Best of the Week
Most Popular
1. Will Gold Price Breakout? 3 Things to Watch… - Jordan_Roy_Byrne
2.China Invades Saudi Oil Realm: PetroDollar Kill - Jim_Willie_CB
3.Bitcoin Price Trend Forecast, Paypal FUD Fake Cryptocurrency Warning - Nadeem_Walayat
4.The Stock Market Trend is Your Friend ’til the Very End - Rambus_Chartology
5.This Isn’t Your Grandfather’s (1960s) Inflation Scare - F_F_Wiley
6.GDX Gold Mining Stocks Fundamentals - Zeal_LLC
7.US Housing Real Estate Market and Banking Pressures Are Building - Chris_Vermeulen
8.Return of Stock Market Volatility Amidst Political Chaos and Uncertain Economy - Buildadv
9.Can Bitcoin Price Rally Continue After Paypal Fake FUD Attack? - Nadeem_Walayat
10.Warning Economic Implosion on the Horizon - Chris_Vermeulen
Last 7 days
How Long Does it take for a 10%+ Stock Market Correction to Make New Highs - 21st Apr 18
Sheffield Ruling Labour Party Could Lose 10 Council Seats at May Local Elections - 21st Apr 18
Crude Oil Price Trend Forecast - Saudi Arabia $80 ARAMCO Stock IPO Target - 21st Apr 18
Gold Price Nearing Bull Market Breakout, Stocks to Follow - 20th Apr 18
What’s Bitcoin Really Worth? - 20th Apr 18
Stock Market May "Let Go" - 20th Apr 18
Overwhelming Evidence Against Near Stock Market Grand Supercycle Top - 20th Apr 18
Crude Oil Price Trend Forecast - Saudi's Want $100 for ARAMCO Stock IPO - 20th Apr 18
The Incredible Silver Trade – What You Need to Know - 20th Apr 18
Is War "Hell" for the Stock Market? - 19th Apr 18
Palladium Bullion Surges 17% In 9 Days On Russian Supply Concerns - 19th Apr 18
Breadth Study Suggests that Stock Market Bottom is Already In - 19th Apr 18
Allegory Regarding Investment Decisions Made On Basis Of Government’s Income Statement, Balance Sheet - 19th Apr 18
Gold – A Unique Repeat of the 2007 and How to Profit - 19th Apr 18
Abbeydale Park Rise Cherry Tree's in Blossom - Sheffield Street Tree Protests - 19th Apr 18
The Stock Market “Turn of the Month Effect” Exists in 11 of 11 Countries - 18th Apr 18
Winter is Coming - Coming Storms Will Bring Out the Best and Worst in Humanity - 18th Apr 18
What Does it Take to Create Living Wage Jobs? - 18th Apr 18
Gold and Silver Buy Signals - 18th Apr 18
WINTER IS COMING - The Ongoing Fourth Turning Crisis Part2 - 18th Apr 18
A Stock Market Rally on Low Volume is NOT Bearish - 17th Apr 18
Three Gold Charts, One Big Gold Stocks Opportunity - 17th Apr 18
Crude Oil Price As Bullish as it Seems? - 17th Apr 18
A Good Time to Buy Facebook? - 17th Apr 18
THE Financial Crisis Acronym of 2008 is Sounding Another Alarm - 16th Apr 18
Bombs, Missiles and War – What to Expect Next from the Stock Market - 16th Apr 18
Global Debt Bubble Hits New All Time High – One Quadrillion Reasons To Buy Gold - 16th Apr 18
Will Bitcoin Ever Recover? - 16th Apr 18
Stock Market Futures Bounce, But Stopped at Trendline - 16th Apr 18
How To Profit As Oil Prices Explode - 16th Apr 18
Junior Mining Stocks are Close to Breaking Downtrend - 16th Apr 18
Look Inside a Caravan at UK Holiday Park for Summer 2018 - Hoseasons Cayton Bay Sea Side - 16th Apr 18
Stock Market More Weakness? How Much? - 15th Apr 18
Time for the Gold Bulls to Show their Mettle - 15th Apr 18
Trading Markets Amid Sound of Wars - 15th Apr 18
Sugar Commodity Buying Levels Analysis - 14th Apr 18
The Oil Trade May Be Coming Alive - 14th Apr 18

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

Trading Lessons

Iraq Wake Up Call For Oil Is A Yawn

Commodities / Crude Oil Jun 19, 2014 - 07:36 AM GMT

By: Andrew_McKillop

Commodities

Forward Looking Statements
The IEA's energy scenarios and forecasts for the next 21 years, to 2035, heavily feature long-term increases of oil supply from Iraq to help meet “soaring oil demand”, but the IEA's Factsheet for Oil Supply in Iraq, published 13 June, allows and enables some doubt. In particular this concerns the Agency's previous forecasts of “ever growing Iraqi supply”. In turn, the Agency's continued forecasting of world oil demand increasing by 12 - 15 million barrels a day by 2035 (from the IEA's estimate for early 2014 of about 90 Mbd) should be compared with the actual status and forward trends of oil in world energy. Overall, this raises plenty of doubt on the real need for increasing Iraqi oil supply.


As we can clearly see, coal and oil are now about level-pegging in world energy terms, and gas also plays a major role but BP data also shows how rapidly coal energy demand has been growing – while oil continues to decline as energy supply by percentage, and world oil demand grows at the uber-unimpressive rate of around 0.75% per year.

More surprising, at least at first glance, natural gas has stalled as a growing energy supplier, but regional variations on gas demand nuance this impression due to European gas demand showing an already four-year-long decline, but Asian demand, despite high prices, continues to increase.

Peak Oil Narrative
The IEA's narrative concerning Iraq oil is scarcely-disguised Peak Oil alarmism. Outside of Saudi Arabia and other GCC suppliers Kuwait, UAE and Oman, only Iraq is seen as able to maintain long-term annual growths of oil output. Regular claims by Iraq oil ministers and delegates to OPEC conferences that the country can maintain its 2011-2013 pace of oil production hikes including NGLs, of 25.8% in the the three years (using IEA data) are only claims. Future production increases at that rate – excluding adverse impacts from degraded security conditions and completely excluding the possibility of civil war – were already hypothetical. Iraq as of early 2014 has in fact only been able to dial back to late-1980's oil production levels.

Concerning crude oil, not NGLs and unconventional crude (which total less than 90 000 barrels a day on total oil output of about 3.37 Mbd), Iraq's production in first quarter 2014 had grown to slightly exceed its production in 1989. That is not exactly a breakthrough.

Claims that this output could be “almost doubled by about 2025” are simply that – claims.

The IEA's World Energy Outlook series however continues to claim that in Iraq, as elsewhere, supply from both unconventional oil and natural gas liquids (NGLs) “must be increased”. Worldwide, the IEA says this increase will have to be about 15 Mbd, as their combined share of total world oil supply jumps from 25% in 2012 to 33% in 2035. Despite popular belief that Iraq is home to large reserves of easily produced light sweet crude, the reality is that Iraq's lightest crudes are at 35 degrees API, called a medium-heavy crude, and much of its oil reserves and crude output is 22 degrees API – categorized very heavy crudes which are heavily contaminated by sulphur and heavy metals.

At least a half of Iraq's claimed total oil reserves of 143 billion barrels are heavy oils.

Iraq's future growth of output (excluding the country's almost unimportant NGLs and unconventional oil output) therefore depends on massive investment in heavy crude extraction and processing. In terms of science and technology to be sure – but for energy economics not at all - the IEA’s assumptions are highly plausible. Heavy crude extraction and processing for pipeline transport is no problem, in technical terms. But when we turn to energy economics we can note that nearly all (over 75%) of the rise in world oil output over the past few years has come from the US and concerns very light, zero sulphur shale oil not needing any special processing at all and able to be used “as is” in lower-cost refinery operating systems. The IEA admits that least until the end of the 2020's,  America’s “light tight” oil and Brazil’s deepwater production of light crude will continue to grow. As recently as 2010, the IEA made no references to these two sources of light low-sulphur crude. By 2020, we can take an easy bet, other sources of similar light low sulphur crudes – this time including NGLs in quantity – will become available, for example Africa onshore and offshore.

The IEA also continues to believe, or at least to forecast that OPEC supply “must grow”. Apart from output growth in the US, Brazil, Canada and Kazakhstan (Azerbaijan is omitted), it is OPEC which must do the “heavy lifting”. Inside OPEC and excluding Saudi Arabia, Iraq is the star player for “potential output increase”.

Will Global Oil Demand Contract?
The IEA completely excludes that forecast. For the OECD countries however, it has no alternative but to note the developed nations group continuing to reduce its total oil consumption. This was well over 50 Mbd in 2005, but today is about 44.5 Mbd. The difference is more than twice the total oil consumption of Germany. To be sure, both China and India could return to high and fast annual growths of oil demand, but this is no longer sure and certain. On the demand side not only economic recession, but energy efficiency gains and non-oil fuels development for national industry and transport will eat into previously-projected oil demand growth.

Global oil import demand is not exactly the same thing as global demand, either. The supposed metric of oil prices – if oil import demand is robust oil prices should stay firm or rise – no longer has real significance due to heavy and constant manipulation of oil and other energy markets by financial players. Iraq's supposed future role as the “export supplier of last resort” (after Saudi Arabia and Russia of course) depends on global oil import demand holding firm, or rising.

Present global oil import trends are highly complex due to factors including bunkering (for shipping and air transport) and re-export of both crudes and refined products. Probable net total worldwide oil import demand is around 50 Mbd and net total imports by the OECD group – which is declining – likely stand at about 24 Mbd. Neither of these figures are necessarily set to grow by large amounts, and for the OECD group the only discussion is by how much net oil import will contract to 2035.

Iraq Returns to Haunt
It is almost certain that the handwringing and posturing – from Obama downward – about Iraq's slump into a grisly and bizarre civil war is intensified by IEA-correct ideas and notions about world oil and export supply, and the role of Iraq in it.

The IEA has decided that world oil demand has to and will increase, and that world oil import demand will also rise. However, pretending that Iraq has a “special role” is exaggerated. The IEA's own briefing of 13 June shows that Iraq, in Q1 2014, supplied almost exactly 4% of world total oil output, and OECD net total imports of Iraqi oil according to the IEA stood at exactly 1.00 Mbd in Q1 2014 (also close to 4%).

This is hard to present as awe inspiring oil import dependence on Iraq. Imports by OECD Europe from Libya, for example, were running much higher than that before the overthrow and killing of Muammar Gaddafi! Any cut off of Iraqi oil exports will have a much more serious impact on non-OECD countries including China and India.

To be sure the US has invested a lot of political capital – and probably more than $700 billion of US taxpayers' money, counting war costs – in Iraq and could expect some ROI. However and outside US political elites, the West no longer wants to know about Iraq after the US, UK and its allies' disastrous foreign policy failures over the past decade. Images of ISIS public executions are not consumer-friendly. Nobody wants to know.

Ironically however, the simple fact that the US has had to ask Iran for help keeping Iraq together promises major paybacks in the oil domain and arena, due to Iran's own oil sector being heavily in need of new investment and new technology. Bringing Iran in as “new ally of the West”, in Iraq, makes sanctions against Iran even more laughable than they previously were.

In turn however this will not change oil supply/demand fundamentals due to the real context of world energy and oil. With the benefit of hindsight, it is clear that previous Peak Oil-influenced forecasts of imminent (or long term) oil shortage also included the hypothesis of continued major growth of oil demand. On the supply side it is sure, certain and proven that cheap first-generation, conventional oil is declining, but oil prices of above $75 have changed the reserve and supply balllgame. Prices above $100 a barrel almost certainly guarantee near-term overproduction and oversupply of oil and falling prices, unless oil markets stay heavily manipulated.

Iraq is in any case unlikely to achieve and sustain oil output at much better than its 1989 level in the short term. Dialing back further, to the 1970s, it could or might attain its output of those days, of more than 4.5 Mbd, but under present and emerging civil war conditions that is a pipedream. Forget about Iraq.

By Andrew McKillop

Contact: xtran9@gmail.com

Former chief policy analyst, Division A Policy, DG XVII Energy, European Commission. Andrew McKillop Biographic Highlights

Co-author 'The Doomsday Machine', Palgrave Macmillan USA, 2012

Andrew McKillop has more than 30 years experience in the energy, economic and finance domains. Trained at London UK’s University College, he has had specially long experience of energy policy, project administration and the development and financing of alternate energy. This included his role of in-house Expert on Policy and Programming at the DG XVII-Energy of the European Commission, Director of Information of the OAPEC technology transfer subsidiary, AREC and researcher for UN agencies including the ILO.

© 2014 Copyright Andrew McKillop - All Rights Reserved Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisor.

Andrew McKillop Archive

© 2005-2018 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in

6 Critical Money Making Rules