Best of the Week
Most Popular
1.London House Prices Bubble, Debt Slavery, Crimea 2.0 - Russia Ukraine Annexation - Nadeem_Walayat
2. Gold And Silver – 2014 Coud Be A Yawner; Be Prepared For A Surprise - Michael_Noonan
3.Sheffield, Rotherham Roma Benefits Plague, Ch5 Documentary Gypsies on Benefits & Proud - Nadeem_Walayat
4.Glaring Q.E. Failure Spotted - Money Velocity Is Falling Rapidly - Jim_Willie_CB
5.Don't Miss the Boat on Big Biotech Catalysts: Keith Markey - Keith Markey
6.Gold Prices 2014: Do What Goldman Does, Not What It Says - David Zeiler
7.Bitcoin Price Strong Appreciation to Be Followed by Declines? - Mike_McAra
8.Gold Preparing to Launch as U.S. Dollar Drops to Key Support - Jason_Hamlin
9.Doctor Doom on the Fiat Money Empire Coming Financial Crisis - Andrew_McKillop
10.The Real Purpose Of QE - It’s Not Employment - Darryl_R_Schoon
Last 72 Hrs
Killing the Maximum-Wage Myth - 23rd Apr 14
U.S. Quarterly Economic Review - Optimism at the Fed - 23rd Apr 14
Why Mohamed El-Erian Left Pimco - Video - 23rd Apr 14
QE Is A Fraud Perpetrated By Made Men - 23rd Apr 14
Gold and Miners Outperform Once Again - 23rd Apr 14
G-20 and the US Tell the Bank of Japan to End Quantitative Easing - 23rd Apr 14
How to Get in the Trading Game and Profit - 23rd Apr 14
Fed Follies, U.S. Housing Market Fiasco - 23rd Apr 14
What Will December 31, 2014 Financial Headlines Look Like? - 23rd Apr 14
Why Gasoline Prices are Surging Again - 22nd Apr 14
Cold War 2.0 - 22nd Apr 14
The JIS – Junk Ideology Syndrome - 22nd Apr 14
How to Avoid Losing All Your Money - 22nd Apr 14
Silver Up, Stocks S&P Down - 22nd Apr 14
U.S. Mainstream Media Propaganda Setting the Stage for War With Pakistan - 22nd Apr 14
U.S. Interest Rates are NOT Rising! - 22nd Apr 14
A Crisis vs. the REAL Crisis: Keep Your Eye on the Debt Ball - 22nd Apr 14
Bitcoin Implications of Lack of Price Action - 22nd Apr 14
Japan - The Twilight Of The Rising Sun - 22nd Apr 14
Is This What a Credit Bubble Looks Like? - 22nd Apr 14
The Dark Side Of The Silver Mining Industry - 21st Apr 14
Strong U.S. Dollar Rally Could Pull Rug From Under Gold and Silver - 21st Apr 14
Silver Feeble Rally Fails to Hold Breakout, Falling Back Towards Support - 21st Apr 14
Stock Market Smart Money – All Out or More to Go? - 21st Apr 14
Fast Rising Pump Prices Counterattack - 21st Apr 14
Extreme Climate Change And Life On This Planet - 21st Apr 14
Gold and Silver Stocks Sitting Tight - 21st Apr 14
Stock Market Minor Correction Imminent - 21st Apr 14
Gold and Silver - Counting Blessings and Tender Mercies - 20th Apr 14 - Jesse
The CIA Through The Looking-Glass - 20th Apr 14 - Stephen_Merrill
Gold And Silver - Gann, Cardinal Grand Cross, A Mousetrap, And Wrong Expectations - 20th Apr 14 - Michael Noonan
Nikkei Stock Market - Sell Japan - 20th Apr 14 - WavePatternTraders

Free Instant Analysis

Free Instant Technical Analysis


Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

Solving The Global Energy Equation: Demand-Supply-Infrastructure

Commodities / Crude Oil Mar 28, 2012 - 10:45 AM GMT

By: Andrew_McKillop

Commodities

Best Financial Markets Analysis ArticleLittle remarked by most analysts of the OECD-wide financial and debt rout in 2008-2011, world energy demand rebounded fast from its sharp plunge in 2008-2009. For the year 2010 the BP Statistical Review of 2011 painted a dramatic rebound story. World energy demand jumped by 5.6% led by coal demand growing over 7%, gas demand growing almost as much, and oil consumption by 3.1% as China moved to become the world's biggest single energy using nation. With no surprise, oil prices rose by 29% on average in 2010 from the year previous.


Today we know what would happen to oil prices if there was another 3.1% increase in world demand: we would attain naked, open and declared Peak Oil. Today also, China and India know what will probably happen to world coal prices if, as forecast, China's coal imports increase 8-fold by 2015, from 25 million tons in 2011 to as much as 200 million tons, while India's coal import merely doubles by 2015, to also attain 200 million tons a year. The theoretical limit-price for coal could be as high as oil parity on a $100-barrel basis, making coal cost as much as $500 per ton. The likelihood of this is however low, for reasons including rising availability of LNG, in major part due to the price of LNG, for Japan shipments averaging about $16.75 per million BTU in February 2012, compared with US pipeline gas at around $2.50 per million BTU. Another reason is that hopes for a fall in global gas prices are high, when or if the US shale gas boom can be transplanted outside the US and large global stranded gas finds can be processed and shipped as LNG.

The bottom line is there is no problem for world energy demand, but supply is different. World power demand was also in rebound mode, since 2010, with either double-digit, or near double-digit growths of electricity demand in Emerging Asia and other Emerging countries. Simply due to the rate of growth, power blackouts and brownouts are sure and certain for these countries, witnessed by China which at present faces brownouts in many cities while it increases its national power production capacity by about 90 GW-a-year. This is around 1.5 times the total installed capacity (63 GW) of all France's nuclear power plants, which took 40 years to build, or two-thirds of Germany's total national power capacity. Global electricity demand also knows no problems.

SUPPLY AND INFRASTRUCTURES
These run together on the other side of the equation. We can make calculations on what it would cost to match the present rates of energy demand growth, but energy resource and infrastructure development runs on several levels and responds to both anticipated and policy-desired change of world, regional or national energy supply and demand. Using a rough figure for world oil and gas E&P (exploration and production) spending in 2011 of about $400 billion and taking only the oil side, the net result of this spending, worldwide, was to grapple 0.1 Mbd growth of net supply, after depletion losses, with global oil demand in 2012 estimated by the IEA at 89.9 Mbd.

The bang for the buck on the gas side was much higher, with a net gain of at least 1 Mbd of gas energy supply from much less than one-half of the $400 billion spent by the world's major energy companies, including the large National Oil Corporations. The drift of Big Energy E&P spending away from oil, to gas - and coal - is easy to understand. Shell is now a gas-dominant energy company by share of its energy output, and in 2012 Exxon will produce more than 50% of its energy output as gas.

Global spending on oil E&P is now only sluggishly responsive to any oil price on the upside, and shuts down fast when oil prices turn south: in 2009 oil and gas E&P spending was more than 35% lower than this year's forecact, at around $275 billion, led by falls in oil spending. The onrush of shale gas production in the US, and the collapse of US gas prices has already impacted, and cut E&P spending plans by companies as large as Exxon, Chesapeake and Shell inside the US and on gas. The trend for gas investment is therefore geographically focused outside the US, heavily Asia-oriented, drawn by Asian LNG shipments priced at 7 times the US gas price.

The energy supply side is also increasingly infrastructure constrained, worldwide. Coal transport, downstream from coal mining, is the biggest threat to Chinese and Indian plans to massively raise their coal imports in the 3 years to 2015. Likewise their plans to ramp up LNG consumption, needing huge investments, and long construction times for building LNG regasification plants and either local, or national gas distribution grids. The infrastructure constraint is clear in Japan, also. Following the March 2011 tsunami and Fukushima disaster, Japan's oil imports have risen by 440 000 barrels/day in 1 year, and its LNG demand for electric power companies has more than tripled In both cases to replace its nuclear power production, this has strained the physical capacity of Japan's oil storage, refining and distribution networks and drawn in Chinese oil imports, as well as straining its gas infrastructures.

In Europe another energy infrastructure limit is now clearly in view - on electric power transport capacities and utility-scale electricity storage caused by EU member state REAPs (renewable energy action plans), with high, or extreme high goals for the role of renewable energy in European power supplies by 2020. The power transport goal of a fully functional pan-European high power Super Grid is easy to describe on paper, but could take 20 years to build and cost more than 300 billion euro. More important there is almost zero real world action, on the ground, to start building it. At the same time, in Europe windpower capacity is mushrooming, attaining 30 GW in Germany and close to that level in Spain, on windy days, which for Germany already creates heavy power system integration problems with neighboring countries. Further growth of wind and solar power capacities, in Europe, will surely tilt the energy equation for the continent.

As in Europe, the US and several other developed OECD countries have large but unfunded outline plans to shift away from fossil energy, for environmental, climate and energy security reasons, but the energy infrastructure barrier is clear. Shifting from fossil energy to renewables is possible on resource grounds, but building the infrastructures and integrating both types of energy is more than a simple economic challenge or management and finance problem. When the financing is entrusted to a semi-delinquant finance sector habituated to boom-slump asset plays, the results can often be disappointing as Italy, Spain and Germany have already found.

POSSIBLE BREAKPOINTS
The most likely is a major breakout on the upside for oil prices. This could be caused by the heavily simmering Middle East political scene shifting to all-out wars, in several theatres, possibly on a simultaneous basis. It can also be caused simply by global demand tracking back towards the 2010 growth rate - of 3.1% - resulting in YOY oil demand growing by more than 2.7 Mbd. The supply will not be there. Supply outages, breakdowns and accidents can also take their toll on the increasingly edge-of-technology infrastructures needed to wrestle just enough oil from the Earth's crust, including deep offshore and tarsand oil.

Increase of global prices beyond about $150/barrel will surely be treated as Economic Armageddon, by editorialists and pundits, for a few days, but the economic sentiment damage can be high and may be used to trigger another financial-led recession, repeating the 2008-2009 sequence.

Possible delays in the US shale gas boom being transplanted to Europe and Asia are shaping up and even under the best hypothesis shale gas will not attain major supply levels outside the USA before 2017-2020, leaving the Gas Window as LNG-only, outside the US. Demand growth for gas will surely continue at a high level, but the breakpoint for gas may include an initial softening, then a real fall in LNG prices to ranges of around $12 per million BTU for Asian and European delivery. At only 4 to 5 times the US gas price, this will be revolutionary !

The 2017-2020 horizon is shaping up as a probable hinge point for world energy, at which the shift to renewables and gas become so strong that investment and action in fossil energy will plummet. The already three-year-long, year on year fall in energy demand, led by oil in several major European countries like Spain and Italy, can break out to many other OECD developed countries, not obligatorily under all-out recession conditions but through policy decision and the prressure of public opinion. For the Asian emerging giants, national-focused energy policies and programmes will surely take the high ground, in which the renewables and energy conservation will have a leading role, in a future for world energy that will every year be less and less like the present.

By Andrew McKillop

Contact: xtran9@gmail.com

Former chief policy analyst, Division A Policy, DG XVII Energy, European Commission. Andrew McKillop Biographic Highlights

Co-author 'The Doomsday Machine', Palgrave Macmillan USA, 2012

Andrew McKillop has more than 30 years experience in the energy, economic and finance domains. Trained at London UK’s University College, he has had specially long experience of energy policy, project administration and the development and financing of alternate energy. This included his role of in-house Expert on Policy and Programming at the DG XVII-Energy of the European Commission, Director of Information of the OAPEC technology transfer subsidiary, AREC and researcher for UN agencies including the ILO.

© 2012 Copyright Andrew McKillop - All Rights Reserved Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors.


© 2005-2014 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in

Free Report - Financial Markets 2014