hand, must have a strong sense of the cultural matrix within which economic phenomena occur. Culture, in this sense, includes everything we are: our political systems,  economic psychology, mores, traditions, sciences, and education. These all play a role in how we make purchase and investment decisions. (For more on Cultural Economics and Social Security, go to my blog ).

As for the Social Security “Trust” Fund, it's in more trouble than anyone can guess.

Ronald R. Cooke
The Cultural Economist
Author:  Detensive Nation

Cultural economics is the study of how we interact with economic events and conditions. Culture, in this sense, includes our political systems, religious beliefs, psychology, history, customs, arts, sciences, and education. The term "Economics" refers to the extent and process of how we employ capital, labor and materials. If human existence is dynamic, then economics – as a science – must be able to characterize the interaction of culture and economics in contemporaneous terms.

Ronald R Cooke Archive

© 2005-2019 - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.

Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in