Best of the Week
Most Popular
1. The Trump Stock Market Trap May Be Triggered - Barry_M_Ferguson
2.Why are Central Banks Buying Gold and Dumping Dollars? - Richard_Mills
3.US China War - Thucydides Trap and gold - Richard_Mills
4.Gold Price Trend Forcast to End September 2019 - Nadeem_Walayat
5.Money Saving Kids Gardening Growing Giant Sunflowers Summer Fun - Anika_Walayat
6.US Dollar Breakdown Begins, Gold Price to Bolt Higher - Jim_Willie_CB
7.INTEL (INTC) Stock Investing to Profit From AI Machine Learning Boom - Nadeem_Walayat
8.Will Google AI Kill Us? Man vs Machine Intelligence - N_Walayat
9.US Prepares for Currency War with China - Richard_Mills
10.Gold Price Epochal Breakout Will Not Be Negated by a Correction - Clive Maund
Last 7 days
Gold & Silver Stand Strong amid Stock Volatility & Falling Rates - 16th Aug 19
Gold Mining Stocks Q2’19 Fundamentals - 16th Aug 19
Silver, Transports, and Dow Jones Index At Targets – What Direct Next? - 16th Aug 19
When the US Bond Market Bubble Blows Up! - 16th Aug 19
Dark days are closing in on Apple - 16th Aug 19
Precious Metals Gone Wild! Reaching Initial Targets – Now What’s Next - 16th Aug 19
US Government Is Beholden To The Fed; And Vice-Versa - 15th Aug 19
GBP vs USD Forex Pair Swings Into Focus Amid Brexit Chaos - 15th Aug 19
US Negative Interest Rates Go Mainstream - With Some Glaring Omissions - 15th Aug 19
US Stock Market Could Fall 12% to 25% - 15th Aug 19
A Level Exam Results School Live Reaction Shock 2019! - 15th Aug 19
It's Time to Get Serious about Silver - 15th Aug 19
The EagleFX Beginners Guide – Financial Markets - 15th Aug 19
Central Banks Move To Keep The Global Markets Party Rolling – Part III - 14th Aug 19
You Have to Buy Bonds Even When Interest Rates Are Low - 14th Aug 19
Gold Near Term Risk is Increasing - 14th Aug 19
Installment Loans vs Personal Bank Loans - 14th Aug 19
ROCHE - RHHBY Life Extension Pharma Stocks Investing - 14th Aug 19
Gold Bulls Must Love the Hong Kong Protests - 14th Aug 19
Gold, Markets and Invasive Species - 14th Aug 19
Cannabis Stocks With Millennial Appeal - 14th Aug 19
August 19 (Crazy Ivan) Stock Market Event Only A Few Days Away - 13th Aug 19
This is the real move in gold and silver… it’s going to be multiyear - 13th Aug 19
Global Central Banks Kick Can Down The Road Again - 13th Aug 19
US Dollar Finally the Achillles Heel - 13th Aug 19
Financial Success Formula Failure - 13th Aug 19
How to Test Your Car Alternator with a Multimeter - 13th Aug 19
London Under Attack! Victoria Embankment Gardens Statues and Monuments - 13th Aug 19
More Stock Market Weakness Ahead - 12th Aug 19
Global Central Banks Move To Keep The Party Rolling Onward - 12th Aug 19
All Eyes On Copper - 12th Aug 19
History of Yield Curve Inversions and Gold - 12th Aug 19
Precious Metals Soar on Falling Yields, Currency Turmoil - 12th Aug 19
Why GraphQL? The Benefits Explained - 12th Aug 19
Is the Stock Market Making a V-shaped Recovery? - 11th Aug 19
Precious Metals and Stocks VIX Are About To Pull A “Crazy Ivan” - 11th Aug 19
Social Media Civil War - 11th Aug 19
Gold and the Bond Yield Continuum - 11th Aug 19
Traders: Which Markets Should You Trade? - 11th Aug 19
US Corporate Debt Is at Risk of a Flash Crash - 10th Aug 19
EURODOLLAR futures above 2016 highs: FED to cut over 100 bps quickly - 10th Aug 19
Market’s flight-to-safety: Should You Buy Stocks Now? - 10th Aug 19
The Cold, Hard Math Tells Netflix Stock Could Crash 70% - 10th Aug 19
Our Custom Index Charts Suggest Stock Markets Are In For A Wild Ride - 9th Aug 19
Bitcoin Price Triggers Ahead - 9th Aug 19
Walmart Is Coming for Amazon - 9th Aug 19

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

Top AI Stocks Investing to Profit from the Machine Intelligence Mega-trend

What Is Or Was The European "Superstate"?

Politics / European Union Apr 09, 2013 - 12:35 PM GMT

By: Andrew_McKillop


The absolutely basic problem for answering this question is that no European politician, nor European technocrat, civil servant or 'functionary' will admit there is any kind of plan to create a Superstate. They will quickly shift to talking about "convergence and integration", which basically mean the same thing. Once again the European cult of lying makes it impossible to have any rational discussion or analysis of what a "Superstate" might mean

One of the theatrical horror themes of Britain's Iron Lady Thatcher, also called the Bent Metal Lady, was a monstruous "communist type" European Superstate which would sweep away the only thing she wanted out of Europe - a free trade zone. Curiously enough, however, the very first in a string of European treaties was the European Coal and Steel Community Treaty of April 1951, now totally forgotten (but only dissolved in 2002). This was basically a free trade treay-plus-a trade protectionist treaty. For Thatcher-type politicians that could be called: "Win one, lose one".

But vastly more important, we have to understand these treaties are now photo-op sessions for presenting unreadable, Bible-thick lists of things for European bureaucrats to fill their work weeks. Try to find somebody who can explain the Nice Treaty to you - with the warning it isn't a nice read, but is a great alternative to sleeping pills. In sum, European treaties mean nothing.

Vastly more real, and threatening, European Monetary Union (EMU) is a stealth project with very light nail-them-down written texts on its actual decision making process and system. Its structure is copiously detailed, to be sure, but not its Old Boy Technocrat decision making process - allowing the world to wake up one day, not long ago, to the Cyprus bank deposit theft in shock and awe.

Details of how the Eurocrat-Technocrats decide when and how to steal bank deposits is, not surpringly, not given Bible-thick, published, detailed descriptions which lawyers, for example, might well use against the thieves. We can immediately see the difference between symbolic, theatrical, playacting "Union", and the European kleptocracy which sets out to steal bank deposits, as well as to ruin the economy any way it can. Simply checking the mostly "informal", that is secret links between the European Central Bank and the Basle-based Bank for International Settlements will clarify the major role of murky, always-deniable, real and dangerous kleptocrat convergence and integration.

Its usually an easily won bet to ask persons who style themselves "well informed" as to when they think EMU began, and who wrote the very slim number of evasive texts founding EMU? Usually they can't answer. One reasons is really simple - there is no real "starting date". We could go back to the 1950s, if we wanted, but "formal history' says that in June 1988 the European Council confirmed the previously set (by who?) objectives of "progressively realising" Economic and Monetary Union. The Council of Ministers then mandated a committee chaired by Jacques Delors, then President of the European Commission, who himself mandated a committee of "experts and bank governors", in fact only one governor of one major national bank of then-member countries of the European Community. Delors with no suprise chose Alexandre Lamfalussy,  then General Manager of the Bank for International Settlements to chair the meetings with him, Niels Thygesen, a Danish professor of economics and Miguel Boyer, the then President of the Banco Exterior of Spain.

This process went on until the 1 January 1999 launch of the euro currency in the original 12 Eurozone countries, in 3 stages, each more "convergent" then the previous, and each one concentrating more power in non-elected, secretive, impossible-to-monitor agencies and institutions freshly created for the process - such as the 1994 creation of the European Monetary Institute, the template for the ECB created in 1998. Later enlargement to 17 countries in the zone, to be sure, was each time "by announcement", with or without a face-saving, manipulated referendum in the new member country. ECB archives on the "converging process" are slim content, except after a public disclosure request process, and when accessed provide most detail on "early expert policy decisions" -- dating to the 1962-1973 period.

How the ECB, European Commission and IMF (the so-called Troika) decided to operate its theft or "confiscation" of Cyprus bank deposits is - unsurprisingly - not explained!

Maybe still warm, Thatcher's body would not need to do the twist at the antics of Eurozone Technocrats whose favourite one-liner is exactly the same as hers: "Give us back our money". The only difference is the Eurocrats are stealing money they didnt provide, but have created an elaborate fairy story to pretend otherwise. This is "historically low interest rates due to the euro".

Why eurozone interest rates started low, and went lower is a very long story, and the story really does thr twist, when it isn't the French can-can and German mark-to-market. Cynics can say right away that the theft (or "confiscation") of savings was one the most basic goals, and longest-running themes running around in the heads of European Technocrats. Explaining why is an existential question.

This could be looked at in the following way. Thatcher's favorite way of stealing her citizens' life savings was to let inflation rip at double-digit rates while whining about her hatred of inflation. The Eurocrat method was to set interest rates at derisorily low levels and deflate the economy through low or no economic growth, or outright contraction of the economy (which is exactly the same thing that "Thatcheromics" did to the UK economy). Pas de difference, Monsieur.

Both approaches are primarily defeatist when they were not outright paranoid. Thatcher was defending her Fortress Britain, or in fact England - she was always hated in Scotland, and vastly accelerated the pace of Scottish separatist politics. The Eurocrats were defending their Fortress Europe. Both approaches claimed to be "free trade" but this was a primal lie - "managed trade" is the term. Both claimed to be Strong Money, but whenever that happens - for example when Thatcher's pound hit $2.50 and the Eurocrat's euro hit $1.50 - they screamed like stuck pigs about declining exports.

Like there was no "Brtish Revival" under Thacher and it continued declining into a downsized, dumbed down low-level police state with a crippled economy, the European "Superstate" is a fake entity, only useful to cover the antics of kleptocrats.

By Andrew McKillop


Former chief policy analyst, Division A Policy, DG XVII Energy, European Commission. Andrew McKillop Biographic Highlights

Co-author 'The Doomsday Machine', Palgrave Macmillan USA, 2012

Andrew McKillop has more than 30 years experience in the energy, economic and finance domains. Trained at London UK’s University College, he has had specially long experience of energy policy, project administration and the development and financing of alternate energy. This included his role of in-house Expert on Policy and Programming at the DG XVII-Energy of the European Commission, Director of Information of the OAPEC technology transfer subsidiary, AREC and researcher for UN agencies including the ILO.

© 2013 Copyright Andrew McKillop - All Rights Reserved Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisor.

Andrew McKillop Archive

© 2005-2019 - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.

Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in

6 Critical Money Making Rules