Best of the Week
Most Popular
1. Market Decline Will Lead To Pension Collapse, USD Devaluation, And NWO - Raymond_Matison
2.Uber’s Nightmare Has Just Started - Stephen_McBride
3.Stock Market Crash Black Swan Event Set Up Sept 12th? - Brad_Gudgeon
4.GDow Stock Market Trend Forecast Update - Nadeem_Walayat
5.Gold Significant Correction Has Started - Clive_Maund
6.British Pound GBP vs Brexit Chaos Timeline - Nadeem_Walayat
7.Cameco Crash, Uranium Sector Won’t Catch a break - Richard_Mills
8.Recession 2020 Forecast : The New Risks & New Profits Of A Grand Experiment - Dan_Amerman
9.Gold When Global Insanity Prevails - Michael Ballanger
10.UK General Election Forecast 2019 - Betting Market Odds - Nadeem_Walayat
Last 7 days
Gold and Silver - The Two Horsemen - 11th Nov 19
Towards a Diverging BRIC Future - 11th Nov 19
Welcome to the Zombie-land Of Stock Market Investing - 11th Nov 19
Illiquidity & Gold And Silver In The End Game - 11th Nov 19
Key Things You Need to Know When Starting a Business - 11th Nov 19
Stock Market Cycles Peaking - 11th Nov 19
Avoid Emotional Investing in Cryptocurrency - 11th Nov 19
Australian Lithium Mines NOT Viable at Current Prices - 10th Nov 19
The 10 Highest Paying Jobs In Oil & Gas - 10th Nov 19
World's Major Gold Miners Target Copper Porphyries - 10th Nov 19
AMAZON NOVEMBER 2019 BARGAIN PRICES - WD My Book 8TB External Drive for £126 - 10th Nov 19
Gold & Silver to Head Dramatically Higher, Mirroring Palladium - 9th Nov 19
How Do YOU Know the Direction of a Market's Larger Trend? - 9th Nov 19
BEST Amazon SMART Scale To Aid Weight Loss for Christmas 2019 - 9th Nov 19
Why Every Investor Should Invest in Water - 8th Nov 19
Wait… Was That a Bullish Silver Reversal? - 8th Nov 19
Gold, Silver and Copper The 3 Metallic Amigos and the Macro Message - 8th Nov 19
Is China locking up Indonesian Nickel? - 8th Nov 19
Where is the Top for Natural Gas? - 7th Nov 19
Why Fractional Shares Don’t Make Sense - 7th Nov 19
The Fed Is Chasing Its Own Tail; It Doesn’t Care What You Think - 7th Nov 19
China’s path from World’s Factory to World Market - 7th Nov 19
Where Is That Confounded Recession? - 7th Nov 19
FREE eBook - The Investment Strategy that could change your future - 7th Nov 19
Is There a Stock Market Breakout Ahead? - 6th Nov 19
These Indicators Aren’t Putting to an Economic Resurgence - 6th Nov 19
Understanding the Different Types of Travel Insurance - 6th Nov 19
The Biggest Gold Story Of 2020 - 6th Nov 19
Best Money Saving FREE Bonfire Night Fire Works Show Sheffield 2019 - 5th Nov 19
Is the Run on the US Dollar Due to Panic or Greed? - 5th Nov 19
Reasons Why Madrid Attracts Young Professionals - 5th Nov 19
Larger Bullish Move in USD/JPY May Just Be Getting Started - 5th Nov 19
Constructive Action in Gold & Silver Stocks - 5th Nov 19
The Boring Industry That Hands +500% Gains - 5th Nov 19
Stock Market Chartology vs Fundamentals - 4th Nov 19
The Fed’s Policy Is Like Swatting Flies with Nuclear Weapons - 4th Nov 19
Stock Market Warning: US Credit Delinquencies To Skyrocket In Q4 - 4th Nov 19
Stock Market Intermediate Topping Process Continues - 4th Nov 19
Stock Market $SPY Expanded Flat, Déjà Vu All Over Again - 4th Nov 19
How To Buy Gold For $3 An Ounce - 4th Nov 19

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How To Buy Gold For $3 An Ounce

Expansive Monetary Policy Bullish for Small Cap Stock Performance

Companies / Sector Analysis Jun 25, 2008 - 10:05 AM GMT

By: Joseph_Dancy

Companies Best Financial Markets Analysis ArticleNumerous studies have presented evidence investors receive excess returns, or an investment premium, when investing in small and micro capitalization stocks. The findings indicate that even after considering the higher risk associated with investing in the small companies the small cap sector generates excess returns on a risk-adjusted basis.

Monetary Conditions

A few studies have extended the market capitalization research by considering the influence of monetary conditions on the small cap premium. Due to limited access to capital markets some researchers have argued that easier monetary policies should have a greater effect on smaller companies. Since we are now in a period of monetary easing by the Federal Reserve, we thought it would be worthwhile to review the findings of this research.

In the last few months the Federal Reserve cut interest rates for the seventh time, and securities lending by financial institutions to the Fed reached an e xtraordinarily high level – setting records the last week of the month. The size of the Fed's biweekly cash auctions to banks was increased by 50%, and the type of securities accepted as collateral by the Fed for loans was expanded to include credit card debt, student loans, and car loans.

The term “accommodative” or “expansive” to describe Fed actions may be an understatement in light of the recent Fed policy initiatives,

Examining the period between 1960 and 1998, Gerald R. Jensen, Robert R. Johnson, and Jeffrey M. Mercer , authors of “ The Role of Monetary Policy in Investment Management” , found that during accommodative or expansive monetary conditions small cap stocks generated much higher returns than during periods of restrictive monetary conditions. The data was statistically significant.

During accommodative monetary periods smaller companies also tended to perform much better than larger firms. The results of the study are set out in the chart below.

During periods of monetary easing micro cap firms performed 26.2% better than micro cap firms in a restrictive monetary policy environment according to the data.

The micro cap firms in the Jensen et al. study averaged an annual return of 31.3% during these expansive periods, outperforming large cap stocks in expansive periods by 12.3% per year.

Don Hays of Hays Analytics also discussed this issue last month. He included the following chart by Robert Johnson of the CFA Institute in his commentary. It includes performance comparisons similar to the study above, but over a longer time period (1937 to 2000).

Note that the ‘small cap effect' – the propensity of smaller firms to outperform larger firms – is much more pronounced in periods of expansive monetary policy than in periods of restrictive monetary policy. Data for the chart was collected over a six decade period, so the results are statistically significant.

As Jensen et al. found, when monetary policy is expansive, as it is now, both the small cap and larger cap sectors perform much better than average.

Hays notes that liquidity, in the form of expansive monetary policy, has historically benefited the performance of smaller companies the most.

Jensen's book sums up the findings well: “These findings indicate that investing in small firms was a much more favorable strategy during expansive monetary periods . . . Furthermore, the small cap premium is quite large during expansive policy periods and virtually non-existent during restrictive periods ”. (emphasis supplied).

Return Persistence

In addition to monetary conditions, several recent studies have focused on r eturn persistence – the tendency for stocks to trend in the same direction. Many academics, and a number of portfolio managers, adhere to the theory that the market is reasonably efficient. As such, historical stock prices should reflect the sum of public knowledge and should have little predictive value of future stock price movements. Many value managers adhere to this theory. The fact that some studies show stocks tend to trend on one direction is therefore a puzzle to these efficient market adherents.

The most recent comprehensive study of this issue was published by Elroy Dimson, Paul Marsh and Mike Staunton of the London Business School . They examined 108 years of market data, looking at markets in 16 different countries, to determine if a stock's historical return has any predictive basis when looking at future stock returns.

The study of 108 years of market data found extensive evidence that returns are persistent. The data was statistically significant across time periods and markets – that is a stock that has performed extremely well in the last year has an increased probability of performing well in the future. Conversely, stocks that have performed poorly have an increased probability of underperforming the market going forward.

For larger capitalization firms the best performing stocks outperformed the worst performing stocks by 10.3% per year in the U.K. markets. Over time such incremental returns compound – delivering substantial excess returns for long term investors.

Significantly, at least from our standpoint, is that the study found the excess returns attributable to return persistence was larger for small cap stocks than large cap stocks. While the best performing U.K. stocks weighted by company size had an annual return of 18.3% for the 1956-2007 period, using an equally weighted portfolio in which smaller companies had the same impact as larger ones resulted in an annual returns of 25.6%. The average market return during these periods was 13.5%.

The study concluded that the inefficiencies of the smaller cap sector apparently compounds the momentum effect.


The Russell 2000 Small Capitalization index has always been one of the more volatile major market indexes. It tracks firms that are less liquid, and that trade in the most inefficient part of the market.

Negative market news is magnified in the illiquid small cap market. Conversely, positive news is also magnified in this segment.

One measure of returns and portfolio volatility is called the Sharpe ratio. It essentially is the return divided by the volatility of the portfolio, measuring the units of return versus the units of risk.

Over the last 72 months the Sharpe ratio indicates that when markets are volatile the Russell 2000 will be disproportionately impacted – both positively and negatively.

Investors in the Russell 2000 index can expect 0.56 units of gain for every unit of volatility, as compared to 0.27 units of gain for every unit of volatility for the Nasdaq Composite index and even lower gains for the other major indexes.


Historical data indicates that current monetary conditions, return persistence, and volatility all point favorably toward firms in the small cap sector.

By Joseph Dancy,
Adjunct Professor: Oil & Gas Law, SMU School of Law
Advisor, LSGI Market Letter


Copyright © 2008 Joseph Dancy - All Rights Reserved

Joseph R. Dancy, is manager of the LSGI Technology Venture Fund LP, a private mutual fund for SEC accredited investors formed to focus on the most inefficient part of the equity market. The goal of the LSGI Fund is to utilize applied financial theory to substantially outperform all the major market indexes over time.

He is a Trustee on the Michigan Tech Foundation, and is on the Finance Committee which oversees the management of that institutions endowment funds. He is also employed as an Adjunct Professor of Law by Southern Methodist University School of Law in Dallas, Texas, teaching Oil & Gas Law, Oil & Gas Environmental Law, and Environmental Law, and coaches ice hockey in the Junior Dallas Stars organization.

He has a B.S. in Metallurgical Engineering from Michigan Technological University, a MBA from the University of Michigan, and a J.D. from Oklahoma City University School of Law. Oklahoma City University named him and his wife as Distinguished Alumni.

Joseph Dancy Archive

© 2005-2019 - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.

Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in

6 Critical Money Making Rules