Best of the Week
Most Popular
1. Market Decline Will Lead To Pension Collapse, USD Devaluation, And NWO - Raymond_Matison
2.Uber’s Nightmare Has Just Started - Stephen_McBride
3.Stock Market Crash Black Swan Event Set Up Sept 12th? - Brad_Gudgeon
4.GDow Stock Market Trend Forecast Update - Nadeem_Walayat
5.Gold Significant Correction Has Started - Clive_Maund
6.British Pound GBP vs Brexit Chaos Timeline - Nadeem_Walayat
7.Cameco Crash, Uranium Sector Won’t Catch a break - Richard_Mills
8.Recession 2020 Forecast : The New Risks & New Profits Of A Grand Experiment - Dan_Amerman
9.Gold When Global Insanity Prevails - Michael Ballanger
10.UK General Election Forecast 2019 - Betting Market Odds - Nadeem_Walayat
Last 7 days
Gold Price Breaks Down, Waving Good-bye to the 2019 Rally - 12th Nov 19
Fed Can't See the Bubbles Through the Lather - 12th Nov 19
Double 11 Record Sales Signal Strength of Chinese Consumption - 12th Nov 19
Welcome to the Zombie-land Of Oil, Gold and Stocks Investing – Part II - 12th Nov 19
Gold Retest Coming - 12th Nov 19
New Evidence Futures Markets Are Built for Manipulation - 12th Nov 19
Next 5 Year Future Proof Gaming PC Build Spec November 2019 - Ryzen 9 3900x, RTX 2080Ti... - 12th Nov 19
Gold and Silver - The Two Horsemen - 11th Nov 19
Towards a Diverging BRIC Future - 11th Nov 19
Welcome to the Zombie-land Of Stock Market Investing - 11th Nov 19
Illiquidity & Gold And Silver In The End Game - 11th Nov 19
Key Things You Need to Know When Starting a Business - 11th Nov 19
Stock Market Cycles Peaking - 11th Nov 19
Avoid Emotional Investing in Cryptocurrency - 11th Nov 19
Australian Lithium Mines NOT Viable at Current Prices - 10th Nov 19
The 10 Highest Paying Jobs In Oil & Gas - 10th Nov 19
World's Major Gold Miners Target Copper Porphyries - 10th Nov 19
AMAZON NOVEMBER 2019 BARGAIN PRICES - WD My Book 8TB External Drive for £126 - 10th Nov 19
Gold & Silver to Head Dramatically Higher, Mirroring Palladium - 9th Nov 19
How Do YOU Know the Direction of a Market's Larger Trend? - 9th Nov 19
BEST Amazon SMART Scale To Aid Weight Loss for Christmas 2019 - 9th Nov 19
Why Every Investor Should Invest in Water - 8th Nov 19
Wait… Was That a Bullish Silver Reversal? - 8th Nov 19
Gold, Silver and Copper The 3 Metallic Amigos and the Macro Message - 8th Nov 19
Is China locking up Indonesian Nickel? - 8th Nov 19
Where is the Top for Natural Gas? - 7th Nov 19
Why Fractional Shares Don’t Make Sense - 7th Nov 19
The Fed Is Chasing Its Own Tail; It Doesn’t Care What You Think - 7th Nov 19
China’s path from World’s Factory to World Market - 7th Nov 19
Where Is That Confounded Recession? - 7th Nov 19
FREE eBook - The Investment Strategy that could change your future - 7th Nov 19
Is There a Stock Market Breakout Ahead? - 6th Nov 19
These Indicators Aren’t Putting to an Economic Resurgence - 6th Nov 19
Understanding the Different Types of Travel Insurance - 6th Nov 19
The Biggest Gold Story Of 2020 - 6th Nov 19
Best Money Saving FREE Bonfire Night Fire Works Show Sheffield 2019 - 5th Nov 19
Is the Run on the US Dollar Due to Panic or Greed? - 5th Nov 19
Reasons Why Madrid Attracts Young Professionals - 5th Nov 19
Larger Bullish Move in USD/JPY May Just Be Getting Started - 5th Nov 19
Constructive Action in Gold & Silver Stocks - 5th Nov 19
The Boring Industry That Hands +500% Gains - 5th Nov 19
Stock Market Chartology vs Fundamentals - 4th Nov 19
The Fed’s Policy Is Like Swatting Flies with Nuclear Weapons - 4th Nov 19
Stock Market Warning: US Credit Delinquencies To Skyrocket In Q4 - 4th Nov 19
Stock Market Intermediate Topping Process Continues - 4th Nov 19
Stock Market $SPY Expanded Flat, Déjà Vu All Over Again - 4th Nov 19
How To Buy Gold For $3 An Ounce - 4th Nov 19

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How To Buy Gold For $3 An Ounce

Proving The Effectiveness Of The Only Known Antidote For Economic Suicide

Stock-Markets / Credit Crisis 2009 Aug 25, 2009 - 07:15 PM GMT

By: Andrew_Butter

Stock-Markets

Best Financial Markets Analysis ArticlePutting aside colorful sensationalism (tales of greed, fraud, and incompetence), the instrument of the recent suicide attempt was banks lending money against collateral and not taking reasonable or responsible steps to make sure that the value of collateral was more than the loans that were outstanding, at the point in time loans defaulted.


A common argument by bankers is that they did not know that this would happen. This is (probably) true in most cases (i.e. they say it was incompetence not fraud), but the reason they did not know was that they did not do, or commission, proper valuations. That is self-evident, but then they say, "Oh but it is impossible to do a valuation of an asset for some date in the future, so we used some jerry-built concoction of "the market" to do the valuation".

First: The "market" did not deliver satisfactory valuations, it could not, and it can never do that. That's like doing a valuation based on a popularity contest, there may be a weird logic there, but (a) that is not how you do a valuation under any coherent valuation standards, particularly not International Valuation Standards and (b) evidently it does not work, if it did work there would be no crisis.

Second: It is not impossible to make a reliable estimate of what an asset can sell for in the future, that happens all the time. People who make auto loans understand this, they understand for example that a new car will be worth less in ten years time that it is worth today, and they account for that. So why should a building or a security be any different?

The problem was not that no one could do such a valuation; it was that no one asked the question. This is the question that should have been asked and answered: "What is the minimum price that I can reasonably expect to be able to sell this asset for over the next five, ten or twenty years".

Is that difficult to do? Not really, it obviously takes more skill than simply finding out how much the asset could sell for today, but it's not hard. The problem then was no one asked, the problem now is that still no one is asking that question, and the problem there, is that the global financial system will have to rely on the morphine drip of state handouts until (a) that question is routinely asked and (b) market participants believe the answer.

How can you do that?

This article is not about how to do valuation; if someone needs to have that explained to them, then they would be well advised to hire someone who knows, valuations are tricky, they are not things that amateurs should attempt without adult supervision. This article is simply to demonstrate that it can be done, with deadly accuracy.

Proof:

The current problem was started with housing, so perhaps that's a place to start?

I have done valuations of real estate for a big part of my life, I can demonstrate that a properly conceived valuation of housing in USA in 2004 would have flagged the fact that housing was at that time on average 23% over-priced, and thus after allowing for they dynamics of corrections after mispricing (which are not a mystery (http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article12114.html)), the maximum value that should be attributed to housing when used as collateral at that time was 60% of the current (then) mark-to-market value (http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article6250.html). But that's in the past, and anyone can be smart after the fact, so that's hardly proof.

How about all those toxic assets sitting on bank balance sheets, what will they be worth in five years time?

The problem with that is as explained (http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article12770.html), it always was and it still is impossible to value those assets, because sufficient market-derived data is not available in the public domain. And until sufficient data is made available to market participants those assets will sit in the stomach of the banks un-digested, and the government will have to play "make-believe" until they eventually "mature" and can be passed through the digestive system.

So what's left?

How to demonstrate that it is possible for anyone who is "skilled-in-the art" to do a reliable valuation of a complex asset; in the future.

Here is an example:

In January I decided to do a valuation of the US stock market using well-known valuation techniques. I was not making a prediction; I was doing a valuation.

 

On 26th February 2009 (http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article9131.html, I reported:

US Stock markets values will decline to a point when DJIA hits 6,600 and S&P 500 hits 675.  Thereafter values will increase markedly.

 

A follow up confirmation was made in 17th April 2009 (http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article10101.html):

US Stock Markets values will increase 13% to 30% before the end of 2009.

Is that accurate enough?

That's 99.77% accurate, you don't need that level of accuracy; 10% is easily good enough. In any case that valuation model was only accurate 8% at the 95% confidence level, the fact it was spot-on was just luck.

But that was not alchemy, nor was it a "prediction" made thanks to some inside track or special knowledge that I have of the markets (I have none). That was simply a valuation done strictly in accordance with International Valuation Standards, it could have been for a car, second hand bottling plant, or a herd of pedigree cows; the methodology is identical.

Proper valuation as an antidote to Economic Suicide:

Lending money against collateral that can be expected (by reasonable and rational valuation techniques), to be worth less than the outstanding amount of the loan, is financial suicide.

Governments that implicitly or explicitly support financial institutions that engage in such practices, are committing economic suicide,

Free markets depend on government providing sufficient regulation to prevent market participants from poisoning the market. A good example is the sale of melanin tainted milk in China, a few criminals caused huge damage to the FMCG industry over there.

There is no reason why in a free market, anyone should not be allowed to commit financial suicide, but when they decide, metaphorically, to do that by hijacking a plane and flying it into a building, it is the duty of government, to prevent such actions.

The antidote is that governments must absolutely require any financial institution that relies on their support, either explicitly (via the discount window) or implicitly (via the prospect of bail-outs), to do their valuations properly.

Notes:

(1): By "proper valuations" I explicitly exclude the Voodoo Valuation Standards employed by FASB and IFRS (http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article8177.html).

(2):  The valuation of the US stock market made on 26th February was valid for six months, from today no opinion is expressed about the future price of the US stock market, the valuation was done simply as a demonstration of capability.

By Andrew Butter

Andrew Butter is managing partner of ABMC, an investment advisory firm, based in Dubai ( hbutter@eim.ae ), that he setup in 1999, and is has been involved advising on large scale real estate investments, mainly in Dubai.

© 2009 Copyright Andrew Butter- All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors.

Andrew Butter Archive

© 2005-2019 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Comments

Andre Taiakin
26 Aug 09, 04:27
Stock Market Valuation

I am sure I am not the only one sincerely impressed by the accuracy of your 6600 and 675 numbers. I am also sure that I am not the only one wondering how you got those numbers. As someone who had never even heard of International Valuation Standards before reading your articles on this website, I would certainly appreciate a little more insight into this subject. Obviously it would be particularly interesting to find out how to derive the other-than-market-value for a market index, such as the one used in your chart in www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article9131.html

Thanks!


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in

6 Critical Money Making Rules