Best of the Week
Most Popular
1.Will Gold Price Drop to $500? - Peter_Zihlmann
2.Gold And Silver Greater Certainty is Found in the Charts - Michael_Noonan
3.Revenge of the Minsky Moment, Economists Are Still Clueless - John_Mauldin
4.Stocks, Gold and Crude Oil Markets Analysis and Trends Forecasts - Chris_Vermeulen
5.New Cold War - U.S. Meat Made in China? - Frank Marchant
6.Is Economic Austerity Responsible for the Crisis in Europe? - Martin Masse
7.Have Gold and Silver Stopped Responding to U.S. Dollar Price Action? - P_Radomski_CFA
8.Contrarian Gold Stocks - Zeal_LLC
9.Media, Economy and Markets Behind The looking Glass! - Robert_M_Williams
10.Stock Markets Risks Unacceptably High and Rising - Brian_Bloom
Last 72 Hrs
China's Innovation Hurdle Points to Withering Economy - 19th June 13
Cocoa Investing - Where a Resources Manager is Uncovering a Sweet Find - 19th June 13
END GAME Singularity: The System Will Be Purged through Interest Rates - 19th June 13
Will Silver Price Drop to $10? - 19th June 13
Silver Price to Rise as Top Miner's High Grade Production Evaporates - 19th June 13
U.S. Real Estate Investing: Now Time to Take Advantage of the Current Buyer’s Market? - 18th June 13
U.S. Gold Reserves, They Would Not Lie to Us, Right? - 18th June 13
G8 Meeting: Climate Change Laid To Rest - 18th June 13
Stock Market Top Called to Within One Day by Contracting Fibonacci Spiral...Now What? - 18th June 13
U.S. Treasury Bond Bubble Red Alert, QE Taper Talk Puts Bonds at Risk – Where to Hide? - 18th June 13
Manipulated Crude Oil Market Malarkey – Welcome Greater Fools! - 18th June 13
The Hidden Costs of Gold and Silver Miners’ Optimism - 18th June 13
Undervalued Gold Miners Historically Contrarian Investor Opportunity - 17th June 13
Gold Market - Pieces Of The Puzzle! - 17th June 13
Global Recession Forecast - Is PIMCO's Bill Gross Wrong Again? - 17th June 13
United Stasi of America through the Echelon Prism - 17th June 13
Western Governments Diffuse Gold Bull Market With Central Banks Supply - 17th June 13
Germany's Accidental Empire - 17th June 13
Stock Market Caught in a Wide Trading Range, Odds Favor Resolution to Downside - 17th June 13
Stock Markets Risks Unacceptably High and Rising - 17th June 13
NSA Big Brother “Pre-Crime” Artificial Intelligence Program - 17th June 13
Deadly Saudi MERS-CoV Global Pandemic Bio-tech Stocks Profit Potential - 17th June 13
Media, Economy and Markets Behind The looking Glass! - 16th June 13
Revenge of the Minsky Moment, Economists Are Still Clueless - 16th June 13
Stock Market Longer Trend Weakening, Daily Trend Turning - 16th June 13
Will Gold Price Drop to $500? - 16th June 13
Climate-Energy Hits The Wash, Rinse And Spin Cycle - 16th June 13
Stock Market Correction Continues - 15th June 13
U.S. Housing Market - Time to Buy a House? - 15th June 13
Gold And Silver Greater Certainty is Found in the Charts - 15th June 13
What If The Secular Stocks Bear Market Is Not Over? - 15th June 13

Free Instant Analysis

Free Instant Technical Analysis


Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

Global Financial and Commodity Market Forecasts 2013

Audit the Fed and End the Mandate

Politics / US Politics Apr 19, 2010 - 10:29 AM GMT

By: Dr_Ron_Paul

Politics

Last week I introduced a very important piece of legislation that I hope will gain as much or more support as my Audit the Fed bill. HR 4995, the End the Mandate Act will repeal provisions of the newly passed health insurance reform bill that give the government the power to force Americans to purchase government-approved health insurance.


The whole bill is rotten, but this provision especially is a blatant violation of the Constitution. Defenders claim the Congress's constitutional authority to regulate "interstate commerce" gives it the power to do this. However, as Judge Andrew Napolitano and other distinguished legal scholars and commentators have pointed out, even the broadest definition of "regulating interstate commerce" cannot reasonably encompass forcing Americans to engage in commerce by purchasing health insurance. Not only is it unconstitutional; it is a violation of the basic freedom to make our own decisions regarding how best to meet the health care needs of ourselves and our families.

The new law requires Americans to have what is defined as "minimum essential coverage." Some people may claim that the requirement to have "minimal essential coverage" does not impose an unreasonable burden on Americans. There are two problems with this claim. First, the very imposition of a health insurance mandate, no matter how "minimal," violates the principles of individual liberty upon which this country was founded.

Second, the mandate is unlikely to remain "minimal" for long. The experience of states that allow their legislatures to mandate what benefits health insurance plans must cover has shown that politicizing health insurance inevitably makes it more expensive. As the cost of government-mandated health insurance rises, Congress will likely respond by increasing subsidies for more and more Americans, adding astronomically to our debt burden. An insurance mandate undermines the entire principle of what insurance is supposed to measure - risk.

Another likely response to rising costs is the imposition of price controls on medical treatments, and limits on what procedures and treatments mandatory insurance will have to reimburse. This is happening in other countries where government is intrinsically involved in these decisions and people suffer and die because of it.

This will only increase the bottom line of the very insurers the legislation was supposed to control. Meanwhile, alternate methods of healthcare delivery and financing, such as concierge doctors, alternative medicine, or physician owned hospitals will be greatly harmed, if not put out of business altogether, when the entire country is forced into the insurance model. It will be difficult for families to come up with extra money to pay for alternate healthcare of their choice when their budget has been squeezed by this mandate to buy insurance. This will in turn reduce competition for healthcare dollars. Health insurers, like many other corporations in other industries, have now used the legislative process anti-competitively to corner the healthcare market. Instead of calling this socialized medicine, we should call it corporatized medicine, since the reform is to force us all into being customers of these corporations, whether we like it or not.

Congress made a grave error by forcing all Americans to purchase health insurance. The mandate violates fundamental principles of individual liberty, and will lead to further government involvement in health care. It is time for legislation that fights back for the freedom of the people on this issue. It is time to End the Mandate.

Dr. Ron Paul
Project Freedom

Congressman Ron Paul of Texas enjoys a national reputation as the premier advocate for liberty in politics today. Dr. Paul is the leading spokesman in Washington for limited constitutional government, low taxes, free markets, and a return to sound monetary policies based on commodity-backed currency. He is known among both his colleagues in Congress and his constituents for his consistent voting record in the House of Representatives: Dr. Paul never votes for legislation unless the proposed measure is expressly authorized by the Constitution. In the words of former Treasury Secretary William Simon, Dr. Paul is the "one exception to the Gang of 535" on Capitol Hill.

Dr. Ron Paul Archive

© 2005-2013 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in

FREE Deflation Survival GuideFREE Updated 118 Page Independant Investor E-book