Most Popular
1. Banking Crisis is Stocks Bull Market Buying Opportunity - Nadeem_Walayat
2.The Crypto Signal for the Precious Metals Market - P_Radomski_CFA
3. One Possible Outcome to a New World Order - Raymond_Matison
4.Nvidia Blow Off Top - Flying High like the Phoenix too Close to the Sun - Nadeem_Walayat
5. Apple AAPL Stock Trend and Earnings Analysis - Nadeem_Walayat
6.AI, Stocks, and Gold Stocks – Connected After All - P_Radomski_CFA
7.Stock Market CHEAT SHEET - - Nadeem_Walayat
8.US Debt Ceiling Crisis Smoke and Mirrors Circus - Nadeem_Walayat
9.Silver Price May Explode - Avi_Gilburt
10.More US Banks Could Collapse -- A Lot More- EWI
Last 7 days
Stock Market Volatility (VIX) - 25th Mar 24
Stock Market Investor Sentiment - 25th Mar 24
The Federal Reserve Didn't Do Anything But It Had Plenty to Say - 25th Mar 24
Stock Market Breadth - 24th Mar 24
Stock Market Margin Debt Indicator - 24th Mar 24
It’s Easy to Scream Stocks Bubble! - 24th Mar 24
Stocks: What to Make of All This Insider Selling- 24th Mar 24
Money Supply Continues To Fall, Economy Worsens – Investors Don’t Care - 24th Mar 24
Get an Edge in the Crypto Market with Order Flow - 24th Mar 24
US Presidential Election Cycle and Recessions - 18th Mar 24
US Recession Already Happened in 2022! - 18th Mar 24
AI can now remember everything you say - 18th Mar 24
Bitcoin Crypto Mania 2024 - MicroStrategy MSTR Blow off Top! - 14th Mar 24
Bitcoin Gravy Train Trend Forecast 2024 - 11th Mar 24
Gold and the Long-Term Inflation Cycle - 11th Mar 24
Fed’s Next Intertest Rate Move might not align with popular consensus - 11th Mar 24
Two Reasons The Fed Manipulates Interest Rates - 11th Mar 24
US Dollar Trend 2024 - 9th Mar 2024
The Bond Trade and Interest Rates - 9th Mar 2024
Investors Don’t Believe the Gold Rally, Still Prefer General Stocks - 9th Mar 2024
Paper Gold Vs. Real Gold: It's Important to Know the Difference - 9th Mar 2024
Stocks: What This "Record Extreme" Indicator May Be Signaling - 9th Mar 2024
My 3 Favorite Trade Setups - Elliott Wave Course - 9th Mar 2024
Bitcoin Crypto Bubble Mania! - 4th Mar 2024
US Interest Rates - When WIll the Fed Pivot - 1st Mar 2024
S&P Stock Market Real Earnings Yield - 29th Feb 2024
US Unemployment is a Fake Statistic - 29th Feb 2024
U.S. financial market’s “Weimar phase” impact to your fiat and digital assets - 29th Feb 2024
What a Breakdown in Silver Mining Stocks! What an Opportunity! - 29th Feb 2024
Why AI will Soon become SA - Synthetic Intelligence - The Machine Learning Megatrend - 29th Feb 2024
Keep Calm and Carry on Buying Quantum AI Tech Stocks - 19th Feb 24

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How to Protect your Wealth by Investing in AI Tech Stocks

Short Selling Uptick Rule to Return, But Keep It Simple

Stock-Markets / US Stock Markets Mar 30, 2009 - 05:25 PM GMT

By: Frank_Holmes

Stock-Markets

Best Financial Markets Analysis ArticleIt looks like an uptick rule for short selling will soon be back in place, but let's hope it's not the version being sought by the Nasdaq and the New York Stock Exchange.

The two exchanges and others are pushing a proposal that is overloaded with conditions that must be met before a particular stock becomes subject to the rule, and even then the rule's reach would be limited.


My question is, “Why make things so complicated?” If Washington 's new leadership is serious about restoring integrity to our capital markets, it will restore the old uptick rule requiring that any short sale of a stock must follow an uptick in the share price.

Adding conditions to the uptick rule creates gray areas that will be open to interpretation and thus open to exploitation. Rogue hedge funds and other market abusers like to operate in the gray areas—we've been warning about their abusive practices for several years.

The uptick rule was created in the 1930s to protect public companies from illegal “bear raid” manipulations—groups of investors working together to make big profits by driving down a stock's price. Insightful research by the Wharton School published last year lays out how these attacks can occur.

A few years ago an SEC study determined the rule was ineffective, but many have suggested this study was flawed because it took place during a rising market with low volatility. Not in doubt, however, is that the removal of the uptick rule in July 2007 was immediately followed by an unprecedented jump in market volatility.

Especially hard hit have been financial stocks, with Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers among the first to be dragged under by what many market commentators have described as classic “bear raid” manipulations.

Lehman shares, for example, lost 30 percent of their value in the first month after the uptick rule was shelved. In the first 10 trading days of September 2008, Lehman stock fell from over $17 to 15 cents per share, and soon it was gone. It never had a chance once it was attacked by predatory short-sellers taking advantage of the uptick rule's absence. We are fortunate that we don't own any risky derivative securities or have any debt—factors that could have exposed us to the same forces that affected Bear Stearns, Lehman and many others.

The uptick rule is not solely to blame for the stock market's huge drop and it will not cure all of the unscrupulous behavior in our stock markets.

Abusive “naked shorting”—making a short sale with no intention of locating and delivering those shares to the buyer—also should be addressed with stricter rules on both the short seller and the broker executing that sale. The SEC has recognized this as a significant problem in the market, and we have been calling for a remedy since 2007.

While the regulations are being changed, we should also do something about “empty voting”—short sellers borrowing shares of a company involved in an important shareholder vote in order to oppose management's proposals. The game: defeating ballot proposals can undermine confidence in management and drive down the stock price.

And let's not forget the FAS 157 “mark-to-market” rule, which pushed many financial companies to write off many billions of dollars worth of securities. As we've written recently, these wounded companies were easy prey for malevolent short-sellers, who pounded down their stock prices and impaired their ability to raise new capital to rebuild their balance sheets. I believe having the uptick rule in place could have changed how that scenario played out.

Oddly enough, there was no great clamor to get rid of the uptick rule in the first place. Not oddly, those arguing loudest against restoring it are hedge fund managers who have been the main beneficiaries of its absence.

Regulators surely had good intentions when they suspended the uptick rule, but there were unforeseen consequences. Now they should learn from the experience and make appropriate changes before more companies are needlessly destroyed.

Bottom line—bring back the uptick rule as it was prior to July 2007. That's the simple and straightforward solution, not to mention a good first step toward more effective market regulation.

By Frank Holmes, CEO , U.S. Global Investors

Frank Holmes is CEO and chief investment officer at U.S. Global Investors , a Texas-based investment adviser that specializes in natural resources, emerging markets and global infrastructure. The company's 13 mutual funds include the Global Resources Fund (PSPFX) , Gold and Precious Metals Fund (USERX) and Global MegaTrends Fund (MEGAX) .

More timely commentary from Frank Holmes is available in his investment blog, “Frank Talk”: www.usfunds.com/franktalk .

Please consider carefully the fund's investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. For this and other important information, obtain a fund prospectus by visiting www.usfunds.com or by calling 1-800-US-FUNDS (1-800-873-8637). Read it carefully before investing. Distributed by U.S. Global Brokerage, Inc.

All opinions expressed and data provided are subject to change without notice. Some of these opinions may not be appropriate to every investor. Gold funds may be susceptible to adverse economic, political or regulatory developments due to concentrating in a single theme. The price of gold is subject to substantial price fluctuations over short periods of time and may be affected by unpredicted international monetary and political policies. We suggest investing no more than 5% to 10% of your portfolio in gold or gold stocks. The following securities mentioned in the article were held by one or more of U.S. Global Investors family of funds as of 12-31-07 : streetTRACKS Gold Trust.

Frank Holmes Archive

© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in