Best of the Week
Most Popular
1. Investing in a Bubble Mania Stock Market Trending Towards Financial Crisis 2.0 CRASH! - 9th Sep 21
2.Tech Stocks Bubble Valuations 2000 vs 2021 - 25th Sep 21
3.Stock Market FOMO Going into Crash Season - 8th Oct 21
4.Stock Market FOMO Hits September Brick Wall - Evergrande China's Lehman's Moment - 22nd Sep 21
5.Crypto Bubble BURSTS! BTC, ETH, XRP CRASH! NiceHash Seizes Funds on Account Halting ALL Withdrawals! - 19th May 21
6.How to Protect Your Self From a Stock Market CRASH / Bear Market? - 14th Oct 21
7.AI Stocks Portfolio Buying and Selling Levels Going Into Market Correction - 11th Oct 21
8.Why Silver Price Could Crash by 20%! - 5th Oct 21
9.Powell: Inflation Might Not Be Transitory, After All - 3rd Oct 21
10.Global Stock Markets Topped 60 Days Before the US Stocks Peaked - 23rd Sep 21
Last 7 days
AI Tech Stocks State Going into the CRASH and Capitalising on the Metaverse - 25th Jan 22
Stock Market Relief Rally, Maybe? - 25th Jan 22
Why Gold’s Latest Rally Is Nothing to Get Excited About - 25th Jan 22
Gold Slides and Rebounds in 2022 - 25th Jan 22
Gold; a stellar picture - 25th Jan 22
CATHY WOOD ARK GARBAGE ARK Funds Heading for 90% STOCK CRASH! - 22nd Jan 22
Gold Is the Belle of the Ball. Will Its Dance Turn Bearish? - 22nd Jan 22
Best Neighborhoods to Buy Real Estate in San Diego - 22nd Jan 22
Stock Market January PANIC AI Tech Stocks Buying Opp - Trend Forecast 2022 - 21st Jan 21
How to Get Rich in the MetaVerse - 20th Jan 21
Should you Buy Payment Disruptor Stocks in 2022? - 20th Jan 21
2022 the Year of Smart devices, Electric Vehicles, and AI Startups - 20th Jan 21
Oil Markets More Animated by Geopolitics, Supply, and Demand - 20th Jan 21
WARNING - AI STOCK MARKET CRASH / BEAR SWITCH TRIGGERED! - 19th Jan 22
Fake It Till You Make It: Will Silver’s Motto Work on Gold? - 19th Jan 22
Crude Oil Smashing Stocks - 19th Jan 22
US Stagflation: The Global Risk of 2022 - 19th Jan 22
Stock Market Trend Forecast Early 2022 - Tech Growth Value Stocks Rotation - 18th Jan 22
Stock Market Sentiment Speaks: Are We Setting Up For A 'Mini-Crash'? - 18th Jan 22
Mobile Sports Betting is on a rise: Here’s why - 18th Jan 22
Exponential AI Stocks Mega-trend - 17th Jan 22
THE NEXT BITCOIN - 17th Jan 22
Gold Price Predictions for 2022 - 17th Jan 22
How Do Debt Relief Services Work To Reduce The Amount You Owe? - 17th Jan 22
RIVIAN IPO Illustrates We are in the Mother of all Stock Market Bubbles - 16th Jan 22
All Market Eyes on Copper - 16th Jan 22
The US Dollar Had a Slip-Up, but Gold Turned a Blind Eye to It - 16th Jan 22
A Stock Market Top for the Ages - 16th Jan 22
FREETRADE - Stock Investing Platform, the Good, Bad and Ugly Review, Free Shares, Cancelled Orders - 15th Jan 22
WD 14tb My Book External Drive Unboxing, Testing and Benchmark Performance Amazon Buy Review - 15th Jan 22
Toyland Ferris Wheel Birthday Fun at Gulliver's Rother Valley UK Theme Park 2022 - 15th Jan 22
What You Should Know About a TailoredPay High Risk Merchant Account - 15th Jan 22
Best Metaverse Tech Stocks Investing for 2022 and Beyond - 14th Jan 22
Gold Price Lagging Inflation - 14th Jan 22
Get Your Startup Idea Up And Running With These 7 Tips - 14th Jan 22
What Happens When Your Flight Gets Cancelled in the UK? - 14th Jan 22

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How to Protect your Wealth by Investing in AI Tech Stocks

U.S. Economy Catch-22 of a China Yuan Currency Revaluation

Economics / US Economy Apr 12, 2010 - 05:24 AM GMT

By: Colin_Brodhead

Economics

Best Financial Markets Analysis ArticleThe stage has been set for a play of the utmost irony, coupled to an acceleration in the decline of the fundamental U.S. economy. Members of the U.S. Congress have recently urged the Treasury Department to declare China a "currency manipulator," thus implicitly threatening China with punitive measures if it does not allow the value of its currency to rise against the dollar.


Needless to say, politicians in general clearly have no understanding whatsoever of the circular dynamics of economics nor, in particular, of China's primary motivation in this regard for buying U.S. Treasury bonds in the first place; that is, as a means to absorb the flood of dollars it obtains by buying Treasuries in order to maintain some semblance of balance in its current account.

Beware of what you wish for. So what will happen if Congress & co. ultimately gets its wish? There are two immediate consequences, neither of which are subtle in their effects:

First, the price of every Chinese import (think Wal Mart) will immediately and proportionately increase, manifesting as a round of high --though not yet hyper-- inflation. This will in turn serve to further reduce whatever is left of the U.S. consumers' discretionary budget, and thus push another unknown percentage of homeowners over the edge into further mortgage defaults and late credit card payments; items which, sad to say, U.S. Banksters are still allowed to point to as the initial cause for the on-going global crisis. After all, it's not their fault: they didn't see it coming.

The second consequence is, of course, that China itself will then obtain fewer dollars from trade --not only due to the numerical revaluation of its currency, but because consumers who buy in dollars will simply not be able to afford as many Chinese products. However, fewer dollars for the Chinese thus also directly reduces any commensurate need to buy U.S. Treasuries --even aside from the fact that they have already started withdrawing from that market, and may even be net sellers already. All this merely serves to exacerbate an already extent process of negative feedback: The less the demand for Treasuries, the lower the bidding price and the higher their yields become.

The government is then forced to borrow money at a higher rate of interest, which increases the risk of buying Treasuries in the first place, which lowers the demand, which increases the interest. Where does this interest payment come from? Declining tax revenues! --which is, no doubt, the very reason why certain congressional members want China to revalue the yuan relative to the dollar: i.e. in order to increase the "competitiveness" of U.S. exports! Funny, no?

Want to hear something even funnier? The greater bulk of Chinese imports are really coming from U.S. corporations, who have merely outsourced their labor pools to increase their profit margins by selling to whomever is still employed. All of this is commonly known, but corporate self-interest is a sacred cow. Here is Congress, attempting to force Chinese monetary policy in order to protect ourselves from the depredations of American corporate culture. How ironic is that!? One might hope that our politicians could connect at least two of the most obvious dots, and thus begin to suspect that real solutions might just lie much closer to home than Beijing.

So why did Tim Geithner make a sudden trip to China yesterday? Many seem to presume that it was to offer some kind of olive branch, though in truth, no details of discussions have yet been released; however, the most logical inference we can make is that he was, and is now, highly motivated to plead with the Chinese not to revalue their currency, for the very reasons just discussed. Maybe the gods just love a good comedy in which the antagonist is quickly hoisted on his own petard; because if the Chinese ever do accede to official Congressional demands, it will primarily be only because it suits their own purposes.

In any event, the U.S. economy --which is already coming apart at the seams-- will continue to unravel at an increasingly accelerated pace. Besides, the Chinese already have reasons of their own to begin a controlled rise in the relative value of the yuan, since it should be apparent to all that they are attempting to position the yuan to become the global alternative to the dollar as the reserve currency of choice.

When all is said and done, the continual economic deterioration of the U.S. is now unavoidable, primarily because its guiding lights are trapped in illusory catch-22's of their own making. For the underlying physical economy of main street is entire comprised of physical energy sources and processes. One can of course, symbolically misrepresent this basic reality with all the paper one cares to print, but the paper economy --the fiat "monetary" system, which appears so wonderfully flexible to the crackpot economists of the present day-- is, in reality, rigidly tied to the underlying energy flow that comprises the physical economy, in precisely the same sense that the symbolic representations of mathematics cannot be arbitrarily divorced from the dynamics of any given physical process to which they are applied.

The alleged "recovery" is thus nothing more than an illusion generated by an official distortion of the true facts and figures. Like the financial industry itself, the economic structure of the country is already a brittle hollow shell, and currently sustained by nothing more than a highly sophisticated, but symbolically fraudulent system of arithmetical smoke and mirrors. Timmy G. is merely a mouse at the base of an avalanche of pending effects, scurrying about in pathetic desperation. But there is simply no real room left for maneuvering. The Treasury market is already showing signs of severe stress, and beneath the public radar, the forces of decline continue to accumulate. The world is gagging on the vast sums of government bonds being printed and offered up worldwide. You can therefore be absolutely certain that interest rates will continue to be forced upward by the underlying market, regardless of every effort by Government Sachs to prevent it.

The lesson in all this is really quite simple. Ignorance with respect to the underlying physical nature of economic systems is utterly incapable of formulating any appropriate response to states of economic decline. To the clueless clutch of congressmen, modern economists and financial 'geniuses' currently in charge, it thus seems entirely reasonable to expect that an economic crisis can thus be addressed with methods of accounting. These people are neither capable of independent thought nor of understanding the very events in which they are immersed in terms of physics. They haven't the slightest notion that their economic "theory" is simply a futile attempt to exempt themselves --with nothing more in hand than a symbolic currency system-- from the inescapable grasp of E= MC2. Thus, every action they now take will simply boomerang around to strike them on the back of the head with a force in direct proportion to the depth of decline. We may in fact, expect them to continue until they simply pound their faces (and us with them) into the ground. Not, of course, that the little bottom-feeders would ever notice.

By Colin Brodhead

I'm an electrical engineer with a penchant for nonlinear systems analysis. However, a few years ago, an interest in macroeconomics evolved, almost of its own accord, out of this same skill set when I realized one day that the entire foundation of modern economics had been falsely premised on a single unquestioned assumption: i.e. that economics began as a product of barter and trade. To anyone who stops to rethink everything from scratch however, it becomes eminently clear that the truly fundamental principles of "economics" are utterly inseparable from the physics of life itself. In brief, this ultimately explains why economics was never previously able to develop a coherent and fully integrated explanation based, by definition, on a single principle and process, but instead become lost in a labyrinth of psychology, metaphysics, quasi-mathematical formulas, statistics and completely abstract monetary theories. As this latter system is now crumbling to its knees even as we speak, you may perhaps be interested to know that a completely integrated theory of economics makes it possible to literally engineer an economy --as an energy-based system-- to render states of permanent and universal prosperity. http://postparadox.blogspot.com/

© 2010 Copyright Colin Brodhead - All Rights Reserved Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors.


© 2005-2019 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in