Best of the Week
Most Popular
1.Bitcoin War Begins – Bitcoin Cash Rises 50% While Bitcoin Drops $1,000 In 24 Hours - Jeff_Berwick
2.Fragile Stock Market Bull in a China Shop -James_Quinn
3.Sheffield Leafy Suburbs Tree Felling's Triggering House Prices CRASH! - Nadeem_Walayat
4.Bank of England Hikes UK Interest Rates 100%, Reversing BREXIT PANIC Cut! - Nadeem_Walayat
5.Government Finances and Gold - Cautionary Tale told in Four Charts - Michael_J_Kosares
6.Gold Stocks Winter Rally - Zeal_LLC
7.The Stock Market- From Here to Infinity? - Plunger
8.Ethereum (ETH/USD) – bullish breakout of large symmetrical triangle looks to be getting closer - MarketsToday
9.Electronic Gold: The Deep State’s Corrupt Threat to Human Prosperity and Freedom - Stewart_Dougherty
10.Finally, The Fall Of The House Of Saud - Jim_Willie_CB
Last 7 days
Gold Sector is On a Long-term Buy Signal - 21st Nov 17
Saudi Arabia and Israeli Alliance Targets Iran - 21st Nov 17
What History Says for Gold Stocks in 2018-2019 - 21st Nov 17
US Bond Market Operation Twist by Another Name and Method? - 21st Nov 17
Learning from Money Supply of the 1980s: The Power and Irony of “MDuh” - 20th Nov 17
Trump’s Asia Strategy, Goals and Realities - 20th Nov 17
Crude Oil – General Market Link - 20th Nov 17
Bitcoin Price Blasts Through $8,000… In Zimbabwe Tops $13,500 As Mugabe Regime Crumbles - 20th Nov 17
Stock Market More Correction Ahead? - 19th Nov 17
Universal Credits Christmas Scrooge Nightmare for Weekly Pay Recipients - 18th Nov 17
Perspective on the Gold/Oil Ratio, Macro Fundamentals and a Gold Sector Bottom - 18th Nov 17
Facebook Traders: Tech Giant + Technical Analysis = Thumbs Up - 18th Nov 17
Games Betting System For NCAA Basketball Sports Betting - Know Your Betting Limits - 18th Nov 17
Universal Credit Doomsday for Tax Credits Cash ISA Savers, Here's What to Do - 18th Nov 17
Gold Mining Stocks Fundamentals Q3 2017 - 17th Nov 17
The Social Security Inflation Lag Calendar - Partial Indexing - 17th Nov 17
Mystery of Inflation and Gold - 17th Nov 17
Stock Market Ready To Pull The Rug Out From Under You! - 17th Nov 17
Crude Oil – Gold Link in November 2017 - 17th Nov 17
Play Free Online Games and Save Money Free Virtual Online Games - 17th Nov 17
Stock Market Crash Omens & Predictions: Another Day Another Lie - 16th Nov 17
Deepening Crisis In Hyper-inflationary Venezuela and Zimbabwe - 16th Nov 17
Announcing Free Trader's Workshop: Battle-Tested Tools to Boost Your Trading Confidence - 16th Nov 17
Instructions to Stop a Dispossession Home Sale and How to Purchase Astutely at Abandonment Home - 16th Nov 17
Trump’s Asia Tour: From Old Conflicts to New Prospects - 16th Nov 17
Bonds And Stocks Will Crash Together In The Next Crisis (Meanwhile, Bond Yields Are Going Up) - 16th Nov 17
A Generational Reset That Will Redistribute Wealth to the Bottom 60% Is Near - 16th Nov 17
Ethereum (ETH/USD) – bullish breakout of large symmetrical triangle looks to be getting closer - 16th Nov 17
Gold’s Long-term Analogies - 16th Nov 17
Does Stripping Streets of ALL of their Trees Impact House Prices (Sheffield Example)? - 15th Nov 17
The Trump Administration’s IP Battle Against China - 15th Nov 17
5 Ways Bitcoin can Improve its Odds of Becoming the Future of Money - 15th Nov 17
These Headlines Say Gold is Building a Base for Something Big - 15th Nov 17

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

Traders Workshop

Too Much Capital

Stock-Markets / Economic Theory Jul 17, 2017 - 05:02 PM GMT

By: Submissions

Stock-Markets

Henri Schneider writes: Truisms and banalities: Investors must be able to assess the productivity of their capital. This is done by comparing returns to interest rates. But what, if all interest rates are rigged? What if they are artificially lower than they should be? Then, not only too much capital is invested, but it is invested in the wrong places. Even more pressing: what if there is simply too much capital in the financial system?


For sure, financial markets are up, investors are happy, politicians – central bankers just being a peculiar type of politicians – enjoy the merriment. But the population of question marks regarding the actual cycle is also increasing.

Is there real investment appetite in financial markets or is the upward trend a function of cheap central-bank money? Is a bull-cycle of roughly 7-years the fruit of higher productivity or a result of central-banks unwillingness to raise interest-rates? Is it the nature of development that tech assets and internet companies have higher valuations than those firms that produce stuff an employ people?

For sure, all these question marks have always been there. And they will always be. But keep in mind that in the cycle before the 2007-09 crisis, a similar discussion took place. Low interest rates that remained for an overly long period of time; cheap money created and circulated by central banks; and the built-up of capital in asset classes that turned out to not to be the ones that mattered – these were all features of the 2000s bull-cycle.

Back then, no person of sane mind would question the pace of globalization. No one would dare putting a question mark behind housing. Not even the craziest would contest the financial engineers’ ability to build products. Even the diehard atheists were convinced of the god-likeliness of the Chairman (of the Fed, that is).

Today, many of the same question marks remain but can be applied to different trends, sectors and skills. The trouble is twofold. First, there is too much capital in the system. The more capital there is and the more this capital deviates from the natural investment stock, the harder is the landing. Once market-agents realize that they were valuating a capital stock much higher than the real demand for that stock is, its value implodes – crisis. Second, the more this capital-stock deviates from the natural preference for capital or assets, the longer it takes to correct this misallocation – long crisis.

Granted: The “natural” investment stock and the “natural” preference for assets seem difficult to find out. But “natural” means nothing more than what market agents would do if there weren’t interventions from central bankers pouring money into the system and lowering interest-rates. “Natural” is only what agents would do if they were to choose freely, invest per their own risk-budgets and with their own money. All of these three are currently hindered by monetary policies.

Truisms and banalities? Of course. When investors use their own money, act per their individual risk-budges and choose freely, the risk of financial crises is considerably lower. Even if they hit, markets can shake off the effects of by themselves quickly. However, the next crisis is born when central banks meddle either by keeping interest rates low or by creating too much capital. Both of them being done right now.

Henrique Schneider is the chief economist of the Swiss Federation of Small and Medium Enterprises and board member in different funds and asset managers.

New Books
Mehr als Helden: Menschen; Portrait überraschender Liberaler
https://tinyurl.com/yceyvhpr

Uber: Innovation in Society
https://tinyurl.com/ycljdjwb

Creative Destruction and the Sharing Economy
https://tinyurl.com/y7apcebg

Indifferenz, Gegnerschaft, Identität: Veränderungen im politischen Verhältnis von Dorf und Staat im Kosovo
https://tinyurl.com/y8yzhlhd

Copyright © 2017 Henri Schneider - All Rights Reserved Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors.


© 2005-2017 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in

Catching a Falling Financial Knife