Most Popular
1. THE INFLATION MONSTER is Forecasting RECESSION - Nadeem_Walayat
2.Why APPLE Could CRASH the Stock Market! - Nadeem_Walayat
3.The Stocks Stealth BEAR Market - Nadeem_Walayat
4.Inflation, Commodities and Interest Rates : Paradigm Shifts in Macrotrends - Rambus_Chartology
5.Stock Market in the Eye of the Storm, Visualising AI Tech Stocks Buying Levels - Nadeem_Walayat
6.AI Tech Stocks Earnings BloodBath Buying Opportunity - Nadeem_Walayat
7.PPT HALTS STOCK MARKET CRASH ahead of Fed May Interest Rate Hike Meeting - Nadeem_Walayat
8.50 Small Cap Growth Stocks Analysis to CAPITALISE on the Stock Market Inflation -Nadeem_Walayat
9.WE HAVE NO CHOICE BUT TO INVEST IN STOCKS AND HOUSING MARKET - Nadeem_Walayat
10.Apple and Microsoft Nuts Are About to CRACK and Send Stock Market Sharply Lower - Nadeem_Walayat
Last 7 days
Why PEAK INFLATION is a RED HERRING! Prepare for a Decade Long Cost of Living Crisis - 9th Aug 22
FREETRADE Want to LEND My Shares to Short Sellers! - 8th Aug 22
Stock Market Unclosed Gap - 8th Aug 22
The End Game for Silver Shenanigans... - 8th Aug 22er
WARNING Corsair MP600 NVME2 M2 SSD Are Prone to Failure Can Prevent Systems From Booting - 8th Aug 22
Elliott Waves: Your "Rhyme & Reason" to Mainstream Stock Market Opinions - 6th Aug 22
COST OF LIVING CRISIS NIGHTMARE - Expect High INFLATION for whole of this DECADE! - 6th Aug 22
WHY PEAK INFLATION RED HERRING - 5th Aug 22
Recession Is Good for Gold, but a Crisis Would Be Even Better - 5th Aug 22
Stock Market Rallying On Slowly Thinning Air - 5th Aug 22
SILVER’S BAD BREAK - 5th Aug 22
Stock Market Trend Pattren 2022 Forecast Current State - 4th Aug 22
Should We Be Prepared For An Aggressive U.S. Fed In The Future? - 4th Aug 22
Will the S&P 500 Stock Market Index Go the Way of Meme Stocks? - 4th Aug 22
Stock Market Another Upswing Attempt - 4th Aug 22
What is our Real Economic and Financial Prognosis? - 4th Aug 22
The REAL Stocks Bear Market of 2022 - 3rd Aug 22
The ‘Wishful Thinking’ Fed Is Anything But ‘Neutral’ - 3rd Aug 22
Don’t Be Misled by Gold’s Recent Upswing - 3rd Aug 22
Aluminum, Copper, Zinc: The 3 Horsemen of the Upcoming "Econocalypse" - 31st July 22
Gold Stocks’ Rally Autumn 2022 - 31st July 22
US Fed Is Battling Excess Global Capital – Which Is Creating Inflation - 31st July 22
What it's like at a Stocks Bear Market Bottom - 29th July 22
How to lock in a Guaranteed 9.6% return from Uncle Sam With I Bonds - 29th July 22
All You Need to Know About the Increase in Building Insurance Premiums for Flats - 29th July 22
The Challenges on the Horizon for UK Landlords - 29th July 22
The Psychology of Investing in a Stocks Bear Market - 26th July 22
Claiming and Calculating The Research and Development Tax Credit - 26th July 22
Stock Market Bearish Test - 26th July 22
Social Media Tips and Writing an Effective Call to Action - 26th July 22
Has Rishi Sunak Succeeded in Buying His Way Into No 10 - Fake Tory Leadership Contest - 26th July 22
The Psychology of Investing in a Stocks Bear Market - 26th July 22
Claiming and Calculating The Research and Development Tax Credit - 26th July 22
Stock Market Bearish Test - 26th July 22
Social Media Tips and Writing an Effective Call to Action - 26th July 22
Has Rishi Sunak Succeeded in Buying His Way Into No 10 - Fake Tory Leadership Contest - 26th July 22

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How to Protect your Wealth by Investing in AI Tech Stocks

Shock and Awe II - The Consequences of an US attack on Iran

Politics / Iran Apr 04, 2007 - 04:21 PM GMT

By: Nadeem_Walayat

Politics

The British and American public appear to being hyped up towards a possible attack against Iran . Despite recent rhetoric. the actual consequences of an attack need to be fully investigated before another ‘Mission Accomplished' photo opportunity turns into something far worse than the quagmire in Iraq, which so far is on target to cost over $1 trillion, with estimates being revised higher every quarter.


A ground invasion of Iran is not possible, not with the USA tied down in both Iraq and Afghanistan . Therefore any attack would only be ariel attacks, most probably limited to Iran 's nuclear and key military infrastructure. Still this ‘ Shock and Awe II' would involve thousands if not tens of thousands of missiles and ordinance. So on a scale similar if not greater to the attack on Iraq in 2003.

An attack on Iran will likely have the following consequences -

1. Crude Oil – This one is easy, the price of oil would likely jump to a new high, how high is unknowable, but the immediate response would be a price north of $80. the consequences of this on a weakening world economy is obvious – Recession 2008.

2. Financial Markets Panic – Financial markets seek stability and order, not chaos, an attack against Iran would reek of panic, the last throw of the dice before the Neo-cons lose control of the White House.

3. Unknown Knowns – Iran probably has anticipated an attack and it is highly likely some unknown strategic retaliatory action is planned. As to what ? I can only speculate that Iran would seek to draw Israel into another war with Lebanon but on a much grander scale. There is speculation that Hezbollah possessed advanced Iranian missiles to be launched in the event of an attack against Iran .

4. IRAQ – At this point in time most of the conflict against the Co-alition in Iraq is from the Sunni insurgency. Should an attack against Iran occur, then the fallout would be double if not triple the current level of insurgency as the Shiite's are the defacto government and majority of the population of Iraq .

5. Objective 1 – Get Rid of Iranian Nuclear Programme – An attack would reinforce Iran 's resolve that the only deterrence against attack would be for Iran to double its efforts to secure a nuclear deterrence regardless of the consequences.

6. Objective 2 - Weakening Iran , may have the exact opposite effect, out of the fires of 'Shock And Awe' we may in 3 years time awaken to an fundamentalist Iranian super state that engulfs most of Iraq and parts of Saudi Arabia . The Iranians sacrificed some 1,000,000 soldiers in the war against Iraq , and it is not inconceivable that another 1,000,000 will be sacrificed or as the Shiite ideology would have it Martyred in the formation of an Iranian super state.

I am of the opinion that an attack against Iran would be a disaster. Iran is not Iraq , it has not been disarmed over the last 10 years. It will have the effect of opening Pandora's box, the consequences of which we would have to live with for decades and in far greater magnitude than the fallout from the disaster that is Iraq .

I am more or less certain that this time, Britain would not ally itself in an attack on Iran , therefore this time, the USA would truly have to go it alone. The recent release of the 15 British Navy personnel is likely to further diffuse the situation in Britain.

I still consider any attack against Iran during 2007, as a very low probability, less than 15% chance of occurring. The only realistic way to deal with Iran 's nuclear ambitions is via negotiations and security guarantees, which is the primary purpose of an Iranian nuclear programme, i.e. to secure against another war similar to that which cost Iran 1 million lives during the 1980's when Iraq attacked Iran .

However, should the US attack Iran , then Gold and Oil and related companies are set to benefit. The stock markets (apart from the Military industrial complex), will take a hit. Which would represent a good buying opportunity, for adding to investments in the emerging markets, i.e. China , India , Brazil , Russia etc.

By Nadeem Walayat,
Editor of The Market Oracle.
Copyright © MarketOracle.co.uk 2007

The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Forecasting & Analysis online publication. We aim to cut through the noise cluttering traditional sources of market analysis and get to the key points of where the markets are at and where they are expected to move to next ! http://www.marketoracle.co.uk


© 2005-2019 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Comments

Larry
06 Apr 07, 13:25
Re: Shock and Awe II - The Consequences of an US attack on Iran
The military in the u.s. as you pointed out (I believe) see such an operation as a disaster. And i have read this frequently and it is quoted as statements by recently retired Generals.

But those generals who would plan and supervise the bombing surely see it as a great opportunity for themselves as that part of the operation can go with few casualties or loss of equipment. Those guys are not getting stars doing missions over Afghanistan or Iraq as that's a different type of bombing and air operation.

And the administration if we can still stretch the definition of that word to include the neo cons are not working from a rational perspective. They have stated frequently this is a war against evil by Christians carrying out God's wishes. All fundamentalist think the same way as it is a disengagement from reality.

Now since that is so ludicrous we conclude they don't believe it themselves and just mouth the words for their own band of crazies.
But the more i read people like Seymour Hirsch who interviews the insiders the more i am convinced these people see it as their only possibility to regain control as they are becoming more isolated the nearer we get to national elections.

So just for fun entertain this question. Just who is going to stop them from bombing Iran?

And another advanced question.
Afterwards, when they are loosing who will stop them from using nukes? Russia, china? I don't think so. Though that day will come but they will let the Empire flounder first.

I will answer some of the above as lead in. Not the U.S. congress as george is the commander in chief. And he can attack who ever 'he likes'.
And not 'the people' as the neo cons have been building holding pens for us for some time. This was even voted on and approved by the congress ($300 ml to Halliburton) since they where labeled as needed to hold illegal immigrants. A few hundred thousand?

They already have those FEMA facilities standing empty but they insisted they will need even more 'containment facility's.
The public liked this issue as it was billed as anti immigrant which in this case is really racism; since we are talking Anglo's verses Latino's.

Best.
Larry

Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in