Best of the Week
Most Popular
1.Gold Price Trend Forecast, Where are the Gold Traders? - Bob_Loukas
2.Stocks Bear Market of 2017 Begins? Shorting the Dow At its Peak! - Nadeem_Walayat
3.Betting on President Trump Leaving Office Early, Presidency End Date - Betfair Market - Nadeem_Walayat
4.Why Stock Market Analysts Will be Wrong About 2017 - Clif_Droke
5.Is This The Best Way For Investors To Play The Electric Car Boom - OilPrice_Com
6.Silver Price 2017 Trend Forecast Update - Video - Nadeem_Walayat
7.Gold Price Set For Very Bullish 2017, Trend Forecast - Austin_Galt
8.10 Things I learned From Meetings With Trump’s Transition Team - - John_Mauldin
9.How Investors Can Profit From Trumps Military Ambitions - OilPrice_Com
10.Channel 4 War on 'Fake News', Forgets Own Alt Reality Propaganda Broadcasting - Nadeem_Walayat
Last 7 days
The Best Reasons to Buy Gold in the Age of Trump - 22nd Feb 17
Silver, The Return of Stagflation - 22nd Feb 17
Why EU BrExit Single Market Access Hard line is European Union Committing Suicide - 22nd Feb 17
Gold: Short End US Rates Matter More Than Long End Real Yields - 22nd Feb 17
CONTINENTAL RESOURCES: Example Of What Is Horribly Wrong With The U.S. Shale Oil Industry - 22nd Feb 17
Here’s Proof Rising Rates Are Good for Gold - 21st Feb 17
Gold and Silver Weekly Update - 21st Feb 17
US Dollar and Gold Battle of the Cycles - 21st Feb 17
NSA and CIA is the Enemy of the People - 21st Feb 17
Big Moves in the World Stock Markets - Big Bases - 21st Feb 17
Stock Market Uptrend Continues - 21st Feb 17
Brent Crude Oil Price Technical Update: Low Volatility Leads to High Volatility - 20th Feb 17
Trump’s Tax System Could Spark The Wave Of Self-Employment - 20th Feb 17
Here’s How to Stay Ahead of Machines and AI - 20th Feb 17
Warning Signs Of Instability In Russia - 20th Feb 17
Warning: This Energy Investment Could Wreak Havoc On Your Portfolio - 20th Feb 17
The Mother of All Financial Bubbles will be Unimaginably Destructive when it Bursts - 19th Feb 17
Gold’s Fundamentals Strengthen - 18th Feb 17
The Flynn Fiascom, the Trump Revolution Ends in a Whimper - 18th Feb 17
Not Nearly Enough Economic Growth To Keep Growing - 18th Feb 17
SPX Stocks Bull Market Continues to make New Highs - 18th Feb 17
China Disaster to Trigger Gold Run, Trump to Appoint 5 of 7 Fed Governors - 18th Feb 17
Gold Stock Volume Divergence - 17th Feb 17
Gold, Silver, US Dollar Cycles - 17th Feb 17
Inflation Spikes in 2017, Supporting Gold Prices Despite Increased Odds of March Rate Hike - 17th Feb 17
Roses Are Red... and So's Been EURUSD's Trend - 17th Feb 17
Gold Trade Note Sighted - 17th Feb 17
Gold Is Undervalued Say Leading Fund Managers - 17th Feb 17
NSA, CIA, FBI, Media Establishment 'Deep State' War Against Emerging 'Trump State' - 16th Feb 17
Silver, Gold Stocks and Remembering the Genius of Hunter S. Thompson - 16th Feb 17
Maps That Show The US’ Strategy In Asia-Pacific - 15th Feb 17
The Trump Stock Market Rally Is Just Getting Started! - 15th Feb 17
Tesco Crisis - Fake Prices, Brexit Inflation Tsunami to Send Food Prices Soaring 10% 2017 - 15th Feb 17
Stock Market Indexes Appear Ready to Roll Over - 15th Feb 17
Gold Bull Market? Or was 2016 Just a Gold Bug Mirage? - 15th Feb 17
Here’s How Germany Buys Time From China - 15th Feb 17
The Stock Trader’s Actionable Guide to Trump - 15th Feb 17
Trump A New Jacksonian Era? The Fourth Turning (2) - 14th Feb 17
Stock Market Yet Another Wall Street 'Witch's Brew' - 14th Feb 17
This Is Why You Don’t Own A Lot Of Stocks - 14th Feb 17
Proposed Tax Reforms Face Enormous Headwinds - 14th Feb 17

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

State of Global Markets 2017 - Report

California Debt Crisis, Muni Bonds At Real Risk of Default

Interest-Rates / US Debt Feb 10, 2010 - 10:36 AM GMT

By: Richard_Shaw

Interest-Rates

Best Financial Markets Analysis ArticleCalifornia’s finances are a mess.  Credit default swap rates put California among the top ten most likely to default among major governments worldwide.

If you are a California resident and think California can solve it’s own budget problems, or if you think the US government will bail them out, then you might want to own California municipal bonds for the best fit tax shelter and the higher nominal yield.  However, if you doubt either of those, you may be better off owning a national or non-California muni fund, and accept a less tax efficient holding with a somewhat lower nominal yield, but with superior credit quality.


Since national muni funds tend to hold California as their largest position (perhaps around 20%), California residents might even want to consider a single state muni fund other than California, instead of a national muni fund, to avoid the California credits altogether.

California Default Probability Among The Worst In the World

According to CMA, which is a leading credit default swap data service, California is the tenth most likely to default major government in the world, with a 26% chance of default.  They are in poor company with the likes of Argentina, Venezuela, Pakistan, Latvia, Iceland, Dubai and Greece. — Brother can you lend me a dime?

California ranks near Greece, which sent the world’s stock markets into a tail spin last week, and which only relieved that stock price pressure this week when the EU began talking about some sort of assistance.  Just imagine if California was seen as on the ropes like Greece.

That’s a big deal.  California has the largest state economy in the US, and it’s economy is larger than all but the top 7 to 10 sovereign nations — bigger than Greece.

California, according to CMA, has roughly five times the probability of default as the US (roughly 25% to roughly 5%).

Several countries have lower default probabilities than the US, such as Hong Kong [China SAR] (4.4%) Germany (3.6%), Netherlands (3.5%) and Norway (1.8%).

That’s what the derivatives market says.  What does the press say?

Bankruptcy Bloodbath May Hit Muni Bond Owners Next
(Feb. 10, Bloomberg)

The biggest financial crisis since the Great Depression is squeezing municipalities across the country. Since Vallejo, California, successfully petitioned for bankruptcy protection in May 2008, California’s towns, Detroit’s schools and Pennsylvania’s capital city of Harrisburg have all talked about Chapter 9.

That should make bondholders nervous because it “questions whether a local government’s labor contracts would be surgically undone with bondholders’ rights left intact,” Fitch [Ratings] said.

… Local governments have been reluctant to reduce headcount during the recession. Since employment peaked at 115.6 million in December 2007, businesses have cut 8.5 million jobs, a 7.4 percent reduction. Local governments, by contrast, continued adding employees through September 2008, to a high of 14.6 million and have since fired 141,000 workers, or 0.96 percent, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

… Chapter 9 bankruptcy is rare, according to the American Bankruptcy Institute in Alexandria, Virginia.

Only six occurred during the first three quarters of 2009, the latest period for which data is available. There were four in 2008. Since 1980, we’ve seen 227 instances, the peak year being 1991, with 18. Most have involved utilities or special districts … not cities or counties.

States can’t enter Chapter 9 bankruptcy … That hasn’t stopped municipalities from talking about it more than they have since 1994, when Orange County, California, suffered through the country’s biggest municipal bankruptcy. Bondholders have to worry if it’s more than just talk”

Muni Funds Are a Mixture of Credits

Muni-funds, whether state specific or national, include a mixture of state and local general obligations and revenue bonds.  Local governments in California are not prohibited from bankruptcy.  Revenue bonds, whether state or local, are at risk if the revenue streams on which they are based become inadequate.

States haven’t gone bankrupt yet, but we wonder what to call payment in IOUs by California.  Wouldn’t payment of interest and/or principle in IOUs be default?  Is that a possibility?  Wouldn’t deferral of payments be default? Is that a possibility?

California Muni Fund vs National Fund Attributes

This table compare the attributes of CMF and MUB, the California and national muni funds from iShares.  You get a little less than 1/2% more nominal yield for the extra credit risk.

This table compares the attributes of an intermediate-term California and an intermediate-term national muni mutual fund, plus a long-term California and a long-term national muni mutual fund, each from Vanguard.

You get about 30-35 basis points for the extra risk of the California funds over the national funds.

How Has the Performance Differed?

This chart shows the percentage performance for 2-years for the ratio of the price of CMF to MUB, as well as the percentage performance of each fund alone.

With the ETFs, the performance was quite similar and the California holders may have experienced a slightly better return.  That seems a bit odd in light of the bad press about California’s budget, political process and prospects.

These two chart of the same dimensions for the intermediate-term and long-term muni mutual funds from Vanguard tell a different story.  Note that the Vanguard funds are massively larger than the ETFs and they trade at NAV (don’t go to premium or discount as ETFs do).  They are probably a better indicator of the larger reality than the smaller, newer ETFs.

These charts make it clear that California holders generally suffered an opportunity loss in nominal yield terms over holding a national fund.

Whether that translates to an opportunity loss in after-tax terms, is an individual matter.

Conclusion:

The real question is not about splitting hairs over nominal yield and after-tax yield.  The big issue is whether you think there is a risk of default by the local governments and by the revenue bonds in a California fund, and whether you think the State would defer payments, or whether a court or federal order would “haircut” State GO holders contractual rights in the event of even more dire financial circumstances in California.

Two years ago, we might have opted for the risk.  Today, having seen the unfair treatment of bond holders orchestrated by the US government in the auto industry bankruptcies; and having heard the hawkish talk, by Representative Franks and Senator Dodd during the height of the banking crisis, about the need for bondholders to share the pain, we would opt for better credits.

Call us worry-warts, alarmists, chickens, or “Chicken Littles”.  That’s OK.

Because our clients generally have irreplaceable assets, and are currently or will soon be relying on their assets to support lifestyle, we tend to put a higher priority on risk management than on gain pursuit.

If California did default, and maybe even if it had to be bailed out, the adverse ripples in the US stock market, and maybe around the world, could possibly be quite severe.  We hope the 26% probability of default posted by CMA is only a bad dream.

Holdings Disclosure:

As of February 9, 2010, we have positions in VWIUX in some managed accounts, and by client mandate we have VCADX in some other managed accounts.  We do not have positions in any other securities discussed in this document in any managed account.

Disclaimer:
Opinions expressed in this material and our disclosed positions are as of February 9, 2010.  Our opinions and positions may change as subsequent conditions vary.  We are a fee-only investment advisor, and are compensated only by our clients. We do not sell securities, and do not receive any form of revenue or incentive from any source other than directly from clients. We are not affiliated with any securities dealer, any fund, any fund sponsor or any company issuer of any security. All of our published material is for informational purposes only, and is not personal investment advice to any specific person for any particular purpose. We utilize information sources that we believe to be reliable, but do not warrant the accuracy of those sources or our analysis. Past performance is no guarantee of future performance, and there is no guarantee that any forecast will come to pass. Do not rely solely on this material when making an investment decision. Other factors may be important too.  Investment involves risks of loss of capital.   Consider seeking professional advice before implementing your portfolio ideas.

By Richard Shaw 
http://www.qvmgroup.com

Richard Shaw leads the QVM team as President of QVM Group. Richard has extensive investment industry experience including serving on the board of directors of two large investment management companies, including Aberdeen Asset Management (listed London Stock Exchange) and as a charter investor and director of Lending Tree ( download short professional profile ). He provides portfolio design and management services to individual and corporate clients. He also edits the QVM investment blog. His writings are generally republished by SeekingAlpha and Reuters and are linked to sites such as Kiplinger and Yahoo Finance and other sites. He is a 1970 graduate of Dartmouth College.

Copyright 2006-2010 by QVM Group LLC All rights reserved.

Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilizing methods believed reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any trading losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Do your own due diligence.

Richard Shaw Archive

© 2005-2016 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Comments

stev e
11 Feb 10, 09:20
CA muni article

you have to understand the nature of the CDS in which CA is traded and by whom. Presenting facts without total knowledge of the trading option you compare to is not always the best way to point out risk/value. Things are not as they appear.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in

Catching a Falling Financial Knife