Most Popular
1. It’s a New Macro, the Gold Market Knows It, But Dead Men Walking Do Not (yet)- Gary_Tanashian
2.Stock Market Presidential Election Cycle Seasonal Trend Analysis - Nadeem_Walayat
3. Bitcoin S&P Pattern - Nadeem_Walayat
4.Nvidia Blow Off Top - Flying High like the Phoenix too Close to the Sun - Nadeem_Walayat
4.U.S. financial market’s “Weimar phase” impact to your fiat and digital assets - Raymond_Matison
5. How to Profit from the Global Warming ClImate Change Mega Death Trend - Part1 - Nadeem_Walayat
7.Bitcoin Gravy Train Trend Forecast 2024 - - Nadeem_Walayat
8.The Bond Trade and Interest Rates - Nadeem_Walayat
9.It’s Easy to Scream Stocks Bubble! - Stephen_McBride
10.Fed’s Next Intertest Rate Move might not align with popular consensus - Richard_Mills
Last 7 days
Friday Stock Market CRASH Following Israel Attack on Iranian Nuclear Facilities - 19th Apr 24
All Measures to Combat Global Warming Are Smoke and Mirrors! - 18th Apr 24
Cisco Then vs. Nvidia Now - 18th Apr 24
Is the Biden Administration Trying To Destroy the Dollar? - 18th Apr 24
S&P Stock Market Trend Forecast to Dec 2024 - 16th Apr 24
No Deposit Bonuses: Boost Your Finances - 16th Apr 24
Global Warming ClImate Change Mega Death Trend - 8th Apr 24
Gold Is Rallying Again, But Silver Could Get REALLY Interesting - 8th Apr 24
Media Elite Belittle Inflation Struggles of Ordinary Americans - 8th Apr 24
Profit from the Roaring AI 2020's Tech Stocks Economic Boom - 8th Apr 24
Stock Market Election Year Five Nights at Freddy's - 7th Apr 24
It’s a New Macro, the Gold Market Knows It, But Dead Men Walking Do Not (yet)- 7th Apr 24
AI Revolution and NVDA: Why Tough Going May Be Ahead - 7th Apr 24
Hidden cost of US homeownership just saw its biggest spike in 5 years - 7th Apr 24
What Happens To Gold Price If The Fed Doesn’t Cut Rates? - 7th Apr 24
The Fed is becoming increasingly divided on interest rates - 7th Apr 24
The Evils of Paper Money Have no End - 7th Apr 24
Stock Market Presidential Election Cycle Seasonal Trend Analysis - 3rd Apr 24
Stock Market Presidential Election Cycle Seasonal Trend - 2nd Apr 24
Dow Stock Market Annual Percent Change Analysis 2024 - 2nd Apr 24
Bitcoin S&P Pattern - 31st Mar 24
S&P Stock Market Correlating Seasonal Swings - 31st Mar 24
S&P SEASONAL ANALYSIS - 31st Mar 24
Here's a Dirty Little Secret: Federal Reserve Monetary Policy Is Still Loose - 31st Mar 24
Tandem Chairman Paul Pester on Fintech, AI, and the Future of Banking in the UK - 31st Mar 24
Stock Market Volatility (VIX) - 25th Mar 24
Stock Market Investor Sentiment - 25th Mar 24
The Federal Reserve Didn't Do Anything But It Had Plenty to Say - 25th Mar 24

Market Oracle FREE Newsletter

How to Protect your Wealth by Investing in AI Tech Stocks

Cooked or Accurate US Employment Numbers?

Politics / Economic Statistics Oct 11, 2012 - 12:15 PM GMT

By: Stephen_Lendman

Politics

Best Financial Markets Analysis ArticleFor over a decade, US job prospects have been dismal. Since crisis conditions erupted in 2008, they've been dire for millions wanting work.

Since Obama took office in January 2009, job creation has been pathetic. Numbers reported during the weakest US recovery on record largely failed to compensate for others lost.

Monthly Labor Department (BLS) data report inaccurately. America's broken jobs engine isn't explained. The latest 7.8% unemployment rate is blarney. Based on the 1980s calculation model, real unemployment approaches 23%.

You'd never know it from irrational exuberance following the October 5 BLS report. "Better News on Jobs" headlined a New York Times editorial, saying:

The report "was stronger than expected." It's also true that more needs to be done "to maintain and create jobs," The Times admitted. It also called the unemployment rate drop from 8.1% to 7.8% "partly due to a statistical fluke and partly to more part-time employment."

It has nothing to do with the latter. It has everything to do with huge numbers of workers dropping out of the labor force monthly for lack of jobs. Healthy economies have them for virtually anyone wanting work. No longer.

Moreover, most jobs created are poor temporary or part-time low wage/low or no benefit ones. People take them to eat and avoid having to sleep on city streets.

The Times left unexplained what's most important to know. A Washington Post editorial was worse. It headlined "Jobs report shows an economy on the move," saying:

Before taking office in January 2009, Obama told Post editors that job creation was his "number-one priority." Grade him F for not delivering or trying. 

Not according to the Post, saying: "Friday's employment report gave Mr. Obama a reason to crow." 

"Unemployment probably would have been worse but for some of (his) policies…."

False! Obama helped Wall Street, not Main Street. His so-called fiscal stimulus went mostly for corporate tax cuts and others to rich elites. Ordinary people got austerity, not help. Current dire conditions show it.

An October 9 NYT editorial claimed otherwise. Headlined "Conspiracy World," it covered more than unemployment. It said many Republicans see Obama "as the center of a broad and malevolent liberal conspiracy to upend the truth."

Both parties and supportive media scoundrels wage relentless war on it.

The latest unemployment numbers "make the administration look good." They're, in fact, dismal, but Republicans take issue with anything appearing to help Obama, even if untrue.

Some called the latest BLS numbers "cooked." The Times berated anyone "mistrust(ing) the most basic functions of government." 

They should be exposed and denounced for what they are.

BLS and other federal bureaucrats resist "political pressure and manipulation," claimed The Times. Conspiracists claim otherwise. Sometimes they're right. Insiders don't go public and admit it.

Instead of giving Obama undeserved credit, the Post, Times and other supportive media should explain how badly he failed.

Economist Paul Craig Roberts excels in doing it. On October 5, he headlined "Another Phony US Employment Report: Spiraling Number of Involuntary Part-Time Workers," saying:

BLS reported jobs created fell way short of population growth. Healthy US economies would be producing nearly three times the reported number monthly.

BLS said 2.5 million "persons were marginally attached to the labor force." Orwell couldn't have said it better. They want work but can't find it. BLS made them non-persons. Millions of others bump dangerously close to the same status.

America's economy is sick. Roberts explains it often. He omits ambiguity. He says what people need to know. Dire US employment prospects show up monthly in huge involuntary part-time worker increases. Similar full-time dropouts also reflect it.

High-paying/good benefit full-time manufacturing, high-tech, and other professional jobs are disappearing. They're now offshore in low-wage countries. 

Growing numbers of Americans must settle for part-time Walmart, bartending, waitressing, ditch-digging, and other rotten service jobs they don't want but have no choice.

America's "New Economy" is as phony as Iraq's WMDs. Reality falls way short of rhetoric. 

Economist Jack Rasmus appears regularly on the Progressive Radio News Hour. He reports accurately on economic and financial conditions. Like Roberts, he explains what's most important to know. He's world's different from tout-TV analysts and business press headlines.

He questioned the accuracy of BLS jobs reports. They're not falsified, but something very much is wrong and has been previously. 

For the last three years, an unexplained phenomenon repeated. Rasmus is one of few economists explaining it. It's significant and needs highlighting. It suggests something out of whack, besides much else about suspect and inaccurate BLS reporting.

Each fall and winter, well above trend job gains are reported. In contrast, every spring/early summer gains "collapse. There is indeed something going on with the jobs numbers, though it's not falsification," says Rasmus.

Last month's Household Survey mysteriously showed outsized gains. Given current conditions, they made no sense. They reflect one or two phenomena, believes Rasmus.

Employers are either replacing full-time workers with part-time/temp ones, or they're hiring for the latter two categories because economic prospects aren't encouraging.

In calculating its headline U-3 unemployment rate, part-time workers count the same as full-time ones. Hiring them in place of permanent employees reflects "very weak labor market" conditions.

Fictitious new business formations also help explain inordinately high part-time hiring. Estimates are suspect. Media scoundrels report them like gospel. 

Something is very wrong with BLS reports. Problems are more extensive than one month's numbers. When divergence is so great between the Establishment (Payroll) and Household (Population) Surveys, something indeed is amiss.

As or more important is the extraordinary seasonal divergence. One year's aberration wouldn't matter. Three consecutive years shows something else entirely. "Something is wrong."

America's economy is sick. Labor market reality reflects it. It's not "rapidly mending." Over 23 million remain jobless. Trillions of dollar of tax cuts, banker bailouts, corporate subsidies, and other handouts did nothing to mend things.

Nor did QE ad infinitum. The most radical ever monetary/fiscal experiment failed. 

In the first so-called presidential debate, neither candidate discussed "anything remotely representing a jobs program."

Obama and Romney don't care. They want more for bankers, war profiteers, and other corporate favorites. People needs don't matter. Bipartisanship reflects let-em-eat-cake indifference, government of, by, and for them alone, force-fed austerity, unfair "free" trade deals, permanent wars, and harsh crackdowns on non-believers.

Nothing ahead next year looks promising. Both parties are in lockstep. People needs aren't addressed. America's military alone actively recruits. Join the army. See the world. Lose a limb or two or three. 

Lose your emotional stability and future prospects. Nothing abroad justifies fighting for. Nothing good domestically awaits returning vets. Hot wars target America's enemies. Financial ones affect ordinary people back home. Both have deadly consequences.

A new IMF report signaled trouble. "The recovery has suffered new setbacks, and uncertainty weighs on the outlook," it said. "Downside risks have increased and are considerable."

Worldwide growth will match 2009 recession levels. Global recession may follow. Out-of-control government debt is pandemic. Expect higher interest rates, lower profits, and weak financial markets.

US 2013 fiscal cliff austerity assures harder times ahead. Similar cuts across Europe smother the continent. Employment gains are fake, a mirage. Business and consumer confidence are "exceptionally" fragile. Market rallies are head-fake traps.

Dismal prospects loom. Companies cut staff in hard times. Expect them in 2013. Rasmus predicts nasty recession conditions. Past forecasts he made proved accurate. Stay tuned. He, Roberts, and others reporting accurately will update their outlooks ahead.

By Stephen Lendman
http://sjlendman.blogspot.com

His new book is titled "How Wall Street Fleeces America: Privatized Banking, Government Collusion and Class War"

 

http://www.claritypress.com/Lendman.html

Stephen Lendman is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization. He lives in Chicago and can be reached in Chicago at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.

Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to The Global Research News Hour on RepublicBroadcasting.org Monday through Friday at 10AM US Central time for cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on world and national topics. All programs are archived for easy listening. © 2012 Copyright Stephen Lendman - All Rights Reserved Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors.


© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.


Post Comment

Only logged in users are allowed to post comments. Register/ Log in