
  U.S. Federal Reserve Rate Hike
Interest-Rates / 
US Federal Reserve Bank 
Nov 26, 2015 - 11:48 AM GMT 
By: EconMatters 
	 
	
 
The Federal  Reserve has been telegraphing to markets that they are going to raise the fed  funds rate by 25 basis points next month at its December Fed Meeting. The  financial markets think they are serious this time and have been pricing in  this 25 basis point rate hike for the past 6 weeks. The real question is that  since the Fed has told us that they are Data Dependent for the past 7 years  regarding changes to monetary policy, what has really changed in the economic  data for the positive? Why now of all times do they decide to raise rates? Are  they raising rates for the right reasons? These are just some of our concerns  as the Federal Reserve embarks upon their final FOMC Meeting on December 16th  2015. 
 
 
	
 John Williams
 It is  hilarious watching Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco President John  Williams flip flop on rate hikes faster than a politician on an issue after a new  poll comes out. It has become obvious that this Fed member has no views of his  own regarding monetary policy, he is basically Janet Yellen`s mouth piece, and  is not an independent Fed member. If one just reads his statements over the  course of 2015 regarding possible rate hikes, with an economy that hasn`t  dramatically changed much in 2015, one would demand immediate and supervised  drug tests on a monthly basis. Maybe I am being too hard on this guy, and that  he has a difficult job of navigating Fed Policy politics, but he sure is coming  across as an incompetent and unqualified board member that adds no real value  to the committee. 
 Neel Kashkari
 Any maybe  that is why Neel Kashkari, has been chosen as head of the Federal Reserve's  regional bank in Minneapolis to make everyone else appear more qualified in  comparison. I am not sure why this Fed move hasn`t garnered more attention by  the mainstream financial media, but what has Neel Kashkari ever done that makes  him qualified to be a Federal Reserve Board member? And yes it is too easy a  cynical softball setup for the peanut gallery to shout out “He worked at  Goldman Sachs!” here. But he has accomplished very little in the Hedge Fund  community, Investment Banking, his small time as a Portfolio manager at PIMCO,  he made an unsuccessful run for governor of California in 2014, and was an unsuccessful  aerospace engineer at TRW Corp. So unsuccessful in fact at TRW Corporation that  he went to Wharton to get his MBA to reinvent himself at Goldman Sachs. 
 It seems the  only thing this guy has succeeded at is kissing up to Hank Paulson while at  Goldman Sachs, which landed him a high profile position at the Treasury  Department during the TARP bailout program, by the way another colossal failure  both in terms of policy creation and implementation. The guy has literally  failed at every job he has ever done, and keeps getting promoted to better jobs  with higher required responsibilities and required competencies. It is not like  this guy has written extensively on monetary policy in his career or has a PhD  in economics from a respected academic institution. This guy was literally  pushing defense stocks on CNBC a couple of years ago while learning Portfolio  Management at PIMCO. I realize that often employment success in life is knowing  the right people and connections, but this is the Federal Reserve we are  talking about, and not the Vice President of some obscure department in a  sleepy corporation. Consequently the Peter Principle is alive and well at the  Federal Reserve, has the Federal Reserve become one giant example of the Peter  Principle?
 Inconsistent Message
 This brings  us back to the fact that the Fed now is so motivated to raise rates just to  show that they can actually raise rates, even when it is obvious to everyone in  financial markets that there is no need to raise rates here. In fact, the Fed  should have raised rates 3 or 4 years ago, and at the very least last year when  GDP was more robust during the second half of 2014. In short, for the near term  the Fed missed their opportunity window to raise rates, according to the  economic data and overall global economic environment – them being ‘Data-Dependent’  and all. 
 
  Therefore,  this rate rise is purely for show, the Federal Reserve has had 7 plus years to  raise rates and they pick the time when China is struggling, and the ECB, Japan,  and almost every other EM country is trying to weaken their currency. And they  are going to do it, as they have extended so much credibility the last 6 weeks  talking up this rate cut, that they would become a complete laughing stock by  their most diehard supporters if they bailed out on this one. The Federal  Reserve isn`t even consistent with their messaging within the same calendar  year. As the reason they couldn`t raise rates back in June, another heavily  telegraphed Fed Rate Rise Meeting, was because the US Dollar was too strong. They  were worried about the effects of a strong dollar on the US Economy from a  trade and corporate profits standpoint; not to mention its effects on emerging  markets. Hello Federal Reserve, just six months later we have the same  conditions with a strong US Dollar, it is not like anything has changed from a  data standpoint to now suddenly merit a 25 basis point rate hike. I realize it  is easy for me to sit back and criticize their actions, but it seems that from  a logical reasoning standpoint if they can raise rates now, then they should  have raised rates back in June.
 
 
 Reasons Not to Raise Rates
 
 
 The main  reason the Federal Reserve shouldn`t raise rates now is that the ECB, which the  Euro makes up the largest part of the US Dollar Index, is going full scale  nuclear on devaluing their currency for trade competitive advantages over the  United States. The second reason is that Emerging Markets haven`t shown a real  pickup yet from their latest stimulus attempts, and are still hampered by being  in the early stages of financial reform and structural rebalancing. The third  reason is that commodities are being hammered with a strong dollar, further  reinforcing deflationary pressures from a “Data-Dependent” standpoint given  that the Fed wants to stimulate ‘inflation’ in the economy. The fourth reason  is that there really is no need to now, that ship has sailed about 5 years ago,  for all we know we have reached the other side of the business cycle, and are  headed back into recession. 
 
 
 QE4
 In fact,  there can even be a case for QE4 as the inflation in the economy is coming  mainly from Housing, (not enough affordable housing), and healthcare. Thus buying  new bonds and lowering interest rates further might stimulate the housing industry  in helping additional buyers move from apartment living into buying their first  home; thereby lowering the steep rise in apartment rents of the last several  years. This might also stimulate loan growth for both commercial builders and  banks now that some have started to up their commitment to consumer home loans.  Moreover, with regard to healthcare, raising rates isn`t going to promote or reduce  inflation as this inflation is purely institutional to the absolute structural  nightmare that is the healthcare industry today. A major overhaul will be  required in the healthcare business over the next five years. The recent college  try at reform has been a total and unmitigated disaster; we have only begun to  see the fallout from this failed policy initiative. 
 The Gang that couldn`t Shoot Straight
 The Federal  Reserve is increasingly looking like the scared kid who is egged on to show his  bravery by jumping from a high cliff to regain his ‘manhood’ in the eyes of the  cool kids only to make a reckless decision with negative consequences. Yes the Federal  Reserve needed to raise rates, but they probably should have started 7 years  ago. After 7 plus years of being ‘Data Dependent’ why now? 
 
 
 In case the  Fed hasn`t been paying attention, the world has devolved into a full out  currency war, what the ECB has done to devalue the Euro in 2015 is not in the  United States best interests. It makes for bad Fed Policy to raise rates now,  it puts the US at a competitive disadvantage. All one has to do is look at the  hit to the retail sector from the drop in tourism spending of this year due to  the stronger dollar and compare this with the latest economic upturn in the European  economic data with a weaker Euro to realize that currency devaluation as a  strategy works and confers a strategic advantage for countries. 
 
 
 Really Federal  Reserve, you pick now of all times to raise rates? I think I know why Neel  Kashkari was recently selected to head the Federal Reserve's regional bank in  Minneapolis, he makes the rest of the brain dead zombie Fed Members feel ‘comfortable’  and not threatened by actually making competent and sound monetary decisions  for the US economy.
By EconMatters
http://www.econmatters.com/
The theory of quantum mechanics and Einstein’s theory of relativity (E=mc2) have   taught us that matter (yin) and energy (yang) are inter-related and   interdependent. This interconnectness of all things is the essense of the   concept “yin-yang”, and Einstein’s fundamental equation: matter equals energy.   The same theories may be applied to equities and commodity markets.
  
  All   things within the markets and macro-economy undergo constant change and   transformation, and everything is interconnected. That’s why here at Economic   Forecasts & Opinions, we focus on identifying the fundamental theories of   cause and effect in the markets to help you achieve a great continuum of   portfolio yin-yang equilibrium.
  
  That's why, with a team of analysts, we   at EconMatters focus on identifying the fundamental theories of cause and effect   in the financial markets that matters to your portfolio.
© 2015 Copyright EconMatters - All Rights Reserved Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion   provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment   advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising   methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any   losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors.
© 2005-2022 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online   publication.