Best of the Week
Most Popular
1. Investing in a Bubble Mania Stock Market Trending Towards Financial Crisis 2.0 CRASH! - 9th Sep 21
2.Tech Stocks Bubble Valuations 2000 vs 2021 - 25th Sep 21
3.Stock Market FOMO Going into Crash Season - 8th Oct 21
4.Stock Market FOMO Hits September Brick Wall - Evergrande China's Lehman's Moment - 22nd Sep 21
5.Crypto Bubble BURSTS! BTC, ETH, XRP CRASH! NiceHash Seizes Funds on Account Halting ALL Withdrawals! - 19th May 21
6.How to Protect Your Self From a Stock Market CRASH / Bear Market? - 14th Oct 21
7.AI Stocks Portfolio Buying and Selling Levels Going Into Market Correction - 11th Oct 21
8.Why Silver Price Could Crash by 20%! - 5th Oct 21
9.Powell: Inflation Might Not Be Transitory, After All - 3rd Oct 21
10.Global Stock Markets Topped 60 Days Before the US Stocks Peaked - 23rd Sep 21
Last 7 days
Investing in the METAVERSE Stocks Universe - 8th Dec 21
Stock Market Sentiment Speaks: I Expect 15-20% Returns For 2022 - 8th Dec 21
US Dollar Still Has the Green Light - 8th Dec 21
Stock Market Topping Process Roadmap - 8th Dec 21
The Lithium Breakthrough That Could Transform The Mining Industry - 8th Dec 21
VR and Gaming Becomes the Metaverse - 7th Dec 21
How to Read Your Smart Meter - Economy 7, Day and Night Rate Readings SMETS2 EDF - 7th Dec 21
For Profit or for Loss: 4 Tips for Selling ASX Shares - 7th Dec 21
INTEL Bargain Teck Stocks Trading at 15.5% Discount Sale - 7th Dec 21
US Bonds Yield Curve is not currently an inflationist’s friend - 7th Dec 21
Omicron COVID Variant-Possible Strong Stock Market INDU & TRAN Rally - 7th Dec 21
The New Tech That Could Take Tesla To $2 Trillion - 7th Dec 21
S&P 500 – Is a 5% Correction Enough? - 6th Dec 21
Global Stock Markets It’s Do-Or-Die Time - 6th Dec 21
Hawks Triumph, Doves Lose, Gold Bulls Cry! - 6th Dec 21
How Stock Investors Can Cash in on President Biden’s new Climate Plan - 6th Dec 21
The Lithium Tech That Could Send The EV Boom Into Overdrive - 6th Dec 21
How Stagflation Effects Stocks - 5th Dec 21
Bitcoin FLASH CRASH! Cryptos Blood Bath as Exchanges Run Stops, An Early Christmas Present for Some? - 5th Dec 21
TESCO Pre Omicron Panic Christmas Decorations Festive Shop 2021 - 5th Dec 21
Dow Stock Market Trend Forecast Into Mid 2022 - 4th Dec 21
INVESTING LESSON - Give your Portfolio Some Breathing Space - 4th Dec 21
Don’t Get Yourself Into a Bull Trap With Gold - 4th Dec 21
GOLD HAS LOTS OF POTENTIAL DOWNSIDE - 4th Dec 21
4 Tips To Help You Take Better Care Of Your Personal Finances- 4th Dec 21
What Is A Golden Cross Pattern In Trading? - 4th Dec 21
Bitcoin Price TRIGGER for Accumulating Into Alt Coins for 2022 Price Explosion - Part 2 - 3rd Dec 21
Stock Market Major Turning Point Taking Place - 3rd Dec 21
The Masters of the Universe and Gold - 3rd Dec 21
This simple Stock Market mindset shift could help you make millions - 3rd Dec 21
Will the Glasgow Summit (COP26) Affect Energy Prices? - 3rd Dec 21
Peloton 35% CRASH a Lesson of What Happens When One Over Pays for a Loss Making Growth Stock - 1st Dec 21
Stock Market Sentiment Speaks: I Fear For Retirees For The Next 20 Years - 1st Dec 21 t
Will the Anointed Finanical Experts Get It Wrong Again? - 1st Dec 21
Main Differences Between the UK and Canadian Gaming Markets - 1st Dec 21

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How to Protect your Wealth by Investing in AI Tech Stocks

Libyan Oil Is A Red Herring: Unless The Saudis Have a Sulk…Or Worse!

Commodities / Crude Oil Mar 01, 2011 - 04:50 AM GMT

By: Andrew_Butter

Commodities

Best Financial Markets Analysis ArticleAccording to dispatches the recent events shut-down 75% of Libya’s oil exports. If the situation deteriorates into a full blown civil war then the output could dwindle to nothing.

On top of that, when the UN Security Council starts talking about sanctions; you know you are in for a long haul. What that really means is whilst they “disapprove” they won’t do anything of any practical value to help resolve the violence; case-in-point Iran; which has had sanctions in one form or another for thirty years; and look what that “achieved”.


Part of the problem is that no-one (at least not in any place nice), wants to have Gaddafi, so the sewer-rat has so where to turn and he has his back against the wall, and rats are always dangerous in such circumstances. Oh well perhaps Berlusconi will oblige, or perhaps those two best-buddies can trot off hand in hand to some place with a surplus of empty “luxury” real estate, plenty of prostitutes, and a relaxed attitude to all-cash transactions? There you go Muammar, just slip me a couple of million (mate) and I’ll set the whole thing up for you.

Come to think of it, the worst thing the U.N. could have done was go after Gaddafi’s money BEFORE he got out. Now I’m going to have to ask for hard cash to deliver my services (small denominations please).

But aside from all that, could this be the end of the world as we know it? Will oil prices shoot up to $200 a barrel (WTI), and will America have to find (i.e. borrow), an extra $250 billion a year of foreign exchange just so that the lights stay on?

Hardly, or if they do, it will be nothing to do with Libya.

Round numbers Libya produces (produced) about 1.5 million barrels a day of oil which represents about 2% of what is currently being pumped worldwide.

Lose that “colossal” source of supply, and if everything else is equal; then according to the most reliable (and fiendishly complex) supply/demand model ever known to mankind; (FOOT=3.33% x TOAD/OIK), a loss of 2% of supply will jack up the price of WTI by a “terrifying”  $1.7 a barrel.

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article24849.html

That’s about how much any self-respecting “God’s Worker” can manipulate the price over lunch, (up-or-down, same difference).

Sure $98 WTI and counting is 15% over the “fundamental”, at least the one determined by the principles of Parasite Economics. That’s the one about how much “milk” you can squeeze out of Daisy before she starts to MOO really loud and then tries to  kick over the bucket. But $98 is just speculation and it’s nothing to do with the supply/demand dynamics (although that doesn’t mean it will stop at that price).

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article10998.html

BUT!

The real problem may be that the Saudis might be; let’s just say….a mite “displeased” by the trajectory of the recent (and not so recent) turn of events.

FIRST the Americans invaded Iraq and installed (horror) an approximation of a “Western-Style-Democracy”. Which is exactly what Ayatollah Sayyed Ruhollah Mostafavi Moosavi Khomeini was trying to do a quarter of a century ago; so that what are essentially ethnic Iranians could take over Iraq, which they now have.

THEN America refused to “cut of the head of the (Iranian) Serpent”, (well that’s what Wiki-leaks said they said).

THEN they threatened that if the Egyptian army opened fire on civilian protesters, they would cut off the $15 billion a year they had been paying to prop up the said army. In that regard, you have to ask yourself, is there any POINT in a megalomaniac despot having an army at all, if they won’t shoot civilians when push comes to shove?

THEN…the coup-de-whatever, to cap it all, some “loose cannons” started hinting rude things about the way Bahrain is governed. And even worse, “someone” obliquely suggested that it might be a good idea to have another one of those darn “Western-Style-Democracies” over there; in which case the “essentially” ethnic Iranians would take over too, just like they did in Iraq.

No one has been so impolite as to even hint that the Saudis might be “better-off” with a “Western-Style-Democracy” (as in Tony Blair’s famous line “We (the Royal “We”), are better-off without Saddam Hussein”). Although the penny has started to drop in some quarters where the pennies tends to drop last, that there might be a latent potential source of “instability” inside the bosom of the “fairy-godmother-of-last-resort”, who, until recently could be relied on to make sure oil prices were kept “fair”.

It (Saudi Arabia) has a Shiite minority estimated at between 10 percent and 15 percent of the population, according to Human Rights Watch. Most live in the Eastern Province, where state-owned Saudi oil company Saudi ARAMCO is based, and in which they constitute 75 percent of the population

http://www.businessweek.com/news/...

Actually if you extrapolate from the GCC Demographic Data-Book that 10% to 15% is more like 20%.

That’s not an “estimate”, that’s based on a study commissioned by Unilever (for market research) and was once the definitive guide to the Saudi population structure, which was then (and still is) TOP SECRET.

But you can work it out by births & death statistics (reliable) plus large-sample random dialling telephone research (funny how if you use a sweet-talking Yemini girl to do that you get a 95% hit rate on unsolicited calls, and if the respondent is asleep they will often call her back later).

But that’s all bye-the-bye, the big story is that this time last year the Saudi’s were saying that $75 WTI was “fair”. More recently the whispers have been around the $100 mark, although they promised to “act” if things got out of hand. Yet last month Saudi pumped 2% less oil than the month before that.

Perhaps it’s time for some people (who shall remain nameless), to show a little bit more “respect”, if they want to pay a “fair” price, for oil?

Or perhaps it’s worse than that?

There have been some malicious and totally unfounded rumours flying about, of late (under the “cloak” as one might say), that Saudi Arabia doesn’t actually have the capacity to make sure that the price of oil is “fair”, if push comes to shove.

Of course it’s insane to even speculate on whether America’s most favoured friend would be putting out porky pies on such a sensitive issue, just so that they got the respect they deserved.

But what if; what if the capability to “make things “fair”” was just one more mirage? In that case the “fair” value of oil would be how much it would cost, in today’s money, to bring in the 20 million to 30 million barrels a day of “yet-to-be-discovered” oil, that the IEA say will need to be discovered over the next five to ten years.

That’s over $150 a barrel (WTI).

Interesting times!

Of course all bets are off if the Saudi’s decide that $150 WTI is “fair”.

By Andrew Butter

Twenty years doing market analysis and valuations for investors in the Middle East, USA, and Europe; currently writing a book about BubbleOmics. Andrew Butter is managing partner of ABMC, an investment advisory firm, based in Dubai ( hbutter@eim.ae ), that he setup in 1999, and is has been involved advising on large scale real estate investments, mainly in Dubai.

© 2011 Copyright Andrew Butter- All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors.

Andrew Butter Archive

© 2005-2019 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in