Weird Global Warming and Nuclear Science
Politics / Environmental Issues Mar 21, 2011 - 05:44 AM GMTBy: Submissions
 Satre writes: The  catastrophic disaster that swept Japan into a new stone age is truly an earth-shattering  milestone. Worldwide grief and empathy is real and deserved. If this occurrence  were only, a script out of a Godzilla B movie, or just lyrics from a ringtone  song, the hurt or the aftermath would not be so horrible.
Satre writes: The  catastrophic disaster that swept Japan into a new stone age is truly an earth-shattering  milestone. Worldwide grief and empathy is real and deserved. If this occurrence  were only, a script out of a Godzilla B movie, or just lyrics from a ringtone  song, the hurt or the aftermath would not be so horrible. 
  you cannot run in  any direction
  no place to hide  ain't got no protection
  it can be sorrow,  blood, and destruction
  but it can give you  incredible emotion
How does  one explain this calamity? Is it a mysterious act of God, or is it modern  technology run amuck? 
  As long  as the earthquake was not triggered by HAARP like intentions, the wall of tsunami destruction is part of the risk of  residing in the active zone of the ring of fire. The meltdown of the Fukushima  nuclear power plant complex is far less than a matter of fate. Is nuclear  electric generation just too risky to chance or can humanity trust upon  technology to institute new safeguards for future developments?
  The  answer usually depends upon one’s viewpoint on the Global Warming theory. Those  who worship at the altar of Transhumanism love their environmentalist adoration. While nuclear power is CO2 friendly, the  radiation peril is too threatening to accept. The half-life of these zealots  often reflects the mental capacity of Homer Simpson and the appearance of   Polycephaly mutant beasts  of burden. 
  Those  who see Global Warming as a manageable problem often place great reliance on scientific  progress in solving and overcoming environmental challenges. These people  normally populate the engineering professions and research laboratories that  spawn the next evolution of made-made technological marvels.
  Ted  Nordhaus and Michael Shellenberger write in the WSJ. 
  “There is a better way. Nations should focus  on lowering the cost of clean energy, not raising the cost of fossil energy.  The goal? Make clean energy cheap enough to become a viable option for poor as  well as rich nations. Until that happens, emissions will continue to rise, and  no effort to regulate carbon can succeed.
  How do we accomplish that? Stop subsidizing  old technology that will never compete with fossil fuels and create incentives  for innovation. Along with ramping up support for research, governments should  buy cutting-edge clean-energy technologies, prove them—and then give away the  intellectual property, so others can improve on it”.
  Then  there are those who view Global Warming as a hoax and a political grab for further  consolidation of a centralized society under the control of a corporate/state  oligarchy. The evidence is on their side. Exhibit 1, Cap  and Trade proposals demonstrate the total disconnects for meeting the  energy needs of a modern society.
  The high  and mighty culture would like you to believe that nuclear energy from civilian  reactors is a centerpiece of scientific superiority over nature. Well, there  are a few problems with this conclusion. Since the nuclear genie escaped from  the bottle, the myth that science is equal to God has run wild for decades. At  the risk of condemnation by the scientific inquisition court, is the world a  better place to live under the canopy of a mushroom cloud?
  Admittedly,  the symbol of this age is the face of existential oblivion, dressed up in space  suits on life support. The fallout from the Fukushima reactor disaster will  last longer than the radioactive dust that contaminates the ecosphere. At  question is not solely the safety of the nuclear electrical generation process,  but the notion of pushing the limits of human endeavors that endanger the  survival of the species itself. 
  A favorite  and world-class curmudgeon, Fred Reed, proposes a valid and alternative conclusion  to the insanity in, Why  We Need an Asteroid Strike.
  “I figure that what we need is to tear the  whole sorry system down and see what comes next. The best hope is that a  patriot will learn how to impel some unused interplanetary object, Phobos or  Deimos or Ganymede maybe, into Washington at ninety percent of the speed of  light. This would eliminate the teachers unions, the Pentagon, AIPAC, Fox News,  Langley, the Washington Post, lobbies, and my mother-in-law. Cockroaches would  doubtless survive, that being what they do best, and evolve into a civilization  less degraded than ours, briefly”.
  The  disinformation coming out of Japan from official circles all qualifies as radiation poisoning. The Green  revolution is nothing more than a denial cult of blind faith in the power of mankind  to destroy society with all the best intentions that the Tempter can muster. Wind and solar are not candidates for prime  time. Renewable deficiencies are well documented by IWA and CPA and suggest that only a “true believer” would accept the  prevarications of the anti fossil fuel lobby. Sentencing clean coal to the pits  of a dark hole verges on calling for the release of Jeffrey Skilling from prison.
  After  the Japanese disaster, the nuclear industry needs an alternative to the current  reactors, now perceived as unsafe. John Wheeler in This Week in  Nuclear, evaluates the safety of small nuclear reactors.
  “These smaller reactors contain less nuclear fuel.  This smaller amount of fuel (with passive  cooling I’ll mention in a minute) slows down the progression of reactor  accidents.  This slower progression gives  operators more time to take action to keep the reactor cool.  Where operators in large reactors have  minutes or hours to react to events, operators of SMRs may have hours or even  days. This means the chance of a reactor damaging accident is very, very  remote.
  Even better, most SMRs are small enough that they cannot  over heat and melt down. They get all the cooling they need from air  circulating around the reactor. This is a big deal because if SMRs can’t melt  down, then they can’t release radioactive gas that would pose a risk to the  public.  Again, this means the need for  external emergency actions is virtually eliminated.
  Also, some SMRs are not water cooled; they use gas,  liquid salt, or liquid metal coolants that operate at low pressures.  This lower operating pressure means that if  radioactive gases build up inside the containment building there is less  pressure to push the gas out and into the air.   If there is no pressure to push radioactive gas into the environment and  all of it stays inside the plant, then it poses no risk to the public.
  SMRs are small enough to be built underground”.
  “So  called” miracles of science often become the thimerosal babies of tomorrow. Likewise,  the politics of nuclear energy are riddled in contradictions. Lessons  from the Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Storage Debate, points out the  ineptness of domestic energy policy.
  “Over the past decade, more than 7,000  shipments of radioactive nuclear waste have been sent, without any problem, to  a government repository in the southwestern United States.
  This crucial repository is not the ill-fated  Yucca Mountain, the Nevada site that has been steeped in controversy since  Congress selected it 22 years ago to store the country's civilian nuclear  waste. Yucca Mountain, in fact, has gotten so bogged down in legal and  political fights that President Barack  Obama, in his new budget, is proposing to eliminate almost all of its  funding and explore "alternatives," raising serious questions about  how the United States will resolve its nuclear waste problems—and, for that  matter, whether the nuclear  industry will be able to grow in coming decades.
  The functioning repository is located in  Carlsbad, N.M., and it may hold some useful answers. Since opening in 1999, it  has received more than 60,000 cubic meters of radioactive waste from the  country's nuclear defense facilities. Experts say its success offers valuable  clues about how Washington can learn from the mistakes made at Yucca Mountain  to find a lasting waste solution”.
  If the  nuclear industry is targeted for demise, only natural gas or coal can produce  the needed electric energy on a scale to keep the economy viable. The  alternative of rolling brown outs are a favored tactic used by such titans of  business ethics as Enron.  Welcome to the era of designed shortages and inflated costs. 
  The  risks of hydrofracking techniques to extract natural gas are very real and  profound. The New  York Times reports on contamination of the water table.
  ¶More than 1.3 billion gallons of wastewater  was produced by Pennsylvania wells over the past three years, far more than has  been previously disclosed. Most of this water — enough to cover Manhattan in  three inches — was sent to treatment plants not equipped to remove many of the  toxic materials in drilling waste. 
  ¶At least 12 sewage treatment plants in  three states accepted gas industry wastewater and discharged waste that was  only partly treated into rivers, lakes and streams.
  ¶Of more than 179 wells producing wastewater  with high levels of radiation, at least 116 reported levels of radium or other  radioactive materials 100 times as high as the levels set by federal  drinking-water standards. At least 15 wells produced wastewater carrying more  than 1,000 times the amount of radioactive elements considered acceptable. 
Weird  science is a serious problem, but factitious global warming is a well-designed  dose of irradiation that attacks the mush of feeble-minded morons who want to  be “PC” in a culture gone mad. If you surrender to the totalitarian collectivists,  you are accepting the global gulag. Clean coal offers the best economic and  safe energy future for an independent America. Synthetic fuel conversion from  coal into synfuel is  the best way to reduce the addiction of imported oil.
http://batr.org/gulag/032011.html
© 2011 Copyright BATR - All Rights Reserved 
Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors.
© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.
	

 
  
 
	