Best of the Week
Most Popular
1. Ray Dalio: This Debt Cycle Will End Soon - John_Mauldin
2.Stock Market Dow Plunge Following Fake US - China Trade War Truce - Nadeem_Walayat
3.UK House Prices 2019 No Deal BrExit 30% Crash Warning! - Nadeem_Walayat
4.What the Oil Short-sellers and OPEC Don’t Know about Peak Shale - Andrew_Butter
5.Stock Market Crashed While the Yield Curve Inverted - Troy_Bombardia
6.More Late-cycle Signs for the Stock Market and What’s Next - Troy_Bombardia
7.US Economy Will Deteriorate Over Next Half Year. What this Means for Stocks - Troy_Bombardia
8.TICK TOCK, Counting Down to the Next Recession - James_Quinn
9.How Theresa May Put Britain on the Path Towards BrExit Civil War - Nadeem_Walayat
10.This Is the End of Trump’s Economic Sugar High - Patrick_Watson
Last 7 days
Gold’s Not An Investment – You Won’t Get Rich - 17th Dec 18
Stock Market At Medium-Term Lows, Which Direction is Next? - 17th Dec 18
This Stock Will Drive America’s 5G Buildout - 17th Dec 18
Stock Market Turn In The Tide - Have a Happy Bear Market! - 17th Dec 18
How A NASA Scientist Could Trigger The Next Cannabis Boom - 17th Dec 18
iShares Russell 2000 IWM Leading Stock Market Decline - 17th Dec 18
Where is the Dow Stock Market Santa Rally? - 17th Dec 18
With Weaker Climate Consensus, Expect Elevated Climate Change - 16th Dec 18
SMIGGLE Advent Calendar 2018 UK Contents - What You Get Look Inside Review - 16th Dec 18
Is there a Lump of Coal in Santa's Stock Market Bag? - 16th Dec 18
This Market Will Drive Gold in 2019… - 16th Dec 18
Gerald Celente:Central Banks Can’t Stop a 2019 Debt Disaster - 16th Dec 18
Gold Stocks Triple Breakout - 15th Dec 18
The stock market fails to rally each day. What’s next for stocks - 14th Dec 18
How Low Could the S&P 500 Go? - 14th Dec 18
An Industrial to Stock Trade: Is Boeing a BUY Here? - 14th Dec 18
Will the Arrest of Huawei Executive Derail Trade War Truce? - 14th Dec 18
Trump vs the Fed: Who Wins? - 13th Dec 18
Expect Gold & Silver to Pullback Before the Next Move Higher - 13th Dec 18
Dollar Index Trends, USDJPY Setting Up - 13th Dec 18
While The Stocks Bulls Fiddle With The 'Fundamentals,' Rome Burns - 13th Dec 18
The Historic Role of Silver - 13th Dec 18
Natural Gas Price Setup for a Big Move Lower - 13th Dec 18
How to Get 20% Off Morrisons Weekly Supermarket Shopping - 13th Dec 18
Gold Price Analysis: Closer To A Significant Monetary Event - 13th Dec 18
Where is the Stock Market Santa Claus Rally? - 12th Dec 18
Politics and Economics in Times of Crisis - 12th Dec 18
Owning Precious Metals in an IRA - 12th Dec 18
Ways to Improve the Value of Your Home - 12th Dec 18
Theresa May No Confidence Vote, Next Tory Leader Betting Market Analysis and Forecasts - 12th Dec 18
Gold & Global Financial Crisis Redux - 12th Dec 18
Wow Your Neighbours With the Best Christmas Projector Lights for Holidays 2018! - 12th Dec 18
Stock Market Topping Formation as Risks Rise Around the World - 11th Dec 18
The Amazing Story of Gold to Gold Stocks Ratios - 11th Dec 18
Stock Market Medium term Bullish, But Long Term Risk:Reward is Bearish - 11th Dec 18
Is a Deleveraging Event about to Unfold in the Stock Market? - 11th Dec 18
Making Money through Property Investment - 11th Dec 18
Brexit: What Will it Mean for Exchange Rates? - 11th Dec 18
United States Facing Climate Change Severe Water Stress - 10th Dec 18
Waiting for Gold Price to Erupt - 10th Dec 18
Stock Market Key Support Being Re-Tested - 10th Dec 18
May BrExit Deal Tory MP Votes Forecast, Betting Market Analysis - 10th Dec 18
Listen to What Gold is Telling You - 10th Dec 18
The Stock Market’s Long Term Outlook is Changing - 10th Dec 18
Palladium Shortages Expose Broken Futures Markets for Precious Metals - 9th Dec 18
Is an Inverted Yield Curve Bullish for Gold? - 9th Dec 18

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How You Could Make £2,850 Per Month

Gold And Silver – Will Precious Metals Purchasers Become Terrorists?

Commodities / Gold and Silver 2016 Feb 15, 2016 - 12:14 PM GMT

By: Michael_Noonan

Commodities

A clarification:  We tend to use the regular Friday closes for our charts to avoid the closing “fix” that can sometimes be several dollars for gold and several cents for silver away from the end of Friday trade.  It is not of much consequence because we are consistent in doing it that way, but two weeks ago, the was a substantial rally after the normal close, and it was not taken into consideration during our analysis.

More people are becoming aware that not all is as it seems with the federal government, but there is still a reluctance, even a refusal, to attribute many of today’s existing problems as a root cause by the federal government, which is not a government of, by, or for the people.  Today’s de facto federal government has been a product of the globalists for over a century, starting in more earnest when the Rothschild’s financed both sides in the Civil War, and when Lincoln introduced the Executive Order, now routinely used by presidents to by-pass Congress in the Bread and Circus facade known as the federal government where the globalists are in  charge behind the “curtain.”


We are on record for consistently advocating the purchase of gold and silver for the past three years, regardless of price.  Some may fault us for exhorting purchases at much higher prices than are current.  The recommendations were for wealth preservation and not for speculation or profit, even though we can be criticized for the [temporary] erosion of supposed wealth preservation, and in some cases, the erosion is substantial.  The timing has been off, yet the reasoning, or purpose for buying and holding remains the same today, and even more pressing.

Reuters printed an interesting article, a few weeks ago, from which we will provide excerpts.  The full article is here.

U.S. eyes ways to toughen fight against domestic extremists.

Here is the opening paragraph:

The U.S. Justice Department is considering legal changes to combat what it sees as a rising threat from domestic anti-government extremists, senior officials told Reuters, even as it steps up efforts to stop Islamic State-inspired attacks at home.

Not to be missed is the lumping of domestic Americans in the same sentence as ISIS.
Now, anyone who expresses discontent with the federal government is called an anti-government extremist, and they are labeled as a threat.  No regard is given to the validity of their cause or reason for dissent.  Actually, these individuals and/or groups are viewed as more than a threat:

Extremist groups motivated by a range of U.S.-born philosophies present a “clear and present danger,” John Carlin, the Justice Department’s chief of national security, told Reuters in an interview.

They are a clear and present danger, says the chief of national security.  The motivation is laughably described as a range of U.S.-born philosophies. The deeper one gets into the article, the less disguised is the association between those expressing a legitimate degree of  dissatisfaction with the federal government.  They are simply called domestic terrorists:

Carlin said his counter-terrorism team, including a recently hired counsel, is taking a “thoughtful look at the nature and scope of the domestic terrorism threat” and helping to analyze “potential legal improvements and enhancements to better combat those threats.”

No mention is ever made that ISIS was created, trained, armed, and still supported by the CIA/federal government.  Such pertinent details are not for public consumption.  Nor is any mention made that the US is considered the greatest threat to world peace, bringing nothing but destruction to many countries, especially in the Middle East, and/or economic warfare to those countries opposed to US greed and interests, including Europe.

A legitimate consideration is, now that domestic terrorists will be treated the same as ISIS terrorists, does that mean the US will now also go after actual ISIS terrorists as it does when going after domestic U.S.-born philosopher terrorists?

The French has been trying this, with little success, and what has been happening in France is that protestors against immigrants, some with known ISIS affiliations, the protestors are being arrested while the law-breaking immigrants are being protected.

The point is, the US federal government views Americans as suspect terrorists for any reason when dissenting against the federal government.

“You can discover what your enemy [or government] fears most by observing 
the means he uses to frighten you.”  Eric Hoffer – American moral and spiritual philosopher [1898 – 1983]

Where is the line drawn?  Nowhere to be found.  It will not be a far stretch to view those who buy and hold gold and silver as “economic terrorists”  The Reuters article, which covers the views of the federal government, mentions a few specific groups or individuals many would [incorrectly] agree that should be called and treated as terrorists, as the federal Thought Police manipulate the public’s mind.  However, much of the content in the article is expressed broadly enough to encompass as a terrorist whatever the federal government decides or declares.

A “war against cash” has now perked to regular news status to massage the public into accepting this form of slavery, which is all it is.  The only thing the issuers of fiat can do to keep their Ponzi currency scheme going it to make it impossible to use any other form for
money.  Cash transactions are not recorded in the banking system, and that is unacceptable to those in control.  Gold and silver fall into the anti-fiat category and outside of government control.  Only those who use or have gold and silver must be against the government use of fiat, and being against the government dictates, gold and silver users must therefore be terrorists not to be tolerated.

The window for buying, holding, owning gold and/or silver is closing.  Problem, Reaction, Solution.  Those dealing in PMs are outside of the system, a Problem.  The Reaction is to make it extremely difficult to buy and hold gold and silver, unless it is in open public record where the federal government can come after you.  Solution?  Brand PM holders as economic terrorists.  Sound far-fetched?

We have recently discussed how there is no confirmation of a bottom in place, and then gold shoots up in an unchecked rally, seemingly making moot our point.  Maybe, maybe not.  We are less concerned in calling the bottom than we are in recognizing one is in place.  There have been lot of so-called the-bottom-is-in articles that were simply wrong.  We have never been in that camp since gold and silver began their step decline over the past 6 years.  We may miss a 10%, 15%, even 20% rally once a final bottom is in place, but only in the paper futures market.

Our call for the ongoing acquisition and holding of physical gold and silver has never wavered, however untimely some of those recommendations were when gold was over $1,500+ the ounce, silver over $30 the ounce.  Like almost everyone else, we did not foresee the globalists exerting so much manipulative influence across all markets for as long as they have.  That is past, and we do not use a rear-view mirror for physical purchases made.

Are we starting to see a bottoming process?  Yes.  Does that mean a bottom is in?  We do not know, yet.  The rally ran into a zone of resistance, seen on the chart.  The current rally is but one of many steps in a bottoming formation.  Each successive step confirms the one that came before.

The next step will be to watch the next downward reaction to see how it unfolds in order to assess the significance of the rally over the past two weeks.  The daily chart makes this clearer.

What validates the weekly resistance area is the activity on the daily chart.  There is no apparent resistance on this lower time frame that shows up over a year ago on the weekly.  We have often stated that smart money, aka controlling interests, buys low, sells high.  It is also axiomatic that unusually large volume surges are from smart money in action.  The public simply do not act in such a coordinated effort in concert to create heavy volume days.  The public only react.

The persistent rally in gold attracted a lot of attention breaking above moving averages and/or above prior failed rallies.  The public do not want to miss out on the move higher, and each successive daily high whetted the appetite to want to buy gold before-it-became-too-late.  Thus, the huge reaction rush by the public when gold went higher without pause.

Guess who were willing sellers to the public at the higher prices?

Whenever you see a substantially wider price range in a rally, accompanied by a huge surge in volume, odds favor that day as being a climatic buying spree that ends the rally.
This is exactly what you see on the daily gold chart.  A reaction to the downside will likely follow, and it is how the reaction unfolds that will tell us if higher highs will follow, or not.

The next week or so may be revealing as to the significance of this recent strong rally.

Silver has a much stronger fundamental underlying situation, yet for now, it continues to underperform relative to gold.  If the Nov-Dec-Jan bottom trading range is the bottom, it will have fooled us, but it has yet to be decided as to final bottom status.

This daily chart cuts off at the beginning of February, prior to the current rally.  We want to show how the market provides pertinent information based on past market behavior.  There was a swing high established last October when price closed strongly, and it then gapped open lower, net day.  The price high is obvious resistance, and so is the high of the next day’s open when price could not regain the gap and continued lower.

We drew in dashed lines to reflect how this failed swing high can influence future market behavior, a fact known well in advance.

The same horizontal line was in effect when silver rallied to the lower portion of the zone of resistance.  A weaker market will tend to fail at lower resistance areas rather than exceed them, as gold did.  The unusually wide trading range and the huge volume surge were red flags for a possible buying climax at a recognized area of resistance.  We will be more certain of this once any reaction lower unfolds in order to assess the character of any change on market behavior that can lead to a new trend.

By Michael Noonan

http://edgetraderplus.com

Michael Noonan, mn@edgetraderplus.com, is a Chicago-based trader with over 30 years in the business. His sole approach to analysis is derived from developing market pattern behavior, found in the form of Price, Volume, and Time, and it is generated from the best source possible, the market itself.

© 2016 Copyright Michael Noonan - All Rights Reserved Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors.

Michael Noonan Archive

© 2005-2018 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in

6 Critical Money Making Rules