Yemen, Behind Al-Qaeda Scenarios, a Geopolitical Oil Chokepoint to Eurasia
Politics / GeoPolitics Jan 06, 2010 - 01:01 AM GMT On  December 25 US authorities arrested a Nigerian named Abdulmutallab aboard a  Northwest Airlines flight from Amsterdam to Detroit on charges of having tried  to blow up the plane with smuggled explosives. Since then reports have been  broadcast from CNN, the New York Times  and other sources that he was “suspected” of having been trained in Yemen for his  terror mission. What the world has been subjected to since is the emergence of  a new target for the US ‘War on Terror,’ namely a desolate state on the Arabian  Peninsula, Yemen. A closer look at the background suggests the Pentagon and US  intelligence have a hidden agenda in Yemen.
On  December 25 US authorities arrested a Nigerian named Abdulmutallab aboard a  Northwest Airlines flight from Amsterdam to Detroit on charges of having tried  to blow up the plane with smuggled explosives. Since then reports have been  broadcast from CNN, the New York Times  and other sources that he was “suspected” of having been trained in Yemen for his  terror mission. What the world has been subjected to since is the emergence of  a new target for the US ‘War on Terror,’ namely a desolate state on the Arabian  Peninsula, Yemen. A closer look at the background suggests the Pentagon and US  intelligence have a hidden agenda in Yemen. 
 For some months the world has seen a steady  escalation of US military involvement in Yemen, a dismally poor land adjacent  to Saudi Arabia on its north, the Red Sea on its west, the Gulf of Aden on its  south, opening to the Arabian Sea, overlooking another desolate land that has  been in the headlines of late, Somalia. The evidence suggests that the Pentagon  and US intelligence are moving to militarize a strategic chokepoint for the  world’s oil flows, Bab el-Mandab, and using the Somalia piracy incident,  together with claims of a new Al Qaeda threat arising from Yemen, to militarize  one of the world’s most important oil transport routes. In addition,  undeveloped petroleum reserves in the territory between Yemen and Saudi Arabia are reportedly among  the world’s largest.
For some months the world has seen a steady  escalation of US military involvement in Yemen, a dismally poor land adjacent  to Saudi Arabia on its north, the Red Sea on its west, the Gulf of Aden on its  south, opening to the Arabian Sea, overlooking another desolate land that has  been in the headlines of late, Somalia. The evidence suggests that the Pentagon  and US intelligence are moving to militarize a strategic chokepoint for the  world’s oil flows, Bab el-Mandab, and using the Somalia piracy incident,  together with claims of a new Al Qaeda threat arising from Yemen, to militarize  one of the world’s most important oil transport routes. In addition,  undeveloped petroleum reserves in the territory between Yemen and Saudi Arabia are reportedly among  the world’s largest.  
The 23-year-old Nigerian man charged with the failed bomb attempt, Abdulmutallab, reportedly has been talking, claiming he was sent on his mission by Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), based in Yemen. This has conveniently turned the world’s attention on Yemen as a new center of the alleged Al Qaeda terror organization.
Notably, Bruce Riedel, a 30-year CIA veteran who advised President Obama on the policy leading to the Afghan troop surge, wrote in his blog of the alleged ties of the Detroit bomber to Yemen, “The attempt to destroy Northwest Airlines Flight 253 en route from Amsterdam to Detroit on Christmas Day underscores the growing ambition of al Qaeda's Yemen franchise, which has grown from a largely Yemeni agenda to become a player in the global Islamic jihad in the last year…The weak Yemeni government of President Ali Abdallah Salih, which has never fully controlled the country and now faces a host of growing problems, will need significant American support to defeat AQAP.”
Some basic Yemen geopolitics
 Before we can say much about the latest  incident, it is useful to look more closely at the Yemen situation. Here  several things stand out as peculiar when stacked against Washington’s claims  about a resurgent Al Qaeda organization in the Arabian Peninsula.
Before we can say much about the latest  incident, it is useful to look more closely at the Yemen situation. Here  several things stand out as peculiar when stacked against Washington’s claims  about a resurgent Al Qaeda organization in the Arabian Peninsula.
In early 2009 the chess pieces on the Yemeni board began to move. Tariq al-Fadhli, a former jihadist leader originally from South Yemen, broke a 15 year alliance with the Yemeni government of President Ali Abdullah Saleh and announced he was joining the broad-based opposition coalition known as the Southern Movement (SM). Al-Fadhli had been a member of the Mujahideen movement in Afghanistan in the late 1980’s. His break with the government was reported in Arab and Yemeni media in April 2009. Al-Fadhli’s break with the Yemen dictatorship gave new power to the Southern Movement (SM). He has since become a leading figure in the alliance.
Yemen itself is a  synthetic amalgam created after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1990, when  the southern Peoples’ Democratic Republic of Yemen (PDRY) lost its main foreign  sponsor. Unification of the northern Yemen Arab Republic and the southern PDRY  state led to a short-lived optimism that ended in a brief civil war in 1994, as  southern army factions organized a revolt against what they saw as the corrupt  crony state rule of northern President Ali Abdullah Saleh. President Saleh has  held a one-man rule since 1978, first as President of North Yemen  (the Yemen Arab Republic) and since 1990 as  President of the unified new Yemen. The southern army revolt failed as Saleh  enlisted al-Fadhli and other Yemeni Salafists, followers of a conservative  interpretation of Islam, and jihadists to fight the formerly Marxist forces of  the Yemen Socialist Party in the south.
  Before 1990 Washington  and the Saudi Kingdom backed and supported Saleh and his policy of Islamization  as a bid to contain the communist south. Since  then Saleh has relied on a strong Salafist-jihadi movement to retain a one-man  dictatorial rule. The break with Saleh by al-Fadhli and his joining the  southern opposition group with his former socialist foes marked a major setback  for Saleh. 
  Soon after al-Fadhli joined  the Southern Movement coalition, on April 28, 2009 protests in the southern  Yemeni provinces of Lahj, Dalea and Hadramout intensified. There were demonstrations  by tens of thousands of dismissed military personnel and civil servants  demanding better pay and benefits, demonstrations that had been taking place in  growing numbers since 2006. The April demonstrations included for the first  time a public appearance by al-Fadhli. His appearance served to change a long  moribund southern socialist movement into a broader nationalist campaign. It  also galvanized President Saleh, who then called on Saudi Arabia and other Gulf  Cooperation Council states for help, warning that the entire Arabian Peninsula would  suffer the consequences.
  Complicating the  picture in what some call a failed state, in the north Saleh faces an al-Houthi  Zaydi Shi’ite rebellion. On September 11, 2009, in an Al-Jazeera TV interview,  Saleh accused Iraq’s Shi’ite opposition leader, Muqtada al-Sadr, and also Iran,  of backing the north Yemen Shi’ite Houthist rebels in an Al-Jazeera TV  interview. Yemen’s Saleh declared, “We cannot accuse the Iranian official side,  but the Iranians are contacting us, saying that they are prepared for a  mediation. This means that the Iranians have contacts with them [the  Houthists], given that they want to mediate between the Yemeni government and  them. Also, Muqtada al-Sadr in al-Najaf in Iraq is asking that he be accepted  as a mediator. This means they have a link.”
  Yemen authorities claim  they have seized caches of weapons made in Iran, while the Houthists claim to  have captured Yemeni equipment with Saudi Arabian markings, accusing Sana’a  (the capital of Yemen and site of the US  Embassy) of acting as a Saudi proxy. Iran has rejected claims that Iranian  weapons were found in north Yemen, calling claims of support to the rebels  as baseless. 
  What about al-Qaeda?
  The picture that  emerges is one of a desperate US-backed dictator, Yemen’s President Saleh,  increasingly losing control after two decades as despotic ruler of the unified  Yemen. Economic conditions in the country took a drastic downward slide in 2008  when world oil prices collapsed. Some 70% of the state revenues derive from  Yemen’s oil sales. The central government of Saleh sits in former North Yemen in  Sana’a, while the oil is in former South Yemen. Yet Saleh controls the oil  revenue flows. Lack of oil revenue has made Saleh’s usual option of buying off  opposition groups all but impossible.   
  Into this chaotic  domestic picture comes the January 2009 announcement, prominently featured in  select Internet websites, that al-Qaeda, the alleged global terrorist  organization created by the late CIA-trained Saudi, Osama bin Laden, has opened  a major new branch in Yemen for both Yemen and Saudi operations.    
  Al Qaeda in Yemen  released a statement through online jihadist forums Jan. 20, 2009 from the  group’s leader Nasir al-Wahayshi, announcing formation of a single al Qaeda  group for the Arabian Peninsula under his command. According to al-Wahayshi,  the new group, al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, would consist of his former  al Qaeda in Yemen, as well as members of the defunct Saudi al Qaeda group. The  press release claimed, interestingly enough, that a Saudi national, a former  Guantanamo detainee (Number 372), Abu-Sayyaf al-Shihri, would serve as  al-Wahayshi’s deputy. 
  Days later an online  video from al-Wahayshi appeared under the alarming title, “We Start from Here  and We Will Meet at al-Aqsa.” Al-Aqsa refers to the al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem  that Jews know as Temple Mount, the site of the destroyed Temple of Solomon,  which Muslims call Al Haram Al Sharif. The video threatens Muslim leaders --  including Yemeni’s President Saleh, the Saudi royal family, and Egyptian  President Mubarak -- and promises to take the jihad from Yemen to Israel to “liberate”  Muslim holy sites and Gaza, something that would likely detonate World War III  if anyone were mad enough to do it. 
  Also in that video, in  addition to former Guantanamo inmate al-Shihri, is a statement from Abu-al-Harith  Muhammad al-Awfi, identified as a field commander in the video, and allegedly  former Guantanamo detainee 333. As it is well-established that torture methods  are worthless to obtain truthful confessions, some have speculated that the  real goal of CIA and Pentagon interrogators at Guantanamo prison since  September 2001, has been to use brutal techniques to train or recruit sleeper  terrorists who can be activated on command by US intelligence, a charge  difficult to prove or disprove. The presence of two such high-ranking  Guantanamo graduates in the new Yemen-based al Qaeda is certainly ground for  questioning. 
  Al Qaeda in Yemen is  apparently anathema to al-Fadhli and the enlarged mass-based Southern Movement.  In an interview, al-Fadhli declared, “I have strong relations with all of the  jihadists in the north and the south and everywhere, but not with al-Qaeda.” That  has not hindered Saleh from claiming the Southern Movement and al Qaeda are one  and the same, a convenient way to insure backing from Washington.
  According to US  intelligence reports, there are a grand total of perhaps 200 al Qaeda members  in southern Yemen.  
  Al-Fadhli gave an  interview distancing himself from al Qaeda in May 2009, declaring, “We [in  South Yemen] have been invaded 15 years ago and we are under a vicious  occupation. So we are busy with our cause and we do not look at any other cause  in the world. We want our independence and to put an end to this occupation.” Conveniently,  the same day, al Qaeda made a large profile declaring its support for southern  Yemen’s cause. 
  On May 14, in an  audiotape released on the internet, al-Wahayshi, leader of al Qaeda in the  Arabian Peninsula, expressed sympathy with the people of the southern provinces  and their attempt to defend themselves against their “oppression,” declaring,  “What is happening in Lahaj, Dhali, Abyan and Hadramaut and the other southern  provinces cannot be approved. We have to support and help [the southerners].”  He promised retaliation: “The oppression against you will not pass without  punishment… the killing of Muslims in the streets is an unjustified major crime.” 
  The curious emergence  of a tiny but well-publicized al Qaeda in southern Yemen amid what observers call a broad-based popular-based Southern  Movement front that eschews the radical global agenda of al Qaeda, serves to  give the Pentagon a kind of casus belli to escalate US military operations in  the strategic region.
  Indeed, after declaring  that the Yemen internal strife was Yemen’s own affair, President Obama ordered  air strikes in Yemen. The Pentagon claimed its attacks on December 17 and 24  killed three key al Qaeda leaders but no evidence has yet proven this. Now the  Christmas Day Detroit bomber drama gives new life to Washington’s “War on  Terror” campaign in Yemen. Obama has now offered military assistance to the  Saleh Yemen government.
  Somali Pirates escalate as if on cue
  As if on cue, at the  same time CNN headlines broadcast new terror threats from Yemen, the  long-running Somalia pirate attacks on commercial shipping in the same Gulf of  Aden and Arabian Sea across from southern Yemen escalated dramatically after  having been reduced by multinational ship patrols. 
  On December 29,  Moscow’s RAI Novosti reported that Somali pirates seized a Greek cargo vessel  in the Gulf of Aden off Somalia's coast. Earlier the same day a British-flagged  chemical tanker and its 26 crew were also seized in the Gulf of Aden. In a sign  of sophisticated skills in using western media, pirate commander Mohamed Shakir  told the British newspaper The Times  by phone, "We have hijacked a ship with [a] British flag in the Gulf of  Aden late yesterday." The US intelligence brief, Stratfor, reports that The  Times, owned by neo-conservative financial backer, Rupert Murdoch, is  sometimes used by Israeli intelligence to plant useful stories. 
  The two latest events  brought a record number of attacks and hijackings for 2009. As of December 22,  attacks by Somali pirates in the Gulf of Aden and the east coast of Somalia  numbered 174, with 35 vessels hijacked and 587 crew taken hostage so far in  2009, almost all successful pirate activity, according to the International  Maritime Bureau's Piracy Reporting Center. The open question is, who is  providing the Somali “pirates” with arms and logistics sufficient to elude  international patrols from numerous nations? 
  Notably, on January 3, President  Saleh got a phone call from Somali president Sheikh Sharif Sheikh Ahmed in  which he briefed president Saleh on latest developments in Somalia. Sheikh  Sharif, whose own base in Mogadishu is so weak he is sometimes referred to as  President of Mogadishu Airport, told Saleh he would share information with  Saleh about any terror activities that might be launched from Somali  territories targeting stability and security of Yemen and the region. 
  The Oil chokepoint and other oily affairs
The strategic  significance of the region between Yemen and Somalia becomes the point of  geopolitical interest. It is the site of Bab el-Mandab, one of what the US  Government lists as seven strategic world oil shipping chokepoints. The US  Government Energy Information Agency states that “closure  of the Bab el-Mandab could keep tankers from the Persian Gulf from reaching the  Suez Canal/Sumed pipeline complex, diverting them around the southern tip of Africa.  The Strait of Bab el-Mandab is a chokepoint between the horn of Africa and the  Middle East, and a strategic link between the Mediterranean Sea and Indian  Ocean.” 

Bab el-Mandab, between Yemen, Djibouti, and Eritrea connects the Red Sea with the Gulf of Aden and the Arabian Sea. Oil and other exports from the Persian Gulf must pass through Bab el-Mandab before entering the Suez Canal. In 2006, the Energy Department in Washington reported that an estimated 3.3 million barrels a day of oil flowed through this narrow waterway to Europe, the United States, and Asia. Most oil, or some 2.1 million barrels a day, goes north through the Bab el-Mandab to the Suez/Sumed complex into the Mediterranean.
An excuse for a US or NATO militarization of the waters around Bab el-Mandab would give Washington another major link in its pursuit of control of the seven most critical oil chokepoints around the world, a major part of any future US strategy aimed at denying oil flows to China, the EU or any region or country that opposes US policy. Given that significant flows of Saudi oil pass through Bab el-Mandab, a US military control there would serve to deter the Saudi Kingdom from becoming serious about transacting future oil sales with China or others no longer in dollars, as was recently reported by UK Independent journalist Robert Fisk.
It would also be in a position to threaten China’s oil transport from Port Sudan on the Red Sea just north of Bab el-Mandab, a major lifeline in China’s national energy needs.
In addition to its geopolitical position as a major global oil transit chokepoint, Yemen is reported to hold some of the world’s greatest untapped oil reserves. Yemen’s Masila Basin and Shabwa Basin are reported by international oil companies to contain “world class discoveries.” France’s Total and several smaller international oil companies are engaged in developing Yemen’s oil production. Some fifteen years ago I was told in a private meeting with a well-informed Washington insider that Yemen contained “enough undeveloped oil to fill the oil demand of the entire world for the next fifty years.” Perhaps there is more to Washington’s recent Yemen concern than a rag-tag al Qaeda whose very existence as a global terror organization has been doubted by seasoned Islamic experts.
1.  Bruce Riedel, The Menace of Yemen, December 31, 2009, accessed in http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-12-31/the-menace-of-yemen/?cid=tag:all1.
  2.   Stratfor, Yemen: Intensifying Problems for the Government, May 7, 2009. 
  3.  Cited in Terrorism Monitor, Yemen President Accuses Iraq’s Sadrists of Backing the Houthi Insurgency, Jamestown Foundation, Volume: 7 Issue: 28, September 17, 2009.
  4.   NewsYemen, September 8, 2009; Yemen Observer, September 10, 2009.
  5.   Albaidanew.com, May 14, 2009, cited in Jamestown Foundation, op.cit.
  6.   Abigail Hauslohner, Despite U.S. Aid, Yemen Faces Growing al-Qaeda Threat, Time, December 22, 2009, accessed in www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1949324,00.html#ixzz0be0NL7Cv.
  7.   Tariq al Fadhli, in Al-Sharq al-Awsat, May 14, 2009, cited in Jamestown Foundation, op. cit.
  8.   al-Wahayshi interview, al Jazeera, May 14, 2009.
  9.   US Government, Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, Bab el-Mandab, accessed in http://www.eia.doe.gov/cabs/World_Oil_Transit_Chokepoints/Full.html.
  10.  Adelphi Energy, Yemen Exploration Blocks 7 & 74, accessed in http://www.adelphienergy.com.au/projects/Proj_Yemen.php.
Endnotes:By F. William Engdahl 
  www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net 
*F. William Engdahl, author of Full Spectrum Dominance: Totalitarian Democracy in the New World Order (Third Millennium Press), may be reached via his website, www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net.
COPYRIGHT © 2009 F. William Engdahl. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
|  F. William Engdahl Archive | 
© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.
	

 
  
 
	