Most Popular
1. It’s a New Macro, the Gold Market Knows It, But Dead Men Walking Do Not (yet)- Gary_Tanashian
2.Stock Market Presidential Election Cycle Seasonal Trend Analysis - Nadeem_Walayat
3. Bitcoin S&P Pattern - Nadeem_Walayat
4.Nvidia Blow Off Top - Flying High like the Phoenix too Close to the Sun - Nadeem_Walayat
4.U.S. financial market’s “Weimar phase” impact to your fiat and digital assets - Raymond_Matison
5. How to Profit from the Global Warming ClImate Change Mega Death Trend - Part1 - Nadeem_Walayat
7.Bitcoin Gravy Train Trend Forecast 2024 - - Nadeem_Walayat
8.The Bond Trade and Interest Rates - Nadeem_Walayat
9.It’s Easy to Scream Stocks Bubble! - Stephen_McBride
10.Fed’s Next Intertest Rate Move might not align with popular consensus - Richard_Mills
Last 7 days
Global Warming ClImate Change Mega Death Trend - 8th Apr 24
Gold Is Rallying Again, But Silver Could Get REALLY Interesting - 8th Apr 24
Media Elite Belittle Inflation Struggles of Ordinary Americans - 8th Apr 24
Profit from the Roaring AI 2020's Tech Stocks Economic Boom - 8th Apr 24
Stock Market Election Year Five Nights at Freddy's - 7th Apr 24
It’s a New Macro, the Gold Market Knows It, But Dead Men Walking Do Not (yet)- 7th Apr 24
AI Revolution and NVDA: Why Tough Going May Be Ahead - 7th Apr 24
Hidden cost of US homeownership just saw its biggest spike in 5 years - 7th Apr 24
What Happens To Gold Price If The Fed Doesn’t Cut Rates? - 7th Apr 24
The Fed is becoming increasingly divided on interest rates - 7th Apr 24
The Evils of Paper Money Have no End - 7th Apr 24
Stock Market Presidential Election Cycle Seasonal Trend Analysis - 3rd Apr 24
Stock Market Presidential Election Cycle Seasonal Trend - 2nd Apr 24
Dow Stock Market Annual Percent Change Analysis 2024 - 2nd Apr 24
Bitcoin S&P Pattern - 31st Mar 24
S&P Stock Market Correlating Seasonal Swings - 31st Mar 24
S&P SEASONAL ANALYSIS - 31st Mar 24
Here's a Dirty Little Secret: Federal Reserve Monetary Policy Is Still Loose - 31st Mar 24
Tandem Chairman Paul Pester on Fintech, AI, and the Future of Banking in the UK - 31st Mar 24
Stock Market Volatility (VIX) - 25th Mar 24
Stock Market Investor Sentiment - 25th Mar 24
The Federal Reserve Didn't Do Anything But It Had Plenty to Say - 25th Mar 24

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How to Protect your Wealth by Investing in AI Tech Stocks

Trump’s China Agreement Is a Fake Deal

Politics / Protectionism Jan 07, 2020 - 07:50 AM GMT

By: Patrick_Watson

Politics We have a trade deal! Should we pop the champagne corks?

If so, we better hurry. The Trump administration wants to slam 100% tariffs on French champagne—retaliation for France’s new digital services tax. This trade war has more than one battlefield.

But China is the biggest, and last week the Trump administration said it had reached a “Phase 1” agreement with China. The president postponed a new round of tariffs that would have taken effect Dec. 15.



That’s about where the good news ends, though. Everything else is what Silicon Valley cynics call “vaporware.”

Maybe this deal will develop into something worth celebrating. But it’s not there yet.

Opposite of Agreement

Before we get to the deal, let’s first talk about why we need it.

The US has legitimate issues with China surrounding intellectual property and market access. President Trump has been using tariffs to coerce change, so far unsuccessfully and with significant damage to the US economy.

Cancelling and/or reducing tariffs helps, but the real problem is the confusion surrounding them. Businesses can’t make effective growth plans without some minimal stability.

If you’re a CEO or CFO, and you have no idea what your cost structure will look like a year from now, you would be foolish to invest in new machinery or train a bunch of new workers. Not being fools, they have grown reluctant to do those things. This reduces US growth.

The latest Business Roundtable CEO Survey and a Duke University CFO survey show both ends of the C-suite are anything but “confident” right now. We see the results in shrinking capital investment. Eventually, this leads to recession, though we aren’t there yet.

That’s where we are. Now, imagine you are on the White House trade team. You need to boost business confidence as you announce Phase 1 of the solution. How would you do that?

Well, you might start by giving everyone as many specific details as possible. If the full text isn’t ready, you reveal as much as you can.

But most important, you would make sure both governments say the same thing. Otherwise, it’s not an “agreement” but the opposite of an agreement.

Last week, instead of a joint event featuring negotiators from both sides, we got a two-page fact sheet from the US Trade Representative, which was basically a list of things China committed to do.

Did China really commit to those things? We don’t know. Beijing had little to say.

So Phase 1 consists mainly of vague, secondhand promises, and the promising party declines to confirm it made them.

That shouldn’t build confidence. 

Different Stories

Phase 1’s main winners, if we can believe the spin, are US farmers. The US says China committed to buy large quantities of American grain and other food products. Here again, Beijing has a different story.

Let’s note, too, that China was already buying megatons of US grain until quite recently. This trade war is what made those exports fall. Restoring them would be nice, but unnecessary had Trump not gone tariff-crazy.

We should also note that US taxpayers have spent billions helping affected farmers. Simply returning exports to prior levels doesn’t reimburse the taxpayers, nor does it repay what farmers already lost.

What we need is for exports to rise substantially above the prior levels and stay there for a long time. The USTR fact sheet claims that will happen. Brian Kuehl of Farmers for Free Trade told Fox Business, “We’ll believe it when we see it.”

It’s not clear US farmers can produce enough grain to do what Trump promises. We have other domestic and export customers, too. There’s a high probability raising exports will raise food prices here. That’s not what we need.

Midwestern farmers are a key Trump constituency. He wants them to believe he is protecting them. The lack of specificity, and the different story coming from Beijing, ought to give farmers pause.

Reality Is Real

“Potemkin village” is something that portrays a false reality. Russian minister Grigory Potemkin ordered fake villages to be built to impress Empress Catherine II on her 1787 journey through what is now Ukraine.

That might be a legend, but the term fits. You build a Potemkin village when you want people to see something that isn’t actually there—for instance, the false building facades used to make films or TV shows.

Could “Phase 1” be a Potemkin trade deal? If so, it won’t accomplish much. No one can be confident it will do what it claims, or that it will last long enough to help the economy.

Yes, it’s nice the newest round of tariffs didn’t happen. But they are postponed, not cancelled. And even if they had been cancelled, we all know President Trump can reverse himself at any time.

This deal looks designed to give both leaders the appearance of an accomplishment to impress their domestic bases. No surprise—that’s how politics works. But it doesn’t fix the real problems.  

Reality is, well, real. You can’t hide from it forever. Anyone making financial decisions because they think last week changed anything should think again.

The Great Reset: The Collapse of the Biggest Bubble in History

 New York Times best-seller and renowned financial expert John Mauldin predicts an unprecedented financial crisis that could trigger in the next five years. Most investors seem completely unaware of the relentless pressure that’s building right now. Learn more here.

By Patrick_Watson

© 2019 Copyright Patrick_Watson - All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors.


© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in