Best of the Week
Most Popular
1. Climate Change Mass Extinction - Birds, Bees and Bugs: Going Going Gone - Richard_Mills
2.A Purrrfect Gold Price Setup! - Peter_Degraaf
3.Who Finances America's Borrowing? Recession Indicator for Independent Thinkers Part 2 - F_F_Wiley
4.America’s One-sided Domestic Financial War - Raymond_Matison
5.Gold Price Summer Doldrums - Zeal_LLC
6.Two Key Events Will Unleash Gold - Jim_Willie_CB
7.Billionaire Schools Teacher in NAFTA Trade Talks - Richard_Mills
8.Get Out Of Crypto Cannabis Bubble Before It Pops and Move Into Bargain Basement Miners - Jeb_Handwerger
9.Stock Market Could Pullback for 1-2 weeks, But Medium Term Bullish - Troy_Bombardia
10.G7 Chaos, Central Banks and US Fed Will Drive Stock Prices This Week - Chris_Vermeulen
Last 7 days
Soybean Price Hits 9 Year Low Due to Trade War - 24th Jun 18
Small Cap Stocks, Technology and Pharma To Drive A Renewed Market Rally - 24th Jun 18
Gerald Celente: Why You Still Need Guns, Gold, and a Getaway Plan... - 23rd Jun 18
Cheap Gold Stocks Bottom Basing - 23rd Jun 18
A Trade War Won’t Be Good for the US Dollar - 23rd Jun 18
SPX/Gold, Long-term Yields & Yield Curve 3 Amigos Update - 22nd Jun 18
Gold - How Long Can This Last? - 22nd Jun 18
Dow Has Fallen 8 days in a Row. Medium-long Term Bullish for Stocks - 22nd Jun 18
Trouble Spotting Market Trends? This Can Help - 22nd Jun 18
Financial Markets Analysis and Trend Forecasts 2018 - A Message from Nadeem Walayat - 21st Jun 18
SPX Bouncing Above Support - 21st Jun 18
Things You Need To Know If You Want To Invest In Bitcoin Now - 21st Jun 18
The NASDAQ’s Outperformance vs. the Dow is Very Bullish - 21st Jun 18
Warning All Investors: Global Stock Market Are Shifting Away From US Price Correlation - 20th Jun 18
Gold GLD ETF Update… Breakdown ? - 20th Jun 18
Short-term Turnaround in Bitcoin Might Not Be What You Think - 19th Jun 18
Stock Market’s Short Term Downside Will be Limited - 19th Jun 18
Natural Gas Setup for 32% Move in UGAZ Fund - 19th Jun 18
Magnus Collective To Empower Automation And Artificial Intelligence - 19th Jun 18
Trump A Bull in a China Shop - 19th Jun 18
Minor Car Accident! What Happens After You Report Your Accident to Your Insurer - 19th Jun 18
US Majors Flush Out A Major Pivot Low and What’s Next - 18th Jun 18
Cocoa Commodities Trading Analysis - 18th Jun 18
Stock Market Consolidating in an Uptrend - 18th Jun 18
Russell Has Gone Up 7 Weeks in a Row. EXTREMELY Bullish for Stocks - 18th Jun 18
What Happens Next to Stocks when Tech Massively Outperforms Utilities and Consumer Staples - 18th Jun 18
The Trillion Dollar Market You’ve Never Heard Of - 18th Jun 18
The Corruption of Capitalism - 17th Jun 18
North Korea, Trade Wars, Precious Metals and Bitcoin - 17th Jun 18
Climate Change and Fish Stocks – Burning Oxygen! - 17th Jun 18
A $1,180 Ticket to NEW Trading Opportunities, FREE! - 16th Jun 18
Gold Bullish on Fed Interest Rate Hike - 16th Jun 18
Respite for Bitcoin Traders Might Be Deceptive - 16th Jun 18

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

5 "Tells" that the Stock Markets Are About to Reverse

Drillers Pay Hush Money to Keep Their Fracking Toxic Secrets

Commodities / Natural Gas Jun 12, 2013 - 06:44 PM GMT

By: Money_Morning

Commodities

Tara Clarke writes: Hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, the art of separating oil from rock, has the potential of turning America into the world's top oil and natural gas producer.

But as with any bonanza it has some secrets oil and gas companies want to keep under wraps. And some companies are willing to put some big bucks behind that.


The industry has injected possibly carcinogenic chemical cocktails underground in more than 150,000 of wells during the fracking process.

U.S. companies have driven more than 30 trillion gallons of fracking liquid underground in the past several decades.

But not to worry: the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is monitoring the situation! It is solely charged with conducting long-term studies of the potential impact of fracking on water.

Feel safe?

It recently surfaced that the EPA keeps super-secret email accounts. In addition, we now know the EPA has shady ties with the vocally pro-fracking Obama administration.

Consider how the IRS has been operating under Obama.

I'd say the odds are prettttty good that the EPA hasn't been doing a whole lot of "objective research" on the environmental effects of fracking.

You might comfort yourself with the thought that there's nothing in the news about people being harmed by fracking chemicals. No real data is coming out showing that fracking taints our water.

Well, as it turns out, across the country drillers are paying hundreds of thousands of dollars in cash settlements to silence people who say that fracking ruined their water.

In return for the hush money, they must sign non-disclosure agreements.

"At this point they [the companies] feel they can get out of this litigation relatively cheaply," said Marc Bern, an attorney with Napoli Bern Ripka Sholnik LLP in New York, who has negotiated about 30 settlements on behalf of homeowners, in an interview for Bloomberg. "Virtually on all of our settlements where they paid money they have requested and demanded that there be confidentiality."

This strategy keeps real fracking data out of the public's reach.

With no public court hearings, and no Average Joe on local news channels talking about how he can light his drinking water on fire, it's very difficult to challenge policymakers' claims that fracking doesn't cause ill-effects.

But a telling court case was recently unsealed.

In the case, private Pennsylvania citizens Stephanie and Chris Hallowich accuse fracking companies with ruining their drinking water and causing them to suffer from chronic health issues, including headaches, inflamed eyes and sore throats.

The Hallowich case was originally settled and sealed from the public with the same non-disclosure and payoff tactics I described above; defendant drillers paid the Hallowiches $750,000 in settlement in exchange for their silence.

But recent media demands caused a Pennsylvania judge to reexamine whether the case should be sealed.

The media requested that Hallowich be made public because the press has a common-law rule of access to the courts. On the other hand, the drillers argued that unsealing the case would violate their businesses' constitutional right of privacy.

Ultimately, the drillers were unable to demonstrate that opening the Hallowich case would cause harm to their trade secrets, to the privacy and reputation of innocent parties, to national security interests, or to the fairness of a trial.

The Hallowich case gives us a rare glimpse of the negative effects fracking can have on our water that drillers don't want anyone to know about.

We also get to see, first-hand, how this hush money formula typically works.

With so many settlements being reached to silence property owners across the U.S., clearly fracking must cause some ill-effects. More transparent studies should be undertaken. And not by the EPA.

Fracking is in our national interest. More domestic oil means less dollars flowing overseas to enrich potentates. But the more we know about it, the safer we can make it. Paying hush money doesn't help.

Source :http://moneymorning.com/2013/06/10/drillers-pay-hush-money-to-keep-their-fracking-secrets/

Money Morning/The Money Map Report

©2013 Monument Street Publishing. All Rights Reserved. Protected by copyright laws of the United States and international treaties. Any reproduction, copying, or redistribution (electronic or otherwise, including on the world wide web), of content from this website, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of Monument Street Publishing. 105 West Monument Street, Baltimore MD 21201, Email: customerservice@moneymorning.com

Disclaimer: Nothing published by Money Morning should be considered personalized investment advice. Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions, they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular investment situation. No communication by our employees to you should be deemed as personalized investent advice. We expressly forbid our writers from having a financial interest in any security recommended to our readers. All of our employees and agents must wait 24 hours after on-line publication, or after the mailing of printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation. Any investments recommended by Money Morning should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Money Morning Archive

© 2005-2018 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Comments

Meremortal
13 Jun 13, 00:34
Fracking Garbage

Not one source of actual harm to water or people included in the article.

I wonder why.

The Democrat Governor of Colorado drank fracking fluid at a meeting about it. That's how dangerous it is. He's still in office, didn't die from drinking it straight.

"Possible carcinogenic cocktails" Oh? WHAT possible carcinogenic coctails, NAME them. You can't because you are making it up.

Wild claims, no evidence. It is the same with all arguments against fracking. Hundreds of gallons of fracking fluid was spilled near Parachute, Colorado last year. It froze into a waterfall and was there for the taking for weeks.

What evil things were in the fracking fluid? No one seems to know, even though anyone could have sampled and analyzed the "secret" liquid.

Wild claims, no evidence. Over one million wells fracked with no harm done.

If you've got evidence, let's see the cases.

The EPA has filed 3 lawsuits against fracking companies, and all were thrown out without getting to court because during discovery it was discovered there is NO evidence of harm.

The real question is: What is the hidden agenda of the lying anti-frackers?


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in

6 Critical Money Making Rules