Best of the Week
Most Popular
1. The Trump Stock Market Trap May Be Triggered - Barry_M_Ferguson
2.Why are Central Banks Buying Gold and Dumping Dollars? - Richard_Mills
3.US China War - Thucydides Trap and gold - Richard_Mills
4.Gold Price Trend Forcast to End September 2019 - Nadeem_Walayat
5.Money Saving Kids Gardening Growing Giant Sunflowers Summer Fun - Anika_Walayat
6.US Dollar Breakdown Begins, Gold Price to Bolt Higher - Jim_Willie_CB
7.INTEL (INTC) Stock Investing to Profit From AI Machine Learning Boom - Nadeem_Walayat
8.Will Google AI Kill Us? Man vs Machine Intelligence - N_Walayat
9.US Prepares for Currency War with China - Richard_Mills
10.Gold Price Epochal Breakout Will Not Be Negated by a Correction - Clive Maund
Last 7 days
This Is Your Last Chance to Dump Netflix Stock - 19th July 19
Gold and US Stock Mid Term Election and Decade Cycles - 19th July 19
Precious Metals Big Picture, as Silver Gets on its Horse - 19th July 19
This Technology Everyone Laughed Off Is Quietly Changing the World - 19th July 19
Green Tech Stocks To Watch - 19th July 19
Double Top In Transportation and Metals Breakout Are Key Stock Market Topping Signals - 18th July 19
AI Machine Learning PC Custom Build Specs for £2,500 - Scan Computers 3SX - 18th July 19
The Best “Pick-and-Shovel” Play for the Online Grocery Boom - 18th July 19
Is the Stock Market Rally Floating on Thin Air? - 18th July 19
Biotech Stocks With Near Term Catalysts - 18th July 19
SPX Consolidating, GBP and CAD Could be in Focus - 18th July 19
UK House Building and Population Growth Analysis - 17th July 19
Financial Crisis Stocks Bear Market Is Scary Close - 17th July 19
Want to See What's Next for the US Economy? Try This. - 17th July 19
What to do if You Blow the Trading Account - 17th July 19
Bitcoin Is Far Too Risky for Most Investors - 17th July 19
Core Inflation Rises but Fed Is Going to Cut Rates. Will Gold Gain? - 17th July 19
Boost your Trading Results - FREE eBook - 17th July 19
This Needs To Happen Before Silver Really Takes Off - 17th July 19
NASDAQ Should Reach 8031 Before Topping - 17th July 19
US Housing Market Real Terms BUY / SELL Indicator - 16th July 19
Could Trump Really Win the 2020 US Presidential Election? - 16th July 19
Gold Stocks Forming Bullish Consolidation - 16th July 19
Will Fed Easing Turn Out Like 1995 or 2007? - 16th July 19
Red Rock Entertainment Investments: Around the world in a day with Supreme Jets - 16th July 19
Silver Has Already Gone from Weak to Strong Hands - 15th July 19
Top Equity Mutual Funds That Offer Best Returns - 15th July 19
Gold’s Breakout And The US Dollar - 15th July 19
Financial Markets, Iran, U.S. Global Hegemony - 15th July 19
U.S Bond Yields Point to a 40% Rise in SPX - 15th July 19
Corporate Earnings may Surprise the Stock Market – Watch Out! - 15th July 19
Stock Market Interest Rate Cut Prevails - 15th July 19
Dow Stock Market Trend Forecast Current State July 2019 Video - 15th July 19
Why Summer is the Best Time to be in the Entertainment Industry - 15th July 19
Mid-August Is A Critical Turning Point For US Stocks - 14th July 19
Fed’s Recessionary Indicators and Gold - 14th July 19
The Problem with Keynesian Economics - 14th July 19
Stocks Market Investors Worried About the Fed? Don't Be -- Here's Why - 13th July 19
Could Gold Launch Into A Parabolic Upside Rally? - 13th July 19
Stock Market SPX and Dow in BREAKOUT but this is the worrying part - 13th July 19
Key Stage 2 SATS Tests Results Grades and Scores GDS, EXS, WTS Explained - 13th July 19
INTEL Stock Investing in Qubits and AI Neural Network Processors - Video - 12th July 19
Gold Price Selloff Risk High - 12th July 19
State of the US Economy as Laffer Gets Laughable - 12th July 19
Dow Stock Market Trend Forecast Current State - 12th July 19
Stock Market Major Index Top In 3 to 5 Weeks? - 11th July 19
Platinum Price vs Gold Price - 11th July 19
What This Centi-Billionaire Fashion Magnate Can Teach You About Investing - 11th July 19
Stock Market Fundamentals are Weakening: 3000 on SPX Means Nothing - 11th July 19
This Tobacco Stock Is a Big Winner from E-Cigarette Bans - 11th July 19
Investing in Life Extending Pharma Stocks - 11th July 19
How to Pay for It All: An Option the Presidential Candidates Missed - 11th July 19
Mining Stocks Flash Powerful Signal for Gold and Silver Markets - 11th July 19
5 Surefire Ways to Get More Viewers for Your Video Series - 11th July 19

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

Top AI Stocks Investing to Profit from the Machine Intelligence Mega-trend

The Mindless Stupidity of Negative Interest Rates

Interest-Rates / US Interest Rates Oct 13, 2015 - 12:33 PM GMT

By: MM

Interest-Rates

MoneyMorning.com By Lee Adler, Editor's Note: We're sharing this Wall Street Examiner column with you today because negative interest rates are destroying trillions of dollars in wealth in Europe right now, cheered on by some of the "smartest" economists in the world – who want to bring NIRP here. Here's Lee Adler with some facts that show why negative rates are a horrible idea…

There are troubling signs that the doves at the Federal Reserve are considering a negative interest rate policy (NIRP) as a way to handle "the next crisis" – and there's always a next crisis…


NIRP is a monetary policy tool that sets interest rates below zero. A recent MarketWatch article on NIRP said it has a "'Dr. Strangelove' feel."

I have to agree. They're a lot like nuclear warfare in that they're so extreme, so irrational and destructive, that they fly in the face off all common sense and decency.

But this is the Great Stagnation Middle Class Elimination. You can bet that the "General Jack D. Ripper" faction at the Federal Reserve is thinking the unthinkable – and thinking about it incorrectly.

Consider this quote from that MarketWatch article:

"…pushing rates into negative territory works in many ways just like a regular decline in interest rates that we're all used to."

That's patently false – so much so that it borders on insanity.

They don't work just like a "regular decline in interest rates" – not that a "regular decline in interest rates" does what economists think it does, but that's another story.

The issue here is that central bankers don't even seem to understand how negative interest rates work, or why they're so destructive to individual wealth and entire economies…

The Rest of Us Learned This in "Money 101"

Negative interest rate proponents ignore the most basic tenets of double-entry accounting.

Because there are two sides to a bank balance sheet, negative interest rates are the mirror image of positive rates. The move to negative rates imposes new costs on the banks, unlike low positive or zero interest rates, which reduce bank costs.

The greater the negative interest rate, the higher the cost imposed, which is the same as a central bank raising interest rates when they are positive.

When the Fed lowers a positive interest rate, it lowers the bank's cost.

But if the Fed were to lower the interest rate to below zero, those $2.3 trillion in banks' excess reserves held on deposit at the Fed become a cost to the banking system.

Not only that, but it's a cost banks cannot avoid, except by using those cash assets to pay down debt.

This isn't just a theory…

We Have a Real-World Example to Go On

European banks did exactly what I said they would do in mid-2014 when the European Central Bank (ECB) announced the negative deposit rates.

The banks did what anybody with any common sense would do, and the ECB knew it… Under NIRP, anyone with the ability to pay off loans (and extinguish offsetting reserve deposits) does precisely that, thereby getting rid of the added cost.

So, as opposed to stimulating growth, from the time the ECB announced NIRP in June 2014 until January 2015, loans outstanding in the European banking system actually declined by $18 billion. That may not be a big drop, but it’s exactly the opposite of what the policy makers expected.

As opposed to encouraging borrowing and spending and economic growth (you know, the good stuff), the policy encouraged deleveraging.

In fact, the ECB was actually forced to institute outright quantitative easing (QE), to the tune of €1.1 trillion ($1.2 trillion), to try and reverse that shrinkage.

But then, exactly as I predicted, the banks just used part of that to pay off their outstanding ECB "credit" instead of stimulating lending.

And, month in, month out, that's what European banks have done, steadily paying down more than €141 billion in long-term refinancing operation (LTRO) and main refinancing operations (MRO) credit, or 21% of the amounts outstanding when the NIRP was announced.

That cancels out a portion of the growth that would otherwise accrue to the ECB balance sheet from QE. Not that QE does an iota of good for the European economy – yet another story.

That's why we know that it is categorically false that negative rates are working in Europe.

This is not rocket science. It's just common sense and paying attention to facts instead of ridiculous economic myths.

But facts have a funny way of eluding mainstream economists and central bankers.

No One Will Take Responsibility

They can look at the shriveled husk that was the European banking system and somehow gloss over the fact that negative interest rates are to blame. Have you ever heard mainstream economists address the damage? I suspect not.

Because they either don't know or don't want to know. Or they just don't understand that if you raise the costs of holding deposits, then the deposit holders will get rid of them.

And the only way the system as a whole accomplishes that is to pay off loans, using the existing deposits to do so.

Sooner or later the hot potato of the negative-interest-bearing deposit lands in the lap of someone who will… use a deposit to pay off a loan and extinguish the deposit. It would be funny if it weren't so destructive.

You see, most of the ECB's balance sheet was in the form of loans that could be voluntarily repaid. Not so here in the States.

In the United States, the banking system has no chance to escape paying the costs because the Fed has issued permanent reserves.

It bought assets with newly issued money that instantly became cash assets of the banks, held as reserve accounts at the Fed. The amount of cash in the system is fixed until the Fed decides it isn't.

Now, the cash can move from the reserve account of one bank to that of another, but at the end of the day, the Fed's balance sheet is like the Hotel California: You can never leave.

Here's how it "works," if you can call it that…

It's All One Expensive Game of "Hot Potato"

The banks can unload their cash onto other banks by buying long term assets from them. That gets rid of their reserve deposit at the Fed, but the cash just ends up in the reserve account of the bank that sold the asset.

So maybe this starts a buying frenzy that pushes long-term rates to zero, because the banks will all want to exchange cash assets (reserves) for long-term assets. That's apparently what happened in Europe as the banking system there shrank.

But in the United States, some banks always end up holding that hot potato – the reserve deposit on which they must pay the cost.

Well, then what?

Then, if they're rational, with any common sense, Mr. or Mrs. Banker tries to recoup the cost. So they charge their depositors to hold deposits.

Well then, what to the depositors do?

Rather than pay the interest on deposits, some depositors pay off loans and extinguish their deposits.

They pay off their credit cards, their auto loans, even their mortgages, because there's an incentive not to hold deposits.

Then the banks start to shrink, just like they shrank (and continue to shrink) in Europe. And so as their balance sheets shrink, their cash assets grow as a percentage of assets. Ultimately, the cost of the negative deposit rate on reserves at the Fed grows as a drag on earnings.

How can anything positive come from this?

Seriously… has anyone thought this through?

Can anyone show a clear, connect-the-dots example where negative interest rates have stimulated an economy? Can anyone clearly explain how charging an institution or business to hold deposits is in any way stimulative – not "net stimulative," but stimulative at all?

No one can… because it defies all common sense.

Lee Adler writes the facts nearly every day at WallStreetExaminer.com

Join the conversation! Follow Money Morning on Facebook and Twitter.

Source http://moneymorning.com/2015/10/13/the-mindless-stupidity-of-negative-interest-rates/

Money Morning/The Money Map Report

©2015 Monument Street Publishing. All Rights Reserved. Protected by copyright laws of the United States and international treaties. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution (electronic or otherwise, including on the world wide web), of content from this website, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of Monument Street Publishing. 105 West Monument Street, Baltimore MD 21201, Email: customerservice@moneymorning.com

Disclaimer: Nothing published by Money Morning should be considered personalized investment advice. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized investent advice. We expressly forbid our writers from having a financial interest in any security recommended to our readers. All of our employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication, or after the mailing of printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended by Money Morning should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.


© 2005-2019 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in

6 Critical Money Making Rules