Best of the Week
Most Popular
1.US Paving the Way for Massive First Strike on North Korea Nuclear and Missile Infrastructure - Nadeem_Walayat
2.Trump Reset: US War With China, North Korea Nuclear Flashpoint - Video - Nadeem_Walayat
3.Silver Junior Mining Stocks 2017 Q2 Fundamentals - Zeal_LLC
4.Soaring Inflation Plunges UK Economy Into Stagflation, Triggers Government Pay Cap Panic! - Nadeem_Walayat
5.The Bitcoin Blueprint To Your Financial Freedom - Sean Keyes
6.North Korea 'Begging for War', 'Enough is Enough', is a US Nuclear Strike Imminent? - Nadeem_Walayat
7.Bitcoin Hits All-Time High and Smashes Through $5,000 As Gold Shows Continued Strength - Jeff_Berwick
8.2017 is NOT "Just Another Year" for the Stock Market: Here's Why - EWI
9.Gold : The Anatomy of the Bottoming Process - Rambus_Chartology
10.Bitcoin Falls 20% as Mobius and Chinese Regulators Warn - GoldCore
Last 7 days
Comfortably Numb: Surviving the Assault on Silver - 17th Oct 17
Are Amey Street Tree Felling's Devaluing Sheffield House Prices? - 17th Oct 17
12 Real-Life Techniques That Will Make You a Better Trader Now - 17th Oct 17
Warren Buffett Predicting Dow One Million - Being Bold Or Overly Cautious? - 17th Oct 17
Globalization is Poverty - 17th Oct 17
Boomers Are Not Saving Enough for Retirement, Neither Is the Government - 16th Oct 17
Stock Market Trading Dow Theory - 16th Oct 17
Stocks Slightly Higher as They Set New Record Highs - 16th Oct 17
Why is Big Data is so Important for Casino Player Acquisition and Retention - 16th Oct 17
How Investors Can Play The Bitcoin Boom - 16th Oct 17
Who Will Be the Next Fed Chief - And Why It Matters  - 16th Oct 17
Stock Market Only Minor Top Ahead - 16th Oct 17
Precious Metals Sector is on Major Buy Signal - 16th Oct 17
Really Bad Ideas - The Fed Should Have And Defend An Inflation Target - 16th Oct 17
The Bullish Chartology for Gold - 15th Oct 17
Wikileaks Mocking US Government Over Bitcoin Shows Why There Is No Stopping Bitcoin - 15th Oct 17
How to Wipe Out Puerto Rico's Debt Without Hurting Bondholders - 15th Oct 17
Gold And Silver – Think Prices Are Manipulated? Look In The Mirror! - 15th Oct 17
Q4 Pivot View for Stocks and Gold - 14th Oct 17
Gold Mining Stocks Q3’17 Preview - 14th Oct 17
U.S. Mint Gold Coin Sales and VIX Point To Increased Market Volatility and Higher Gold - 14th Oct 17
Yuan and Gold - 14th Oct 17
Tips for Avoiding a Debt Meltdown - 14th Oct 17
Bitcoin Hits New All-Time High Above $5,000 As Lagarde Concedes Defeat and Jamie Demon Shuts Up - 13th Oct 17
Golden Age for GOLD, Dark Age for the Stock Market - 13th Oct 17
The Struggle for Bolivia Is About to Begin - 13th Oct 17
3 Reasons to Take Your Invoicing Process Mobile - 13th Oct 17
What Happens When Amey Fells All of a Streets Trees (Sheffield Tree Fellings) - Video - 13th Oct 17
Stock Market Charts Show Smart Money And Dumb Money Are Moving In Opposite Directions—Here’s Why - 12th Oct 17
Your Pension Is a Lie: There’s $210 Trillion of Liabilities Our Government Can’t Fulfill - 12th Oct 17
Two Highly Recommended Books from Bob Prechter - 12th Oct 17
Turning Point Nations On The Stage - 11th Oct 17
The Profoundly Personal Impact Of The National Debt On Our Retirements - 11th Oct 17
Gold and Silver Report – Several Interesting Charts - 10th Oct 17
London House Prices Are Falling – Time to Buckle Up - 10th Oct 17
The S&P Is A Bloated Corpse - 10th Oct 17
Are Gold and the US Dollar Rallying Together? - 10th Oct 17

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

3 Videos + 8 Charts = Opportunities You Need to See - Free

Stock Market S&P 500 Trends: 1980 - 2009

Stock-Markets / Stock Market Valuations Mar 13, 2009 - 12:12 PM GMT

By: Richard_Shaw

Stock-Markets Diamond Rated - Best Financial Markets Analysis ArticleSince we are in an historic set of economic conditions, and we have experienced an historic recent decline in equity prices, it is appropriate to examine historical market trends to put this year in perspective.


Linear Chart Analysis:

The following linear chart (equal y-axis height for each price unit of change) plots the annual open, high, low and close for the years 1980 through 2008 (plus the short 2009 year ending 2/27/09).

Linear Long-Term Trend Extension to 12/31/09

If we draw trends to the current time, but excluding the dot.com period, where might we expect the S&P 500 to close this year?

The trendlines on the linear chart suggest a possible 2009 year-end range of 735 to 980 for the S&P 500.

Semi-Log Chart Analysis:

The following semi-log (equal y-axis height for each price percentage change) plots the annual open, high, low and close for the years 1980 through 2008 (plus the short 2009 year ending 2/27/09).

Semi-Log Long-Term Trend Extension to 12/31/09

sp500semilog

In this plot, we extended trendlines from 12/31/1980 across the tops and bottoms through the dot.com bubble (red lines).  The blue trendlines connect (A) 1980 and 2003 low, (B) 1980 and 2008 close, and (C) 1980 and 2008 low.

The red trendlines that take the dot.com bubble into consideration suggest virtually impossible year-end 2009 values of 2256  to 5168 — clear evidence that the dot.com era was way out of line, although that point is not generally in contention.

The blue trendlines, that basically ignore the dot.com bubble effect on the long-term, suggest year-end 2009 values of 1344, or 979, or 796 for A, B and C respectively.

In other words, were it not for the 2008 crash, we might have expected to see 1344 for 2009 — still down from 2007 levels.  Given the 2008 crash, we might more reasonably expect 796 to 979 for 2009.

The four key projections (two  from the linear extensions and the two 2008 crash related semi-log extensions) give us a range of 735/796 to 979/980 for year-end 2009.

As this article is being written the S&P 500 stands at 750.

How Does the Trendline Analysis Square With Fundamentals?

Morgan Stanley : They updated their 2009 year-end projection for the S&P 500 today.  They see 825. That falls somewhere in the middle of the trendline extensions.  They predict a fall to 560 for the index from the current level, however, before climbing to end the year at 825, according to Bloomberg.

They said home prices need to stabilize, financial firms must report smaller losses and earnings at U.S. companies have to improve before they become more bullish on equities

Bloomberg TV reported that Morgan Stanley predicts index earnings of $40 and $56 for 2009 and 2010 (although they did not disclose whether those estimates are total “as reported” or total operating earnings (”ex items”).  We suspect Morgan Stanley used operating earnings.

At 825, the Morgan Stanley projection would be a rounded 21 P/E on trailing basis, and a rounded 14 P/E on a nearly 2-year forward basis.

Various :  As of February 26th, according to Bloomberg, these are the 2009 year-end S&P 500 index predictions from analysts at various firms:

  • Goldman Sachs: 940
  • UBS: 1100
  • Barclays: 940
  • Av of Ten Analyst Followed by Bloomberg: 1010

Goldman said home prices haven't stabilized and losses for financial institutions aren't diminishing,  and that “Improvement in credit-related losses in financials (which are linked to home prices) and clarity surrounding fiscal policy are critical for the S&P 500 to begin a sustained rally.”  They predicted $40 and $63 index earnings for 2009 and 2010.

UBS predicts $51 and $63 earnings for 2009 and 2010.

Nouriel Roubini (March 9) predicts $50 earnings for 2009 (with a 12 multiple to get to 600 for a year low, and possibly a 10 multiple to get to $500).

Standard and Poor's :  S&P Senior Index Analyst Silverblatt says “Massive charges warp P/Es … forward numbers more important - but many investors have a lack of trust in the estimates.”

He points out that 19% of S&P 500 index companies have negative operating earnings, including some with mega-billion losses.  He also states that overall index sales are down 9.13%; with 41% of index companies reporting higher YOY sales (avg +6.86%), and with 59% of index companies reporting lower YOY sales (avg -17.93%)

Here are the S&P index earnings history and projections from Standard and Poor's:

Note that estimated 2009 index dividends are down 25% from 2008 to a level somewhat below the dividends paid in 2005.

Based on the current 750 index level, we are looking at trailing 2009 “operating” earnings (means excluding write-downs and “non-recurring” charges) of 11.7 to 15.6, depending on whether you rely on their bottom up or top down method.  Using their top down “as reported” earnings (meaning including write-downs and “non-recurring” charges) we see a 2009 trailing P/E of 23.1.

For 2010, based on projected operating earnings and today's 750 index level, we see a projected trailing operating earnings P/E of 16.0, and a projected trailing “as reported”earnings P/E of 18.9.

The most we could say from that data is that at 750 the index is probably fully valued.  If the index were to be at a median 15 P/E for trailing “as reported” earnings, it would be at 600 in 2010.  At an optimistic 20 times trailing “as reported” earnings, the index would be at 800 at the end of 2010.

Contrary View:

Jeremy Grantham, long-time bear, maintains his January view that the Standard & Poor's 500 Index may fall below 600 before rebounding, but that you can't catch the bottom, and should therefore begin accumulating stocks now before cash and decision “rigor mortis” sets in.

Conclusion:

We find no fundamental and no charting basis for the S&P 500 to be charging up very high from here at this time, under the current economic conditions. See our article earlier today, “ Winter Warming, More Snow to Come

As for clarity and visibility, Larry Summers (Harvard economist, former Treasury Secretary under Clinton, and head of Obama's National Economic Council) said today “no one can know when the crisis will end”.

With a government policy dependent economy and stock market, we think that level of cautionary statement, should probably cause investors with mature portfolios to wait for more “proof” that the situation will come under control, or to wait for a deeper discount in market prices, before taking more equity risk.

On the other hand, if you share Grantham's concerns about becoming locked into a bear mindset, and if you have confidence in year-end projections in the 900+ range, and if you are emotionally and financially capable of being wrong, and if you can wait several years for a stock commitment to work out, then buying stocks today is not crazy — however, it's not something we are ready to do with our own money just yet.

By Richard Shaw 
http://www.qvmgroup.com

Richard Shaw leads the QVM team as President of QVM Group. Richard has extensive investment industry experience including serving on the board of directors of two large investment management companies, including Aberdeen Asset Management (listed London Stock Exchange) and as a charter investor and director of Lending Tree ( download short professional profile ). He provides portfolio design and management services to individual and corporate clients. He also edits the QVM investment blog. His writings are generally republished by SeekingAlpha and Reuters and are linked to sites such as Kiplinger and Yahoo Finance and other sites. He is a 1970 graduate of Dartmouth College.

Copyright 2006-2009 by QVM Group LLC All rights reserved.

Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilizing methods believed reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any trading losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Do your own due diligence.

Richard Shaw Archive

© 2005-2017 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in

Catching a Falling Financial Knife