We're All Going to Pay For the Housing Market Mess
Housing-Market / US Housing Sep 19, 2009 - 08:08 PM GMTBy: Adam_Brochert
 The citizens of the United States will be paying to clean up the collapse of the   real estate bubble. It doesn't matter if one participated in the housing boom or   not - we are all going to pay and pay dearly for this mess. Renters, owners and   speculators are all equally on the hook if they are taxpayers (did you know that 40% of people living   in the U.S. pay or owe no federal income tax?).
The citizens of the United States will be paying to clean up the collapse of the   real estate bubble. It doesn't matter if one participated in the housing boom or   not - we are all going to pay and pay dearly for this mess. Renters, owners and   speculators are all equally on the hook if they are taxpayers (did you know that 40% of people living   in the U.S. pay or owe no federal income tax?).
Now it is true that those who go through a foreclosure or bankruptcy will have much stress and will take a big hit on their credit score. Those who avoided the bubble, have paid off their house in full and/or don't look at their home as an investment but rather a place to live won't have to deal with these stressors, assuming they don't become a victim of unemployment in the months ahead.
But make no mistake about it, a big chunk of the losses from the housing bubble are going to be put on the taxpayer's tab. The first round of the "bailout ball" was forced upon the unsuspecting American citizenry by Hanky Panky Paulson and his crew to "save the world" from a certain and horrible economic death. The second and third rounds will involve similar sums of money but will come from different angles.
First and most obvious is the number of bank bailouts that the FDIC, and thus the American people, will need to fund. The FDIC will absolutely tap its new $500 billion line of credit from the U.S. Treasury. To pretend otherwise is silly and/or dishonest, as hundreds of additional banks are going to fail before this fiasco is over. In the linked article above, Sheila Bair is quoted as saying:
"Marking banking assets to market prices doesn't make sense."
No, of course it doesn't make sense.   Telling the truth and doing the rational and responsible thing would immediately   bankrupt our entire banking system overnight. It is much better to pretend that   you haven't lost any money on any of the assets you have and instead tell people   that they are still worth what you paid for them, even if their value has been   reduced to zero. This is our government-banker keiretsu hard at work   discouraging reality, honesty and integrity. If the head of the FDIC feels this   way, there is no hope for improved transparency of bank balance sheets and no   realistic way to fairly value these banking firms (Stay away! Sell!).
  
   In   the mean time, these bank "assets" are trending towards zero or less than zero   (in the case of some derivative instruments and homes that have gone through severe   "trash outs"), which means that when the FDIC finally does step in, it will   cost U.S. taxpayers much more than biting the bullet and bailing out these banks   now. All the profits for bankers are and will remain privatized but any and all   of the big losses will be put on the taxpayer's tab as much as possible. The   larger banks are not stupid and have found a way to try to salvage some extra   profits out of this mess (in addition to being able to stay in business) by   asking their pre-bought bureaucrats to jump into the shark pool.
  
   This is   where the second of the two remaining big components of the government housing   bailout comes into play. This is even more nefarious than the direct bank   bailouts. It has to do with Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, the FHA and Ginnie   Mae. These institutions are now guaranteeing 90%   of new home loans generated in this country, including the refinancing and   modification of loans gone bad. Why make lots of loans in the middle of a real   estate collapse? Oh yeah, I forgot - it's because all the inevitable losses will   just be put on the taxpayer's tab, so who cares?
  
   This is, in essence, a transfer   of toxic loans from private balance sheets to the government balance sheet. Underwriting   standards have been subprime and lax for these new government-sponsored   loans. Private mortgage originators are going hog wild signing up anyone with a   pulse who still wants to buy a house (Don't buy - rent!) if they can meet the   government standards because these originators know they can turn around and   pass the hot potato onto the government, making a profit/commission in the   process. 
  
   In the mean time, these loans are already going bad at a   alarming rate akin to subprime loans. Capital reserves are dangerously low at   the government sponsored entities and rapidly declining, which means more   taxpayer money will be needed down the road to bail these quasi-companies out   (don't believe articles   like this where officials say they won't need extra funding - they will).   The low down payments and lax lending standards required for many home loans are   what helped get us into trouble in the first place and I would hazard a guess   that many of the home owners partaking of these new toxic government loans are   going to be close to underwater by the time the ink dries on the final loan   documents.
  
   This scheme is also why private banks are ignoring overdue debtors for up   to 2 years without finishing the foreclosure process. Not only have Sheila   Bair and other apparatchik ilk encouraged private banks to avoid taking losses   by allowing banks to keep home loans on the books as assets with an inflated and   unrealistic value to bolster their balance sheet and make them look vaguely   solvent, but the other part of the plan for banks is to stall while trying to   find a way to get their toxic loans onto the books of Uncle Sam and the American   taxpayer. They will find a way, believe me.
  
   The private, non-federal,   for-profit federal reserve corporation is warming up to the scam and moving   things along nicely by purchasing   large amounts of commercial and residential mortgage debt. This, of course,   will all be foisted onto the taxpayer tab at the opportune time. When this   occurs, it will sold as "an investment," but this will be yet another cruel joke   on the American people. 
  
   So, in the end, it's all coming together for   many bankers. The housing and commercial real estate collapse continues unabated   and the bill is increasingly going to be put on the U.S. taxpayer's tab,   allowing many bankers to get off scot-free and pocket some dough in the process.   This moral hazard Uncle Sam is creating ensures more risk-taking and speculation   in a real estate market the government has no business encouraging people to   speculate in right now. It also absolutely guarantees an even bigger disaster   down the road for Uncle Sam's balance sheet. Privatizing gains and socializing   losses - damn it feels good to be a banksta!
  
   Such moral hazard also   encourages debtors to just walk away from any   bad housing debts. When people aren't paying their mortgage, they rarely   will make property tax payments, so this federal government interference/moral   hazard and willful banker neglect of past due loans will also impact local   governments tremendously. It is likely that these local governments will try to   squeeze some blood out of a stone by asking those left standing who either own   their homes or still pay their mortgage to pay higher property taxes. Being   financially responsible increasingly means being asked to bend over and accept   higher taxes and/or currency debasement while feeling "left out" of the debtor   party. 
  
   Many citizens support the government "stabilizing" housing prices   based on self interest. Yet such folks don't realize that government can only   waste money while making things worse for the whole country and not doing   anything but prolonging the pain that has to happen to allow the market to heal.   Bad debts must be liquidated, not hidden or subsidized. Government cannot   "stabilize" housing, but they can put lots of toxic liabilities on the taxpayer   tab while the real estate market proceeds lower to the same levels it was going   to go anyway. 
  
 Unfortunately, all of this government interference does   mean that housing will take longer to find its true bottom - I think we're   looking at 2014 or later. It also means that the government debt load is going   to increase astronomically over the next few years (what's a few extra trillion,   eh?), almost ensuring a serious currency dislocation at some point down the   road. Be sure to watch with feigned amusement when the apparatchiks tell you in   a year or two that no one saw it coming as the next bailout is announced or a   currency crisis/capital flight rears its ugly head. Home sweet home, my ass.   We're all going to pay for the housing mess - one way or the other.
Visit Adam Brochert’s blog: http://goldversuspaper.blogspot.com/
Adam Brochert
  abrochert@yahoo.com
  http://goldversuspaper.blogspot.com
BIO: Markets and cycles are my new hobby. I've seen the writing on the wall for the U.S. and the global economy and I am seeking financial salvation for myself (and anyone else who cares to listen) while Rome burns around us.
© 2009 Copyright Adam Brochert - All Rights Reserved 
  Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors. 
© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.
	

 
  
 
	