Best of the Week
Most Popular
1.Gold Price Trend Forecast, Where are the Gold Traders? - Bob_Loukas
2.Stocks Bear Market of 2017 Begins? Shorting the Dow At its Peak! - Nadeem_Walayat
3.Betting on President Trump Leaving Office Early, Presidency End Date - Betfair Market - Nadeem_Walayat
4.Why Stock Market Analysts Will be Wrong About 2017 - Clif_Droke
5.Is This The Best Way For Investors To Play The Electric Car Boom - OilPrice_Com
6.Silver Price 2017 Trend Forecast Update - Video - Nadeem_Walayat
7.Gold Price Set For Very Bullish 2017, Trend Forecast - Austin_Galt
8.10 Things I learned From Meetings With Trump’s Transition Team - - John_Mauldin
9.How Investors Can Profit From Trumps Military Ambitions - OilPrice_Com
10.Channel 4 War on 'Fake News', Forgets Own Alt Reality Propaganda Broadcasting - Nadeem_Walayat
Last 7 days
Stock Market Sentiment at ‘Extreme Greed’ - 26th Feb 17
Trump Relinquishes Control of Foreign Policy - 26th Feb 17
[Gratis] "Dark Money" Secrets Revealed! - 26th Feb 17
Stock Market SPX New All-time Highs Continue - 25th Feb 17
POWERFUL GOLD & SILVER COILED SPRINGS: Important Charts You Have To See - 25th Feb 17
Underperformance in Gold Stocks Argues for Interim Peak - 25th Feb 17
Watch What Happens When Silver Price Hits $26...  - 25th Feb 17
Gold Futures Buying Yet to Start - 25th Feb 17
When the Stock Market Flying Pig Tops - 24th Feb 17
Gold, Second Fed Hike and Interest Rates - 24th Feb 17
Bitcoin Price Hits Record High! - 24th Feb 17
Another Stock Market Bubble? Bring it On! - 24th Feb 17
What Investors Need To Know About U.S. Money Market Funds? - 24th Feb 17
When Was America’s Peak Wealth? - 24th Feb 17
The Oscars – Worth Their Weight in Gold? - 24th Feb 17
The Best Reasons to Buy Gold in the Age of Trump - 22nd Feb 17
Silver, The Return of Stagflation - 22nd Feb 17
Why EU BrExit Single Market Access Hard line is European Union Committing Suicide - 22nd Feb 17
Gold: Short End US Rates Matter More Than Long End Real Yields - 22nd Feb 17
CONTINENTAL RESOURCES: Example Of What Is Horribly Wrong With The U.S. Shale Oil Industry - 22nd Feb 17
Here’s Proof Rising Rates Are Good for Gold - 21st Feb 17
Gold and Silver Weekly Update - 21st Feb 17
US Dollar and Gold Battle of the Cycles - 21st Feb 17
NSA and CIA is the Enemy of the People - 21st Feb 17
Big Moves in the World Stock Markets - Big Bases - 21st Feb 17
Stock Market Uptrend Continues - 21st Feb 17
Brent Crude Oil Price Technical Update: Low Volatility Leads to High Volatility - 20th Feb 17
Trump’s Tax System Could Spark The Wave Of Self-Employment - 20th Feb 17
Here’s How to Stay Ahead of Machines and AI - 20th Feb 17
Warning Signs Of Instability In Russia - 20th Feb 17
Warning: This Energy Investment Could Wreak Havoc On Your Portfolio - 20th Feb 17
The Mother of All Financial Bubbles will be Unimaginably Destructive when it Bursts - 19th Feb 17
Gold’s Fundamentals Strengthen - 18th Feb 17
The Flynn Fiascom, the Trump Revolution Ends in a Whimper - 18th Feb 17
Not Nearly Enough Economic Growth To Keep Growing - 18th Feb 17
SPX Stocks Bull Market Continues to make New Highs - 18th Feb 17
China Disaster to Trigger Gold Run, Trump to Appoint 5 of 7 Fed Governors - 18th Feb 17

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

State of Global Markets 2017 - Report

Is it Too Late to Invest in 3D Printing?

Companies / 3d Printing Mar 21, 2013 - 09:53 AM GMT

By: Investment_U

Companies

David Eller writes: It’s rare these days to get in on the ground floor level of an investable trend in technology.

It seems like most of the big technological leaps have already taken place. Whether it’s something as dramatic as a smartphone or as subtly useful as paid search, these huge ideas don’t come around often.

That said, 3D printing may be the next game changer in technology. The industry has been around for a while and the stocks had a great run in 2012.


But we’ve seen a pullback since the Consumer Electronics Show in January, which coincided with the peak. I’m excited about the industry for three reasons:

•The possible emergence of the dental market.
•Falling prices for “prosumer” printers.
•Recent acquisitions offering padding to the upcoming quarter. Additionally, now that we’ve had a pullback, forward valuations for the two premier companies are reasonable.

A Quick Overview
Printing in three dimensions is essentially just layering material. A printer deposits a layer of plastic 28 microns thick (about a third the thickness of a human hair) in the shape of an object’s silhouette, and then adds additional layers until a custom part is formed.

The business case for this today lies in the hands of enabling industrial engineers to do three things:

•Develop proofs of concepts.
•Create prototypes.
•Build production parts.

It’s simply much cheaper, faster and more accurate to print your own part than it is to build a sand-cast model and have it sent out for fabrication.

Any design, production, or engineering company would be a potential customer today. NASA, for instance, used 3D prototyping for 60 to 80 parts on its new lunar rover. These are not necessarily final parts, but a plastic part will initially be printed up in a few hours, tested and modified before eventually being fabricated using the perfect materials. In some cases, clients will even use these parts in production. Diebold (NYSE: DBD) has used fabricated parts in production testing versions of their ATMs.

Whether it’s a plastic casting of the next version of Citi Field or a door handle on the next BMW (OTC: BAMXY), it’s cheaper and faster to build internally using 3D printing.

There’s Still Plenty of Room to Grow
Today, there are 40 million active licenses of Computer Aided Design software, but only 50,000 3D printers in production. There will never be a 1:1 comparison. However, if it could be 50:1, the opportunity is 16 times larger than the current market size.

Future verticals offer new opportunities that aren’t in analysts’ models. Without getting too far ahead of ourselves, consider the dental market.

Imagine going to the dentist with a broken tooth. The technology is becoming available right now to print a ceramic crown – inside the dental practice. This would save days, if not weeks, of walking around with a temporary filling. From the perspective of the industrial 3D printers, the only difference is the base material used for fabrication.

Stratasys (Nasdaq: SSYS) is the leading industrial vendor. The company developed a name for itself using a technology called Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM).

FDM allows clients to produce parts that are closest to production materials in terms of strength, flexibility and weather resistance. By taking the lead in materials, Stratasys has built a tier-one customer list including Bell Helicopter, Ducati, Dana Holding Corporation (NYSE: DAN), Piper Aircraft and Medtronic (NYSE: MDT).

Building on its lead in materials, Stratasys recently merged with Objet, which is developing the first multi-material printing solution. Investment positives for Stratasys include a top-notch customer list, expertise in a wide variety of materials and expansion into the dental industry.

3D Systems Corp. (NYSE: DDD) has an edge in design and distribution. The company has more patents than employees with 1,200 filed. Plus it offers full-color printing capability. The ability to manipulate color should give DDD a significant edge in the home market, as well as the lowest price point at $1,300.

From an investment standpoint though, I like SSYS better. The problem with DDD, as I see it, is the increasing competition for the consumer market. Also, the CEO recently sold 500,000 shares. That was more than half of his holdings. Although there are many harmless reasons insiders sell stock, so many shares could be a warning sign.

The Razor/Blade Model
After numerous recent acquisitions, the two companies look alike in terms of revenue and market cap. But as the market develops, there will be an important profit shift from machines to consumables. Each company is selling the consumable materials used in the printers, which could represent the greater of the profit opportunities. It’s similar to the razor/blade model.

It’s early and there’s no clear winner quite yet. But I believe Stratasys will be able to scale down to the consumer market in time.



* growth rates are not meaningful since both are digesting large acquisitions

Both stocks were high flyers, but pulled back after year’s end. Stratasys dropped 22% from its $90 peak while 3D Systems fell 27% from its high near $46.50.

From a valuation perspective, neither stock is very expensive if you trust consensus earnings estimates for 2013. Stratasys, however, recently released a printer specifically designed for the small-office dental market and simply continues to execute on its core opportunities.

It would normally make sense to simply buy a half position in both companies and let the industry sort it out. However, the recent management share sale at 3D Systems makes me want to take a wait-and-see approach for now.

Source: http://www.investmentu.com/2013/March/ssys-vs.-ddd-is-it-too-late-to-invest-in-3d-printing.html

Good Investing,

by ,

http://www.investmentu.com

Copyright © 1999 - 2012 by The Oxford Club, L.L.C All Rights Reserved. Protected by copyright laws of the United States and international treaties. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution (electronic or otherwise, including on the world wide web), of content from this website, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of Investment U, Attn: Member Services , 105 West Monument Street, Baltimore, MD 21201 Email: CustomerService@InvestmentU.com

Disclaimer: Investment U Disclaimer: Nothing published by Investment U should be considered personalized investment advice. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized investment advice. We expressly forbid our writers from having a financial interest in any security recommended to our readers. All of our employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended by Investment U should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Investment U Archive

© 2005-2016 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in

Catching a Falling Financial Knife