U.S. Jobs May Rebound In 2010, But Unemployment ?
Economics / Employment Jan 07, 2010 - 05:39 AM GMTBy: Mike_Shedlock
 The USA Today says Jobs May Rebound In 2010.
The USA Today says Jobs May Rebound In 2010.
  
The article has some very   nice interactive graphs showing state by state forecasts. The charts below that   I copied are not interactive.

  
  The   chart above is confusing because it does not match the headline. The reason is   the chart is showing third quarter 2009 vs. third quarter 2010, while the   headline "rebound" is for the whole year.
  
I am very interested in   projecting unemployment. Unfortunately charts in the article do not list numbers   precisely. However we can roughly extrapolate from these charts.

  
  
  I   added the lines in blue. Without knowing the precise numbers I can easily be off   by a million or more, but assuming the charts are to scale, the USA today   forecast is approximately 143.5 million jobs by the end of the 2013.
  
  I   think that is an extremely optimistic number but let's see what the unemployment   rate would roughly look like if no jobs are added in 2010, then we hit 143.5   million employed at the end of 2013, with 2012 adding the most jobs.
  
  For   this scenario, I assumed the number of jobs to keep up with birthrate and   immigration (plus return of marginally attached and discouraged workers) is   120,000 a month.
  
  Projecting The USA Today   Unemployment Rate
  
  
  That   certainly does not look very pretty does it?
  
  Yet, I assumed some   moderately favorable things.
  
  1. No double dip recession
  2. A shrinking   monthly labor pool rate shrinking from +120,000 down to +70,000 by 2020 (this   lowers the unemployment rate)
  3. No second recession for an entire   decade
  
  Note the unemployment rate is above 10% at the end of 2013 and   still above 8% at the end of the next decade.
  
  You can download my   spreadsheet and create your own charts automatically using your own assumptions.   Click here to download the USA Today   Unemployment Scenario as shown above.
  
  Methodology Described
  
  To understand the   methodology to change the chart and to see my baseline scenario please see Mish Unemployment Projections Through 2020 - It Looks   Grim.
  
  My baseline scenario has the unemployment rate at 10% all the   way out to 2015.
  
  Mauldin   Scenarios
  
  For scenarios by John Mauldin please see Mapping Unemployment - You Make The Call - Downloadable   Spreadsheet
  
  Mapping The Bernanke   Recovery
  
  I also mapped the Fed's forecast in Bernanke's Outlook For Recovery and What It Means For Jobs. 
....
Inquiring mind just might be interested in mapping Bernanke's statements. Let's assume it takes 100,000 jobs per month to absorb new entrants, decreasing to 70,000 a month by 2020.
Bernanke says jobs will be scarce for some time. He did not define "scarce" or give a timeline. However, let's assume jobs will be scarce only for 1 year. Also let's assume unemployment will rise for about a year (while jobs are scarce), level off, then start dropping in accordance with the paragraphs in red above.
Scenario "B"
Scenario "B" Suggests 100,000 jobs per month from 2010 through 2013 will be needed to keep up with birthrate and immigration. I took the liberty of helping out Bernanke by assuming demographics would start lowing the number of jobs required after 2013.
....
Click here to download the Bernanke   Unemployment Scenario as shown above.
  
  Sharp minds may notice that the   Bernanke scenario initially assumes 100,000 jobs a month to keep up with   demographics while the USA Today assumption is 120,000 jobs a month.
  
  The   reason is the faster the growth in jobs, the more likely discouraged workers and   marginally attached workers will start seeking jobs. As of November 2009 there   were 2.3 million marginally attached workers. Were they all to seek jobs in a   year, the number of job seekers would go up by 192,000 a month, not the 20,000 I   generously showed.
  
  Thus, my assumptions were quite favorable for holding   down the unemployment rate, as opposed to artificially inflating it.
  
  By   the way, those 2.3 million marginally attached potential job seekers will not   only keep the unemployment rate structurally high, they will also pressure wages   for years down the road.
  
If I can get hard numbers from USA Today, I will   plug them into a new, quarter by quarter spreadsheet for as far out as USA Today   is willing to provide data.
By Mike "Mish" Shedlock 
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com 
Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List
 Mike Shedlock / Mish is a registered investment advisor representative for SitkaPacific Capital Management . Sitka Pacific is an asset management firm whose goal is strong performance and low volatility, regardless of market direction. 
  
  Visit Sitka Pacific's Account Management Page  to learn more about wealth management and capital preservation strategies of Sitka Pacific.
 I do weekly podcasts every Thursday on HoweStreet  and a brief 7 minute segment on Saturday on CKNW AM 980  in Vancouver. 
  
  When not writing about stocks or the economy I spends a great deal of time on photography and in the garden. I have over 80 magazine and book cover credits. Some of my Wisconsin and gardening images can be seen at MichaelShedlock.com . 
© 2010 Mike Shedlock, All Rights Reserved
|  Mike Shedlock Archive | 
© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.
	

 
  
 
	
