Best of the Week
Most Popular
1. Investing in a Bubble Mania Stock Market Trending Towards Financial Crisis 2.0 CRASH! - 9th Sep 21
2.Tech Stocks Bubble Valuations 2000 vs 2021 - 25th Sep 21
3.Stock Market FOMO Going into Crash Season - 8th Oct 21
4.Stock Market FOMO Hits September Brick Wall - Evergrande China's Lehman's Moment - 22nd Sep 21
5.Crypto Bubble BURSTS! BTC, ETH, XRP CRASH! NiceHash Seizes Funds on Account Halting ALL Withdrawals! - 19th May 21
6.How to Protect Your Self From a Stock Market CRASH / Bear Market? - 14th Oct 21
7.AI Stocks Portfolio Buying and Selling Levels Going Into Market Correction - 11th Oct 21
8.Why Silver Price Could Crash by 20%! - 5th Oct 21
9.Powell: Inflation Might Not Be Transitory, After All - 3rd Oct 21
10.Global Stock Markets Topped 60 Days Before the US Stocks Peaked - 23rd Sep 21
Last 7 days
AI Tech Stocks State Going into the CRASH and Capitalising on the Metaverse - 25th Jan 22
Stock Market Relief Rally, Maybe? - 25th Jan 22
Why Gold’s Latest Rally Is Nothing to Get Excited About - 25th Jan 22
Gold Slides and Rebounds in 2022 - 25th Jan 22
Gold; a stellar picture - 25th Jan 22
CATHY WOOD ARK GARBAGE ARK Funds Heading for 90% STOCK CRASH! - 22nd Jan 22
Gold Is the Belle of the Ball. Will Its Dance Turn Bearish? - 22nd Jan 22
Best Neighborhoods to Buy Real Estate in San Diego - 22nd Jan 22
Stock Market January PANIC AI Tech Stocks Buying Opp - Trend Forecast 2022 - 21st Jan 21
How to Get Rich in the MetaVerse - 20th Jan 21
Should you Buy Payment Disruptor Stocks in 2022? - 20th Jan 21
2022 the Year of Smart devices, Electric Vehicles, and AI Startups - 20th Jan 21
Oil Markets More Animated by Geopolitics, Supply, and Demand - 20th Jan 21
WARNING - AI STOCK MARKET CRASH / BEAR SWITCH TRIGGERED! - 19th Jan 22
Fake It Till You Make It: Will Silver’s Motto Work on Gold? - 19th Jan 22
Crude Oil Smashing Stocks - 19th Jan 22
US Stagflation: The Global Risk of 2022 - 19th Jan 22
Stock Market Trend Forecast Early 2022 - Tech Growth Value Stocks Rotation - 18th Jan 22
Stock Market Sentiment Speaks: Are We Setting Up For A 'Mini-Crash'? - 18th Jan 22
Mobile Sports Betting is on a rise: Here’s why - 18th Jan 22
Exponential AI Stocks Mega-trend - 17th Jan 22
THE NEXT BITCOIN - 17th Jan 22
Gold Price Predictions for 2022 - 17th Jan 22
How Do Debt Relief Services Work To Reduce The Amount You Owe? - 17th Jan 22
RIVIAN IPO Illustrates We are in the Mother of all Stock Market Bubbles - 16th Jan 22
All Market Eyes on Copper - 16th Jan 22
The US Dollar Had a Slip-Up, but Gold Turned a Blind Eye to It - 16th Jan 22
A Stock Market Top for the Ages - 16th Jan 22
FREETRADE - Stock Investing Platform, the Good, Bad and Ugly Review, Free Shares, Cancelled Orders - 15th Jan 22
WD 14tb My Book External Drive Unboxing, Testing and Benchmark Performance Amazon Buy Review - 15th Jan 22
Toyland Ferris Wheel Birthday Fun at Gulliver's Rother Valley UK Theme Park 2022 - 15th Jan 22
What You Should Know About a TailoredPay High Risk Merchant Account - 15th Jan 22
Best Metaverse Tech Stocks Investing for 2022 and Beyond - 14th Jan 22
Gold Price Lagging Inflation - 14th Jan 22
Get Your Startup Idea Up And Running With These 7 Tips - 14th Jan 22
What Happens When Your Flight Gets Cancelled in the UK? - 14th Jan 22

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How to Protect your Wealth by Investing in AI Tech Stocks

Will U.S. House Prices Drive The 4.8% “Consensus” Nominal GDP Growth Forecast?

Economics / US Economy Jul 28, 2010 - 03:03 AM GMT

By: Andrew_Butter

Economics

Best Financial Markets Analysis ArticleI looked up the “consensus” for nominal US GDP growth in The Economist today; you have to add “real” to “CPI” to get the answer  - I’m not interested in “real”, for me “real” is what they measure (nominal), and the un-reality starts when they subtract whatever weird and wonderful concoction of inflation is handed down by the Bureau of Labor.


Anyway the “consensus” was 4.8% for 2010, although USA Today surveyed 47 top economic forecasters, and their consensus worked out (nominal) at about 3.7%.

http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2010-07-26-econsurvey26_ST_N.htm

All this consensus building is making my head spin, and I’m reminded of John Maynard Keynes’ quote about laying economists head-to tail all round the world and never being able to find a consensus. I’m also wondering how many of the current batch of consensus seekers had reached a consensus that house-prices would go on going up forever in 2005 and 2006? Or are these new consensus seekers?

Anyway, the reason I was interested was because nominal GDP is a driver for most of my models, so I was messing around, and then I noticed this:

That’s quarterly data from Q1-2000 to Q2-2010; the “X” axis (left to right) is the average quarterly change in house prices of the preceding two years, and the “Y” axis is the average quarterly change in nominal GDP in the subsequent three quarters.

That says from 2000 to now, the main driver of nominal GDP in USA was house prices (up and down).

Uh…Duh!!  Yeah OK, we all know that the current malaise was primarily due to the fact that USA had a housing bubble and then it had a bust, so that’s hardly NEWS!!

I acknowledge that’s not very complicated, just one variable plotted against another variable, but it does appear to suggest some sort of cause and effect; like if house prices change, then following that…nominal GDP changes.

But it was a bit of a surprise that you can explain 84% or so of the changes in nominal GDP from the change in house prices in the preceding two years (Oh and don’t fret about the “S” curve (approximated by a third-order polynomial), that’s a perfectly normal relationship; logically a total collapse of hose prices would make everyone dead broke, and an explosion upwards would make everyone so rich that nominal GDP would explode upwards too.

The story of “why” doesn’t have to be particularly complicated either.

When people saw the price of their houses go up, they felt rich, so they didn’t bother to save for the future, and some of them even borrowed money to “unlock” some of the equity that they (thought) they had in their houses; and THEN they went out to get a bit of “Retail Therapy” to reward themselves for their “efforts”.

70% of the US economy is consumer spending, and so like in the old days when they used to say “What’s good for GM is good for America”, all you do is substitute “GM” with “Shoppers”.

And then when house prices went down; they didn’t feel so rich anymore and more to the point their friendly mortgage shark wasn’t around to let them “unlock” some more equity, in fact the shark was being a mite unfriendly and was offering to kick them out of their “equity”.

The interesting thing there is that the “fundamental” for house prices (that’s the line the bubble and the bust oscillates round) is driven by Nominal GDP per house divided by a function of the 30-Year yield, and…and this is the interesting part, the 30 year yield is driven by nominal GDP.

So there is a sort of feedback loop operating there.

A stabilising feedback that operates is that longer term, is the international competitiveness of an economy is a function of the absolute cost of shelter per person; that’s why countries that have sensible policies on house prices and go with the “novel” idea that to make housing “affordable” to ordinary working people, it’s much better to make sure that the prices of housing for them is kept low, rather than setting up complicated ways of lending them money so they can buy very expensive houses they can’t afford.

That’s why the economies of Germany, Hong Kong and Singapore are so “resilient” (all three of those countries have the idea that the role of the government is to make sure that ordinary people have decent, affordable housing, regardless of what the real-estate sharks would like); and why countries that let house prices for ordinary people get out of control (like USA and UK), are so “un-resilient”; and make it their speciality to export jobs.

What’s next for the USA Economy?

Well the Good News is that house prices won’t go down (much) more, about 12% by my estimate.

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article21334.html

The trend-line down will probably be about 1% per quarter over two years; looking at the chart, that works out at about 1% nominal GDP growth per quarter (actually it averages 4.8% going forward three years).

The other good news is that housing in USA now is cheap, which means that ordinary people can afford to live there now, and that unless the Administration makes a concerted effort to shoot themselves in the foot again (their speciality – look at Iraq and Afghanistan), jobs ought to start drifting back.

Two points, the first is that the model says nothing about how much of that 4.8% is inflation, and inflation is a complex issue. Right now since USA still imports a lot of its needs (oil in particular), it’s at the mercy of events outside USA that it cannot control.

The second thing is that it’s hard to see how, long-term, USA can afford to spend the amount of money that it does on playing Rambo-Chasing-Evildoers; that expenditure is inflationary and it’s unnecessary. The BIG threat to the security ordinary Americans is going broke, it’s not a bunch of raggedy lunatics planting IED’s and building one or two nuclear bombs on the other side of the world, and it never was.

By Andrew Butter

Twenty years doing market analysis and valuations for investors in the Middle East, USA, and Europe; currently writing a book about BubbleOmics. Andrew Butter is managing partner of ABMC, an investment advisory firm, based in Dubai ( hbutter@eim.ae ), that he setup in 1999, and is has been involved advising on large scale real estate investments, mainly in Dubai.

© 2010 Copyright Andrew Butter- All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors.

Andrew Butter Archive

© 2005-2019 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in